For starters, a quote (a separate respect to the comrade DarkAngels who found this news and web-dialog.com, thanks to which people still have the opportunity to discuss it):
Information extremism found a place in the Administrative Code:
In Russia, they propose to introduce punishment for disseminating false information - for example, for public lies. Corresponding amendments to the Administrative Code are now being developed in the Federation Council, the author of the initiative, Senator Irina Gekht, told Izvestia. Fines for individuals for disseminating such information can amount to 50-100 thousand rubles, and the innovation itself is designed to protect citizens from panic caused by the broadcast of unverified data, the senator explained. Lawyers call the measure excessive, while environmentalists fear that only information from official authorities will be considered "reliable".
It is proposed to punish individuals and non-profit organizations for disseminating false information. The idea of developing the document arose due to the increased incidence of so-called environmental extremism, said Irina Gekht. At rallies with environmental demands, citizens are intimidated with unverified information, promising, for example, a massive increase in oncological diseases due to the work of a factory or plant. So, in particular, there are “pseudo-ecological” non-profit organizations that pursue political goals, the senator explained.
- We are now discussing with experts and public figures how to write this norm in the Administrative Code. So that people weigh what they say, and once again do not play on emotions, but give an objective assessment, - the author noted.
The new norm will affect not only the environmental sphere - punishment will be provided for inaccurate information on any topic. As an example, Irina Gekht cited the medical field: authoritative scientific studies have long proven the need for vaccinations, but you can still hear calls not to get vaccinated because of the alleged threat of disability or subsequent diseases. The Ministry of Health is trying to restrict the dissemination of false information, trying, in particular, to ban the propaganda of HIV dissidence, she recalled.
Details of the bill, including the amount of fines, are still being worked out.
“For individuals, fines in the range of 50-100 thousand rubles would be a rather serious punishment that would make people think about what they are saying,” the senator believes.
Promotional video:
At the same time, the author of the initiative admits that it is rather difficult to determine the criteria for unreliable information. Now lawyers are looking for a way "not to infringe on the rights and freedoms of citizens within the framework of the bill" - the developers have no intention of prohibiting the population from pointing out problems or fighting for clean water and air, explained Irina Gekht. Tracking and assessing the reliability of the information disseminated, in her opinion, should be primarily "the authorities in charge of this or that topic."
The proposals of the authors are very difficult to enshrine in the law, and the committee will be able to assess the bill only when it is submitted to the State Duma, Pavel Krasheninnikov (United Russia), head of the relevant Duma committee on state construction, told Izvestia.
Environmentalists and lawyers fear that the wording in the document will be vague and provoke excesses. If only information from relevant government agencies is considered reliable, the rule can be used against residents and civil society, said Sergey Tsyplenkov, executive director of Greenpeace Russia and chairman of the HRC commission on environmental rights. He recalled how, thanks to caring citizens in 2017, Rosleskhoz admitted the underestimation of the areas of fires.
- If only the information of official bodies was considered reliable, these citizens would be considered violators and fined, - the expert emphasized.
Cases of "environmental extremism", when false information is disseminated at public events, have really become more frequent lately, noted Andrey Kornitsky, project manager of the S&K Vertical law firm. In his opinion, such actions must be suppressed by law in the event that they entailed adverse social consequences, such as protests or riots.
It is desirable to protect the population from unreliable and often inadequate information, but the proposed measure is redundant and can be used to fight “too curious citizens,” believes Timur Khutov, a member of the Russian Lawyers' Association.
Andrei Nekrasov, a lawyer and senior lecturer at RANEPA, drew attention to the fact that people can be reasonably mistaken: it is not always clear where the line of credibility lies in this case. He is sure that if the norm is adopted, it will affect not only in-person public speeches, but also statements on the Internet. But so far none of the countries in the world where the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms is in force has managed to come up with an effective protection against the spread of rumors and gossip, the expert concluded.
It is planned to agree on the final version of the bill by the end of April; in late May - early June, the authors plan to submit it to the State Duma.
***
The older generation of our readers should remember well the Internet of 2000, when there were no public dedicated channels, fancy sites and YouTube video streams. Life without smartphones was a bit boring by today's standards, but what political battles were on TV! Even more disputes were going on on the Internet, where people did not name each other as soon as possible. Especially politicians got it.
However, over time, smoothly and gradually, the screws tightened and now, even on the Internet on the forum, very few people will peep, because someone important is somehow not so called “to break”. Several sites where they are not afraid to hang out and publish something are still preserved, but the bulk of people have lost interest in politics, agreeing on the opinion that, since nothing can be said, then you yourself rule as you want.
And instead of politics, the masses took up a more important topic: revision of the official chronology, revision of geographic, archaeological and other academic "research". At the same time, with a sufficiently in-depth study of these topics, it suddenly turned out that it is even somehow concretely connected with world politics.
Enthusiasts and especially advanced ladies and gentlemen have been nagging this topic for a long time, for which many years ago they were branded by “academicians” as “charlatans” and “fraudsters from science”. However, these advanced people never gave a damn about “academicians”, since they were not interested in scientific degrees, but in truth.
It is possible, of course, that some of the theories put forward by some adepts are quite radical and incorrectly describe reality, but so far nowhere, except for medieval Europe, there were laws prohibiting scientists from thinking and speaking. However, it looks like times have changed dramatically again.
Having once lifted his head to the top and saw such a strange crap in the sky, someone scratched his head and called it the word chemtrail. As it is clear from the video - they are, they exist. But officially they are not. That is, this is the same false and unreliable information, for the publication of which a fine of 50 thousand or more is offered.
Hosayleshwara Temple, like ancient India:
As you can clearly see, after visiting this “monument of Indian architecture”, even a downtrodden and semi-literate Mexican housewife will understand that the columns for this temple were sawed on a lathe, which was beyond the power of any “ancient adepts”. And stone skulls, hollow from the inside - this is generally nonsense, machines for the manufacture of such products, even today, do not exist anywhere in the world.
Nevertheless, the "academicians" are the official truth of the last resort. If the “academician” said that all this was cut by hand, it means that it is so. Denial of this fact will be a lie and false information, which is punishable by a fine of 50-100,000 rubles.
And chemtrails and antediluvian technologies are just the tip of the iceberg. There are also buildings covered with soil that survived a cataclysm that occurred no later than 400 years ago.
There are also UFOs that do not officially exist. That is, for public conversations about UFOs, it will be possible to impose a fine, and in the future even plant.
The supporters of the flat Earth can also be sent to geographic courses in Mordovia, where they will be convincingly explained in 5-10 years that the Earth is round, and the Earth's magnetic field comes from a molten metal core. Technically, “academicians” can also be attracted for such a statement, since metals lose their magnetic properties during the transition to a liquid state and therefore they cannot have any magnetic field, as it is written in physics textbooks. But in the court over information extremists for the examination they will attract “academicians” who, apparently, have not read these textbooks.
In general, a very interesting legislative initiative, for which we see two explanations.
The first explanation assumes that the theories of the "false scientists" are the most true, and the world is exactly as they say. And this correct perception of the world goes so far as to contradict official dogmas that it threatens to overturn the entire world politics.
For example, suppose there are aliens on Earth. If so, then perhaps these aliens are in control of everything here? Hence all the cover-up plots. Hence, not even an adequate citizen of Kim Jong-un with everything - and he denies aliens.
Or, suppose that the global flood (or other cataclysm) was not in some Precambrian period, but only 300-400 years ago. In this case, some people, bearers of antediluvian technologies and knowledge, probably remained and, since then, it is these people who rule the world, mediating their secret government through some kings or kings.
In the position of these secret rulers, it would be most correct to hire a horde of “enlightened adepts” who, from the heights of university departments, will prove to everyone that there was no flood and that the Hermitage itself fell underground. Well, if the “academicians” are not believed, then for the “inaccurate information” you need to enter an article until all the secret becomes suddenly clear.
Although the first explanation seems to be the most likely, there is also an explanation for the second, which in the current political situation seems very convincing.
Today we can already say directly that the Third World War has begun. So far, it has not come to a direct military clash, but political and economic clashes have already begun, some kind of sanctions, counter-sanctions, blocking, seizures of capital, etc. have already begun. And in this situation, for the United States, for example, it would be strategically correct to rock the boat in Russia as well. For example, through their agents of influence to push through the country a couple of some idiotic laws that would put the people on the ears.
The law on combating information extremism will be, to begin with, just a wonderful option. If the country begins to prosecute people who say publicly that there are chemtrails and aliens, and that there are forests over 200 years old, that the Earth is quite possibly not quite round, that the planet Nibiru is flying to this Earth, then a lot of people will lose some - or the desire to protect this country from anyone. So, at the place of the relevant services, we would have talked with especially proactive legislators and asked where some legislative acts actually grow from.
