One of the techniques that are usually used by "fighters against pseudoscience" of various stripes is to substitute scientific convictions for real scientific data. To put it more bluntly, this is when someone passes off their subjective opinion, while not confirmed by any practical research and experiments, as a science. However, such a substitution is by no means an accident, but a completely worked out method of "dusting the brain", because the "official science" itself in the form split into separate directions, in which it exists now, was created by certain forces not as an instrument of cognition of the surrounding world, but as a tool for controlling the knowledge available to common mankind.
It is also by no means accidental that a false idea of the world around us, as a soulless mechanical machine, in which people themselves are just small cogs, on which nothing depends, was imposed on humanity through the "official science" for a long time. Another slave psychology for the “herd”, designed to strengthen the blind faith in dubious “authorities” and their unfounded statements presented to us as “the ultimate truth”. It is no accident that for a long time the official science imposed on people atheism, which in its essence is the same religion as the religions of the "biblical project", but it is oriented towards more intellectual people.
Nevertheless, his main dogma, taken blindly and fanatically on faith, is the statement about the absence of God. At the same time, this dogma has not been confirmed by any truly scientific methods and, moreover, completely contradicts the elementary logic of the statements of the atheists themselves. For if the surrounding Universe is a mechanical machine, then this itself denies the random nature of its occurrence. But for a person who is not zombified with a blind belief in any dogmas, it is quite obvious that just like every creature has its creators in the person of its parents, in the same way every thing has its creators - chairs, computers, cars, etc. were created by humans. And people can be called the creators of these things.
Similarly, planets, stars, galaxies and the Universe itself have their creators. Science cannot say what happened before the so-called. "Big Bang", which means - nothing can know about its true cause. However, it is quite clear that something was causing it. And this reason is directly related to the Creator of the Universe. So why was atheism slipped into people with its blind faith in the absence of God, the Creator, and I supposedly the accident of the emergence of the Universe itself and life, including on our planet? But is there any concrete evidence that a tornado sweeping over an aviation dump is capable of accidentally assembling a Boeing-777 or at least a simple corn-maker? Of course not. But we can daily observe the creation of aircraft as a result of the intelligent activity of mankind. Consequently, nothing accidentally and spontaneously can appear and manifest itself,but is the result of creative activity - creativity, intelligent labor, creation, etc.
Atheism, with its blind belief in materialism, was created to manipulate people's minds and control their behavior. Only with the help of materialism it was possible to impose on people the psychology of predatory consumers who want to snatch everything here and now, and who do not care about the future in which their grandchildren will live. "After us, even a flood" - this motto is the main sign of social parasitism, so strongly instilled among the people of Western civilization and its colonies. Since there is supposedly no life after the death of the physical body, then everything needs to be done now, within the allotted life of the physical body, and at the same time, regardless of the interests of other people. It was for this that everything was started. Indeed, using parasitic "values", humanity easily turns into a "herd" of stupid biorobots,engaged only in personal material interests. And it is not difficult to manage this “herd” by manipulating the “carrot and stick”. Therefore, one should not be surprised that this "herd" happily runs into the "corral" prepared for it by the parasites and their servants called the "new world order".
But is there really no “life after death”, as most orthodox dogmatists from the scientific community try to convince us? There is no scientific evidence that would refute the possibility of the continued existence of consciousness after the death of the physical body. But real scientists began to seriously study the phenomenon of postmortem experiences (PSP) in states of "clinical death", which confirms that even after cardiac arrest, people not only did not lose consciousness, but also while experiencing a state "outside the body" could observe what was happening in the operating room, at the scene of an accident or disaster, as well as in other places. This was a fairly strong blow to the psychology of social parasitism and the servants of the parasites could not help but react to it.
But what could they oppose? They just came up with another scientific belief that "a dying brain gives rise to hallucinations." Needless to say, this concept is completely refuted by the books of an American doctor, a specialist in the field of the brain - Eben Alexander, who himself experienced a state of deep coma, but even with a completely "disconnected" brain, did not lose consciousness, but experienced the phenomenon of "separation from the physical body" and "out-of-body travel" to other realities of the multidimensional Universe.
But today I want to acquaint you with the opinion of Dr. Michael Sabom, who for years has studied post-mortem conditions resulting from "clinical death". This is how he responded to the publication of an article by Dr. R. Blecker, MD, "Fall asleep and may dream," in the Journal of the American Medical Association, in which he linked near-death experiences with cerebral hallucinations, and called the manifestation of these phenomena "religious conviction." And, as always, absolutely unfounded, but in a different way the servants of parasites, who are "fighters against pseudoscience" and cannot, because they consider their statements, not confirmed by practical research, as allegedly already proven truth.
Promotional video:
So what was written in M. Sabom's letter published in JAMA # 244 for 1984? He writes the following there:
This is just a typical case when false scientific beliefs are presented as supposedly scientific data, which are such only on the basis of practical research and experiments, and not someone's unfounded statements. Of course, among the "fighters against pseudoscience" there are individuals with limited horizons who are not capable of perceiving new ideas that go beyond the outdated paradigm. But a considerable percentage of them are also those who deliberately sold for grants to the parasitic system and now honestly, like a loyal chain dog, work out the interests of their owners, “barking” at those who threaten their interests.
michael101063 ©