I think it's not a secret for anyone that our rulers (and not ours, either) are greedy for temptations to leave descriptions (and many more attributions) of their exploits in history. It is unpleasant to realize this, but honestly and it turns out to look through the prism of this knowledge at current events.
Do you remember how it all began…
Both the authors of "New Chronology" and many other researchers of history agree that the distortion of world history began in the 16th century. It was then that the fundamental work of Scaliger and Petavius on the chronology of historical events was released. A series of colonial wars began. The Jesuits began to invent the "antiquity" of the provincial province of China. Harmful books were burned at the stake, or republished with the necessary amendments in the text. A struggle flared up for the redivision of the world and with the historical past for the future (domination and influence).
After the death of Great Tartary (Mongul and Tartarus are a union of two kingdoms. Where were they?), Favorable times also came in the history of Russia for the seizure of the liberated territories and the writing of state history (the truth got to this only in the 18th century).
I bring to your attention some interesting excerpts from the book: First ed. Radzivilovsky or Konigsberg list of "The Tale of Bygone Years", carried out by I. I. Taubert and I. S. Barkov St. Petersburg: Under Imp. Acad. Sciences, 1767. In the preface of the book, the editor honestly and straightforwardly states how all the states of Europe hired writers and ended up with a ready-made history, and only Russia and Poland have not yet acquired such a useful thing….
So they write: we delayed writing the history of our history, everyone already has it (got it means), but we were not honored. It seems like a good deed - from scattered chronicles, to put together the logical chain of the history of the state … still they would explain how it was, without inventing anything, but no one succeeded. This is how the Russian imperial ideology was born.
Promotional video:
And what about them "over the hill"?
Further, the most revelations of the innocent (and unfortunately unknown to us editor) begin:
As you can see from the text, we have been working on the history of Portugal for a long time. Apparently they agreed, made corrections and again agreed …..
The Spaniards did it easier - they hired a professional songwriter and published their version at the same time as the Portuguese one (agreed after all).
So the French ordered a fabulist from Rome. Probably not because there were not enough of our own - so with the papal throne it was easier to approve this work, in addition, the brain and information center of world deception has always been in the Vatican (and to this day there).
At first, like everyone else, the Germans wrote (or rewrote) the chronicles on their own, but then they wrote out Italians and a Dutchman for themselves (for agreement with the center - the Vatican?). As a result, although a bit late (according to the editor - he probably knew what to calculate the time), the first revised (?) Version was published, and then others (they ruled for a long time - they did not justify the Germanic antiquity).
These were done at about the same time as the Portuguese and Spaniards, but interestingly, they were printed for the first time in Germany, and then the corrected versions were stamped themselves.
Here's how! We hired the Germans (and these were there too), but instead of serious work they wrote FAIRY TALES (this is familiar to us, they still teach our children from such tales) - the Swedes apparently did not like the content (unlike our rulers) and they took the trouble to appoint their own. That is why they were late in relation to others.
The Danes, like ours, were rushing about: then they themselves tried to compose something (simultaneously with the Portuguese, Spaniards and the British), and then (after the "shout from above" is it possible?) They nevertheless hired a "specially trained person" and got the same "approved top”version of their story. They also delayed, and perhaps the Swedes were expected - so that inconsistency did not happen.
The Poles, as can be seen from the text, tried many times, but everything was either rapidly outdated, or it was not enough (something significant that others lacked). That is why they did not have a coherent version of their history in the middle of the 18th century.
And finally, a masterpiece of the editor's confession: the published book describes a very recent period, which compares favorably with Polish, Swedish and Icelandic publications, which (shamelessly) write about the events that took place a thousand years before. Meanwhile, according to the editor, nothing is known about those times, and European authors, recording events about which there is no and cannot be information, expose themselves to ridicule (forced people wrote - ordered, paid, invented, written). True, here he was mistaken - all this invented nonsense, today is the truth of the first instance, they refer to him, write scientific works, cite as a justification for their own conclusions.
Once again we are convinced that world history was rewritten anew in the 16-17 centuries, specially hired (or sent) by writers. Vatican inventions turned out to be stronger than logic, and to this day we only know what they began to invent in the 16th century. Then, apparently, history was more than once adjusted for specific goals, but the foundation laid in those days is unshakable now (to our great regret).