I came across an article on the topic of excavations in Spain, in Tartes. And from the first lines and photos in this article, I was, to put it mildly, shocked by how historians interpret the finds dug up and found by them one-sidedly. Everything is in the style of its paradigm of the craze for the ancient cultures of the Earth by sacrificing animals, filling up their homes before leaving their homes.
I suggest that you once again familiarize yourself with this official doctrine of Western archaeologists. And by tradition, I will ask my questions in this article. For those who have not read my articles for the first time, they will be the same. But I cannot ignore such a vivid fact of delusions.
Also in the article there is a mention of ancient concrete, which is officially a century older than the first mention of Roman concrete. So, look:
Excavations made at this site were carried out back in 2015. The discovery took place in the town of Turunuelo in the province of Badajoz in the middle of tomato plantations.
Official information about this place and the ancient culture of this region of Spain is as follows:
Historians ask the question: why this ancient culture did not live up to the "classics" of ancient times? Has sunk into oblivion a century before the heyday of Ancient Greece and Rome? Found ruins in Tartes, which are trying to explain the conquests of the Phoenicians or Celts. A settlement was found and explored, but only 7%. Here is a view of the excavation:
Staircase leading probably to the basement. Abandoned utensils: cauldrons and other artifacts. We read the comments of archaeologists:
Those. local residents used the technology of artificial stone and concrete in their buildings. And he has not yet appeared (according to the official history) in Rome, because Rome as such did not yet exist. And that makes them dissonant. It is good that at least here the Spanish archaeologists found the courage to admit the chronological contradictions. Because Rome officially appeared on the remains of the Etruscan culture, it is assumed that they also lived here. We go further, tk. below is the most interesting:
Read carefully the official opinion of what happened here. I will not retell. Summary of archaeologists: the cult of the sacrifice of 60 animals was carried out, there was a feast, and then at the end of the doors they turned into a sacrificial burial complex, covering everything with clay. How do you like these sick fantasies of historians?
Many historians call the versions of alternatives about unknown events in history as sheer delirium. Can I call them, supposedly well-established explanations, fierce delirium? Seeing in every such case the cult of sacrifices - they are not tired? It is clear that this is the official paradigm. Thousands of specialists refer to this and there is no risk to report and write about it in the specialized press.
But in my opinion, this is the result of a system error, when someone suggested this and it was replicated, carried through decades. But with this they need to tie and at least begin to consider other points of view. Those that are not in history.
On what grounds did archaeologists make such conclusions? We look:
And all on the basis of the fact that skeletons of domestic animals were found in the basement of this palace or manor. The horses are in harness. Historians cannot assume that all these animals perished in the mudflows of the flood, because there is no such information in their chronology of those times! In any era of human existence, there is no such event about a global catastrophe!
No human skeletons have been found. Probably, people managed to leave this place. But they did not have time to take all the utensils and livestock with them. Or, having climbed onto the roof, they were caught by streams and there, because the building was destroyed. And the animals were locked in pens on the first floor.
Perhaps the catastrophic events that took place here happened simultaneously with the destruction of the Roman Empire. And this is one series of events, when Tartaria perished in eastern Asia and the Mayans left all their hundreds of cities, the Himalayas appeared, the seas and lakes (Caspian and Baikal) changed. This is a short list of those changes that I wrote about. In general, the world and geography have changed beyond recognition everywhere and catastrophically quickly.
And most likely, in that era, there was simply no one to write it down and even orally convey it! Already completely different peoples came to these places. The same Arabs, who were given the violet to conduct their own or someone else's history. These are not my fantasies, here is a proven fact on this topic:
An Arab settlement arose on top of the layers under which there was a Roman one. And not just a settlement, but presumably there was a city of the Roman Empire here.
The fact that the animals in Tartes could have perished in the clay liquid masses is evident. The palace was destroyed and covered with thick layers of clay. My versions remain like this:
- outflows of water from the bowels (mainly in the mountains and in the sources of rivers), the formation of new hills with such sources. Catastrophic floods in river valleys, which covered cities and villages under clay.
- large-scale volcanic eruption across the planet. Clay is like oxidized volcanic ash in water. Ashes caused condensation of water in the atmosphere - clay (then ash) rains fell. This also led to mudflows.
- maybe there were tsunamis in some areas. But not everywhere. From the excavation site in Tartes to the Atlantic at least 250 km. There is only one large flat river in the north (Tahoe).
The reason that provoked the onset of these processes is unknown. So far, too, only versions: from the fall of a large asteroid with the beginning of geotectonic shifts in the earth's crust, to the Janibekov effect and the expansion of the Earth.
Author: sibved
