In the history of ancient Egypt, there are many interesting facts and mysteries, archaeological surveys annually bring a huge amount of material, the consideration and analysis of which is confusing and sometimes shocking. The only condition under which this happens is the correct understanding of what is happening in general and what everything seen and described means.
This work in no way has the goal of riveting the attention of the reader with its sensationalism and novelty of facts, such literature has recently become a lot and it is based only on the desire of the writers, either to make money on speculation of facts, or simply to dazzle with their personal assumptions which everyone has a great many.
In contrast to such collections and atlases, this work was conceived as valid proof that modern Egyptology knows absolutely nothing about ancient Egypt. Despite more than a hundred years as a deciphered language and writing, many finds and material evidence, despite tons of volumes written by eminent authors who personally carried out excavations and are considered masters in the history of Egypt, any small fact taken from already known events completely destroys everything to the very foundation in the understanding of what was happening in those distant times.
In the course of considering such discrepancies, a huge number of references will be made to the already existing works of Egyptologists from different times and countries. Many facts and data were borrowed from these works, since there is no need to re-measure the great pyramid in order to try to prove that it could not be built with the potential about which there is information. The data already available is sufficient, even if they are approximate.
In general, the whole of Egyptology is like a fundamental science, the practical result from which it is senseless to expect immediately. Many generations make their own contribution to it, trying to describe what was found as fully as possible, to systematize it all and, after analyzing it, to give at least some conclusion. But it is precisely at the stage of conclusions that the absurdity arises that disorients society and negates all the work of researchers who have been obtaining material evidence for decades. It is far from always that those who brilliantly conduct excavations and diagnose finds are able to draw the correct conclusion from everything they have found. It is far from always those who have never even touched anything ancient Egyptian or set foot on the land of this country are mistaken. It seems like the time has comewhen the history of this mysterious civilization should be subjected to a fundamental reassessment and it must be done, not just imagining what you like, but relying solely on the available facts and monuments.
It is impossible not to take into account, for example, the fact that the researchers of the late nineteenth, early twentieth century AD, who perfectly described everything that they found and perfectly translated from the ancient Egyptian language, could not and could not understand much due to the fact that society at that time was still did not know many things that are widely known today and, it would seem, having nothing to do with history and with Egypt in particular, have a key role in understanding many events. A huge number of facts already taken by the general public for granted and having a specific explanation, in fact, mean completely different from what they refer to in our current understanding.
It is especially necessary to take into account the fact that the Egyptian civilization is a civilization that has existed continuously for at least three and a half thousand years, and from the point of view of the continuity of traditions, cultural characteristics and many linguistic concepts, it still exists today. Virtually no community or people, no state in history is able to compare with the Egyptian civilization by these criteria. The ancient Egyptian religion also requires a special emphasis, in my opinion, which carries the main answer to many questions about the essence of beliefs and the emergence of traditions, and especially vividly proves that from which it itself arose in general and that unshakable optimism with which the ancient Egyptians believed in the afterlife a life.
There is no doubt that Christianity absolutely exactly copies the cult of Osiris with its fundamental principles and is even identical to it in such moments as the killing of a person with his subsequent miraculous resurrection and the assignment of the status of a god, and also not of the first magnitude, but with the most important functions for mere mortals. And if we take into account the fact that the Jews brought from Egypt a lot of cultural traditions and views and it was in their midst that Christianity later emerged, then such a hypothesis becomes the most provable and logical.
Promotional video:
In the course of the narration, I will cite many quotes from the so-called book of the dead, quotes from which undoubtedly the hair stands on end and an understanding of what the ancient author wanted to say arises, they are all genuine and the authority of the translators is not in doubt. These texts are one of the most important proofs that five thousand years ago there was something that would surprise us even today and that is comparable to the sensations when you understand that this cannot be, but you see that it exists.
In short, it's time to move on to the main part and start the first section in considering this issue. For a smoother transition from the simple to the complex, from proven facts to assumptions, I will start with quotations from the Book of the Dead, prefaced with only the shortest overview of the prehistoric time of ancient Egypt, the so-called pre-dynastic period. I would also like to note that when considering this topic and all sources, I was guided only by the naked pragmatism of an atheist completely, excluding any supernatural participation. For example, I absolutely do not exclude the fact of the construction of the great pyramid of Khufu (Cheops) by the ancient Egyptians themselves, using only those means that they had at hand. But in this case it should be noted thatthat then their fortitude and desire to create something great cannot be compared with the ability to inspire the ideas of communism, all religions and the thirst for money together, because under the influence of the above nothing has ever been created so grandiose and filled with so many unknowns.
Before delving into the analysis of the origin of ancient Egyptian writing and its origin, one interesting question should be asked.
And does it have the same genesis, about which so many and often mention different authors, referring the birth of writing to a particular period and arguing about the relatedness of signs in this writing with some primitive rudiments of art.
It is generally recognized that the ancient Egyptian writing system appears suddenly and nowhere, the earliest texts already have an established linguistic character with clearly defined writing rules and fully established signs. By logic and analogy with other languages and writing, this type requires at least several centuries of polishing and refinement of the sign register. You can also pay attention to the fact that, by the same analogy, in such a process intermediate material evidence of such a process, tablets with texts, papyri, stones, etc., are inevitable. There is nothing like this in the development of this language.
Undoubtedly, a gigantic gap in time could well have destroyed such fragile evidence, but rather they simply did not exist, since other changes in the same writing, despite their antiquity, still exist. This is the so-called simple letter, or, as some researchers believe, a folk variety of the classical Egyptian writing. This variety, unlike the classical one, has the same period of formation and development, and what is very interesting is strikingly different from its more ancient variety in the direction of simplification and less effort in writing. It can be assumed that this is a sign of progress and development, but I personally do not agree with this and I think that this is a sign of borrowing with elements of simplification, which indicates just regression.
Taking the classical writing as a basis, the writing of which required not only their knowledge, but also a considerable talent of the artist, the Egyptians practically invented a new writing system that suits them more with everyday use. It speaks in favor of this borrowing, and the fact that classical writings have always continued to be considered sacred, divine, letters bestowed by the god of wisdom Thoth. Thoth is a character that deserves special attention and we will move on to his consideration when we begin to explore the ancient Egyptian pantheon of gods and legends.
Let's pay attention only to the fact that writing was "gifted"!
At all times, even after the established simple writing, the religious tradition demanded the use of classical writing in afterlife texts and texts concerning something that is involved in eternity. This is not just a tribute, it is an indirect identification of this letter with what is above the mundane, what is sent down, what is divine. It is in this light that the consideration of such a phenomenon finds the most logical explanation and becomes clear. There is a lot of written evidence that God Thoth bestowed writing on people, at the end of the work I will give all references to literature and authors without separately citing many fragments, they are all the same and each in its own way is worthy not only of attention, but also of detailed reading. In ancient Egyptian history and mythology, there are enough references to times (meaning deep antiquity, even in relation to the ancient kingdom) in which the gods and some star-like, god-like, heavenly beings lived with people (aborigines). It was to this period of their history that the Egyptians attributed almost all the "gifts" underlying what is now called the sciences. The mythical book of plans for the temple, (architecture guide) generally descended, not much, not enough, from the sky, even with an exact indication of the place of the fall (landing).(architecture guide) generally descended, not much, not enough, from the sky, even with an exact indication of the place of the fall (landing).(architecture guide) generally descended, not much, not enough, from the sky, even with an exact indication of the place of the fall (landing).
Such persistence cannot but lead to the conclusion that it has absolutely nothing to do with it, neither mythology nor abstract associations. Without a doubt, only real events could have left such a deep imprint in all subsequent religion and mythology. In addition, the aforementioned artifacts probably existed physically, since throughout the history of ancient Egypt, from legend to the texts of the pyramids and from them to any narrative texts, one can trace the desire of many noble and learned people to find these material treasures of wisdom. In a legend called "The Legends of Satni-Hamuas", the eponymous prince with a reputation as a sorcerer and sage even managed to find the "book of Thoth", and a certain Neferko-Ptah found it later in the same parable.
I cite the text further as it was translated by IS Katsnelson and F. L. Mendelssohn in the book “Ancient Egypt. Tales and parables ", publishing house" Coincidence "2000. Moscow.
“When they reached the place where the book of Thoth was kept at the bottom of the Nile, Neferka-Ptah threw sand from the ship and the river dried up in that place. And he saw in that place a ring of twelve thousand cubits of snakes, scorpions and other creeping reptiles. And in the middle of that ring is an iron chest in which the book was kept. Nefetko-Ptah uttered a spell and the whole ring froze.
Then he went down there and fought with the very immortal serpent who guarded the book. He killed the snake twice, but it came to life, then he cut the snake into two parts and threw sand between them, the snake could not become the same again and died. Then Neferko-Ptah approached the iron chest and opened it and saw in it a chest made of bronze, opened it and saw in it a chest made of laurel wood, opened it and found a chest of ebony and ivory in it, opened it and found it a casket of silver, opened it and saw a casket of gold, opened it and found in it the book of Thoth that he was looking for.
Neferko-Ptah took out a book and recited the first of the spells inscribed in it. And he mesmerized heaven and earth, mountains and waters and the afterlife. He began to understand the language of fish in the waters, birds in the sky and animals in the mountains. I saw fish from the bottomless depths for (wonderful), the power raised the waters above them.
He uttered the second of the spells inscribed in the book and saw how the sun makes its way in the heavens, surrounded by a host of gods, he saw how the moon rises and saw the stars in their true form."
A little later, Neferko-Ptah showed this book to his wife, and she, as the legend tells, saw and understood the same. It is curious, however, that the text states in her own name that she cannot write! It remains unclear how she managed to read the secret letters of Thoth. Immediately, the truth is mentioned that Neferko-Ptah, unlike her, was a skilled scribe and, in addition, a sage, and he did the following.
“He ordered, they brought a clean sheet of papyrus, wrote on it all the words from that book, then moistened the papyrus with beer and dissolved it in water. Then he drank it all and began to possess all the wisdom of this book. This fragment makes it clear that the listed two spells were only a small part of the content of the book, for even the literate Neferko-Ptah decided not to waste time on understanding them.
Most likely, we are dealing with some logical error in the understanding by the ancient scribe of the meaning of what is happening. Let's consider several options and choose the most logical and reasonable one.
Taking everything on faith exactly as it is described, we get something not entirely understandable and completely fabulous, which, however, does not prevent some information from remaining in all this capable of conveying the truth.
We are trying to figure it out, but again we take everything described on faith and, in the end, we cannot logically bring some events to others.
Option three, we argue, adapting as much as possible and practically trying to explain everything without exception.
He found this book at the bottom of the river. Considering the materials the chests were from and the book was supposed to be, it would all just get wet and fall apart, or oxidize and fall apart too. Before him, this book lay at the bottom of the Nile (not exactly mentioned), however, no less than a number of centuries, or even millennia. Therefore, the first iron chest was either completely sealed and made of metal not subject to corrosion and oxidation, or at least not exposed to water. Since there is an accurate description of all the materials that made up all the chests and chests, and many of them, wood, ivory, of course, suffer from the ingress of water, we unequivocally conclude that the first chest was completely sealed. Otherwise, Neferko-Ptah would have found only the first chest and a silver and gold chest with a book,unless it was made of papyrus or something.
Assuming the tightness of the chest, we perfectly understand that the ancient Egyptians were not able to create such a thing and, therefore, it was created either by God Himself, or by someone from heaven. If you do not accept the ancient Egyptian legends as fairy tales, then we have a written testimony from a contemporary about the presence of objects convincingly proving the presence of a higher (than the then earthly) mind and its direct participation in the life of the ancient Egyptian civilization. This is supported by the fact that, for example, the Bible has long been recognized not only as a religious story, but also as a source of real historical facts.
What the book itself is made of is not mentioned, but I would venture to suggest that this material is probably incorruptible, however, it is not gold or silver. If it were gold or silver, then the legend would not have missed it in the description, all the more it would indicate the possibility of making this copy by ancient craftsmen from a certain prototype, standard, since the Egyptians were able to make a book out of gold or silver. The papyrus component would not have remained without the attention of the narrator, and who knows, maybe Neferka-Ptah would have eaten it herself without bothering to rewrite. In the legend, the standard itself is described and since the Egyptians are not familiar with the material, it is not described at all, instead it simply says "the divine book of Thoth."
Let's return to the consideration of other components of this part of the legend. And so the text, most likely the husband himself read the wife, because not being able to write, she could not be able to read, the scribe simply missed it. The original way of comprehending the secrets of what was written by eating, drinking materials that contain wisdom clearly indicates that Nefeko-Ptah was not at all a sage. Here we are dealing with an ancient belief, the essence of which is precisely in the fact that, through thoughtlessness, people believed that, having accomplished a certain merger with the original source, even through a copy, they automatically join the truth. This is obvious, especially since after this act, Neferko-Ptah, who supposedly comprehended all the other wisdom of Thoth, did not demonstrate anything more seen and comprehended, and the author, accordingly, did not describe.
It remains to consider those two spells that are described in detail in the legend and, frankly, if they are related to the book of Thoth, then it is far from being paramount.
I think it will be timely to warn that in general I have two versions of assumptions regarding the episodes in question. The first, when, due to the lack of complete confidence, I simply follow the path of the most logical reasoning and the second, when, in addition to coincidences of a logical nature, the facts are such that they leave no doubt about the correctness of the conclusions.
In the case of both of the above spells, I am inclined to the first variant of the assumption, since all of the above is extremely contradictory. Another factor that must be constantly borne in mind is that such written evidence has come down to us in an unknown copy, and each scribe, due to his thoughtlessness, could (but did not always do this) distort the facts in the direction of adoption with his own understanding of the event. Fortunately, most of the scribes and priests in ancient Egypt did not suffer from delusions of grandeur, like some current editors-proofreaders, and if they did not understand something, they preferred to rewrite it without the slightest changes so that the descendants would have a reference text and themselves could overcome the meaning with an already increased intelligence.
So trick number one. “He mesmerized heaven and earth, mountains and waters and the afterlife. He began to understand the language of birds in the sky, fish in the waters and the speech of animals in the mountains."
It is completely incomprehensible what it has to do with, for example, the afterlife - Neferko-Ptah did not seem to begin to understand the deceased and hear their speeches. However, these are nuances. It seems to me that in this case, taking into account the fact that all this has been rewritten many times, in different eras and by different people, there is a case with a misunderstanding of the facts that actually happened. If we consider that Neferko-Ptah studied the manual on the behavioral characteristics of various species of the animal world, then it is logical to assume that he really began to understand many features of the behavior of fish, animals and birds. A striking example is the absolutely indisputable fact of the safe handling of snakes, predatory animals, etc. While you risk doing this, you will pay with your life. It was this skill that our ancient Egyptian hero probably acquired, but what,that this happened due to the fact that he “bewitched the heavens and the earth, and the waters with the mountains,” is the natural conclusion of the ancient author, who has no idea of anything like this and relates everything only to miracles.
The second magic is more complicated. "And he saw the sun making its way in the heavens, surrounded by a host of gods, he saw the moon rise, and saw the stars in their true form, he saw fish from the bottomless depths for the (miraculous) power raised the water column above them."
Immediately we will weed out the lines about fish from the depths and consider them separately, because they certainly refer to the first spell about animals and certainly fell into the second only because of the confusion in understanding the meaning of both cases. Apparently, the scribe did not at all separate astronomical knowledge from knowledge in the surrounding nature, or he simply listed everything in a row and arranged it at random.
In the case of the second spell, I'm pretty sure the guess is correct. Despite the initial shade of the change in meaning, this “miracle” unambiguously describes the eclipse of the sun. At that moment when the Moon closes the solar disk (“and saw the moon rise”), the solar corona is visible in all its glory, with stirring prominences (“and saw how the sun makes its way in the heavens surrounded by a host of gods”), and the stars become visible as at night, but at the same time during the day, therefore the phrase "in the true image" is applicable with the maximum meaning ("and saw the stars in their true image"). Only a few strange sensations remain, the first of which is the incomprehensibility of such a precise description. Even if we assume that Neferka-Ptah had perfect vision, it is difficult to imagine that he would be able to notice the prominences. The conclusion suggests itself. He probably used an optical filter, for example, smoked glass, stone, any of the transparent ones. Colored glass of natural origin in ancient Egypt was abundant.
Let's summarize. We reviewed two tutorials from the book of Thoth. The first is a detailed description of how, when and with which of the animals, fish and birds to be handled. The second, most likely something like an eclipse calendar, because it is impossible to see something like this immediately after reading it, you have to wait for the next eclipse and, in addition, observe it armed with an optical filter. If the manual on the nature of the animal world does not cause me personally special emotions, but the presence of such a calendar of eclipses causes delight of a grandiose find. To compose it, describe and systematize it is simply necessary to have modern ideas about the nature of the cosmos and celestial bodies. Presumably, you also need to understand what the Moon and the Earth are, and possibly the Sun itself. There is a presence of so-called esoteric knowledge. In addition, the fact that in order to compile such a calendar it is simply necessary to deal with the most complex mathematical calculations is the most conclusive evidence of the presence of "outsiders" knowledge. it is not enough to systematize the eclipses that have already occurred, they must be accurately indicated in the future, taking into account all deviations in the calendar and seasonal changes.
Only a small episode with "raised" waters above certain sea depths remained unconsidered. I would not dwell on it, let alone analyze it, if such descriptions, to the smallest detail similar in the principle of what happened, did not occur quite often.
In one of the legends, The Magic of Jajamankh, a girl drops an ornament into a pond and in order to get it, a priest is called, who “put half of the water on the other half” and thus exposed the bottom of half of the lake. He also did this by simply casting a spell. The case is identical to the previous one and is completely incomprehensible to me personally. In any case, I do not find an explanation for this case reliable for today's times. The legend "The Magic of the Jedi" also contains a description of "tricks" with the waters, but this time a channel, not a lake. Thus, in three different legends, we find practically the same way of commanding water, seas, lakes, rivers and canals. It is impossible not to immediately recall how the Lord helped the Jews who fled from Egypt to cross the sea, fleeing the pursuit of the Pharaoh's troops! He, not much, not less,pushed the waters apart, and pushed them apart by some "force". I am absolutely sure that, like many other things, this fragment is a natural plagiarism, which the Christian founding fathers seriously suffered while laying the ancient Egyptian blocks of knowledge, which became known to them during their long time among the Egyptians, as the foundation of the new teaching.
Returning to the very method of commanding water, I can only assume that the described method made it possible to do literally everything with water. It was pushed apart, layered. I think it was not difficult at all to make a certain "well" to the bottom. All this, and even very similar things, can be done with water only when using force fields of a nature unknown to us so far. There is something similar in theoretical physics, but it has not yet been implemented in practice. It is also incredible that the sorcerers did all this without using any instruments and devices, therefore, they themselves had a certain gift. In this case, I am rather inclined to believe that these aids were overlooked in the description, because it would be too fantastic to assume such supernatural abilities among the ancient priests. So we come to the pointwhen the ancient Egyptian sources begin to narrate that can be understood only under one condition. The condition that we will treat the described not from the position of attempts to simplify the incomprehensible, but as quiet students attentively listening to the teacher's story. There are many reasons for this. If someone thinks that ancient Egypt is a dead civilization, he is three times wrong. The entire cultural and scientific tradition, which has not been lost over the centuries, was fully adopted by the Greeks and passed on to the Roman Empire, through which, like a life-giving rain, it irrigated all nations and peoples. But the semi-savage hordes and tribes were unable to accept what is sometimes incomprehensible even to modern scientists, was not ready for this, and Egypt in its bulk and knowledge was secured from oblivion by putting on legends and text, giving it shape and embodying in size.
In the legend "The Magic of the Jedi," Pharaoh Khufu (Cheops) who "spent all his time in search of plans for the secret chambers of Thoth" called a wizard who was found by his son Didifgor and who knew where these plans were stored. The wizard himself was one hundred and ten years old! The age is simply unique for that time, approximately, if someone were now one hundred and ninety or two hundred years old. It is not so important where exactly they were at that time, they are no longer there, like what followed later.
And what followed. Khufu managed to create a pyramid for himself, which conquered not only time and the elements, but also serves as the clearest proof that "outside" knowledge was, of course, in ancient Egypt. I am surprised that not a single researcher of ancient Egypt paid attention to the explicit facts given in the legends and texts. There are many of them and they are not silent, they scream, standing out for their uniqueness and irrefutable origin from antiquity.
But let's remember Khufu again. Having made fun of the ruler a little, refusing to personally give plans, multiple trips with tricks along the way, Dzhedi apparently gave the plans to whoever needed it. There is not a word about the transmission in the legend, but the fact of the construction of an architectural masterpiece, which has no equal to this day, is the best proof. Discarding the possibility that Khufu personally understood something in architecture and construction, most likely the plans fell into the hands of a leading architect who, as is known from history, was a relative of Khufu. The son who found Jedi and brought him to Khufu distinguished himself in history not only by the fact with Jedi, but also by the fact that he allegedly discovered the magic formulas of the “book of the dead”.
Some formulas are also worthy of separate consideration. The fact is that from many sources we know about certain "formulas", and often the narrative presents the "formulas" in such a way that the reader is confident that these are the same spells just with some secret meaning. However, let me assume that this is a completely erroneous version. The book "Egypt of the times of Ramses" contains an excerpt from a papyrus of the time of the new kingdom, in which the author, a certain learned priest, laments over the manifestations of vandalism in the funeral complex of Djoser. There many contemporaries "scribble" their autographs, "doing it clumsily and badly." The essence of the priest's grief is not that someone writes something on the walls of holy places, but that the "divine writings of antiquity" inscribed more than skillfully desecrate with handicraft crooked scratches. But that's not even the point. The same book mentions either the same or another priest who, for some reason, wandered around the “city of the dead”, that is, the cemetery, and came across “ancient formulas” inscribed on one of the ancient gravestones. He did not understand not only the content, he did not even understand what kind of "formula" it was. A case of meeting unknown written signs is simply described. However, let's pay attention that the priest does not say that he met an unknown script, he is sure that these are "formulas"! In this case, something called "magic formulas" was still known to the priests, despite the fact that they could not understand them. Consequently, the son of Khufu, knowing these "formulas", knew a certain language and writing accessible only to a select few. What is this language and writing? They called it "formulas", most likely, because of a misunderstanding of the meaning,so we today can call any unfamiliar script as formulas. Outwardly, these signs could also be different from those familiar to the Egyptians. We can assume that "formulas" are the language that formed the basis of ancient Egyptian, but whose is it and where does it come from? Considering that "formulas" are always "magic", most likely this is the writing of the gods. Therefore, everything that is written down by these "formulas" is simply invaluable for study. the one who wrote in this language was involved in at least some of the secrets of the "gods". Let us also pay attention to the fact that the son of Khufu, who lived in the era of the ancient kingdom, was already honored for his knowledge of these "formulas". It is quite natural that during the period of the Ramses, the new kingdom, for certain, no one at all understood these signs. It can also be emphasized that "formulas" are most often identified with spells and witchcraft,which testifies to the involvement of the texts recorded by them in certain events, which were taken by the Egyptians as miracles. This once again proves their importance in terms of the information they contain.
It looks like it's time to take a closer look at everything described. So what, in essence, are "plans for the secret chambers of Thoth"? I think they should not be confused with the "plans for the temple", although theoretically it is possible. Given that Thoth is the sole owner of all sciences, in our understanding of this knowledge, these are some kind of drawings, most likely buildings. But the main thing is not clear, what kind of building, that is, a building that performs what function? The answer to this question is partially given by the pyramid of Khufu, but let us remember the name again. "Plans for Thoth's Secret Chambers"! The plural of chambers, therefore, it is theoretically possible to assume that the pyramid is only one of many "plans" or "chambers" found in this secret document. The original source itself, like the secret book of Thoth, is also not described in detail. It is only indicated that it was kept in a flint chest. Considering that in those days in the concept,the casket could easily fit something comparable in size to our concept, a chest, then there could be quite a lot of "plans".
Leaving this assumption with the right to exist, we also assume that the plans of the pyramid of Khufu are the very plans that the pharaoh was looking for and which they are completely and without additions. What is it? The fact that Khufu wanted to create a kind of remake with a bias towards his grave interests should not distract us in the least from the question, but what was it in its original form? Since it was necessary for Thoth himself.
My personal answer to this question can be inferred from the entire content of this work, but not before it has been read to the end, but for now we will postpone it. Many authors and researchers, using more accurate, sometimes absolute information in numbers, tried and are trying to understand everything that lies in the great pyramid of Khufu. Its orientation in the stars and cardinal points, length and area, the weight of the blocks of its constituents, interior rooms, the way some surfaces are processed and much more, this is not a complete list of the secrets hiding in this structure. And, of course, I cannot resist the temptation to at least casually go over those blatant facts that the "classical" Egyptologists are trying to disguise with what. There are two officially accepted theories about the emergence of a similar pyramid shape and at least four about whetherWhy was this pyramid built at all? R. Bauval and E. Gilbert in their book "Secrets of the Pyramids" believe that all the pyramids of the Giza complex form a single ensemble with other pyramids located in (today's names) Abusir, Abu Ruvashe and Zawiet el-Arian. Together they (in fact) make up an exact copy of the constellation Orion, for some reason, taken by the ancient Egyptians for "the other world." In the book, it is proved in detail and, I must say, very convincingly that the modeling of the constellation Orion on earth was carried out according to the original general plan, and that the purpose of the whole plan was to create a certain complex with the help of which it would be possible to freely transfer to the stars, to another world, to that shine. Such an unexpected and a little heady with its fantasticness, the theory, oddly enough, always lay on the surface,and only that very conservative attitude towards ancient Egypt prevented researchers from seeing this. R. Bauval is not a professional archaeologist, and being spared from the "classical" school of Egyptology, he is free from inferiority complexes in relation to ancient Egypt. This theory is unique in that, most likely, it is true, since as soon as it appeared, many pieces of illogical facts stuck together, like broken shards lying on the surface, but not attributed to any of the theories. And so the Egyptians tried to create a "gate to eternity", they tried not just to draw them, but to create something architectural, strictly calculated mathematically, without taking into account any costs and efforts, for at least a hundred years! This is exactly how much, according to approximate calculations, all the pyramids of this complex could be built. Why did such persistence arisewhere does so much desire and faith come from? Let us recall Khufu in passing. If there was a general plan, then the architects who built the entire complex had already had its drawings for a long time, but Khufu's search in general does not contradict this, for he might not be happy with the pyramid that he was asked to use. And, being the person on whom everything depended at that moment in time, he decided to find the "divine" plans for "rooms" so that finally and forever his pyramid would become the best in everything. A kind of creative correction of the old plan, strengthening Khufu's advantage. This fact also perfectly proves that the plan for the construction of the entire complex was invented and implemented by people. And Khufu brought “divine” knowledge into him, without trying to change him radically. That is, embodying the plan to create a "star gate", Khufu only improved the main pyramid of the complex, moreover,most likely, it happened by chance, since he could not be one hundred percent sure that he would be able to find this relic.
Let's figure out what seems to be clearer than clear, but what no one pays attention to. First, let us closely follow the development of the pyramid shapes. The classical development from the mastaba (rectangular tombstone) with the addition of tiers could quite logically end with the technical “smoothing” of irregularities, however, most likely this is not the case. Even when the first "even" pyramids were absent and the "stepped" ones were just being built, there were obelisks, there were many of them and they were crowned with small pyramids at the top. These pyramids are nothing more than a symbol of the heavenly stone Ben-ben, which fell from the sky and gave something like a boost to life. Considering the absolute agreement of all Egyptologists that the prototype of Ben-ben was a certain meteorite, they were always called Ben-ben in Egypt, one can safely conclude that such a pyramid shape became a tribute to the celestial body. The pyramidal shape of this symbol was fully formed as completed even under Djoser, who was building a huge step pyramid, long before Khufu. Among all this, I have noticed for a long time several facts that perfectly fit together and even begin to resemble a ready-made theory.
We are again faced with something that served as the strongest incentive for all these accomplishments. Something that forced to conceive and build "star gates", something pushing towards a constant search for perfection, something connected with the stars, which came from there, brought something that multiplied the sciences and the mind of people.
But back to where we started, and consider all this in the same way as before everything else. If the Egyptians so honored the heavenly stone, then it is very doubtful that they would dare to arbitrarily change its shape in the images. Unless this shape originally had a perfect pyramid shape. Since it is impossible to assume that the meteorite has a similar shape, we conclude that either there were two types of Ben-ben, or it was always "perfect". In both cases, the question is inevitable: what could have such a form and at the same time descend from heaven ?! The Great Pyramid of Khufu could well represent Ben-ben himself in the ensemble of "star gates" and, occupying a central place, became the main symbol and temple, a place of transition to another world. Exactly such conclusions were made by R. Bauval, I only added to them reasoning about the meteorite and forms and suggestedthat the pyramid of Khufu is a symbol of "meteorite". The fact that I so often intersect with the conclusions of R. Bauval does not speak about my sympathies and not about plagiarism. Speaking with the analogies already begun, we are trying to glue a certain vessel of truth broken into millions of pieces, and in those places where these pieces coincide ideally the vessel is the same for everyone, although each does it in his own way. Already mentioning Thoth, I did not specify that he was considered not just a god of wisdom and other sciences, but was a kind of messenger of "GOD". That is, he himself was something like an angel sent by the supreme deity. In subsequent eras in ancient Egypt, religious concepts, including the original ones, got so confused and lost all meaning that it is extremely rare to comprehend something by analyzing, for example, the religious views of the “new kingdom”. The most fertile ground for analysis and conclusions is information from the times of the first dynasties and later documents and monuments indicating this era as the primary source.
Briefly summarizing all of the above, we get mysterious circumstances that forced the ancient Egyptians to build "star gates" in an attempt to get to the "gods" in heaven using the knowledge about structures left by "messengers", divine Thoths, etc. In the course of construction, adhering to a strict plan, nevertheless there were deviations of a creative nature that were not prohibited by the plan and did not lead to the inoperability of the "gate". The question of whether the "central" pyramid was really meant to symbolize Ben-ben and the point of "entry" at the same time remains open, maybe yes, maybe not. But, considering that the "meteorite" is a symbol and analogue of something that flies from heaven, or maybe … … …
This is exactly how some sometimes far from crazy ideas come to mind. Let's continue, the pyramid-like Ben-ben not only descends from the sky, he rises there. It was just such a case that inevitably led to analogies that led to the form and the need for "divine" precision in the construction of the "entrance". The previously assumed existence of two forms of meteorites leans towards a pyramid-like shape, since indeed no one would dare to distort it as ideally divine. But what can come down from heaven in such a form !?
What can then go up there !?
If we continue the reasoning using the theory of R. Bauval and E. Gilbert, then the Khufu pyramid clearly corresponds to a particular star in the constellation Orion. Why not continue the authors' conclusions and assume that this correspondence is not accidental. If, for example, the "gods" have already indicated the constellation where they came from, then they probably indicated their own star. Thus, repeating the path of the gods in the opposite direction, the Egyptians created a "constellation" and "star". Moreover, they created the "star" in the form in which its "part" landed before their eyes. Moreover, according to the "divine" drawings.
I think these assumptions can be proved by carefully analyzing two directions. The first is everything we know about the constellation Orion and the star of the corresponding pyramid Khufu, and the second is archaeological research using modern measuring instruments in the alleged areas of Ben Ben's "fall". There is a belief according to which the place of the "fall" of the book of plans of the temple is a certain area north of Memphis. Of course, it is difficult to determine exactly where exactly this place is, but if you still believe in this and start exploring the area, then who knows what surprises the researchers may expect. Fragments of glazed sand of unnatural origin, an increased level of radiation, other types of unnatural radiation, fragments of parts, the very details of something, this is an incomplete list of potential finds in these places.
In addition to the one-time landing of the "book of temple plans" and the same Ben-ben, which can correspond to the same or two different events, there is evidence of other landings and even take-offs. Before considering documentary evidence, let us recall the son of Khufu, who owns the secret formulas of the “book of the dead”. The fact is that the ancient Egyptians did not have any "book of the dead." This term appeared in the nineteenth century, when, summing up everything that was discovered and sorted, the researchers of the texts of ancient Egypt decided to combine the afterlife, funeral hymns and prayers into a single collection, which later received this name. But the ancient Egyptians had a classification of texts, hymns and incantations by themes and areas of knowledge. This is what is meant when describing the knowledge of the son of Khufu. What kind of "formulas" did this man know and did he not comprehend them in the process of transferring the "drawings" to his father, at the same time so to speak. Having considered all the texts that are now classified as the "book of the dead", it becomes clear that many of them are in the nature of prayers that have nothing to do with practical matters and physical phenomena. However, there is something that suggests the idea that these texts once contained other information. The texts were rewritten many times and were certainly perverted in the semantic part. Even the most ancient texts still on the walls of the pyramids of the fifth dynasty already carry the character of changing the original meaning. If we assume that the son of Khufu studied these spells, for some ritual associated with the purpose of the pyramid, then his knowledge interests me little,since they contain nothing but useless religious spells. But if he knew "formulas" of a different content, then it might be interesting.
Consider the texts from the "book of the dead" itself, starting with the least interesting, with each fragment I dare to give my comments about the intended meaning.
Hymn and litany to Osiris: "Greetings, O lord of star-like deities to Anna, and heavenly beings to Kher-aha."
The text is of no interest, except for the miraculously preserved mention of some creatures. Further, you will see the division into "beings" and "gods", which most likely reflects either the primacy of one over the other, or simply confusion in identification, which later grew into the duality of the name of the same.
The chapter on getting a rook in heaven.
From the papyrus Nu (British music in -10477, fol. 9).
»Greetings, O Thigh, who lives in the great Lake of the northern sky, visible to the naked eye and immortal. I stood above you when you ascended like a god. I saw you and I did not die. I ascended to you and rose again like a god. I cackled like a goose, I hovered like a falcon among the divine clouds and great dew. I made a journey from earth to heaven. The God of light strengthened me on both sides of the "ladder." The stars that never set guided me on the right path and helped me avoid destruction."
Isn't that impressive ?! I think only the most conservative Egyptologist of the classical school of the nineteenth century will dispute the fact that in this fragment the ancient author more than lucidly described a certain flight. Moreover, as a reference point in flight, he indicated the constellation, which, naturally, remained motionless and thus ideally suited as a reference point. “Got over you” can be understood only as a rather high rise above the surface, as evidenced by other lines - “I soared like a falcon among the divine clouds and great dew.”
If you lift any of us on an airplane with an open cockpit to the height of rain clouds, about two to four thousand meters above the surface, and if at that moment a rain cloud is nearby, then you will fully experience the same. And the sensations in the larynx area will be most accurately described by just such analogies, "cackling like a goose." In addition, the author wrote unequivocally: "I made a journey from earth to heaven", what else is needed, it is directly said that he did! Only an excessive unwillingness to recognize a real fact, which upsets the entire foundation of Egyptology, makes the "classical" Egyptologists see in these lines some kind of associative analogies in a bizarre way that led to such a description in the text. But the most startling lines are yet to come.
The chapter is about how not to go east in the afterlife.
From papyrus Nu (British Museum in - 10477, fol. 6.)
"Greetings, Phallus of Ra, retreating from his calamities, as a result of opposition, the cycles remain motionless for millions of years."
Next comes a rather lengthy enumeration of various misfortunes that arise if someone, I mean, it is not clear who, but the narrative comes from the author, deviates to the east. Why all this and under what circumstances such a threat arises is completely incomprehensible. But perhaps it is in such a situation that the most unexpected assumption will be the most logically provable.
Imagine a rocket taking off with a pillar of fire erupting from its nozzles. Agree that it is quite possible to call her the phallus of Ra. The analogy with form and fire leads exactly to this conclusion. "Retreating from his misfortunes as a result of opposition" is simply a direct description of the fact that as a result of "opposition" with the force of gravity, the "phallus" "rises" upward, which, by the way, can also serve as some example in favor of a similar analogy with the phallus … Likewise, modern rockets, launching satellites and spaceships into space, "retreat from their own disasters" that will occur as a result of the fall, through "opposition".
The most incomprehensible are the following lines: “cycles remain motionless for millions of years”. At first glance, this has nothing to do with the lines already examined, however, it is not. If we take into account that the text was inevitably distorted during rewriting, then in the following lines a certain meaning is caught, mixed with religious nonsense, added due to a lack of understanding of the reference text, which was replaced by analogies.
"If any member of mine is directed to the east, then the phallus of Ra will be swallowed up (together with) the head of Osiris."
I tried to convey this sentence in the most concise manner, discarding all unnecessary and absolutely not "sticky" to the main content.
If we recall the fate of Osiris, then one cannot but pay attention to the fact that there were several options for describing where and how his body parts were scattered after dismemberment. It is quite possible to assume that it was the head that was thrown somewhere into the body of water … The threat of absorption is most logically combined with this option. And so the "phallus" of Ra, when deviating from a given trajectory, fell, most likely, into the Red Sea, which corresponds to the mythological analogies with the head of Osiris and the reservoir. This is exactly how, when “hitting” the east, the apparatus, which was unsuccessfully trying to rise, had to fall. In this case, the phrase "cycles remain motionless for millions of years" becomes clear. This refers to the movement of the planet, cyclical and really constant for millions of years, and also having a direction of rotation from west to east. It is impossible to ignore the assumption that something elongated, which is associated with the phallus of Ra, and soaring into the sky is very similar in shape to the ancient Egyptian obelisks. Nothing prevents us from assuming that their prototypes were (maybe even identical in shape) devices.
What are these lines and what are they talking about?.. Most likely, these are fragments of some text copied from another text, which, in turn, described similar flights with warnings about incorrect takeoff. Surely they had nothing to do with the Egyptians themselves and were borrowed by them as the consequences of observations, mixed with the comments of those who really had to do with it. Descriptions of this kind are found throughout the Egyptians. The same legend about Osiris and Isis has a strange, in our modern view, character. Considering the fact that the most ancient sources that mentioned this legend refer only to the era of the Middle Kingdom (stele from Abydos, Berlin Museum, stele in -1204) in general, one can be sure that, for example, in the era of the early kingdom this legend did not exist. By analyzing the content,we can definitely say that the text describes the civil strife of the kings, densely flavored with fabulous events, none of which resembles something similar from the examples I have cited. The only moment that I, with great doubts, could try to attribute to cases of a scientific nature, is the moment of the conception of a child by Isis from not only dead, but also pretty much lying in a coffin and dismembered Osiris. If you really want to, you can see in this case echoes of theoretically possible cases of cloning, which miraculously migrated from, for example, the book of Thoth, to later legends.which I, with great doubts, could try to attribute to cases of a scientific nature, is the moment of Isis' conception of a child from not only dead, but also pretty much lying in a coffin and dismembered Osiris. If you really want to, you can see in this case echoes of theoretically possible cases of cloning, which miraculously migrated from, for example, the book of Thoth, to later legends.which I, with great doubts, could try to attribute to cases of a scientific nature, is the moment of Isis' conception of a child from not only dead, but also pretty much lying in a coffin and dismembered Osiris. If you really want to, you can see in this case echoes of theoretically possible cases of cloning, which miraculously migrated from, for example, the book of Thoth, to later legends.
Not a single Egyptologist will dispute the fact of the physical presence, at one time, of almost all prototypes of the gods of ancient Egypt, thus, everyone recognizes that the Egyptians did not invent gods and fairy tales, they derived them from real events, only giving them a color more suitable for legends. From this we conclude that a miraculous conception did take place, and judging by the tediously detailed description of how it happened, something similar happened. Let me remind you that today, in the twenty-first century of our era, any laboratory in a more or less developed country is capable of removing a fragment of living tissue with a still living DNA molecule from a human corpse and fertilizing a living woman, ensuring a completely safe birth of a healthy child. You can go even further. It has long been known that fragments of living DNA are still preserved in ancient Egyptian mummies. The problem is,that all of them were partially preserved, if one part of the spiral is intact, then the other is damaged. But if (and this is possible) one day a whole spiral is found in some mummy, nothing prevents the “resurrection” of a long-dead Egyptian. Of course, this will be a new person who inherited a lot from a modern mother. But from the point of view of a biologist researcher, it will be just a gift. Well, the fact that after that it will be possible to compose a new legend about the miraculous birth, so it is so clear.that after that it will be possible to compose a new legend about the miraculous birth, so it is so clear.that after that it will be possible to compose a new legend about the miraculous birth, so it is so clear.
How exactly Isis conceived is also very interesting. Not finding a member of Osiris, she "made" him and conceived from Osiris. How else could an ancient author who does not understand anything in these subtleties describe the act of cloning ?! But one should not forget that this ancient and possibly occurred event, most likely, has nothing to do with Isis and Osiris herself. The legend reveals much more strongly some primitive communal relations, mixed with the struggle for power. Isis has an affinity with her brother Osiris, and, judging by the fact that she suddenly has mercy on Seth defeated by Horus (her cloned son), she could well have closeness with him. And then the rage of Horus, struck by such an illogical act of the mother, is understandable. He is not only outraged that his efforts and the death of his father have not been avenged, but also enraged with treason. Having carefully remembered the whole legend with surprise, we note that Isis did not really try to do anything to kill Seth. She was looking for the body of Osiris all the time, and when she found it, she hid it, it is not clear what she was about to do. And only after Seth found the corpse and, having dismembered it, scattered it all over the world, Isis decides to conceive from the corpse of Osiris. The fact that the author is constantly supplying Isis' wanderings with comments that all her deeds are aimed at revenge is nothing more than a figment of his own imagination. In fact, Isis did absolutely nothing for the death of Set, and on the contrary, she tried to save him when Horus was about to kill him, for which she rightly paid with her own head, which the enraged son cut down in hearts. Such sexual relations were especially characteristic of the times of primitive social organization and were not at all encouraged in the era of even the ancient kingdom, although it must be admitted that in our time there are more such cases. than enough, which indicates the proximity of the instinctive manifestations of human nature between the ancient Egyptians and modern mankind.
But the most interesting, in my opinion, the description is in another chapter.
Its content sheds light on many questions that have remained unanswered until now.
Chapter CL XXV
From the papyrus of Ani (British Museum in - 10470, fol. 29)
“Greetings, O Thoth! What happened to the divine children of Nut? They have fought, they continue to fight, they have done evil, they have created demons, they have committed murders, they have caused unrest. Indeed, in all their deeds, the powerful opposed the weak. Thy will be done, O mighty one. The one to fulfill what God ordered. That. You do not do evil and do not succumb to anger when they bring confusion into their years, and fill their spaces, and try to break their months. For in everything they have done for you, they have done evil in secret. I am your writing tablet, O Thoth, and I brought you your inkwell. I am not one of those who do evil in their secret places, and let evil not strike me."
The most completely preserved unaltered text. There is so much information in each line that you even get lost where to start. Most of all, it all looks like some kind of complaint from a higher authority about violations committed by subordinates. But who is this boss? It follows from the text that the "god" himself is Thoth. Who, then, are these "children of Nut". Chickpea is the goddess of the sky and two opinions about where these "children" come from. But. He is never and nowhere mentioned in such a capacity as "children of Nut" or even in some connection with heaven, since these "children" themselves are often and specifically mentioned. It is most logical to assume that someone who was called Thoth was something like the governor of (open) territories. Heavenly children Nut were ordinary colonists. Most of all, the events described are similar to a riot in a colony with infringement of all the rights of local aborigines,from which a similar complaint was made, clearly on behalf of the local population. Here is the documentary confirmation of the legends about the times when the gods lived with people. On the vignette for this chapter, in Ani's papyrus, a man and a woman are depicted with their hands raised in worship in front of the One sitting on the throne, who holds the symbol of life in his hands. The classical interpretation of this image is not known to me, but for sure it is extensive and divorced from the real meaning. Meanwhile, everything is extremely clear. The classic image is "petitioners from the master" or "complainers from the authorities." For the sake of laughter, you can even put this image next to it and the still-famous painting "Walkers at Lenin's", and you will be surprised by the similarity of the plot.when the gods lived with people. On the vignette for this chapter, in Ani's papyrus, a man and a woman are depicted with their hands raised in worship in front of the One sitting on the throne, who holds the symbol of life in his hands. The classical interpretation of this image is not known to me, but for sure it is extensive and divorced from the real meaning. Meanwhile, everything is extremely clear. The classic image is "petitioners from the master" or "complainers from the authorities." For the sake of laughter, you can even put this image next to it and the still-famous painting "Walkers at Lenin's", and you will be surprised by the similarity of the plot.when the gods lived with people. On the vignette for this chapter, in Ani's papyrus, a man and a woman are depicted with their hands raised in worship in front of the One sitting on the throne, who holds the symbol of life in his hands. The classical interpretation of this image is not known to me, but for sure it is extensive and divorced from the real meaning. Meanwhile, everything is extremely clear. The classic image is "petitioners from the master" or "complainers from the authorities." For the sake of laughter, you can even put this image next to it and the still-famous painting "Walkers at Lenin's", and you will be surprised by the similarity of the plot.but for sure it is extensive and divorced from the real meaning. Meanwhile, everything is extremely clear. The classic image is "petitioners from the master" or "complainers from the authorities." For the sake of laughter, you can even put this image next to it and the still-famous painting "Walkers at Lenin's", and you will be surprised by the similarity of the plot.but for sure it is extensive and divorced from the real meaning. Meanwhile, everything is extremely clear. The classic image is "petitioners from the master" or "complainers from the authorities." For the sake of laughter, you can even put this image next to it and the still-famous painting "Walkers at Lenin's", and you will be surprised by the similarity of the plot.
In this description, a huge layer of information appears about an era approximately at least five hundred years from the "ancient kingdom", and about which there is no information at all, except for assumptions and legends. In addition, many logical premises of such pillars of ancient Egyptian culture as writing, economic power, architectural knowledge, knowledge of astronomy, etc., lead precisely to these times.
Let us try to analyze all of the above in the most careful way. It is clear that the colonists were very interested in something in this place of the planet. It is unlikely that they were interested in more developed than in other places aborigines. Not for a second doubting that Thoth is a colonist himself, albeit a supreme one, let us imagine the picture as fully as possible, based on the text of the papyrus. Someone came from heaven and founded a colony. Judging by the number of the gods of the ancient Egyptian pantheon that multiplied later, there were many small and medium bosses among the colonists, and, therefore, there should have been even more ordinary colonists themselves. I would venture to suggest that the size of the colony, according to the most modest estimates, could be at least a thousand or two thousand "Nut children."
"They have started a battle, they continue to be at odds", this is the first and most clear moment in understanding what happened. The colonists themselves did not share something, something that they needed. Maybe something, why they came to the ancient Egyptian land.
"They caused unrest, indeed in all their deeds the mighty opposed the weak." To be honest, most likely this refers to the relationship of the colonists with the aborigines, and in this light, the first example can also be rethought in favor of such an assumption, only supplemented with a comment that in this case no one was going to share with anyone at all, and the local population just what it hindered.
"You do not do evil and do not succumb to anger when they bring confusion into their years, and fill their spaces, and try to break their months."
Typical error of the oppressed class in understanding who exactly is the cause of adversity and unfair social distribution. The good "tsar" and the evil officials who distort his fair rule is the fairy tale that was "sang" even to our parents just yesterday, in the historical sense of time. Someone who was called Thoth may have had a desire to somehow arrange the whole process more humanely, but he certainly had no desire to control this and punish the "children of Nut" for liberties in relation to savages. The phrases "bring confusion into their years" sound strange. Maybe they mean a certain sinfulness in their behavior, they say, it is sinful to offend the poor, but they do it anyway, they bring confusion thereby.
“Filling their spaces” is an extremely important part of the description. Personally, I think these three words most convincingly demonstrate the fact that the colonists were mining something. Such a statement may well describe, for example, the filling of certain reservoirs with something. And if we consider this phrase with the one following it, “they fill their spaces and try to break their months”, then one can more fully imagine the supposed picture of events. For example, the most simple. Let's imagine a group of earners, whatever, and a classic industry situation. Here is a layer, a section, a field. Here is the need for raw materials in such and such quantities per month, based on market conditions, etc. And here is the production rate, which follows from all that has been said. But if, for example,imagine that “something” is mined diamonds or gold or something similar (for us) and equivalent for “children of Nut”, then it becomes clear why “they break their months” when “filling their spaces”. It should be noted that this is something, the raw materials probably were in large quantities because they didn't fill in something more or less limited. The volume of "space" is something more extensive than the volume of a container or wagon.
It should also be mentioned that, in general, it is possible to consider a certain prototype of Thoth as some kind of supreme ruler only conditionally, since the ancient Egyptians had a somewhat strange attitude towards the worship of the gods. In some sources, the veneration of some gods is known, in others completely different ones are revered, and those gods who were revered supreme in one place are considered secondary in another. For example, Wallis Budge, a well-known Egyptologist of the late nineteenth - early twentieth centuries AD, in his book "Legends of the Egyptian Gods" gives an example of the content of one papyrus entitled "The Legend of the God HEAVEN-ER-CERE and the history of creation." Unfortunately, the original text is not indicated in full, but only fragmentarily intertwined with the retelling of the author himself.
The papyrus is kept in the British Museum under number 10188.
The text is more than interesting, and describes not only the origin of the earth, heaven and all things, but also God himself. It follows from the text that the supreme god himself, Neb-ER-Cher, is narrating. Direct translation of this name, "lord to the utmost limit." The essence of this god assumes, according to Budge, the application of the concept of "limit" to time and space. And that in reality this god is the Eternal God of the Universe. Budge further concludes that this god exactly corresponds to the concept of a single god, which is present in all modern religions of the world.
The ancient Egyptians imagined this god as some kind of omnipotent force that fills all space.
The papyrus tells that it was this god who wished to create the world as it is now, and the act of creation is described in detail, exactly similar to the biblical description with only minor deviations of the temporary and local, Egyptian character. However, it’s not like the biblical one, but the Bible itself with all its descriptions about the creation of the world is similar to this papyrus, or rather, to those ideas about existence that existed in ancient Egypt. Another proof that Christianity is not an independently born religion, but the second reincarnation of the ancient Egyptian "book" of the creation of the world and other miracles, completely similar to the original source in meaning and even in particulars and only adapted to the conditions in which it was written. In this light, the fact of the open silence of the church luminaries about the similarity of the fundamental principles of Christianity with the "pre-divine" culture is quite understandable. They probably believe that the credibility of the entire teaching will suffer if everyone understands what it really is. Meanwhile, in my opinion, this only gives credibility, since the ancient Egyptian religion is much older and more substantiated even from a scientific point of view.
To complete the confirmation of the similarity, one can cite one more fragment, which is also exactly repeated by Christianity.
This legend is called, "THE LEGEND OF THE EXPLOITATION OF HUMANITY." The text is written on the four walls of the tomb hall of Pharaoh Seti the First.
According to U. Budge's text, the legend speaks of the times when the gods lived with people and the god Ra ruled at that time, who was not the first divine ruler. A certain Hafaistos ruled before him!
Isn't there something familiar even in the names? So, Ra gathered the gods and told them that the people created by him murmur against him, and he does not want to punish those who murmur without the advice of the gods. They advised to stop the disorder and Ra sent "his eye in the form of Hathor (goddess) in order to destroy the rebels." "Throughout the night, Hathor walked bogged down in human blood." Before continuing, I want to explain to those who have not found in the described anything similar to Christian legends that the legend of the worldwide flood also has a primary reason for the Lord's desire to destroy people because of their licentiousness and murmurings, disrespect for the creator.
And so, inspired by the massacre of Ra, he wished to exterminate not only the rioters, but everyone in general, and then the gods gave him strange advice. "Endure and not forget that his strength is proportional to his power." That is, he was directly told something like, calm down and do not allow yourself more than you have the right! " This was said by the gods to the most supreme god ruler! If we remember about God, who is all-present in space, then, in general, the hierarchy becomes more or less clear. Ra was just another "governor", but not the almighty and final authority. Then Ra began to get sick and unwell, by the way, from the very beginning it is indicated that he was old and wished to leave for heaven. The curious description of the departure is very similar to some fragments from the "Book of the Dead", although they themselves did not get there, however, this is only because the compilers simply missed them. Ascending to heaven Ra "prepared a place where everyone could come." It is not indicated who "everyone" is, but this hardly applies to people, although there is a similar example below. Rather, only a select few were taken “there”, which formed the basis of certain rules of life behavior.
Ascending to heaven Ra, created there all sorts of fields and other analogues of the human concept of paradise. Telling about the rise of Ra, the text says "The goddess Nut trembled, and Ra, fearing that she might fall, created four pillars to support the sky." The text that follows no longer carries such information and says that Ra asked the god Shu to stand between these pillars and also support the sky, thereby transferring his powers to him and maintaining his own calmness "there" in the sky.
Something very similar was already considered when an example was given of a man giggling with delight who went to heaven. "The God of Light has strengthened me on both sides!" In addition, concussions clearly indicate a powerful engine capable of lifting something huge into the sky.
And here and there the presence of quite large fiery exhaust is quite obvious, since talking about pillars, that is, something gigantic. And so for a second there is no doubt that practically all ancient Egyptian sources tell about a vast colony of "gods" with a rather long period of presence on the land of Egypt. Also described as people could understand it in general, the hierarchy of "gods" both in relation to people and to each other. The mention of the extermination of the rioters provides valuable information about the relationships that have developed with the "gods" of people. Apparently, despite the divinity, the newcomers still did not suit everyone among the aborigines, it may well be that they overshadowed the power of the local nobility and leaders, prevented them from solely managing people, sowing knowledge that, enlightening the minds, became an obstacle to stupefying with all kinds of delirium. It can even be assumed that all the gods of ancient Egypt, without exception, are none other than the "governors" listed by name. But then only the collection of ancient names should be taken into account, which was in circulation during the first dynasties, since the later pantheon of gods has already been changed and greatly expanded, which is impossible, because over the centuries the information has only been lost. Completing the examples, the most explicit description in ancient Egyptian sources, of certain relations with the "gods" and events associated with them, I will cite another excerpt from the "book of the dead", placed there from the papyrus of Ani (British muses. C. - 10470. L. 29) …which is impossible, because over the centuries information has only been lost. Completing the examples, the most explicit description in ancient Egyptian sources, of certain relations with the "gods" and events associated with them, I will cite another excerpt from the "book of the dead", placed there from the papyrus of Ani (British muses. C. - 10470. L. 29) …which is impossible, because over the centuries information has only been lost. Completing the examples, the most explicit description in ancient Egyptian sources, of certain relations with the "gods" and events associated with them, I will cite another excerpt from the "book of the dead", placed there from the papyrus of Ani (British muses. C. - 10470. L. 29) …
“Greetings, Tmu! What is this place that I have come to? There is no water or air here. The depth of this place has no limit, it is darker than the darkest night and people helplessly wander (move) over it. Here the human heart knows no rest, and desires cannot be satisfied here. May I acquire the state of radiant beings, which will be given to me instead of air and water, and may peace of mind descend on me instead of food."
In this passage, I find all those sequels that perfectly confirm the fact that not only the "gods" were transferred to heaven, but also some people. Why this was done can only be assumed, however, the fact of such a "journey" is in front of you. Without any doubt, outer space was described, the state of weightlessness was also paid attention to, "people wander helplessly through it." I think that the word roam can be interpreted as "move", because there was simply no such word more accurately reflecting the state of chaotic movements. In addition, in this fragment there is a description of a certain state of stellar beings in which food is not needed, and the heart finds peace. It is from this moment that one more addition to the existence of the "gods" can begin, which will smoothly lead us later to the second part of the work,dedicated to the influence of ancient contact on the development of our civilization as a whole.
So, let's summarize the preliminary results. I have cited just a few examples known to me today in which none other than the ancient Egyptian authors themselves tell about their contacts, moreover, direct, and not in the form of dreams or visions, with the gods. Of course, given that the ancient inhabitants of Egypt were at an almost primitive level of development, even modern sailors with their ship would seem to them to be gods, especially pilots with an airplane. But the ancients cannot be denied the pedantry of fixing everything that they saw. Everything that was not even understood, they described with the smallest details, trying not to adapt something to their understanding, but to describe how it was in fact with maximum realism. That is why we have written evidence that can hardly be overestimated,and with the help of which it is possible not only to partially restore the picture of the history of ancient Egypt, but also part of the history of the "gods", both from the historical and from the technical side.
In the process of thinking about the relationship of the ancient Egyptians with the "gods", I cited several analogies of the ancient Egyptian religion with modern Christianity. Initially, I had no intention at all to compare anything in religions, but there were so many analogs and they were so identical that I could not get around these facts, and even more so I could not fail to notice them. Leaving for later a comparative analysis of similar subjects, I want to consider the very origins of the ancient Egyptian faith in general. What did such a sophisticated cult filled with many rituals come from? Personally, I am quite sure that it was from the parody of the events observed by the ancient Egyptians in the "gods".
Let's start in order. Previously known burials, which are located at a time interval of about a thousand years from the era of the first dynasties, are of a primitive nature, people were dismembered and laid in pits, at best wrapped in various kinds of blankets. There are many theories that the cult and dismemberment of Osiris proceeds precisely from this custom, well, maybe so, this does not at all contradict any of my assumptions. But with the beginning of the first dynasties and the very first material evidence, texts, monuments, objects, we find the funeral rite already established and completely different from the previously observed. There is only one thing, but this is a period of uncertainty lasting from 1000 to 600 years, between these events. The reign of the gods! "When the gods lived among people." The pre-dynastic period, and the earlier part, sincelater times are already described in some sources as the times of the formation of the supreme power of some leaders and attempts to unite Egypt. I would even venture to introduce a new era in the history of ancient Egypt. The period of the gods' reign followed by a pre-dynastic transitional period, like the periods of the kingdoms and the times of strife between them, called transitional periods.
What I will assume next will not please the professional Egyptologists of the classical school, who are allergic to such theories. Also, the clergy will not like it very much, but for a different reason. They just, like the clergy of all times and peoples, are jealous of their power over the minds of the masses, and ultimately their power over the crowd. They hang and kill, not embarrassing anything or anyone, and then only modestly apologize on behalf of the church after centuries and without any sense, because today they are completely conservative and inert both in their own teaching and in understanding everything around them. We will not separate the history of ancient Egypt of those times from the history of the "gods", nevertheless they were inseparable, so we will analyze them.
The "gods" had an incomparably higher development and the technical inclination of their civilization was beyond doubt. In the last example from the "book of the dead" there is a mention of a certain state of finding peace of heart, which was achieved by the star beings. I am sure that we are talking about the state of inhibition of the vital activity of the body when immersed in some kind of artificial sleep. In modern science there are only theoretical grounds for such a state in which the aging process does not apply to the sleeping person. But in science fiction, and as practice has shown, it is always ahead of real discoveries, this state of artificial suspended animation has long been known and, reasonably, is used during long space flights to avoid aging of the crew or passengers. It is curious that in order to achieve it, in real life, undoubtedly, too, you need a place, a camera, a capacity, a case. It is in its confined space that it is most convenient and easiest to preserve the body in those conditions that are necessary for its preservation and keeping the organism in a viable inhibited state. Subconsciously realizing the similarity, people have long been calling these containers sarcophagi, as often as in another way. It is quite natural to bring together the fact of the sudden emergence of a new type of funeral rite in ancient Egypt and the above. Considering that the technical development of the "gods" at that time did not allow them to cross huge distances in space in a short period of time, it becomes clear that they did it in a state of "sleep". Similar sarcophagi seen by those Egyptians who, for one reason or another, were for some reason brought to a ship, shuttle, etc., undoubtedly made an indelible impression. Moreover, their application,in the new funeral tradition that followed immediately, it becomes especially understandable due to the fact that the ancient Egyptians saw how the “dead” rise from the “coffin”, and how they lie down there in order to “rise again” later.
The direct dependence of the entire ancient Egyptian cult and funeral rites on these observations is so obvious that it leaves no doubt about its origins. Over the centuries, many different nuances, spells, local customs and much more have been mixed with the "pure" cult. The fact is that, having copied everything to the smallest detail, people still did not achieve the previously visible result. Yes, they created sarcophagi and began to lay the deceased there, but they did not rise again! A similar fate awaited the "stargate", which apparently decided to create, as another attempt to break through to the "gods". People did not understand why they do not have what they observe in the "gods". Given the development of the ancient Egyptians at that time, it is difficult to assume that they went further than simple copying of forms. But even this is the most valuable historical and technical information,able to shed light on many questions about "gods". It is curious that on the inner surfaces of the sarcophagi, especially on the back of the lids, celestial plots and winged counterparts of the gods were always depicted. I am quite sure that there are no such murals in the first sarcophagi. Later, having made sure that there was no result, the Egyptians begin to be content with the play of the imagination, replacing it with something that did not actually happen. Spells replaced exclamations of delight upon awakening, drawings, real events. But they kept the fact of what was happening! Most likely, having created the "stargate", the ancient architects and priests never got anywhere, but they did not share their disappointment with the masses, but simply began to use faith and cult to influence the people. The history of ancient Egypt and its religion is a tragic story of faith and betrayal,naive childhood and sophisticated maturity.
Taking everything that was needed, the "gods" left the Egyptians. They were not going to enlighten them or take them to heaven, however, isolated facts were and they were recorded in the works of the ancients, they influenced people by their very presence. This cultural contact could not pass without a trace and was useless. Thought received a powerful impetus for development, a goal, a building material in the form of ready-made solutions, in order to recreate which it is necessary to figure out how to do it. The "gods" did not leave the ancients without ready-made solutions. Lots of information about construction, geometry, astronomy, mathematics, physics and chemistry. A huge number of other rudiments of sciences, all these are the basics, which were taught by the "gods", willing or not. That is why the Egyptians did not have the concept of separate sciences, all sciences were brought together into a kind of conglomerate of knowledge that has several names at the same time. Over time, the belief in "going" to heaven was replaced by a religion overgrown with spells and rituals and was no longer confirmed by visual demonstrations of ascension. Following its natural development, religion changed according to the influence of its creators, served as a control mechanism and at the same time retained information that is simply priceless today.
If we, the modern inhabitants of the Earth, want to find material evidence of the "gods", we need to change the angle of view on what to look for on the land of ancient Egypt, how to look and where to look. I cannot answer all these questions, because if I could, I would become something more than Howard Carter and Champelien put together, but I can be right in the essence of the idea itself. And someone who picks up this idea and is able to implement it will reap the fruits of truth, and, having received them, will undoubtedly transfer them into the hands of civilization. If the "gods" were mining something, then the remains of it are still there. If the "boats of Ra" landed on the land of Egypt, then these places can be determined using modern instruments. If there were secret drawings of the "gods", then at least their copies are obligatory, somewhere. If someone has worked blocks of stone to such an extent that you cannot stick a blade between them,it is not necessary to stubbornly persist in the assertion that this is the work of slaves armed with bronze tools. No one has ever been able to practically prove that the most important evidence of secret knowledge, the great pyramid of Khufu, was built exactly this way and with the help of what is customary to speak of as indisputable and allegedly proven. She, like many monuments of antiquity on the land of Egypt, is exactly the paradox that stimulates thought, hones logic, poses questions and makes us look for answers to them. It itself is a stimulus to development, an artifact of progress.which is customary to speak of as indisputable and allegedly proven. She, like many monuments of antiquity on the land of Egypt, is exactly the paradox that stimulates thought, hones logic, poses questions and makes us look for answers to them. It itself is a stimulus to development, an artifact of progress.which is customary to speak of as indisputable and allegedly proven. She, like many monuments of antiquity on the land of Egypt, is exactly the paradox that stimulates thought, hones logic, poses questions and makes us look for answers to them. It itself is a stimulus to development, an artifact of progress.
There is a lot of indirect information that some research centers have already begun to hide the obtained information about the knowledge and history of the ancient Egyptians. This suggests that this information has already become a valuable commodity that can influence a lot in this world. Personally, I would pay special attention to American researchers. The logic is simple, they did not make a contribution commensurate with the contribution of French, English, German researchers to the popularization and dissemination of the knowledge of ancient Egypt. Recently, American society has been moving by leaps and bounds towards such authoritarianism that soon the ancient pharaohs will not be able to compete with the clans of this country in terms of the concentration of power. And multiplied by modern potential, both scientific and military, all this becomes a real threat to the global dictatorship of a group of tycoons. Besides,American science and new technologies, like everything that is considered necessary by the state, are so classified that it is almost impossible to get to the truth. For this reason, if something is known to such groups of researchers as the "Chicago Society", then there is nothing to catch the world community.
Particular attention is drawn to the very present Egyptian society, parasitizing on the glory and greatness of the ancient civilization. Someone will be outraged, they say, what is it that the tourism business is booming, and the treasury is replenished. Maybe there is nothing wrong with this, if the government of this country really did something on its own to preserve and study the ancient heritage, and did not attract others just a little. So far, those who identify with the ancient Egyptians, but in fact are the descendants of those who destroyed ancient Egypt, only take away their finds from archaeologists of other countries, profit from the display of monuments, do practically nothing to preserve them and are not even able to bring elementary order in the locations of the monuments. I have nothing against the peoples inhabiting present-day Egypt, but the people ruling the country must understand that they are not the same people,which inhabited ancient Egypt. That nation disappeared, assimilated. For many thousands of years, not a single gene has remained (except for those in mummies). And therefore, to feel like the masters of the situation is at least indecent. Rather, you can imagine yourself as a guest in someone else's cemetery. Of course, this situation is partly due to the difficult political and economic situation in the country, but this cannot serve as an excuse for indirect vandalism. What are the main conclusions that can be drawn if you look at ancient Egypt from this point of view. This situation is partly due to the dire political and economic situation in the country, but this cannot be used as an excuse for indirect vandalism. What are the main conclusions that can be drawn if you look at ancient Egypt from this point of view. This situation is partly due to the dire political and economic situation in the country, but this cannot be used as an excuse for indirect vandalism. What are the main conclusions that can be drawn if you look at ancient Egypt from this point of view.
Firstly, the continuity of religions with Christianity is immediately and indisputably traced. Any example has an analogue in both religions, take the consecration of water, its purification by ritual. An earlier and original analogue was intended to transform water into a kind of elixir by inscribing magic spells on the walls of the vessels. The direct analogy is undeniable. There are an infinite number of such examples, and the first conclusion is that Christianity is not what we are used to. All these churches, Catholic, Orthodox, early, late, varieties of cults, etc. - all this is a local plaque, a layer of oxide on the body of the teaching. The teaching itself has a five thousand year history and originates from the advent of a more developed mind. In general, this does not even contradict the orthodox views of fanatics - all the same higher reason, all the same miracles.
Conclusion torah. There is no doubt that in ancient times the Egyptian civilization had some kind of contact with someone who possessed a more developed mind, more perfect technology and generally stood at the "heavenly" level of development. This is proved by the quotes I have cited from ancient Egyptian sources and the very fact that the whole history of ancient Egypt is not a progressive development, but a regression in its purest form. This is due precisely to the fact that the original community of primitive people was unable to fully accept everything given to them, and only after millennia, and then thanks to the chosen caste of priests, absorbed part of the wisdom of the "teacher".
The famous Egyptologist Wallis Budge wrote.
»One can be quite sure that the religious rites and ceremonies of the Egyptians were never built on grounds devoid of common sense, on fiction and superstition. They were laid with the aim of further developing morality and prosperity for those who must observe them and in order to preserve the memory of some important period in history or to present us with something that happened."
There are many similar statements by all famous researchers recognized as classics of Egyptology, but none of them, for some reason, dares to make the first and second steps. Recognize that the ancient Egyptians were dealing with something that is sometimes not comprehensible even to us today. Recognize that white is white and black is black. Not to refer all misunderstood events to anything, just not to what is written more clearly than clear, but simply to read them as they are.
As a third conclusion, we can analyze the development of "gods".
At the time when they are mentioned, they had a very interesting technique for our understanding today. On the one hand, we see copies of the ships "mothers" - presumably a pyramid of a similar shape, on the other hand, there is evidence of shuttle technology plying into orbit or into near space. There are even prototypes of carriers, similar to modern multistage rockets, these are "obelisks". With this form, there simply cannot be any other purpose. Why would the "gods" need so many different flying equipment in one expedition? If you still believe my assumption that they were mining something, then everything that was available was used, both the most advanced and older technology. In addition, the huge ships of the "mother" could not sink to the surface at all. They could be seen by representatives of the priestly elite, taken on a tour,for a visual demonstration of the teaching. It is quite possible, wishing to sow the seed of knowledge, the "gods" decided to do it in this way. The castes of the chosen, guardians, were created, and it was they who shared or did not share divine knowledge with the rulers of tribes and communities (later pharaohs).
Without a doubt, fragments of mining equipment, land transporters, etc. should also be preserved. Maybe something has already been found, it's just that it is hidden and researched outside the public. In our time, there are even too many "castes" and, unlike the ancient Egyptian, they only hinder progress with their megalomania and secrecy.
One way or another, but in the case of the ancient Egyptian civilization, we are dealing with the most interesting case in the history of mankind. The case when religion was born not from impressions associated with natural phenomena, but from direct contact with the highest mind itself, no matter in what form, and no matter with which mind. And if we have enough common sense and intelligence, then we will definitely get to the bottom of this greatest mystery of the entire history of people on earth.
As one ancient Latin saying goes, "I did everything I could, let the one who can do better."
Published according to the text of the Mashkov Library
Author: DMITRY NECHAY
Continuation: Part Two. Pyramids