The Reason For The Boeing's Crash Was Never Named Unnamed? - Alternative View

The Reason For The Boeing's Crash Was Never Named Unnamed? - Alternative View
The Reason For The Boeing's Crash Was Never Named Unnamed? - Alternative View

Video: The Reason For The Boeing's Crash Was Never Named Unnamed? - Alternative View

Video: The Reason For The Boeing's Crash Was Never Named Unnamed? - Alternative View
Video: The real reason Boeing's new plane crashed twice 2024, May
Anonim

Until the very last moment, no one understood what was happening. The last words of the pilot “I'm going to go around. Bye-bye …”The weather was bad, but it allowed landing. There were no dispatcher errors. Piloting errors, it seems, too.

Everyone saw the footage of the fall - a highly luminous object at an angle of 45 degrees crashed into the ground and caught fire. The speed was about 100 meters per second, fell from a height of about 300 meters. That is, everything happened in 3 seconds after "bye-bye."

The plane could not have enough thrust when going around, it could be knocked off course by a strong gust of wind. But then the trajectory of the fall would be completely different, and the speed of the fall, too. And then the blow after a sharp dive was so strong that the huge car was literally scattered into small fragments along the runway.

This is all very strange, unusual. And no one talks about the likelihood of external impact on the plane. Something, for example, a shot from a MANPADS, could destroy the crew when it hit the cockpit - the whole plane could not, the charge was not very powerful. But if it got into the cockpit of an aircraft going to land, it would be just such a picture. And there is a very small probability of finding the remnants of the rocket or traces of its hit - only small fragments remained from the plane, little remains from the projectile itself during the explosion …

Why someone could need this is a completely different question. But there could be those who wanted to, and on a bad night there were plenty of opportunities to carry out a terrorist attack.

Somehow everyone forgets that Rostov-on-Don has been a front-line city for two years now, and there are battles a hundred kilometers away. All conditions have been created for the penetration of sabotage groups - a poorly guarded border, a regime of free crossing, mass migration, and total corruption. There are many armed groups in the adjacent territory, which practically do not obey anyone. There are a lot of opportunities to dissolve in the millionth city and its environs.

All this, of course, is speculation. Or versions that "competent authorities" are required to consider and verify. Although the competence and interest of the “authorities” in Rostov-on-Don, in the light of recent revelations, it seems low. To catch terrorists is not to plant journalists for a couple of words in LiveJournal, it requires different professionalism. If hundreds of "trunks" disappear right from the storage room of the GUMVD, and then are found in the trunk of the head of the rear, why not "walk" more seriously between the arms and hands? Moreover, the border, where is it in bulk, a stone's throw?

And who will catch? Those who successfully trade in confiscated goods?

Promotional video:

Or those SBU officers who, after the annexation of Crimea, moved to serve in the FSB and the prosecutor's office?

It’s even surprising that the problem of terrorism exported from the adjacent territory doesn’t seem to concern anyone at all. And the plane crashed due to a crew error or equipment failure. What mistake? What technique? Never mind…