Another war between Tartary and Europe took place at the beginning of the nineteenth century. In our country it is known as the "Patriotic War of 1812", and in Europe it was called "Napoleon's Eastern campaign." Everything in this story is perverted, starting with the name. In order to realize this, it is enough to choose the correct definition of the concept of "domestic". Most refer to native speech as a collection of sounds. But after all, the Russian language, unlike most artificially created in the recent past, has not lost its original meaning. It is like a matrix that simply does not allow you to distort reality.
Now is the time to ask yourself questions: - “Why is the war called patriotic? Middle name, what's this? The same as the Motherland”? But if we answer these questions correctly, it turns out that a patriotic war is one that happens in the fatherland. And if so, then this is nothing but a civil war! Civil, and not a war with an external aggressor. As soon as the realization of this seemingly simple and obvious thing comes, the veil created by modern historians immediately begins to fall from the eyes.
Now it is clear why the Smolensk peasants, upon seeing an officer in a blue uniform (this is exactly how green uniforms were introduced in the Russian army later to distinguish themselves from the French), who spoke French, immediately took out pitchforks or axes, and thus sent hundreds of Russian officers. They were invaders for them. And it doesn't matter where they came from, from Gaul, or from St. Petersburg. Although … Walking through the Halls of the Hermitage's military gallery, one can easily see that in the Russian army of that time, "foreigners" were almost the majority. What does this mean? And this suggests that St. Petersburg and Russia are, to put it mildly, incompatible concepts. Vladimir, Yaroslavl, Novgorod, this is Russia. And the name "St. Petersburg" sounds to the Russian ear about the same as a dog barking. Accident?
Of course not. St. Petersburg can be considered Russia only conditionally, since such an organization as the Holy Roman Empire had no physical boundaries on the map, it was located in fact in most of Europe and North-West Russia. St. Petersburg was not built by the Oldenburgs, or their descendants Schleswig-Holstein-Gottorp and Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. The ancient ancient city, which was partially on land, was captured by them after the retreat of the Baltic Sea. Captured and turned into a staging area for an attack on Tartaria.
That is why the British, Dutch, Danes, Saxons, Holsteins, Prussians, etc., were their own in St. Petersburg, Narva, Revel and Riga. No wonder the people called black cockroaches "Prussians", because they, like cockroaches, rushed from Europe through the "window" open in the Baltic to Russia. The children of impoverished European nobles, finding no other way to make a career, came en masse to St. Petersburg to enlist in the army and navy. And having earned a pension, they returned to their homeland.
One of these was the legendary Baron Munchausen, who existed in reality, and retired as a captain of the Riga cuirassier regiment. By the way, it is clear why he became a popular literary character. The Central Archives of the Ministry of Defense of Russia preserved documents compiled by Munchausen during his service. It's a real pleasure to read them. Firstly, the "German" had an excellent command of the Russian language, which would be the envy of many literary experts. Secondly, the baron was endowed with an amazing subtle sense of humor, and managed to turn dry service reports into literary masterpieces. Returning to his native Bodenwerder, Karl Hieronymus whiled away his time in retirement in one of the pubs, where he entertained friends with stories about Russia, which earned him a reputation as a liar and storyteller.
From the shores of the Baltic, the "Prussians" crawled farther and farther in all directions. In large cities, they founded their settlements, such as existed even before the "opening of the window to Europe", for example, in Pskov and Novgorod. And after all, it is precisely their merit that the Russian city of Pleskov began to be called in the German manner: - Pskow. And immediately after the extermination of the population on the Volga, after the war with the armies of Emelyan Pugachev, ordinary peasants from Europe also rushed to the space "cleaned" of tartar. They, according to the plans of Catherine II, had to completely replace the Tartar population, so that even memories of the past of the Volga region would not remain. Today such a process would be called detartarization.
So, it turns out that Russia would eventually have to speak German. But this did not happen, and most likely, this is why: - During the reign of Russia by Catherine II, more precisely Sophia Augusta Frederica of Anhalt-Zerbst, the globalizers changed their plans. Perhaps it was some kind of compromise, so that "not yours and not ours." The creators of nations and states, in the current sense, to which Catherine and her friend Voltaire were without a doubt, decided to choose for the future united European "nation" not Russian or German, but a third language, French. It was supposed to become the only language for all of Europe, and later supplant Russian and other languages spoken by the peoples of Great Tartary.
Promotional video:
If we succeeded, then today we would not know anything about our past at all. Thank God, this did not happen even after the last obstacle to complete detartarization was removed - Moscow. In the form in which it continued to exist, Moscow was like a thorn in the creators of the new nation. Therefore, it was necessary to urgently reformat it, and turn it from a Tartar city into a European one, as it already happened with most of the large cities that fell under the rule of Catholics.
But voluntarily, Moscow, the city of mosques, did not want to be Christianized, so there was no choice but to completely burn it down. This is also one of the management methods, tested in practice more than once, and has proven itself flawlessly. For this, the tactic of "dragging chestnuts out of the fire with someone else's hands" was chosen. engaging a foreign legion in the dirty work. Such a legion was led by the ambitious, capable officer Napoleon Bonaparte. Experts know that when Napoleon was still 19 years old, he became an ensign in the Russian artillery. But experts do not explain why Napoleon, already with the rank of colonel, continued to wear the uniform of the Russian army!
Emperor Napoleon I. Emile-Jean-Horace Vernet. London National Gallery.
But everything becomes clear when you understand that France was not the enemy of St. Petersburg, but was part of the Holy Roman Empire, the center of which was in the eighteenth century in the north-west of Russia. Then many absurdities written about this mysterious "Patriotic War of 1812" become clear. The French expeditionary force was only part of the army of the Holy Roman Empire, which marched together with the Russian army against Moscow Tartary.
A memorial sign at the place where the Russian and French armies stopped. Bolshiye Vyazyomy estate in the Odintsovo district of the Moscow region.
Let's turn to the main questions that arise when studying this period of Russian history:
1) In the Patriotic War of 1812, the Russian people won in a difficult battle with an indomitable beast named Napoleon, but it is necessary to call things by their proper names, Russia was not at war with France, but with all of Europe. And not Russia, but Moscow Tartary. And whether it was a war in the usual sense is a very big question. Leo Tolstoy's "immortal work" is sinning with such absurdities that even the most ardent skeptics have no doubts that the work was commissioned with a specific purpose - to present, in the version necessary for the authorities, the events of the war with Napoleon.
Many experts come to the conclusion that the novel "War and Peace" was created by a team of authors, if only because Tolstoy himself took part in hostilities, served in Crimea during another war between Russia and Europe, and with another Napoleon (1853- 1856). He simply could not write the monstrous nonsense about the army service, which could only be written by an amateur who did not serve in the army even in the rear, in peacetime.
Now let's take the official history of this war. Every day is documented. The places on the map, the names, the color of the horses and the number of soldiers, guns, and carts on both sides, who took part in each of the battles, are known. Such accuracy would be the envy of a historian - an expert on imperialist (World War I) or civil war. War is, first of all, chaos. Permanent loss of documents and living witnesses. It is for this reason that there are so many mysteries, secrets, and gaps in the history of any war that has died down. And the Patriotic of 1812 described in hundreds of thousands of sources is known every minute! Isn't it strange?
And here comes the understanding that if the state used all available means to create a myth about the war of 1812, then, in fact, there was something to hide.
2) It is immensely perplexing that, having ended the most difficult war in the history of the Russian people (at that time) with victory, all the sculptors and architects for some reason seemed to have gone mad, and began to erect monuments all over Russia en masse in honor of the events of another epoch-making year. Also the twelfth, but not eight hundred, but six hundred. Wonderful wonder! Imagine the following situation: The echo of the Victory salute on May 9, 1945, has not yet died down, and the sculptors together rushed to sculpt monuments to the heroes of the Russian-Turkish war, for example. This is normal? Not. Then why, after the end of the war of 1812, no one thought about perpetuating the memory of the heroes of this war, and all at once concerned themselves with the events of two hundred years ago !?
And that's not it! Just in the middle of the 19th century, and in the second half of it, a boom in perpetuating the memory of the heroes of the war of 1812 swept across Russia. Why were the heroes of the war of 1853-1856 guilty? But no! Monuments, triumphal arches, temples named after the Archangel Michael are erected and erected around, and all this is in honor of those ancient events when they fought not with the third Napoleon, but with his uncle, the First Buonapartius.
The conclusion suggests itself. In 1812, in fact, something global happened, and monuments were erected in honor of this event. But then the policy changed, and these monuments were renamed, in honor of the events of 1612, about which no one among the people remembered anything for a long time. It is the creations of the masters of those years that most likely have nothing to do with those persons to whom authorship is attributed.
And here the fun begins. In Kazan there is a temple built according to all the canons of Masonic architecture, in the form of a pyramid with an "all-seeing eye", built in memory of the soldiers who died during the capture of Kazan in 1552. Guess what year the temple was built? Amazing nearby. In 1813! Those. there is a war in the yard, all the people tensed in the name of victory over the invaders, running through the forests with pitchforks and rakes in search of the lost Musier - Chevalier, and at the same time Ambrose Sretensky is building such a pyramid, and even in honor of the events that have died down two hundred fifty years before him. The logic is where!
This building was built in full accordance with the level of technology of the second half of the 19th century. And the court for registration, in memory of the same event, to which all the other temples are dedicated, on which they began to depict the "all-seeing eye" everywhere. Events of 1552 Is just an excuse. However, it is obvious that it was not just that the temple was erected in Kazan! This means that Kazan was related to those hidden events that are disguised as the Patriotic War of 1812. For those who are dedicated, it should be clear that Kazan, like Moscow and Nizhny Novgorod, until 1812 did not obey St. Petersburg, and continued to remain Tartary. This is clearly hinted at by the serpent Zilant, depicted on the coat of arms of the modern capital of Tartary, very similar to the griffin that was depicted on the banner of Great Tartary.
Then it is clear why the medals of 1812 survived in Paris. not only for the capture of Moscow, but also for the capture of the Volga.
No, apparently, Napoleon did not "hurry", and part of his expeditionary corps reached Kazan. And it was his soldiers who were buried together with the Russians at the construction site of the Kazan pyramid. And this course of events is dictated by logic itself. When the Russian Empire completely defeated Little Tartary (Crimea), and completely began to control New Russia, it remained only to destroy the traces of the existence of Moscow Tartary in the past. And this was done mainly with the help of invaders from Europe. Exactly as the White Army later tried to do, which itself found itself "in the skin" of Tartary during the Civil War of 1917-1922.
I will not enumerate all the funny stories about the invasion of Napoleon's hordes into Russia, they are known to everyone. This is also an absurd explanation of the route, when, instead of going to conquer the Capital, Napoleon, for some reason, went to the provincial Moscow at that time. I will also leave out of the scope the tales about the number of his troops, according to which the vanguard was supposed to enter Moscow, and the rearguard should only move out of Paris. And about the "great Borodino" battle, in which, if all the units announced by the historians had gathered in the indicated place, the cavalry would have to be located in three tiers on top of each other, I will also keep silent.
These questions were investigated most fully by Igor Shkurin, who is the author of the Logistic theory of civilization. To retell it, I consider it a thankless task, therefore I will allow myself to quote from his article "Focuses of the 1812 War":
- We start with well-known facts: the capital of the Russian Empire was Petersburg, the ruling dynasty was the Romanovs.
- The Romanovs are the local pseudonym of the Holstein-Gottorp branch of the Oldenburg dynasty, who ruled the Baltic Sea.
- St. Petersburg was chosen by the Oldenburgs - "Romanovs" as the capital as the most convenient base for penetration from the Baltic Sea into the Volga basin isolated from all seas in order to expand the sphere of their economic influence.
- The main vector of the conquest and development of the territories of Russia by the Romanovs is directed from St. Petersburg (the Baltic Sea) inward of the continent, to the Volga basin along waterways, naturally, in order to pump out useful resources from there. This part of the history of the gradual conquests of the Romanovs was disguised as various "internal" events to create the illusion of a long-term ownership.
- At the same time, additional vectors of the Romanovs' actions were directed there, into the Volga basin, from the Black and Azov seas. This part of history is well known as the continuous wars of the Romanovs with Turkey.
As they say, only a fool can doubt such a situation. Another interesting thing: - Why was this war called the "War of 1812"? After all, it would be logical to call it "The War of 1812-1814"! Everything becomes clear if all the goals of the war were achieved precisely in 1812, and subsequent events did not play any special significance for the Romanovs. This means that the main goal of the operation was to destroy Moscow, and possibly Kazan. And Mina and Fire coped with this task perfectly.
Watercolor A. A. Romodanovskaya. 1945
The initiate will understand that Minin is a mine, i.e. a tunnel made under the wall of the Kremlin, to which Pozharsky unambiguously points with his hand, i.e. the fire that destroyed Moscow. This means that the Kremlin was taken by storm, by blowing up the wall, and then a huge fire was started, after which Moscow was rebuilt, almost from scratch, leaving not the slightest reminder of its Tartar past. And this event was clearly not independent and accidental. It was only one of the theaters of military operations in Eurasia. In fact, "The Patriotic War of 1812." was just an episode of one big war that swept across the northern hemisphere.
As you remember, America's War of Independence began exactly when the Yemelyan Pugachev Riot was suppressed. This indicates the consistency of the actions of the Oldenburgs on the division of Great Tartary in Eurasia and North America. What happened in the world in 1812? Yes, everything is the same. The Second War of Independence of the United States began in sync with Napoleon's Eastern Campaign. Coincidence again? How much is possible, because the "Crimean War" and "Civil War" in the United States also happened at the same time! All this suggests that these conflicts had the same roots, and were global events linked by an invisible thread.
Today we see multiple indirect signs that the British Empire long and persistently tried to get out of the control of the Holy Roman Empire, and finally became independent in 1801. This was the real reason for the attack on the United States and the SRI in the person of Napoleonic France, and Napoleonic America in 1812. Let me remind you that the backbone of the United States at that time was not at all the Yankees, but the French. They owned all of Canada, and most of the states. This country was called New Louisiana, in honor of the Frankish king Louis XIV.
New Louisiana.
Do not trust the generally accepted interpretation of historical events. You need to pay attention only to actual events, and not to their interpretation, set out in textbooks. If we consider the situation in a detached manner, having forgotten everything that we know from school, then inevitably come to the paradoxical conclusions that in fact, everything is not as in reality. In fact, we see joint, coordinated actions of the SRI, in the form of such subjects as the Russian and French empires, in Eurasia and in North America. And these actions are aimed at the division of the territories inherited from the Great Tartary.
In addition, we clearly see the emergence of another significant political force - Great Britain, which, thanks to its numerous colonies, already has sufficient resources to enter the struggle for new territories. Having defeated Napoleon in Europe, the British broke away from the HRE most of its possessions in the west. And by destroying New Louisiana, they also got all of North America. Let the Americans repeat as much as they like about their glorious victory in the war of independence. In fact, the Yankees lost, because to this day the United States is just a British colony.
This is eloquently evidenced by the fact that all but three US presidents, including the last one, Donald Trump, were descendants of the ancient royal Merovingian family, one of the branches of which bears the name Oldenburgs. The illusion of independence has been created for the American "natives", but in fact, all candidates reaching the final of the presidential race in the United States are approved by the Queen of Great Britain. Therefore, it makes no difference who wins the election, the leader from the Republicans, or the leader from the Socialists. Both candidates will not make it to the final of the election campaign without London's approval.
And the leaders of Canada, Australia, and fifty other countries, the Queen does not hesitate to appoint by her own open decree. In addition, the result of the so-called "War of the North and South" was the complete defeat of the Confederates, i.e. those who were the first to begin the division of the North American lands left after the defeat of Tartary. And let the Yankees boast of their victory over the south until the end of time. In fact, this war was the complete conquest of America by Great Britain.
As for the results of the Patriotic War of 1812, here we have a unique result. Remember that whoever slays a dragon becomes a dragon himself. So St. Petersburg, having hung the ancient symbol of Dazhdbog on the coat of arms of conquered Moscow, made an ambiguous hint that Tartaria was finally defeated. But it's not that simple. Having taken possession of the North American lands, Great Britain only got angry, and opened her mouth to the former lands of Tartary in Asia. But it was not there. At this moment, the Russian Empire had already become the legal successor of Tartary, moreover, too strong to defeat him in a direct armed conflict. Great Britain can be convinced of this in 1853-1856.
Author: kadykchanskiy