The fire in Notre-Dame-de-Paris, which occurred on April 15, was almost unanimously interpreted by the world conspiracy community as a deliberate arson, carried out with a ritual-symbolic purpose. This was indicated by the date of the event, and the subsequent burning of churches that began around the world, and numerous hints of this fire in advertisements, in films and even in cartoons:
And although such “coincidences” do not exist in nature, the Simpsons cannot be sewn to work. Still, Notre Dame de Paris was weird enough without the Simpsons.
Beginning in the 20th century, world architecture began to gradually abandon wooden elements in building structures - ceilings and supporting elements of roofs increasingly began to be made of iron and concrete, sometimes even hanging roofs on tightly stretched steel cables. By the middle of the 20th century, the practice had become generally accepted, therefore, at the beginning of the 21st century, even an experienced ARCHITECT about wooden structures had an idea at the level of a housewife from Honduras.
And what is the idea of housewives? The idea is very simple: since a building is wooden, it means it burns well. And to prove her point of view, the housewife will lead news broadcasts where some barracks built from the past and the century before last are burning.
The problem, however, is that Notre Dame de Paris is not a Soviet barrack for the revolutionary proletariat. Its roof was made of 800 years old oak, which DOES NOT BURN! That is, of course, you can set it on fire, but this requires termite. And this is exactly what some architects who have experience in the construction and reconstruction of wooden buildings spoke about:
However, as usual, no one and nowhere listened to smart people, so they moved on to active actions. In the video below, a man tries to set fire to an oak log with a blowtorch, but it turns out badly for him:
Promotional video:
An oak 300 years old was used in the experiment. In this case, we are talking simply about a log that has not undergone special processing.
What is the essence of this treatment today is difficult to say, nevertheless, everyone knows that the roofs of medieval castles, ceilings in the fortress towers were made of wood. This was exactly what the oak was going to do. And all attempts to set it on fire by the besiegers did not bring success - the oak floors did not catch fire, even when they poured burning oil and tar on them.
Moreover, in Northern Europe, where it was bad with stones, whole fortresses were built from wood. Since there was never so much oak anywhere, all the logs were used. And these logs, after special soaking, also calmly held the siege and the wooden Kremlin caught fire only when the whole city was already burning inside.
Based on all this, it can be argued absolutely unequivocally that Notre Dame de Paris was set on fire deliberately. At the same time, it was not some “yellow vests” or “Muslim extremists” who set him on fire. If a 300-year-old oak without a special refractory treatment does not even take a blowtorch, then an 800-year-old oak treated against worms and fires would not take a Molotov cocktail - unless the “extremists” would have been able to drag a whole tank truck onto the roof. By definition, the “extremists” have nothing but a Molotov cocktail.
Consequently, expensive and professional pyrotechnics were used, for example, the same termite. And they laid it on the roof quite a lot, if the beams of 800 year old oak flared up like a matchbox. However, who did this is a big and big question. Although, of course, the media, as always, are not at all interested in this.