Chapter 1. Old maps of St. Petersburg
Chapter 2. Ancient tale in the north of Europe
Chapter 3. Unity and monotony of monumental structures scattered around the world
Chapter 4. Capitol without a column … well, no way, why?
I can express one more theory about the unity of all world (so-called) religious buildings.
Let's take a look at St. Isaac's Cathedral:
I deliberately took a view from above, and now we will remove the antique colonnade from all four sides, and … let's compare with this:
Promotional video:
Tomb of Gol Gumbaz
Humayun's mausoleum
The unfinished mausoleum of Ali Adil Shah II of Bijapur
Sasaram
I'm not even talking about orientation, these architectural compositions do not seem similar to you: four columns on the sides, and a dome in the center, what kind of world architecture is this for a blueprint.
And finally the most famous
Hagia Sophia
And the Taj Mahal itself
And now let's turn on the imagination, throw away the mosques and attach to it the antique colonnade of St. Isaac's Cathedral … What we get as a result, and this is what we get.
Yes, and the topography of the area, and the position by the river, how everything is similar
And the courtyard is strictly on the opposite side of the river.
And here is another wonder of the world for you, so similar to the previous ones both in view and location - the Cathedral of Christ the Savior.
Although according to the original project, the temple should have looked like this
I thought for a long time what the religious buildings scattered all over the world, mausoleums, temples … were like, and then, by chance, the pictures came together …
What is it, what does it look like?
Vatican
Capitol
Peterskirche (Vienna)
Saint Isaac's Cathedral
Cathedral of Christ the Savior
Taj Mahal
Shuttle Atlantis
Compare the contours, is there a match?
Or so …
Modern launch vehicle Ares IV
Let's tighten the picture a little, look …
What's it like now?
I want to say one more thing, all technological details have been observed, here is the Soyuz rocket at the start
Compare the details
1. Stabilizer of vertical thrust.
2. Compartment for astronauts.
3. Separator between the main engine (top) and fuel tanks (bottom).
4. Power block.
… on the sides there are booster blocks, there are four of them, just like the domes.
The launch of the Energia carrier rocket with the Buran on board.
Here is the entire line of rocketry in the USSR
By the way, this picture is another plus in favor of the fact that the Americans have never flown to the moon, we have more powerful equipment and more missiles, but what can the Yankees offer us?
Here are a couple of very "frank" religious buildings.
Grundtwing Church in Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hallgrimskirkja Church in Reykjavik, Iceland.
Expiatory Temple of the Sagrada Familia in Barcelona, Spain.
Chapel of St. Henry on the island of Hirvensalo, Finland.
Church of La Peregrina, built in the 18th century and dedicated to the Virgin of Peregrina, patron saint of the province of Pontevedra and the pilgrimage route to Santiago.
Worms Cathedral. Germany
For comparison
Doesn't it look like anything?
Returning to "our rams" …
Old fortresses are also interesting in this regard.
Everything is clear here, the towers are functional, it is easy to place archers, cannons, etc. on them.
But at what point did they start building such towers, and why? They are not very functional during a siege, as lookouts are also not very good.
Maybe for the purpose of imitating something, for intimidation….
Let's compare them with this one.
My personal experience suggests that a person cannot come up with something that does not exist, did not exist, or will not exist … even the most daring fantastic assumptions are based on something: life experience, genetic memory, dreams, understanding of the nature of processes, even on intuition. You can't just take and invent something unacceptable for the imagination, just because the imagination itself paints acceptable pictures.
It is the same with structures … We always rely on experience, friend or foe, what's the difference, and even though experience is “the son of difficult mistakes,” we can always, almost always, logically explain one or another device, device, structure or mechanism. Even in the most daring science fiction stories, there is nothing unreal, they are acceptable and understandable, everything is logical here.
So why is the story so illogical, what's the catch?
N-1 at the start
N-1 at MIC
American "Saturn" and N-1 (USSR)
Are there any overlaps with architectural structures in appearance?
You can take a fresh look at the buildings of churches, take a closer look
Or like this
Let's consider the mosques in more detail, night lighting plays a beneficial role here
Compare this with this
Baikonur. Night start.
I leave the conclusions to you.
Asian pagodas fit easily here.
Or so
We have examined the external correspondences, now you can look inside. Look closely, it doesn't remind you of anything.
Shuttle Control Room
Church iconostasis
Spaceship control room (from science fiction novels)
The same iconostasis.
Don't you find any coincidences? Not? Well, okay, let's go.
I have long been tormented by questions: how would our ancestors, who began to learn what bronze is, would react to the landing of a spaceship? What would they remember once inside? Who would be mistaken for astronauts? How would the memory of them be preserved? What places of worship would be built in memory of them? How was knowledge passed on? And who quietly exchanged one knowledge for another?
But these are only the fantasies of the author. True, I did not invent the "cargo cult".
Here's another topic for thought
Earth's magnetic field
Guardian angel
Take a closer look at the drawings, you do not find that they are similar, and the mission (function) they have is the same. But you can learn about this only after leaving the Earth.
Here are some more simple examples of the cargo cult.
Column from Castello Rodrigo.
Modern repeater
Cargo cult (imitation)
Read the continuation here.
Author: ZigZag
