How Is History Written? - Alternative View

How Is History Written? - Alternative View
How Is History Written? - Alternative View

Video: How Is History Written? - Alternative View

Video: How Is History Written? - Alternative View
Video: 101 John Demos, How Historians Write About History (Doing History) 2024, May
Anonim

Just a few years ago, Professor A. Klesov, with the help of DNA genealogy, managed to establish that the common ancestors of the Aryans and the Rus lived in the south of Siberia and the Urals about 20 thousand years ago. From there, after an ancient catastrophe, there was a settlement of the Aryans and Rus to the west and east. Then, as some modern researchers have found out, such as L. Groth, S. Zharikova, N. Guseva, A. Tulupov, in fact, there was a division into Aryans and Russes. The Rus cultivators remained in Eastern Europe (and possibly Siberia), and the nomadic Aryans, or rather part of them, began to migrate to India and Persia. Some of these departed Aryans returned to Europe through the Balkans through the millennia.

Nevertheless, the attitude of the official history to the Aryans themselves, depending on political trends, more than once changed from frankly enthusiastic to ironically negative. History has proved once again that it is not a science, but only an instrument of influence on the minds of people from the side of the ruling elites, always protecting the interests of these elites. In order not to be unfounded, I will cite a fragment of the book of the Russian writer-historian Y. Petukhov "The Primary Origins of the Rus." And this is what he writes in it:

It must be said that such pro-Western sycophancy was instilled in our intelligentsia and the ruling "elite" by the pro-Western Romanovs, in whose dynasty not a drop of Russian blood remained after the substitution of Peter I and the queens of German blood that have become traditional from that moment on. Therefore, the influx of foreign mercenaries and "specialists" who were entrusted with the writing of Russian history was the most common thing under the Romanovs. And the three centuries of the reign of this new dynasty, which, as it turned out, did not have legal rights of inheritance after the election of Mikhail Romanov as Tsar in 1613, it is no coincidence that some modern historians call the real "German-Romanov yoke", which really existed, in contrast to the invented during their rule was the "Mongol-Tatar yoke".

On the example of the attitude of the official history to the Aryans, cited in the book of Y. Petukhov, it is quite clearly shown what the "official history" itself is in fact. And that is why this collection of frankly fantastic works has almost nothing to do with the events that actually happened in our past.

michael101063 ©