Pasha Lobanov has news on the page:
“Yesterday I came across my son’s magazine about the pioneer printer Johannes Gutenberg, in 1430, in general he assembled a printing press. It is assembled with bolts and nuts. In general, factory-made, all materials. To make a bolt you need a lathe. You need a factory for the manufacture of hexagonal blanks. In general, you need Factories, Factories and more Factories, which means that already at that time there were technologies comparable to ours. Where does that go, but we still use a lot, but we do not know about it."
I don’t understand why this news doesn’t make a splash and comments like this appear instead:
"Pasha, the barbarian machine does not fit with the high technologies of our ancestors."
In the article, it is correctly noted that bolts and nuts can only be created with the help of the presence of production. This is how our government in quotation marks has dulled our thinking. And you go to the polls imposed by parasites - after all, what changes with any candidates in any invented state with sovereigns, when the ministry of fooling every year more and more fools children, and even makes us pay money for it? According to the official science, industrial steel began to be mined somewhere in the 1870s. And we see the carvings in 1430 and this news does not cause noise, it is simply unthinkable, how much society is in the dark!
But okay … carvings … medieval factories … what else do we see? We see wood and metal that are 600 years old! Modern copper and aluminum, if I am not mistaken, one metal in the soil will rot in 30 years, the second in 50. The more modern the metal and wood, the more durable it is. And here, a machine from the Middle Ages - even now sit down at it and work! Now think about how the metal was made and how the wood was processed, that the material is essentially eternal! Is this not a sign of high technology?
It is a pity that the administrators of the Phoenix Rebirth from the Ashes group, on whom they created the Sphere Pravi channel, out of their own greed on the principle “I want to be in charge of someone else's work,” have deleted all videos. They didn't just drain important stuff from us down the toilet. They merged an excellent typed base of comments from subscribers, where people shared that the old mansions are eternal - you can't hammer in a nail, you can't drill with a drill, you attach a modern wooden extension to it, it decays over time, but the tower is unchanged!
Of course, we can say that somewhere in the bins there are today technologies that allow metal and wood to be more durable, which is not actually observed on the market. But I repeat once again, this machine is from the Middle Ages, which is 600 years old!
Promotional video:
Bullets of Snowfall
A comment from a person under the pseudonym "Magdalene's blood":
Good evening. So I decided to share a photo of a brick … Only not to poison me to a psychiatrist, he ran away from me … to be honest, we stole this brick at Georgenburg castle. The spectacle is not for faint-hearted men - two girls, who were not allowed into the castle, climbed through the fortifications and stole the property of the priest Chernyakhovsky … because the castles were simply foiled by them.
Seemingly factory quality and so on. If they are branded, they are responsible for the work. But I was confused by the following, when we were there on an excursion earlier, when we went down into the dungeon we saw the following: vaulted masonry, arched ceilings. As they say "classic of the genre" of dungeons on one project. But the following surprised me. The guide showed us bricks with animal prints. Material, quality, color … Everything was the same. But when I saw an embedded brick in the niche of the basement with the imprint of a dog or a wolf. Unfortunately I can't attach a photo now. The guide's story just finished me off "the bricks were dried in the sun, laying them out near the construction site, and animals often ran along it and from this traces". I stand there and freak out from this addiction. But then a fantastic version followed "and they also say that the Masons cursed the Templars with this wolf's paw print."
Templars drying bricks in the sun under the curses of the Masons - I would like to see that.
Supposedly in 1264, this castle was built according to Wikipedia. We saw part of the ruins and the remaining buildings. But there are very few branded bricks with prints. Well, if the brand can be explained by the manufacturer's brand, then the paw print does not fit into this theory. And where did the dogs come from at the factory? And what about the hoof prints? Maybe a fake slipped? Then how did she "wedged into the wall"?
And here is an example of sun-dried bricks on which people and horses were running … I took this from a group of volunteers working for free in the castle:
By the way, here's a photo of me with the "proof of the masons in the castle" tower with an eight at the top. Everywhere you look, the idea of a conspiracy against someone who is not clear is running ahead of a steam locomotive. Of course, I am not an expert on Masons, but I don’t remember that they were friends.
And here is the part of the castle that gave us a brick:
Undoubtedly, the lower part is very interesting, especially by the fact that the basement is multi-level according to the volunteers. And again the story of the filled-up cellars is repeated. Only this time, the "legend" has changed a little "fell asleep because of the threat of collapse." The upper part is also of considerable interest. Multi-meter masonry walls, not only external, but also internal. According to scientists, this castle was a church one and monks and inquisitors lived in it. The rooms or as they are called cells are very narrow, roughly speaking, to put a single bed. Allegedly, they prayed in these cells, while the other part was residential. By the way, I also noticed the differences between the “tip and the underwater part of the iceberg”. At the top there are no bricks with animal prints. And such "marked bricks" are found only in the basement of this castle.
Magdalena's blood
