Finno-Ugrians In Northern Europe Are Not An Autochthonous Population - Alternative View

Finno-Ugrians In Northern Europe Are Not An Autochthonous Population - Alternative View
Finno-Ugrians In Northern Europe Are Not An Autochthonous Population - Alternative View

Video: Finno-Ugrians In Northern Europe Are Not An Autochthonous Population - Alternative View

Video: Finno-Ugrians In Northern Europe Are Not An Autochthonous Population - Alternative View
Video: Origin of the Finns, Hungarians and other Uralians 2024, May
Anonim

We continue the story about the speech in Soviet times by the now deceased Russian ethnologist and art critic S. Zharnikova at a conference dedicated to Hyperborea, during which she was able to prove that people of the white race lived for many millennia in Eastern Europe, while in Western Europe there are climatic conditions for people living due to glaciation were much less favorable. And it was these protoaries who came from the lost Arctic legendary continent and the ancestors of the Rus and Slavs settled in these places much earlier than the Finno-Ugric tribes came there. This means that it is the Russian population of our North that is the indigenous population there.

Here's what her talk says about it:

Thus, scientific data smash into dust the theories of Russophobic falsifiers of history, invented in order to fuel the hatred of the Finno-Ugric peoples towards the Russian, as an alleged enslaver and conqueror who came to their ancestral lands. All territorial claims to Russia are based precisely on these false myths of forgers that have nothing to do with the true events of antiquity. In fact, everything was exactly the opposite - the Finno-Ugric tribes came to these lands much later than the direct descendants of Hyperborea and learned from them agriculture and a sedentary lifestyle.

michael101063 ©