This is an addition to the main post.
While I was looking at the testimonies of the members of the search groups separately, I did not pay attention to it, and when I gathered them together, I was already amazed at what fabulous nonsense the whole legend about the campaign and death at the pass of the Dyatlov group rests on! How can the masses of adults, otherwise normal, look at the facts that leave no feathers from woodpeckers and not see this fabulousness!.. The mystery of the Dyatlov Pass is an indisputable phenomenon and a mystery, but - of mass perception with turned off brains.
The traces of the alleged members of the Dyatlov group, found at the pass in the area of the tent, filmed, described in testimony and in the memoirs of search engines, are the most important and obligatory part of woodpecker science. The same as the duty of all woodpeckers, writers, publicists, activists, media, bloggers, streamers, spammers to kill Dyatlov's group on February 1-2 at the pass, and nothing else.
“February 1-2 at the pass” is a sacred and inviolable mantra of woodpeckers, covering a simple “secret” of the pass, obvious to a child, but forbidden for woodpeckers. The Dyatlovites were not on any pass, the bodies were brought, the filming was fake - the whole "secret" of the pass.
And in order to take away from it, the woodpeckers must drive the Dyatlovites out of the tent and lead them with these traces towards death from the GRU teams, CIA spies, detachments of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the KGB, the Ministry of Defense, the Central Committee of the CPSU, frosts, avalanches, winds, infrasound, military personnel, guards of the Gulag, demons, convicts, bandits, gold miners, Mansi, heptyl, atomic explosion, unknown weapons, deer, bears, wolves, moose, robots from whitemen, alcohol, drugs, plants of power, low-frequency pressure drops, polar madness, yeti, mountain spirits, and etc., etc., etc.
Promotional video:
Having added to the case the protocol of interrogation by the police captain Chudinov of the resident Vizhay Popov on February 6, 1959, the shop supervisor of the production in the organs Ivanov, unwillingly, put a pig on the future generations of woodpeckers. And in fact, he gave out the production - he brought bodies with a forgery of filming.
These lines.
This means that all woodpecker works about traces can be thrown into the trash.
Twice they should be thrown into the trash because of the entry in Blinov's diary about the flight on 1959-21-02 on the Yak-12 with rescuers:
The plane returned from halfway over Auspiya due to bad weather - i.e. because of the blizzard winds. Which the second time with a guarantee will close any traces.
At the same time, the photo of the first bodies discovered shows that they are partially covered with snow. Krivonischenko's legs, arm, and head were left untouched. Doroshenko has a head. The bodies of both are powdered, but not brought in. This means that the bodies were delivered after the bad weather on February 21.
Let's note the complete absence of traces in the snow in this first photo with the bodies found and read the protocol of the interrogation of the witness V. D. Brusnitsyn. who saw these bodies the day before the picture. By the way, the author of the only photograph of the tent in an unassembled state, which by itself renders the props, is absent among the photographs in envelopes attached to the case. Somehow Ivanov missed a Brusnitsyn photo of the tent.
Although I tried very hard to ensure that the photographs of the tent before its analysis were not in the case or outside it, judging by the absence of them …
Look again at the photo with Doroshenko and Krivonischenko, not yet transferred to the outlier. The day before this photo, 1959-26-02, everything around was trampled by footprints and the activities of several figures. It took a day for the traces of the cedar to disappear. The trail was gone from trampling. Not a trace remained of the traces.
And whose tracks were these that disappeared in one day, if not the props who brought two bodies the day before and were too lazy to bury them? Or will some crazy woodpecker continue to insist that Doroshenko and Krivonischenko trampled the snow under the cedar in Brusnitsyn's testimony?))
The forest, if anyone does not know, is a natural snow collector. In any blizzard, wind, snowfall, it collects more snow than on the slopes.
*
Now let us carefully look through the eyes of witnesses for the tracks on the slope.
Many network woodpeckers impute Ivanov, Maslennikov, Tempalov and others that they did not take care of proper research, schemes of traces, shooting them with a ruler … From a small mind, of course. Traces were seen only by the first search engines in the very first days. And then there were no traces.
Let us arrange the witnesses according to the time of their examination of the traces, but we will start not with them, but with the protocol of the interrogation of the witness G. S. Ortyukov., a colonel who reported an important detail that the others did not remember:
This is the same blizzard that hid the trampled snow near the cedar.
18-00 at the end of February near Otorten - it's already half an hour of civil twilight. The first two, Slobtsov and Sharavin, saw the tracks shortly before this time. It was impossible to estimate the extent of the tracks.
*
Sharavin M. P., one of the two pioneers of the tent, was not questioned in the case. Kuntsevich spoke with him on 15.02.2007:
*
Slobtsov B. E., another tent discoverer, only bothered to be questioned on 15 April. Interrogation protocol:
*
Search participant Koptelov Yu. E. was the third to see the footprints and the tent. True, after drinking a flask of alcohol brought on the eve by the pioneers of the tent Slobtsov and Sharavin. On the morning of February 27, Sharavin again came to the pass for inspection, taking Koptelov, and Slobtsov could not go for some reason.
Koptelov, like Sharavin, was not interrogated by Ivanov, so he, like Sharavin, shared his memories in recent times, with the conference of woodpeckers in 2011, and then answered clarifying questions from one of the forums. Do not rush to dismiss this witness, like Ivanov. He was the only one who noted the most important detail. Perhaps for this reason, Ivanov did not interrogate him and Sharavin, and from Slobtsov (according to him) he took both the general and personal diaries with records of the searches that he conducted, as in a campaign; smaller, Ivanov had to attach such details to the case …
*
Brusnitsyn V. D., was interrogated only on 15 May, almost three months later. Therefore, he was mistaken with the date of discovery by one day. He saw the tracks later Sharavin and Slobtsov, did not say anything about the tracks during interrogation, but only spoke about them in May 2007:
And yet, answering a question from one of the forums about traces, he noted:
*
On February 27, the first person who could properly examine the tracks was E. P. Maslennikov.:
*
Member of the search Lebedev V. L. Being busy with the contents of the tent, I was distracted by the traces in the last turn and completed in my imagination the picture brought to the search engines, not in the least embarrassed by its illogicality. What traces can there be in a terrible blizzard, dear?
*
Member of the search for Atmanaki G. V. also busy with a tent, became interested in footprints, not including a colleague's fantasies:
*
Assistant Chief of Staff of the military unit A. A. Chernyshov represented the military contingent of search engines, therefore, although he was parachuted to the pass only in the evening of February 27, he testified in a military manner clearly:
*
Of all the witnesses on February 27, the prosecutor Tempalov V. I. he stayed in the tent the longest, where he carefully looked for traces of the struggle and recorded the things found, so he was the last to look at the traces. He is the only one who photographed the footprints (whose photographs have reached publicity - it will be more accurate). The shadows in the photographs indicate the pre-sunset time of shooting.
*
Prosecutor Ivanov L. N., who arrived at the site on February 29, saw little with his own eyes and in the famous Resolution compiled the impressions of the participants in the search. Emphasizing socks, felt boots, bare feet and the convergence and divergence of individual chains.
Now, let's summarize. What did the search engines see if you look at all the evidence in dynamics?
*
Where the tracks begin
8 meters from the tent
can be 8-10 meters from the tent
15-20 m from the tent
20-30 meters below the tent
from the tent 30-40 meters
below the tent at 50-60 m
Traces disappear before our eyes, smoothed out and carried by wind and snow. When the first witnesses appeared, the wind managed to smooth out and bring in 8 meters of snow thrown over the tent. In two days, by the time of the examination by Tempalov, who performed professional duties in describing the tracks, the snow from the tent and the rest of the surface of the slope had already covered 50-60 meters. Three days later, by the time Ivanov appeared, the tracks were no longer readable.
*
What is the length of the tracks
about 1 km along the slope of
about 800 meters
for a length of 700-800
meters 60 meters, maybe 100
were visible only on a 50-meter section
Between Maslennikov's testimony of 1 kilometer and Tempalov's testimony of 50 meters, the traces continued to appear and disappeared in front of the search engines in almost two days. By the time Ivanov appeared on February 29, they were gone. In the Resolution Ivanov wrote the arithmetic mean - 500 meters.
Crazy woodpeckers will still insist that these traces, which disappeared before our eyes in two days, were made by the Dyatlovites a month ago?))
*
Than the traces left
The common place of woodpecker research: witnesses saw footprints in felt boots, in socks, without socks. This was especially emphasized by Ivanov and repeated thousands of times by woodpeckers. This is another basis for the eternal plot for woodpeckers, who are obliged to kill the group on February 1-2 at the pass, chasing them in socks and barefoot.
It is easy to make sure that the first four witnesses did not see any feet with or without socks. Feet in socks and without socks appear only in the testimony of Maslennikov, the chief of staff of search groups, then repeated by other search engines and recorded by Ivanov as general testimony.
Valenki really were on those who left traces. And where could "feet in socks and without socks" come from, if not counting Ivanov's great desire to attribute them to all the witnesses? Elementary. Traces do not just disappear before our eyes for two days, they are brought in and smoothed out, while they inevitably change, lose their shape. If you wish, you can see the hooves of deer, and the paws of bears, and the bells-tentacles of the Anunakhs, and the desire of Maslennikov, of subsequent search engines, already charged with the legend of the flight of the Dyatlovites from the tent, in whatever they got and barefoot, Ivanov of course, was huge.
*
Where does the clear heel mark of the boot come from - the title shot of this post
Many managed to see, and Tempalov - to photograph the prints of the boots, identifying them by the heel pressed into the snow (no different from the prints of boots with the same heel). It is clear that these are boots (or boots) of a props. Not a single shoe (especially a boot) was on any corpse of the Dyatlovites. Why do the woodpeckers not comment on this fact in any way?
*
Why did all the witnesses noted the great depth and indentation of the tracks
The answer is even simpler. Those who left traces did not go just like that, but with a load. They carried the very bodies found later along the line of these tracks. Four were carried in twos, on weight, the fifth - by drags, homemade sleds like these, with a centimeter-deep rut. With such a speed of disappearance of traces, in a day there will be no traces of it.
*
And here Koptelov's testimony is appropriate, which Ivanov did not need for the case: “First, it was strange that there were only eight of them! Secondly, the paired tracks were arranged in a row! "
"Paired tracks in a row" are just corpse carriers carrying their load in pairs. The trail of the ninth porter of corpses, rolling the drag, is not as deep as that of the loaded eight, it should disappear faster, so the ninth trail in the testimony, that is, then no, and if there is, then it is questionable …
The assistant to the chief of staff of the military unit, Captain Chernyshov, is even more specific: "The tracks stretched in parallel chains close to each other, as if people were walking holding each other." Everything is correct. They carried the bodies in twos, straps on their shoulders.
Based on the picture of the traces within two days, when they were present, one can confidently reconstruct the actions of the fake team. The bodies and things with the tent were delivered to the location of the tent. Things were hurriedly thrown into the tent, setting it up in an idiotic place. The eldest (most likely he was in boots or boots) ordered the corpse-borers to carry the bodies towards the forest in parallel routes. Three corpses were completely buried in the snow along the route, two were taken to the forest, but they were thrown just like that, without burying, they cut a Christmas tree, they managed to light a fire when the command came to reel. They returned to the wagon train on Auspiya not in their tracks, but in the forest; in the forest, as we can see, any traces disappear within a day.
Although Slobtsov is a lover of alcohol, he nevertheless noticed signs of pulling out corpses from the common heap, where the cargo brought from the convoy was dumped: “From the tent in the direction of the wind, that is, in the direction where the footprints of people remained, at a distance of about 0.5-1 meters, several slippers from different pairs were found, ski hats and other small items were also scattered. All this little thing was scattered, pulling out the corpses.
Well, to whom I will inform, to whom I will remind what was said in the main post. Bodies and belongings are transported comfortably even by motor transport, at least by two sledges with horses on the flat ice of Lozva, then Auspiya, along which the winter road was still on the maps of the 1960s. From Auspiya to the pass, there are 1300 meters of flat terrain, accessible both on foot with sledges and any northern sleigh. The most convenient delivery time is the night of February 23rd, full moon. The latest delivery date for the first five bodies and things to the pass is 24 February.
*
Why no one saw the props with the train
Because no one could see.
The Mansi began an unorganized search on February 20 and, in principle, could see both the baggage train and the trail from it, but they were looking for skiers or the bodies of skiers, and not a truck or horse-drawn transport. Moreover, no one will be interested in the tracks of the convoy - they were looking for ski tracks, not sled tracks.
Air reconnaissance on the Yak-21 on February 21 could not fly over the upper reaches of the Auspiya due to bad weather. But on this day, a wagon train, a truck or two sledges with horses, was just getting ready.
The first organized search group of Slobtsov was delivered by helicopter only on February 23 to Mount Otorten, the second group from Grebennik on February 24 - along the Vizhay channel, the third Axelrod group on February 25 - to the proposed route east of Otorten. All to places far from the main scene. Nobody interfered with the work of the props on February 23, maximum 24 February.
*
About the actual amount of snow and wind frequency
Let's add one more document about the real meteorological situation - a gravestone for all the tales about the footprints of the Dyatlovites and a direct indication of the bringing of bodies barely covered by drifting snow in the forest.
It snowed 1-4, 6-13, 15, 19-22, 25 February; heavy snow - February 1, 21, 24-25; snowstorms of all types of shoals on February 4, 12-16, 23.
In Burmantovo, the meteorological station closest to the pass. Some argue that it is 66 km away, and there could have been no snow at all on the pass since February 1-2, so traces remained. Nonsense, of course. The wind, even without snow, copes well with the tracks that we saw for two days, on February 26-27 at the pass. Secondly, all multi-day events with precipitation, as a rule, cover a large area. These are cyclones covering territories not tens, but hundreds of kilometers.
*
And finally, three, completely buried, headlong, in the snow, leave no chance at all in any theory that they could have left any traces on this snow that remained almost a month later.
Dyatlov, Slobodin, Kolmogorova.
At the same time, both Kolmogorova and Slobodin were buried headlong on a kilometer stretch of footprints recorded by Maslennikov, that is, right under the “footprints of the Dyatlovites”.
Pass schemes.
*
How can woodpeckers, who themselves draw diagrams of the location of bodies on the route from the tent to the cedar, can combine in their heads the bodies of the Dyatlovites buried headlong into the snow with the "footprints of the Dyatlovites" left on this snow, who themselves draw the layouts of the bodies on the route from the tent to the cedar - this is the true riddle of the pass.
*
Mind and health!