Nicholas II Died A Natural Death In 1985 - Alternative View

Table of contents:

Nicholas II Died A Natural Death In 1985 - Alternative View
Nicholas II Died A Natural Death In 1985 - Alternative View

Video: Nicholas II Died A Natural Death In 1985 - Alternative View

Video: Nicholas II Died A Natural Death In 1985 - Alternative View
Video: The Riddle of the Romanovs - Royal murder mysteries 2024, May
Anonim

Greetings to all imperialists, monarchists, linguists and conspiracy theorists! Today I will tell you about the miraculous transformation of the last Russian tsar, the mystical “end of his reign” and, naturally, how it happened that there was no execution of the Royal family in 1918, as well as about the further real fate of the royal family. Go!

First, let's understand the history

First, it is worth noting the most obvious: the royal family was “shot” much later than the October Revolution in Russia. No one was embarrassed that the communists, who actively opposed the tsarist regime and overthrew the regime of the interim government, for some reason kept the Romanov family alive, so also under supervision? Yes, it can be interpreted, they say: "So that the adherents of the old regime did not return the empire," but somehow it is implausible, isn't it?

Secondly: the "reds" of that time argued the execution by the fact that the "whites", in turn, approached the city where the royal family was located and in order to show them that the newly-made government was not a pikhan's finger, but with the British fuck, they killed the royal family. It's kind of strange, isn't it? What would the "whites" do with the king and his family? Saved them and taken to war-torn Europe? Used as a psychological weapon against the communists? Why did they have a king? But if we consider from the side of the fact that the “red” wanted to break the motivation of opponents, destroying their main symbol, their “head”, if I may say so, then this version is more believed.

Thirdly:no one paid attention to how the beginning of the Romanov dynasty is similar to its end? The first Russian Romanov was Mikhail, and the last emperor to receive the throne from his brother, Nicholas II, was Mikhail Alexandrovich, son of Alexander III. Guess the patronymic of the first Romanov? That's right, Alexandrovich. Mikhail Alexandrovich had a son, Alexei. Remember the name of the last Tsarevich, the son of Nicholas II and nephew of Mikhail Alexandrovich? That's right, Alexey. Remember the year when Mikhail Romanov was crowned? That's right, 1617. Remember the year of the February and October revolutions? That's right, 1917. You can give a lot of arguments: wars with the Turks, the same area of access to the sea, etc., but the most important thing remains in one thing - the boyars elected Romanov because of his good qualities as a leader of one of the principalities, and the politicians, in turn, overthrew Nicholas II,for poor leadership qualities. But if Mikhail Romanov was exalted, then they tried to erase Nicholas II from history as much as possible.

Fourthly: remember the list of those people who were shot together with the royal family (yes, not only the family of Nicholas II was shot). Together with them, close friends of the family and their servants were shot. In total, 13 people were shot, and their remains … And what happened to them, by the way? Even the execution documents do not indicate what was done to them. Isn't that the most important part of the conspiracy?

Promotional video:

And now the most important thing:

When the "whites" took the city and entered the basement where the shooting took place, there were no bullet holes in the walls. But how? The family and their servants were shot by 7 people and none of them ever hit the wall, or did the bullet never go off? The absence of cartridges and gunpowder can be explained by cleaning, but this is the main puncture in this whole situation.

But how could Nicholas II and his entire family hide from 3 wars and survive until the 1980s?

In 1992, a relative of the Romanovs came to Russia for the first time. Walking around the Winter Palace, he uttered a strange phrase: “Yes, this palace was very large in its time. Nicholas really wanted to return here with his great-grandchildren, but did not have time. And I understand why he wanted to return. This relative was Albert Einstein Karl Ikrello, born in 1929. But how then could he see Nicholas II if he was shot in 1918? As Albert wrote in his reflections on Soviet Power:

Archival photograph of one of the daughter of Nicholas II, 1931
Archival photograph of one of the daughter of Nicholas II, 1931

Archival photograph of one of the daughter of Nicholas II, 1931.

Further, he describes how the Red Army men - spies, took the royal family to England back in December 1917 to their relatives, where they were under false names and were waiting for the end of the "temporary rubella of Russia". Then, after the end of the war in 1918, the Romanov family moved to France, where they lived until 1937. Then he moved to the United States due to the military sentiments of Germany, where they lived until 1965. Then they return to England, where Nicholas II ends his life. The fate of the emperor's children and wife was a little better. Nikolai's wife became a close friend of the Queen of England and published her works under a pseudonym. Alexei married a lady of the court, and then acquired a son, Peter. Nicholas's daughters married English dukes, but that's not the point.