On the Internet there are a huge number of photographs of the bombed Dresden. According to the agreement of the Yalta Conference, the city of Dresden was to withdraw into the zone of influence of the Soviet Union … But it was not for this that the Americans acted so cruelly in the city, acting on the principle: "So don't get anyone else!" But a very long time ago, right after school, I happened to read an article of a purely technical nature about the creation of an atomic bomb. And there I saw interesting information that no one really knew exactly how to do it … how the atom could be split and thereby create enriched Uranium. The Americans apparently got ready-made material, according to which it is necessary to immediately create "Plutonium" as the basis for an atomic bomb. And Europe … I mean, first of all, Germany, since it was they who supported the idea of creating a superbomb. About the consequences of the "explosion"excuse the "nuclear reaction" and no one had any idea how this would happen (in what form). This can be judged at least by the way the political and military leadership observed the first "nuclear reaction" without even thinking of hiding in bunkers. You can also judge the method that could lead to a "nuclear reaction": 1) by means of a circular explosives, 2) by pushing two pieces of plutonium with the help of powder charges (it’s as if the barrel had at each end a charging chamber with projectiles directed towards). So in this article it was mentioned that there were more than a dozen laboratories in Germany, each of which developed its own way of fissioning uranium, creating a pluton, and on the basis of "heavy water" that the Wehrmacht captured in the laboratories of Norway.how the political and military leadership watched the first "nuclear reaction" without even thinking to hide in bunkers. One can also judge the method that could lead to a "nuclear reaction": 1) by means of a circular explosives, 2) by pushing two pieces of plutonium with the help of powder charges (it's as if the barrel had a charging chamber at each end with projectiles directed towards it). So in this article it was mentioned that there were more than a dozen laboratories in Germany, each of which developed its own way of fissioning uranium, creating a pluton, and on the basis of "heavy water" that the Wehrmacht captured in the laboratories of Norway.how the political and military leadership watched the first "nuclear reaction" without even thinking to hide in bunkers. One can also judge the method that could lead to a "nuclear reaction": 1) with the help of a circular explosive charge, 2) colliding two pieces of plutonium with the help of powder charges (this is as if the barrel had a charging chamber at each end with projectiles directed towards it). So in this article it was mentioned that there were more than a dozen laboratories in Germany, each of which developed its own way of fissioning uranium, creating a pluton, and on the basis of "heavy water" that the Wehrmacht captured in the laboratories of Norway.2) colliding two pieces of plutonium with the help of powder charges (it's as if the barrel had a charging chamber at each end with projectiles directed towards it). So in this article it was mentioned that in Germany there were more than a dozen laboratories, each of which developed its own way of fissioning uranium, creating a pluton, and based on the "heavy water" that the Wehrmacht captured in the laboratories of Norway.2) colliding two pieces of plutonium with the help of powder charges (it’s as if the barrel had a charging chamber at each end with projectiles directed towards it). So in this article it was mentioned that there were more than a dozen laboratories in Germany, each of which developed its own way of fissioning uranium, creating a pluton, and on the basis of "heavy water" that the Wehrmacht captured in the laboratories of Norway.
So what am I talking about? There was one sentence in this article.
“In Dresden underground, at the beginning of 1945, there were 4 laboratories working on the 'atomic bomb'.
Object that "nonsense" … Well, let's see … It's the same as with the island of Matua. When I was interested in the course of the history of the Second World War, while still at school, I was interested in the message that Matua Island was one of the few that the Japanese surrendered in an organized manner, without a fight. And Soviet soldiers noted that there were traces of tracks of tanks and tractors on the island, but none of them were found on the island, but all traces ended in a tunnel that led to the mouth of a volcano, then boiling with lava. But no eruption.
Several decades have passed and I read that a laboratory plane at the B-29 base, while studying the natural radiation situation around Japan before the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, found derivatives from a nuclear reaction in the air. Of course, the Americans thoroughly dug all the islands of Japan, trying to find traces of laboratories, but alas … they were out of luck.
But I have combined these two facts and put forward a version that it was Matua who could become the laboratory for the creation of the “atomic bomb”. But only when military equipment began to work there, I learned that a German submarine lay not far from the island. This means that the island is not only a laboratory, but also a storage base for substances obtained in Germany. It just so happened that I. V. Stalin did not allow the United States to extend its influence to a number of the Kuril Islands. This leader, “just simply,” never gave the territories of his country under foreign influence. Even in exchange for allied commitments during the World War.