The sensational hypothesis of Valentin Pavlov about the mechanism and reason for such a picture of the structure of the solar system. According to this hypothesis, the terrestrial planets quite recently (not even on an astronomical scale), but by historical standards, revolved not around the Sun, but around Saturn. However, you cannot tell everything in a nutshell, it is better to watch his performance on the Tainam.net channel, or even better to get acquainted with his book in detail … VB Pavlov "The Birthday of the Moon" by following the link. Official site.
The first part of the film introduces the ancient and current ideas about the structure of the solar system. Weak points of the current hypotheses of the origin of the Moon - Earth's satellite.
Nature is not arranged the way we often imagine it. We use a model representation of nature as the basis for cognition. Nature often does not even match our models. But our models allow us to exploit nature and take from it what is useful to us. There are model representations of Ptolemy - Copernicus, Newton - Lomonosov, Einstein - Atsukovsky, Rutherford - Thomson, etc. There are adherents of these models who have migrated into textbooks and are often accepted as dogmas, but these are just models with a huge number of unjustified assumptions and often have nothing to do with true knowledge, but they are suitable for applied matters. We create models and then present them to natural phenomena. And if our model is good, like a "jacket" sits on a natural phenomenon, and with its help you can exploit nature,until the best model appears, we use it successfully until a certain moment. But suddenly observational astronomy throws us a fact that does not fit into the old model or ideas about the phenomenon, then it is necessary to create a new model of this phenomenon.
I have created an effective method for carrying out rather complex generalizations of the knowledge accumulated by mankind. Some of this knowledge is false, and an unjustified reference to it simply hinders further development and leads to an intellectual impasse from which it is not always possible to find a way out. The purpose of this video and information from the book is to teach the correct (critical) attitude to information and, based on true knowledge, put forward viable hypotheses. They may reproach me for not taking a lot on myself? My answer is confident - no. For opponents to whom my hypotheses seem strange or unconvincing, I recommend watching a piece of the video where S. P. Kapitsa speaks just about this intellectual impasse, which has prevented a breakthrough in fundamental science for 50 years. To do this, on a sheet of writing paper,divided in half by a vertical line, where on the left write the claims to my hypotheses, and on the right the statements on the basis of which the refutation is made. Just be consistent and fully understand the truth of your beliefs in your own beliefs. Discrepancies should appear very quickly, especially with you. Information from my films and books to help you!
Quantum theory of gravity or "Theory of the Aether" can explain the effects of orbital resonance and spin-orbital resonance, as well as the nature of the interaction of gravitational waves with themselves and many other observations that Einstein's theory of gravitational field gives in.
Many planets and satellites of the solar system are in the so-called orbital resonance:
Promotional video:
"Orbital resonance in celestial mechanics is a situation in which the periods of revolution of two (or more) celestial bodies are related as small natural numbers."
For example:
Pluto and some other objects of the Kuiper belt (the so-called plutino) are in orbital resonance 2: 3 with Neptune - two revolutions of Pluto around the Sun correspond in time to three revolutions of Neptune;
Saturn and Jupiter are in near exact resonance 2: 5;
Trojan asteroids are in 1: 1 resonance with Jupiter (located at L4 and L5 Lagrange points);
Jupiter's moons Ganymede, Europa and Io are in 1: 2: 4 resonance;
Pluto's moons are in resonance 1: 3: 4: 5: 6;
The modern theory of the gravitational field is unable to explain how the orbits of solids can form such precise and long-lived systems, so opinions are divided into two camps:
supporters of the theories of higher intelligence argue that this is an artificial construction, which was made on purpose by some kind of supercivilization;
scientists, however, made the assumption that the cores of these bodies, liquid and tidal gravitational forces, somehow self-adjusted their orbits in the most optimal way.
Why do the terrestrial planets have a silicate crust, angles of inclination of the axes of rotation, internal structure? Let's collect facts to hypothesize the origin of the terrestrial planets.
The structure of the inner cores of stars and planets can be understood by studying the properties of the fluid compressed between the diamonds of a diamond anvil. A quantum phase transition from the surface of the nucleus triggers the ejection of plasma matter and double and multiple stars are born. Birth of the Sun and ejection of its shell.
Why do the planets all rotate in one direction and mainly in one direction around the axis. How are satellites formed, Why are they turned one side to the mother planet? How did the terrestrial planets acquire their periods of rotation around their axes?.. How did the circumplanetary ring of Saturn appear? Cold thermonuclear fusion at the center of a nascent planet. Oddly enough, the Rank-Hilsch effect and the compression of the gas mixture in the diesel cylinder are of the same nature: in both cases, there is a resonant or increasing pressure in the central part of the chamber, leading to a sharp decrease in entropy in the center and transfer of angular momentum to the periphery. Therefore, at the walls gas (or water) in the pipe heats up to 150˚C, and in the diesel cylinder - up to 700˚C
There was a disaster. How did the terrestrial planets break away from Saturn? The cumulative ejection from the bowels of Saturn gave birth to a rotating vortex of a giant atmospheric vortex. He immediately moved to the point of the South Pole and has remained there until now. On a rapidly spinning Saturn, this movement also happened quickly, according to the law of Coriolis and the gyroscope. The terrestrial planets were in the gravitational field of Saturn and, flying over the vortex vortex, naturally accelerated, because the planet's gravity over empty space is sharply underestimated, and the "law of the sling" enters into action, as a result of which the trajectories of Saturn's satellites move to more elongated elliptical orbits and easily leave Saturn at the Lagrange point. In this case, the second cosmic velocity for Saturn - 36 km / s is not needed. It was enough for the terrestrial planets to cross the border of the Roche lobe for Saturn at any speed and then leave it, heading towards the Sun along a converging spiral curve. And each of the separated planets has already occupied a stationary orbit in accordance with its angular momentum, acquired as a result of separation from Saturn. So everything is real, however …
The seventh part (can be viewed only by clicking on the link)
How did Pluto, Charon and four other moons orbiting in resonance break away from Saturn and become an independent planetary system? Mars and its joined satellites Deimos and Phobos, having made a gravitational maneuver around Jupiter, took up their orbit. Moreover, having encountered the atmosphere of Jupiter, possibly with its small satellites, Mars acquired its dehydrated landscape and the Olympus volcano. Venus, making a gravitational maneuver around Jupiter, passed close, but from the other side than the other planets of the terrestrial group, therefore it lingered and throughout the entire maneuver remained one side turned towards it, its densest part. This contributed to the beginning of the reverse (retrograde) rotation of Venus. As a result of huge dynamic external and internal influences, gas hydrates came out through the crust and formed a powerful atmosphere,92 times the pressure on the Earth's surface. Now Venus is the second planet from the Sun. It simply could not acquire such a dense atmosphere next to the Sun. a solar wind with a speed of up to 1000 km / s would never allow this. Mercury, after a gravitational maneuver around Jupiter, came closest to the Sun and now rotates along a noticeably elongated elliptical trajectory and has an orbit inclination to the ecliptic - 7˚. Academic science has not yet proposed another scenario, but the fact is very much out of the previous ideas about the origin of the solar system … The Earth was moving towards the Sun, flying next to the Moon. After the gravitational maneuver around Jupiter, conditions were created for the soft landing of the Moon and the beginning of its rotation around the Earth. This is the general principle of interaction between the terrestrial planets and their strangely rotating satellites. Pluto captured Charon and the other four satellites in exactly the same scenario as Earth and the Moon.
On Earth, the Flood and Glaciation were simultaneously on the entire planet. Indirect evidence is enough to be convinced of the correctness of the numerous hypotheses put forward by the author about the past and present of the solar system.