News came from India: near the village of Perumallapadu in the state of Andhra Pradesh, a temple was found under layers of sand at great depths:
The builders were mining the sand and discovered the structure. The thickness of the sand layers even up to the top of the structure is more than 10 meters. And only the dome of the temple was excavated. They dug out with an excavator as far as possible. They write that according to archival data, the temple in this place is not so ancient. He is at most 200 years old. Indeed, the video below will show brick plastered walls and wooden elements inside the building. Although, it is too early to judge, there was no official conclusion yet.
The Indians immediately made it a place of worship. Some have called it one of the Shiva temples. If you do not know where this place is, then you can safely talk about the consequences of the global flood, which also affected India. But the place is located by the Pennar River:
Promotional video:
Link to the map.
From the height of the satellite images, sandy deposits are visible in the river floodplain.
Many rivers in India, including the Pennar River, have the following floodplains and valleys:
During the dry period, when dry, they look like streams. In the dry season, water is collected in the reservoir and the river dries up even more:
Dam on the Pennar River. It also regulates the flow of water during floods. And it is not excluded that earlier, due to such a relief of the river bottom, during the flood water spilled over vast territories, flooding the area. And with the rapid flow of water, it brought buildings along the banks. This happened with this Indian temple. But how could this happen on such a scale that the temple was under 15-20 m layers of sand? The flood should be huge.
I do not exclude that Pennar's crayfish was previously different, not so covered with sand. The plain rivers of the North of Asia have not silted up their channels for all the time! Why did this happen in India? Sand, moreover, is more difficult to transfer in water (particles are larger and heavier) than clay silt. Or the river flows through the area where sand deposits are located.
In general, something was happening in this region that could not be recorded in the chronicles, or there was practically no one to do it.
To understand the scale of sanding, here is a video from an Indian researcher about this news:
In the same video there is information about the discovery of unfinished statues of bulls under the ground.
On this topic, you can read a similar case in India in the article: Ancient buildings of India. Excavation at a depth of six meters.
Here, during excavations in the coastal zone of the river near the building, a boat was found under the layers of soil. The building is quite young, built in the 19th century. This means that once upon a time in India in different places there were global floods. But why is this not reflected in history? Perhaps the British withdrawal from India is connected with this event?