The light of knowledge is capable of illuminating the world no worse than the Moon …
At least as far as academic science is concerned: there are things that it not only cannot explain, but simply does not want to. So God forbid not to violate the established theories. Therefore, scientists make their face simpler and shrug their shoulders, they say, science knows everything, but does not talk about everything … Well, let's go over these riddles:
5. "Young" dinosaur remains
Some scientists are already openly talking about this, but in general, things are still there. The fact is that many of the finds of dinosaurs made in different regions of the globe do not fit into academic theories. Genetic analysis gives dates from several million years to - attention! - 20 thousand years ago! That is, in general, people could find dinosaurs and live next to them, see and even capture their image live. Hence the mysterious drawings on the stones and a number of other facts / artifacts. However, "this cannot be, because it can never be." In the sense that "Dinosaurs became extinct 65 million years ago !!!". And that's all, and cry.
4. Finds of bones of giants
Since anthropoid giants were a very rare species on Earth (artificially bred), it is difficult to expect "multimillion-dollar" evidence of their remains. Nevertheless, the finds of the giants were (and still are), but since they do not fit into the officialdom, they were treated as carelessly as possible: they were hidden in the hiding places of museums, bypassed and even deliberately destroyed. Some places where they are (Nan Madol) are simply ignored: they dug out, looked and … buried back. Away from sin. Because grants for such "theories" will not be given! But, unfortunately, giants are purely practice … And not the most pleasant and cute page of earthly history. Perhaps that's why they hide …
Promotional video:
3. Inconvenient artifacts: the Voynich manuscript, the Phaistos disc, the Antikythera mechanism, etc
They seem to be and … they are not. They are not destroyed, there are references to them in the scientific literature, but … they are considered "undeciphered", "incomprehensible" - and taken out of the brackets of science. Thus, the Voynich manuscript is a book of 246 pages, written in an unknown language with botanical illustrations. Based on the results of radiocarbon analysis, the book was written, allegedly in the 15th century, however, due to the inability to determine the alphabet in the manuscript, it is almost impossible to say which civilization or culture it belongs to. There is no progress in the study of such artifacts, roughly speaking, a "whimsy" (in criminal terminology), which can be ignored.
2. Antiquity of the pyramids and other structures of the "gods"
It's even somehow inconvenient to talk about it, but some of the pseudo-scientific idiots still insist on the fact that the pyramids were allegedly built by slaves with the help of ropes, and relatively recently … There is no need to expand on the stupidity of such statements, they are simply untenable just from strictly scientific point of view, but … Information "for textbooks" remains and is not subject to revision. Despite the obvious traces of high technologies and much, much, much more, there is no point in doubting anymore. It's all about the colossal inertia of the "academicians".
1. Cocaine mummies
Cocaine is a fairly common drug in the modern world. However, German scientists were quite surprised when, in 1992, they examined the chemical composition of the remains of Egyptian mummies and found this drug there. Traces of coca and tobacco were found inside the bones, skin and hair of the embalmed bodies.
This drug was not in Egypt at the time, as it was cultivated in America.
Despite all the simplicity and obviousness, this is an unkillable evidence of contacts between very remote places and continents on Earth at that time. No "separate voyages" (which have not been confirmed) can explain this. This is precisely about a highly developed civilization of the distant past, for which intercontinental distances were not a problem and were a very common thing …