Continuation Of Life After Death. Evidence - Alternative View

Table of contents:

Continuation Of Life After Death. Evidence - Alternative View
Continuation Of Life After Death. Evidence - Alternative View

Video: Continuation Of Life After Death. Evidence - Alternative View

Video: Continuation Of Life After Death. Evidence - Alternative View
Video: Why You Shouldn't Mourn The Death Of A Loved One | Neale Donald Walsch 2024, May
Anonim

After death, life continues. Proven

Several evidences confirming the continuation of life after death of the physical body of a person.

The stories about the "after death" experience are sincere and similar to each other, differing only in details; people with different levels of education, different professions, nationalities, gender, age, etc., talk about the same thing. This amazed all researchers who dealt with this issue. An uneducated woman sees and experiences the same thing as an academician. As a rule, the part of a person leaving the body could see their body from the side, often from above, saw the doctors trying to revive it, and everything that was happening around, and a little later perceived many other things.

Despite the sincerity, such messages were still not completely conclusive, since most of them were based on the stories of people who went through a temporary death. There was a lack of objective scientific verification - whether in reality there is a phenomenon of continued life after the death of a physical body.

The next step was taken by Dr. Sab. He organized verification observations that confirmed, and in fact proved that the evidence of life after death is not fiction and that the person after the death of the body actually continues to exist, retaining the ability to think, see, hear and feel.

Dr. Michael Sabom is a professor of medicine at Emory University in the United States. He is a specialist cardiologist, a member of the American Society of Cardiology and has extensive hands-on experience in resuscitation.

He got acquainted with the book of Raymond Moody "Life After Life" in 1976 and at first did not attach serious importance to the cases described there. The book market in those days, as now, was filled with the most outlandish science fiction. What Moody said could easily be taken for a curious invention, but Subom became interested and decided to question his patients. What they said confirmed what Moody was writing about, and Dr. Saboma was struck by the sincerity of the people who had gone through temporary death and the similarity of their experiences.

His patients, who were on the verge of life and death, as a rule, did not tell anyone about their experiences before him, they were not familiar with each other, and yet what they said spoke of the same thing. So, for example, patients told that, leaving the body, they easily moved freely wherever they wanted, and saw and heard what was happening in other wards and corridors of the hospital, on the street, etc. They did it then when their physical body lay lifeless on the operating table. They saw from the side their body and all the resuscitation measures carried out with it in the operating room.

Promotional video:

Dr. Sabom wanted to verify these incredible reports by looking at them from the side through the eyes of an objective researcher. He began to check whether what the patients had said coincided with what was happening at that time in reality. Were those medical devices and resuscitation methods described by the people who were dead in the meantime actually used, was in reality what the latter saw and described in other rooms, distant from the one in which the deceased lay.

Mikhail Sabom collected and published 116 cases, verified by him personally. He compared what the patients told with the case histories, asked the people whom his patients who had returned after death saw and heard, again checking the testimony of both. So, for example, he checked whether the people described were in fact in the waiting room and at what time. He kept accurate minutes, taking into account the place, time, participants, spoken words, etc. For his research, he selected only mentally healthy and balanced people.

This test fully confirmed the existence of the studied phenomenon. It was confirmed that after the death of the physical body, the existence of the personality continues. Some part of a person remains to live, she is able to see, hear, think and feel, as before.

Then, when the body was dead, people saw not only the switched on devices, but also the arrows of their pressure gauges in the positions in which they were actually, they gave detailed and accurate descriptions of machines and devices that they had not seen before and whose existence they did not know … They recounted the medical conversations; watching from above, they described their hairstyles and hats, saw what was happening outside the walls of the room in which their body was, and so on. All these amazing messages have been reliably confirmed. For clarity, here are a few examples from Dr. Sabom's messages.

• Severe heart attack with cardiac arrest in a 44-year-old man. Several electrical shocks were applied to revive. The deceased watched what was happening from a position outside his physical body and subsequently gave a detailed description.

“I was somehow separate, aloof. I didn’t participate, but I watched indifferently, it wasn’t very interesting for me … At first, they injected something through the rubber band that was there for infusion … then they lifted me up and laid me on the board. And then one doctor began to beat on my chest. They used to give me oxygen - a rubber tube for my nose, and then they pulled it out and put a mask on my face. She covers her mouth and nose. It is for pressure … light green …

I saw how they rolled the table, on which lay something like blades. And on it was a pressure gauge, square, with two arrows. One was standing and the other was moving … she was moving slowly, not jumping right away, like on a voltmeter or other device. The first time she went to … between the third and half of the scale. And they repeated it, and she walked more than half, and the third time almost three-quarters. The stationary arrow twitched whenever they pushed this thing and someone fiddled with it. And I think they fixed it and it stopped and the other moved … And there were two blades with wires from them; it is like two round discs with handles. They held a disk in their hands and placed it on my chest. There were small buttons on the handle … I saw how I was twitching ….

The personnel who took part in the intensive care unit confirmed what was said in detail.

• Second case: a 60-year-old worker who experienced cardiac arrest said: “… when I was dying, I saw my body there and I was sorry to leave it … I saw everything that they were doing … at first I did not know who it was, and then I looked at close range and saw myself and could not understand it … how is it? I looked from above, quietly rising higher and higher."

Then he described what the doctors were doing with his lifeless body: “I was aware of everything … and I saw my relatives in the emergency room of the hospital … it's absolutely clear … they were there - my wife, my eldest son, my daughter, and the doctor … no, it was impossible for me to be somewhere there, while I was undergoing an operation at that time … but I saw them and know very well that I was there … I did not know what happened and why they were crying. And then I went further, I found myself in another world."

Dr. Sabom later questioned the patient's wife and daughter. The wife fully confirmed what her husband had said. The daughter also remembered that the three of them were then in the waiting room and spoke to her father's doctor.

• The patient was in a state of clinical death, under deep anesthesia, with a stopped heart. He was covered with surgical sheets and physically could not see or hear anything. He later spoke of his experiences. He watched in detail the operation on his own heart, and his story corresponded to what was actually happening.

Here are some excerpts from his long story: “The anesthetist anesthetized this part and put this thing in there (intravenously). I probably fell asleep, I don't remember anything how they transported me from this room to the one where they are doing the operations. And then all of a sudden I saw that the room was lit, but not as brightly as I might have expected. My consciousness returned … but they had already done something to me … my head and whole body were covered with sheets … and then I suddenly began to see what was happening … I was kind of a couple of feet above my head, like I was just another person in the operating room … I saw two doctors how they sewed me up … they sawed off the sternum … I could draw you a saw and a thing with which they spread the ribs … it was wrapped all around and was made of good steel, no rust ….

He described the course of the operation: “… a lot of instruments … they (the doctors) spoke clamps on them … I was surprised, I thought that there must be a lot of blood everywhere, but there was very little … and the heart does not look the way I thought. It's big; large at the top and narrow at the bottom, like the African continent. At the top, it is pink and yellow. Even creepy. And one part was darker than the rest, instead of everything being the same color … Dr. S. stood on the left, he cut off pieces from my heart and turned them this way and that and looked at it for a long time … and they argued a lot whether it was necessary to make a circuit or no. And they decided not to do this … All the doctors, except one, had boots in green covers, and this eccentric was in white boots covered in blood … it was strange and, in my opinion, antihygienic ….

The patient's description of the course of the operation coincided with the entry in the operation log, made, of course, in a different style.

The medical history noted that it was difficult to restore blood circulation - a confirmation that the patient actually experienced a state of clinical death.

The very beginning of the story is very curious, when the patient, without thinking and without trying to understand, describes in simple words two completely different states: deep anesthesia and clinical death. In the first case, loss of consciousness, complete "nothing"; in the second, the ability to observe your own body and everything around you from the outside, the ability to think, see, hear and feel, being outside your body.

I repeat his words: “The anesthetist anesthetized this part and put this thing in there. I probably fell asleep, I don't remember anything how they transported me from this room to the one where they are doing the operations. " This is the action of anesthesia. Many of us, in exactly the same way, but mistakenly, imagine death - absolute nothing, the absence of any perceptions. However, the patient continues: "And then suddenly I saw … my consciousness returned … I saw two doctors stitching me up, I heard their conversations, I could understand … I was out of my body." This is no longer anesthesia, but the continuation of the life of the soul after the death of the body, in this case, after the temporary death of the physical body.

Of course, many people imagine death differently. For those who have departed from Christianity and from God, and do not remember the soul at all, it is difficult to accept the fact that after the death of the body, some part of a person continues to exist consciously.

This also applies to many doctors. Doubts also arose among scientists who studied the phenomenon of "life after death".

Of course, the above, when you hear about this for the first time, may seem like a simple invention. To believe in it like this, right away, is difficult, and not only for you or me. Scientists Moody and Sabom did not immediately believe in this either.

They are people far from any fantasy, calm and serious scientists. Their books are written in dry, precise language, without any embellishment. Their goal was not to surprise or entertain the reader, but to objectively verify new data. They rejected everything dubious and essentially did not draw conclusions, limiting themselves to the stated facts.

P. Kalinovsky