The American space agency NASA is actively and actively exploring our Universe, posting on its website numerous images of space that amaze the imagination. This is especially true of objects close to us, such as the Moon and Mars. The red planet is of great interest to both researchers and ordinary people, since it is the heavenly body where earthlings may one day move. An expedition is being prepared, which for now is a one-way ticket, since the fuel resources will not be enough for the return.
Judging by the last photo taken by NASA, future settlers will have something to build their facilities from, if, of course, such a need arises. The fact is that Internet users were interested in a strange piece of metal seen on the surface that glittered in the sun. Some immediately put forward the favorite version of modernity - "the aliens are to blame for everything." People believed that they were in front of a flying saucer that landed on the planet for some of their own purposes. Either for their own research, or this is generally an alien home. How likely is this version?
To do this, you need to understand whether someone can live on Mars. Given the official calculations of scientists, this is not possible. The fact is that Mars is a planet that was once very close in characteristics to Earth. Experts say that millions of years ago it was the size of our celestial body or even larger. When the Sun warmed up the planet, and water appeared in a liquid state, some life forms could really arise there. True, reasonable or not, this is the second question. If we set aside the popular version of "people were created by aliens", then you can simply compare the Earth and Mars. Since many characteristics in ancient times coincided, then, theoretically, the Red Planet developed along the same path as our heavenly body. Accordingly, the period in which the Martians appeared,should roughly coincide with the interval from the origin of bacteria to people on Earth, not in exact time, but in how long it took for the Martians. In this case, it can be assumed that the latter might not have had time to arise. The sun warmed up slowly, this can be understood even by the logic of the fact that once there was life on Venus, having arisen there earlier than others. It warmed up the second planet and even fried it completely, so that the water disappeared there, and then reached the Earth, but did not burn our celestial body, leaving a relatively average temperature. It warmed up the second planet and even fried it completely, so that the water disappeared there, and then reached the Earth, but did not burn our celestial body, leaving a relatively average temperature. It warmed up the second planet and even fried it completely, so that the water disappeared there, and then reached the Earth, but did not burn our celestial body, leaving a relatively average temperature.
Consequently, it could not have been very hot on Mars, even in very ancient times, and this suggests that life there originated late, but died early. As you know, a catastrophe took place, as a result of which an unknown celestial body beat off a piece from the Red Planet, moreover, a significant piece, with a large amount of metal, as a result of which it lost its magnetic field, and also, due to loss of mass, lost its attraction, which allows it to hold water in a liquid state. Now it is 0.6 g. It seems that it is not so critical, the movement here is relatively comfortable, however, for the existence of reservoirs, at least 1 g is needed, which can be judged, in fact, by our Earth. Accordingly, there can be no Martians here, as such.
Promotional video:
Can aliens just fly to the planet? In theory, this is possible. If the Earth is so actively visited, then why should they not fly to Mars? The logic of such a move is another matter. Actually, after the catastrophe there are very few metals left on the Red Planet, there is no oil and other things either. This is just an empty patch in space, only interesting because there are relatively acceptable conditions that have survived since ancient times. In addition, Mars is regularly studied by all kinds of probes, rovers, satellites, and so on. If aliens really were there often, they would certainly have been noticed much earlier, and certainly not in one rather indistinct picture. Consequently, there are no aliens there, and the version did not justify itself.
The second opinion is that the camera captured a piece of some kind of automatic earth ship. Actually, this version may be true due to the fact that it is quite difficult to explore space, and people have not yet figured out how to do it perfectly, without errors. Since the beginning of its development, there has been a series of experiments. Various automatic objects were sent almost at random with the thought "what if everything will work out, and it will still fly where it should be?" Naturally, very often the opposite happened. The objects broke right in the process of flight or simply could not withstand the poorly studied conditions, then falling on the celestial body nearest to them. Accordingly, there were enough of such pieces that were sent to study Mars. Many of them simply crashed on the planet's surface, partially strewn with metal debris. Therefore, there is a high probability thatthat even now the cameras of the American space agency have detected just such a case.
Scientists, by the way, are concerned that the outer space closest to us is too filled with such debris. The territory is actively littered, which in the future can damage both our planet and others, eventually depriving them of the possibility of their detailed study. People are going to move somewhere, but you should not repeat your own mistakes and make the space environment as polluted in advance as our Earth has become after thousands of years, otherwise all efforts will be in vain.
Irina Letinskaya