Artificial Phobos - Alternative View

Artificial Phobos - Alternative View
Artificial Phobos - Alternative View

Video: Artificial Phobos - Alternative View

Video: Artificial Phobos - Alternative View
Video: Science Bulletins: Phobos—A Groovy Moon 2024, September
Anonim

In 2012, a whole hysteria began around the mysterious Mars. The red planet, its satellites, the possibility of colonization, the work of the Curiosity rover are discussed wherever possible.

From time to time, loud statements are made by very authoritative organizations. For example, the European Space Agency. More recently, representatives of this organization stated that Phobos, the mysterious Martian moon, is artificial.

At least one third of it is hollow, and the origin of the satellite is not natural, alien in nature. Astrophysicist Dr. Iosif Samuilovich Shklovsky first calculated the orbital motion of Phobos, a Mars satellite. He came to the inevitable conclusion that the Moon is artificial and hollow, in principle, a huge ship.

The Russian astronomer, Dr. Herman Struve, spent months calculating the orbits of the two Martian moons with extreme accuracy at the beginning of the 20th century. After examining the astronomer's report, Shklovsky realized over time that the orbital speed and position of Phobos in space did not match Struve's mathematically predictions. After a long study of tides, gravitational and magnetic forces, Shklovsky came to the firm conviction that there are no natural reasons that could explain the origin of two odd moons or their strange behavior, in particular, what Phobos demonstrates.

The moons were artificial. Someone or something created them. For decades, most mainstream scientists ignored Shklovsky's breakthrough, until ESA began to look closely at the strange little moon. There are several assumptions:

1. This gigantic spaceship could be built as an orbital station or space observatory.

2. This is a generated spacecraft that arrived from another star system and was placed in a parking orbit around Mars.

3. The moon was built in Mars orbit by interstellar travelers, but was never completed.

Promotional video:

4. It is a functional (or non-functional) giant planet - a killer, a space bomb, possibly left over from some interplanetary conflicts in the surrounding space millions of years ago. An alien ship, a superbomb, or a work in progress?

In addition, in 1998, the Monolith object was discovered on Phobos by the researcher Efrein Palermo. He was also assisted by independent researcher Len Fleming when they both tried to analyze a curious artifact photographed by a telescope mounted on the Mars Surveyor and found on the side of Phobos facing Mars. For obvious reasons, they started calling it "Monolith". The artifact is a large hill, similar to a pillar of triangular cross-section.

"Monolith"

Image
Image

Photo: derevenka.su

And further. That's what's alarming. Someone or something stubbornly interferes with the exploration of this small Martian moon. On July 12, 1988, the USSR sent two automatic interplanetary stations to Mars - "Phobos-1" and "Phobos-2". Each of them was equipped with a set of complex devices and instruments: three television cameras, a spectrometer, a flight and attitude control system, video and sound recording systems. The total cost of both AMCs was $ 480 million.

At first everything went well, but on September 2, Phobos-1 did not get in touch. Attempts to restore contact were unsuccessful. Phobos-2 in March 1989 safely reached an intermediate orbit around Mars and managed to transmit a series of data and photographs to Earth before the Mission Control Center in Kaliningrad, Moscow Region (now the city of Korolyov) lost contact with it.

There is information that the task of "Phobos-2" included the study of strange objects and phenomena causing questions on the surface of its namesake - the satellite closest to Mars. The AMC was supposed to maneuver around Phobos for two months, at times descending over it to a distance of up to 50 meters. And, in addition, it was planned to drop two research modules on the Martian moon - for analyzing the soil, measuring the magnetic field, making and transmitting images of the satellite's surface to the Earth.

Upon completion of this part of the program, "Phobos-2" was supposed to return to orbit around Mars and continue its research. But that did not happen. First, from the Martian orbit, the AMS transmitted images of the surface of the Red Planet, as well as data on the composition and properties of its atmosphere. Then, according to the program, on March 27, 1989, Phobos-2 interrupted radio communication with the Mission Control Center - for the duration of the rendezvous with Phobos. But after giving the command to resume communication, MCC received only a very weak, short signal from the probe, after which Phobos-2 was silent forever.

Image
Image

Photo: derevenka.su

Then the USSR collapsed and the large-scale Phobos program was closed. For a while. Apparently, its importance was so great that in 1996 the third, already Russian, station "Mars-96" was launched. This mission was also declared lost, although it was carried out using the most modern technologies and had a record weight of 6.8 tons.

On January 15, 2012, the Phobos-Grunt spacecraft, launched into Earth orbit, ceased to exist, designed to study the Mars satellite Phobos and deliver soil samples from it to Earth. The cost of failure is 5 billion rubles. Immediately after the disaster, representatives of the sixth directorate of the GRU and the FSB took a nondisclosure agreement from the employees who participated in the preparation and launch of the Phobos-Grunt mission. In January, 2 months after the launch, information carriers and control codes of the interplanetary station were seized. These events are explained by the investigation into the death of the spacecraft. But a competent source in Roskosmos said that in fact, Phobos-Ground is currently moving towards Mars, and the "catastrophe" has become one of the largest hoaxes in the history of astronautics.

Several facts speak in favor of this version:

1. The launch of the Phobos-Grunt engine took place over South America, where the spacecraft was hidden from the main ground observation stations, both Russian and American and European.

2. After the launch on November 9, Phobos-Grunt transmitted incomprehensible signals to Earth, which the Control Center could not decipher.

3. Despite the statement about the fall of the Phobos-Grunt apparatus on January 15, 2012, the fall of the debris of the 13-ton station was not recorded.

An amazing persistence in trying to study Phobos and a series of incredible failures lead to strange thoughts. In particular, some experts said that the mass memory supplied by the Americans failed at the Mars-96 station, and all of a sudden it came out all at once - the main and the backup one. So it is possible that Phobos-Grunt, declared dead, continues its flight, and in early 2013 will drop the descent vehicle to the mysterious Monolith.

Author's comment: Some five years ago, after reading the above-selected text of my own composition, I would have thought about the mental state of myself. All these assumptions about the artificiality of Phobos, the Moon sound too fantastic, unreal. But here's what's interesting. Phobos is indeed far from Earth to study thoroughly and draw conclusions.

But the Moon is located very close to us. True, our companion always looks at the Earth with one side, as if hiding her secrets from earthlings. The numerous lunar expeditions of the Americans (I still do not believe in their reality) have brought practically nothing useful to science. For some reason, NASA always has something missing: either someone stole the lunar soil, or someone lit up the photographs and film.

But astronomers still managed to find out that the Moon also represents a kind of huge frame covered with a layer of rigolite. Huge cavities were found under this layer. So are these alien base stations, relay communications satellites, or huge spaceships parked in the orbits of Earth and Mars for a specific purpose? That's the question!

Igor Nechaev