Until now, I have read the Runica signs in images from the caves of France as implicit signs inscribed in the images. Therefore, many academic scholars generally did not honor these readings with their attention, since, in their opinion, not only Russians, but in general, there can be no inscriptions on these images.
And now clear inscriptions have been found, which, of course, can be considered the beginning of the assault on this unshakable academic point of view. Of course, one swallow does not make spring, and while it is alone, it can still be ignored. But it has already entered the scientific circulation, and this is very significant. Now, of course, it should be thoroughly studied.
As usual, I cite this example (my colleague Valery Danilovich Osipov kindly pointed it to me) in translation, comments and my own reading.
Found Upper Paleolithic symbols of the Madeleine Cave
It has long been noted that the beautiful rock art of the Madeleine Cave included not only graphic representations of animals and other things, but also several solitary written symbols. If you were to rearrange the Indian, Greek, or Runic signs to force identical or similar symbols to line up with each other, you would see that these writing systems and symbols in the caves were extremely identical.
This conclusion is overwhelming! It is impossible to escape the realization that the graphic symbols of Madeleine art created 20,000 years ago were the ones that formed the basis for the creation of the early runic, Greek and Indian writing systems. My question is this: were the caves where people began to practice the art of writing? Did writing exist 20,000 years ago?
Figure: 1. Signs on the Madeleine cave (a), Greek (b), Indian (c) and runic (d)
Promotional video:
My comments
I have taken an excerpt from the work of Mary Setgest, published in the journal "World Archeology" in my translation from English. The purpose of the passage is to show that the most advanced archaeologists, albeit in the form of a question, admit the existence of not only drawings, but also writing in the Upper Paleolithic.
Figure: 2. My reading of the Madeleine cave inscription.
The significance of this passage is very great. He shows that archeology is slowly but surely beginning to revise its position in relation to the earliest examples of writing, transferring the time of the emergence of writing from the Neolithic to the Upper Paleolithic. Of course, this is only the first sign, for other researchers are not so determined, however, it shows changes in archeology. And I am glad that it adequately completes all my deciphers of the implicit Runica inscriptions made in the caves of France. Now archaeologists have no moral right to accuse me of reading something imperceptible. This inscription was singled out and attributed precisely as a sample of Upper Paleolithic writing by one of the archaeologists, and not even a Russian one.
Chudinov Valery Alekseevich