The other day I came across a man who said that his school taught critical thinking and taught sanity. A wonderful opinion, of course. After all, what I remember from school is how we were told at the beginning about Egypt, and with such caricatures, they say so and so, slaves built by hand, that any person who has critical thinking has curlers on his head. Then about Greece. Further about Rome.
One question - where is our past?
Our past begins already somewhere in pre-revolutionary times, period. And everything is wrong and wrong two hundred times for each politician.
The second point - what is the subtext of school history? I have not heard the history of industry and production. As if none of this had happened. They say even in pre-revolutionary times it was backward and when they talk about us - only sandals and dugouts. The whole subtext is aimed at diverting from the development of the Middle Ages into the plane of constant wars and civil strife, investing in children's thinking from the very beginning - wars, wars and again wars. Not development, not invention, not culture, but only wars. Also why the planet should not be united, but divided into States and why we should dream of the Sovereign and endlessly pay taxes to him.
And I think people with critical thinking should have noticed this. We should be indignant - what kind of Russophobic school is that, which does not say a word about our past.
What did they tell me at school about the Stars?
Promotional video:
Firstly, this is that these are exclusively wooden structures and only for war. This is how they told everyone, judging from how today people, even seeing architectural masterpieces, cannot realize that it is idiocy to fuss over every meter so that it is destroyed by the enemy's weapon.
Red Fort, India.
Secondly, we have such unique structures in Ukraine and there are so many of them, but I have not found a single one in school textbooks. It was not told how it was built and what they, stone and unique masterpieces from the past, in general we have.
The so-called "Tarakanovsky Fort" was no exception. I found out about him a couple of years ago under the article by Pavel Ulyanov "The geography of the global world before nuclear war on the example of the architecture of the Stars." Pasha, under the article, hung cool photos with a comment:
“Look at the fortifications in the center of the Tarakaniv Fort in Western Ukraine. The star itself has not survived, but the infrastructure inside it is intact, more or less. I showed a friend, a military man, he said that to bury yourself in the ground like this only from the damaging factors of a nuclear explosion."
Indeed, Tarakanovsky looks like after a big bang wave - the outer walls have the shape of fused brick. Moreover, many Stars have these reflows. In some, even the brick melted like plasticine, frozen like "icicles".
And the already familiar picture - Tarakanovsky turns out to be a regime facility belonging to the military department. As well as the historical object of the so-called Brest fortress, and Bobruisk - all the stars on the planet turn out to be regime objects - in the West under NATO and in our country it is exactly the same - under the military.
Tourists are still led along the two upper floors, but no one knows the multi-level underground network. And it is very extensive. Now look at how amazing factory bricks are. Bast shoes and dugouts you say? Such a brick is, according to the official legend, a reproach to modern brick for the second century. Secondly - look at the details of the masonry! They did not put bricks here, but they painted all the walls with it. For war? This is funny. These semicircles, these accordions resemble the railing of milk pans. Brick ceilings, stairs.
Do we see the windows? We see. What did they tell us at school that they were covered with a bullish bubble? For that, someone thinks that critical thinking is instilled in a Russophobic school, when he waved his mane to all essays written by someone who did not understand and substituted his ears for noodles. Look at the accuracy of the object from above. We saw it up close, we see it from a height - from what he saw, a reasonable person will never believe in the backward past, which they are trying to snatch from school to us. It's not that it is impossible for modern craftsmen to build such a thing - even for designers it is a whole problem to calculate. I am already silent about the level of development of these designers. Their builders love so much … to put it mildly, the expression is the following: "nit, I remember you, when we get out of this matrix, I'll break your nose right next to your cryochamber."Because the designers of the twenty-first century are in many ways inferior to the designers of the 1800s and even the 12th century, judging by other luxurious objects dating from this time.
And to finish, some text from Wikipedia:
“Work on building up the hill for the New Dubenskaya fortress began back in the 60s of the 19th century. The main ideologist of the construction of a number of fortified areas was the hero of the defense of Sevastopol, military engineer-fortifier Adjutant General Edward Totleben. In 1873, 66 million rubles were allocated for the construction of the fort. In the 70s-80s of the XIX century, the fort was intensively built. In addition to stone and brick, they used the newest material at that time - concrete. Finally, in 1890, members of the royal family inspected the fort, which indicated that the object was ready. The fort is diamond-shaped with sides up to 240 meters. Outside, it is surrounded by a deep moat with earthen ramparts, fortified with powerful walls. In the central part of the fort, a two-storey barracks was erected, to which four underground passages lead, laid under the second earthen rampart."
We keep this excerpt from Wikipedia in mind, as well as the Tarakanovsky masterpiece. This is still useful to us in the fourth part of the elm "We are lied to from the very birth."
Author: Snowfall Bullets