I will show some images and, using the example of many well-known structures in the world, I will tell you about the sharp contrast in the development of ancient civilizations and their predecessors, or extraterrestrial civilizations that helped them.
Such a difference in the level of masonry of walls and other structures can be seen in many objects, but I will cite as an example for the most part objects from Peru. Let's start!
In Peru, almost everyone created the "great" Incas, which, of course, raises doubts, to put it mildly. There are two versions: Either the Incas exceeded the level of development described in history, or they simply did not own many of the structures, but they only occupied them. I am leaning closer to the second option and this can be easily explained by the elementary contrast in the level of the masonry.
But now for examples. Sacsayhuaman was allegedly built in the XV-XVI centuries, it was problematic to find a masonry of raw stones there, but I still found one such image:
The question arises if the Incas could move and install megaliths weighing tens and hundreds of tons with such jewelry precision, why did they supplement the masonry of some stones, even without the correct shape, not to mention processing.
In fact, in Sacsayhuaman this is not as pronounced as in other structures. I had to sit for a while to find suitable pictures of different levels of masonry, but they are.
Promotional video:
But then there are more interesting examples. In Machu Picchu, everything is many times more interesting and at the same time more obvious. It is noticeable that many of the walls were complemented by some kind of civilization, developed much worse than the original builders of Machu Picchu.
And they did it as it turned out. The ideal walls in Machu Picchu were built from processed blocks without any bonding mortar, and more primitive masonry was also done. But for some reason, one holds perfectly, as if it is a single whole, while the other is almost falling apart.
If you believe the official history, it turns out that the Incas at one moment as they made the walls initially and then began to "sculpt" how it would turn out from ordinary stones of various shapes.
And in Machu Picchu, this contrast in the level of development is very strong. Apparently, it was the Incas who tried to add a lot, as best they could, but still.
There are dozens of such pictures can be uploaded to the article, but I think everyone should understand what all this is about and what Machu Picchu looks like now.
Therefore, we go further to Ollantaytambo. In this case, as in Sacsayhuaman, it was not very easy to find a rough and primitive masonry, but it is also there, just not so strongly expressed.
It’s even difficult for me to guess why this layer of stones was made on top, but I doubt that the builders of such huge megaliths as are below, it was necessary.
Some pictures look quite funny, when everything looks as if one civilization of builders forgot what it was doing quite recently and seemed to be degrading by days and months.
If you look at all these pictures, and they built all this according to the official history of the Incas, then it looks quite strange and funny at the same time.
Apparently, the builders made a passage with perfectly fitted blocks, and then decided to throw stones on top for beauty, nothing special.
In general, one gets the impression that the Incas simply did anything to leave their mark on these truly incredible structures, partly impossible to create even for our time.
This can be continued for a long time and this contrast in the level of development of civilizations is best seen in Peru, although I saw the same in Egypt and other ancient sites around the world.
There is only one conclusion I have: the civilizations of the past simply occupied and appropriated for themselves truly incredible in terms of technology structures that belonged to some highly developed civilization of the past.
And the ancient people, apparently, had some kind of mania to supplement something of themselves and leave a mark in history. True, now this trace makes it clear that many objects were built by perfect others in terms of the level of development of civilization.
Just what kind of civilization (or civilization) they were, it is very difficult to answer. But if we take into account all the facts, especially the movement of huge megaliths over distances of many kilometers, then they were developed no worse than us, or even better.
