The moon is
The natural satellites of the earth are called moons. For example, Mars has two moons. Jupiter has seventy-nine. All planets' moons have a name, and only the moon of our planet has the name Moon. Moon-Moon in general. Actually, near our land, the name has been abolished in our language. So, in English, the earth, in the sense of soil - land, terra, ground, and the Planet is called Earth. Once again - Earth is the name of the planet in English. If you dig, you can find the name of the planet in other languages.
Even if we assume that the visible image is a projection, then it should be projected onto something. So the object really hangs there.
The moon is not what we are shown
I bought a telescope. Unpretentious of course - wrote about him. By changing different eyepieces, changing the degree of magnification, we get the effect of zooming in on the picture with a zoom - that seems to be larger and the details do not become more. The same detail is obtained if you just shoot it with a camera at forty times magnification.
While the development of satellite photography allows (they say) to see the stars on the shoulder straps of the military, to read lips! However, despite the lack of an atmosphere, images of the Moon are much less detailed on Earth. All surface surveys offer only small pieces and can be perfectly captured in terrestrial conditions.
Promotional video:
Where is GUGL LUN I ask you !
You might think about the recently released NASA video of the far side of the Moon flying against the background of the Earth. Not only is there more detail on the Earth than on the Moon, but also the Moon in this picture does not rotate around its axis, unlike the Earth. Quote from the net
"Another mystery: does the Moon rotate around its axis at all? The answer to this question lies in the solution of the semantic problem: who is at the head of the corner - an observer on Earth (in this case, the Moon does not rotate around its axis), or an observer who is in extraterrestrial space (then the only satellite of our planet rotates on its axis). "- so it must rotate!
They explain that this is just an edited video from a heap of photos … So what? A bunch of pictures of the earth rotating and one picture of the moon? Then why this video at all!
Lunar wave.
A lot of videos are posted on various resources. I don’t have mine, so if you ask for "Lunar Wave" you can look it up yourself. It's like a frame change - an image wave that travels across the entire visible surface of the moon.
It is very likely that a projector is hanging somewhere and projects an image onto the disk of the moon. That is why we always see only one side of it. This is of course unsubstantiated, but as a version - quite..
Earthling has not been on the moon
For myself, I have clearly defined and put all the points. Not. There were no Americans on the Moon. I consider the main evidence:
Color photographs are not possible on the Moon. (on tape)
Further excerpts from their network-
I will not give a link to this article, because I did not find the original source, but it is reprinted throughout the network.
So the photo below can be considered a proven fake.
In the next photo, there are no traces both before and after the lunar rover, while the astronaut's tracks are full around and deep enough. And it doesn't work that the rover's tires are wide. In other photos from the same rover, there are complete traces.
Well, I also consider the impossibility of a living being to cross the radiation belts of Van Alen proved. There are a lot of numbers, but the bottom line is that the level of radiation is lethal and so far no methods of protection have been invented. How do they fly to the ISS? The ISS is hanging in the atmosphere.
Moon man made object
The unreal synchronization of the rotation of the Moon and the Earth around its axis - therefore, we see only one side of it. Or it does not rotate at all, then that NASA video is not an invention but a real state of affairs. And if it does not rotate, then what stabilizes it?
The same depth of craters on the surface. Again, if it's a hologram, it's understandable. If not, then there is a solid foundation at a certain depth. These bombs of the Americans and the "buzzing" of the moon after them, proving that it is hollow inside - also speak of man-made.
The inconsistency of information and whether the Moon is approaching the Earth or moving away ?! The scientific community will not agree in any way. Information 50/50. It moves away by 4cm per year, then it approaches! However, there is a version that the Moon, periodically approaching, abruptly returns to its place. It is also certainly not provable, but then all these leaps of scientists here and there converge.
Solar eclipses. The same with what accuracy it was necessary to calculate the diameter of the moon so that it exactly coincides with the visible disk of the sun and exactly overlaps it! And for an observer on Earth, you also need to make corrections for the atmosphere! So that taking into account distortions, refractions and other things. Yes, there is a lot of different things and selective ebb and flow and even the growth of hair, plants and other things that are somehow connected with the lunar cycles - and this is already energy and not moonlight or attraction.
So somehow. For me, the Moon is a man-made object, carefully disguised, designed to monitor the development of earthly life, the course of an experiment. A kind of control panel for the Earth.