Are All Mammoths Extinct? Mentions Of Mammoths Before The 20th Century - Alternative View

Are All Mammoths Extinct? Mentions Of Mammoths Before The 20th Century - Alternative View
Are All Mammoths Extinct? Mentions Of Mammoths Before The 20th Century - Alternative View
Anonim

There are mammoths today. They live in remote places, and people periodically meet with them. The main mystery: why does the "supreme" science not want everyone to know about it? What are they hiding from us?

We all believe that mammoths became extinct in the last ice age, and it seems that it is written everywhere, but it seems that Turgenev did not know about it. In his story "Khor and Kalinych", he placed an interesting phrase - "…" Yes, here I am a man, and you see … "At this word, Khor raised his leg and showed a boot, probably made of mammoth skin …". To write this you need to know who the mammoth is, as well as what kind of skin he had. He had to know about the availability of this skin, otherwise he could not immediately determine it. However, this thing is still shown as somewhat unusual, uncommon.

Image
Image

According to the official version to be debunked, the awareness of them was then negligible. One of the first "academic" mammoth skeletons with preserved remains of soft tissues was found by the hunter O. Shumakov in the Lena River delta, on the Bykovsky Peninsula in 1799. And this was a great rarity for science. In 1806 the botanist of the Academy M. N. Adams organized the excavation of the skeleton and took it to the capital. The exhibit was collected and exhibited at the Kunstkamera, and later transferred to the Zoological Museum of the Academy of Sciences. Only these bones could Turgenev see. Half a century will pass before the discovery of the Berezovsky mammoth and the creation of the first stuffed animal (1900). How did he know what kind of skin the mammoth had, and even determined it offhand?

Image
Image

Jack London talked about the extinct beast in his story "The Remnant of the Tertiary Era": "… and I advise all those of little faith to visit the Smithsonian Institute. If they make recommendations and arrive at the appointed time, they will no doubt be received by Professor Dolvidson. Mukluks are now kept with him, and he will confirm, if not how they were obtained, then, in any case, what material went to them. He authoritatively claims that they are sewn from the skin of a mammoth, and the entire scientific world agrees with him. What else do you want?.. ".

Let's say that at that time there were only dreamers, but there is evidence of the existence of mammoths even in the last century. In his work "Siberian mammoths - is there any hope of seeing them alive" Anatoly Kartashov, Ph. D.

Image
Image

Promotional video:

16th century testimony:

Image
Image

It turns out that mammoths walked with us in the 16th century. Almost everyone knew about them, since even the Austrian ambassador received information. And again the 16th century, this time the legend:

“There is also another legend that in 1581 the warriors of the famous conqueror of Siberia Ermak saw huge hairy elephants in the dense taiga. Experts are still lost in conjecture: who did the glorious warriors see? Ordinary elephants in those days were already well known: they were found at the courts of governors in zoological gardens and in the royal menagerie."

And now we are smoothly approaching the 20th century:

Strange, even after hundreds of years, mammoths are still talked about, but with whom can such an animal be confused? But the 30s. Everyday life memory of a mammoth:

Image
Image

More evidence from the late 70s:

Image
Image

Of course, even after all these testimonies, there will certainly be doubting readers, from the category of those who say: "Until I see, I will not believe."

Everyone who only had a chance to meet the mammoth saw it. These are geologists, hunters, residents of the northern regions. You can even give a summary map of the discovered habitats of these animals.

Image
Image

The currently dominant glacial theory of the death of northern elephants could have arisen no earlier than the end of the 19th century. It was then that the scientific community adopted the dogma of the great glaciation. This dogma lies at the foundation of modern paleontology. In this vein, the artificial blindness of the scientific world is understandable.

The catastrophe in which millions of mammoths died was clearly there. They died almost simultaneously. This is evidenced by the cemeteries of bones covered with loess (washed soil). Calculations of the number of tusks exported from Russia over the past 200 years show more than a million pairs. Millions of mammoth heads populated an ecological niche in Eurasia at a time. Why isn't it right now?

Image
Image

If the catastrophe happened 13 thousand years ago, and some of the northern elephants survived, then they had plenty of time to restore the population. That did not happen. And here there are only two options: either they did not survive at all (the version of the scientific world), or the catastrophe that knocked down the mammoth population was relatively recent. Since there are mammoths, the latter is more likely. They simply did not have time to recover.

Most likely, disputing the timing of the catastrophe is the most painful and unacceptable moment for the "supreme science". They are ready to go to any lengths - to suppress facts, concealment of evidence, mass brainwashing, etc., just to avoid even raising the question on this topic.