I mentioned in passing that I am a supporter of the new chronology. Well, maybe not all the conclusions of Nosovsky and Fomenko, but only those that relate to criticism of the official version of history. In terms of reconstruction - they are fiction writers worse than many, but their criticism, in my opinion, is unbreakable. Their arguments seem to me to be concrete, but not the fact that they seem so to all my readers. So I would like to hear your opinion.
The solar eclipse preceded the attack of the Mongol-Tatars, the clothes of the Russians are from 1236.
I bring to your attention a selection of medieval drawings dedicated to the Tatar-Mongol invasion. You see, there are no differences between Tatars and Russians. In all the drawings, the Tatar-Mongols were depicted as Europeans like our ancestors.
Taking Batu Suzdali.
What can this talk about? In my opinion, the answer is obvious, the Mongols were never here, medieval artists simply did not imagine how they might look, since they were never seen. They did not see the Mongoloid race at all.
Promotional video:
By the way, exactly the same picture is the case with Western European artists. There, too, the Mongol-Tatars have a very European appearance.
Battle of Lignitz on April 9, 1241.
The Mongol lies under the feet of Heinrich the Pious. The most interesting thing is that this Mongol is very similar to the Russian, and Heinrich the Pious died in battle and his head is shown to the knights hiding in the castle.
Now for some details. In all the drawings, Batu is depicted in the Byzantine crown, or rather the crown of the Byzantine Emperor. Experts in Byzantine military affairs will think that both the Russians and the Horde dressed and armed exclusively in Byzantine style. Indeed, looking closely, we will see that the chain mail is dressed on a quilted wadded caftan - kavadion, and on top of the scales - a klibanion or a riveted sleeveless jacket filled with cotton - bombakion, everyone also wears ceremonial cloaks - tablions. In the pictures "The capture of Suzdal" and "the battle of the pious with the wicked Batu" for the Russians and the Tatars, the spafari (honorary guard) of the Byzantine emperor are fighting for the Russians and for the Tatars, in characteristic gilded helmets with colored plumes and in over-armor dresses embroidered with gold threads - epilokorikey.
The battle of the pious with the wicked Batu.
What can this talk about? I have no clear answer. There is an assumption that we consider the ancestors of the Cossacks to be the Mongol-Tatars. Those who constantly lived where they live now, only at different times were called differently. Either the Khazars (isn’t it consonant with the word Cossack, especially if we consider that they were often called “Kozars”), then the Polovtsy (simply the inhabitants of the field, like the inhabitants of the city - the townspeople), then the Tatars (according to the new chronologists, the Mongol is simply the prefix denoting - "great" from the word megalion), well, in the end, they reached our days in the form of the Cossacks. Just at that moment when they were called Tatars, they were able to subjugate Russia and part of Europe, for this they received the nickname of the great. That is, from simply Tatars they became Mongolo-Tatars.
The first picture shows the standing on the Ugra, the second is the Battle of Kulikovo.
Now there is not much about the imperial origin of the Tatars. More precisely, about where the Byzantine Emperor came from in all the drawings. Here you have to give free rein to imagination. Probably, the Tatars were not an independent force with their own state structure, but what the Cossacks in the Russian Empire were - mercenary soldiers or a regular army of the empire. Perhaps the Byzantine as well. They were a kind of armed elite, something like the Japanese samurai, only transferred to our realities. It is not for nothing that the Zaporozhian people called themselves "chicks". Probably, this was not said for a catchphrase, but because they were knights. The customs of the Cossacks also speak for this version. Life in the battle, that is, in a military camp, without women, spent all the time in military amusements, and, more understandably, in training, they were constantly ready to march. This is how they should behaveand are still leading regular troops.
Well, I kind of fantasized enough, I'm waiting for your opinions.