Since the Second World War, the United States has become a global world power. This is evident not only in the fact that the United States, with about 1,000 strong points, serves about 95% of foreign military bases. The United States also dominates economic policy around the world. But not only the US government, but also the financial elite have built a global empire in the last century. However, this is not visible to the general public, although the power of this elite far exceeds that of the United States. This financial empire running in the background is based on three main pillars:
- The first pillar is the global central banking system. Central banks are responsible for monetary policy in a country or currency area. It is important to bear in mind here that almost all central banks around the world are not government agencies, but private banks. In Control of the Rothschilds, it was reported that almost all central banks in the world are controlled by the Rothschild family. This allows the financial elite to provoke economic crises in any country or even around the world. So far, only four countries have escaped their control. These are Cuba, North Korea, Iran and Syria! As reported in the Bankruptcy Elite Strategy, financial crises such as the 1920 US bankruptcy, the 1929 Great Depression,as well as the world economic crisis - 2008 artificially created by the American Central Bank. Thus, both Russia in 1998 and Argentina in 2001 found themselves in a financial abyss - and this is the result of the financial policies of their own central banks. In all these crises, only the financial elite won, thereby significantly increasing their power and wealth. The population plunged into poverty and disaster.
- The second pillar is the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Currently, all countries in the world, with the exception of seven (including Cuba and North Korea), are members of the IMF. Due to the hugely increased government budget indebtedness around the world, almost all countries are now dependent on IMF loans. He is the only possible creditor for states experiencing financial difficulties. However, in order to obtain such loans, the IMF is forcing states to take the strictest austerity measures to ensure that debt is paid for itself and international banks. To this end, the IMF substantially violates the sovereignty of states, as a result of which they lose their financial, economic and political independence. Economics expert Ernst Wolf compares the IMF's demands to a predatory raid "to satisfy the interests of the super-rich."The consequences are unprecedented: disaster and poverty of the population with high incomes for international investors.
“The third pillar of this empire is the US government. According to the revelations of John Perkins, a former US foreign intelligence agent, the NSA, US policy serves the interests of international concerns. According to a study by the Higher Technical School of Zurich, these concerns are closely linked, as they own each other's shares and are also controlled by the financial sector. Thus, the US government is actually an agent of the financial elite. Due to the economic as well as military supremacy of the United States, the rest of the world was systematically forced to obey the interests of the financial elite. Presidents who, for example, wanted to limit corporate power for the benefit of their people, protect their country from exploitation, or maintain the independence of their central bank,were either killed in covert operations by American special services, or removed from office as a result of a coup, or completely openly overthrown as a result of US military intervention.
Here the United States left a long and bloody mark in history:
1953 - putsch against Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh in Iran;
1954 - putsch against President Jacobo Arbenz Guzman in Guatemala;
1960 - Assassination of Patrice Lumumba, the first Prime Minister of the Congo;
Promotional video:
1961 - An attempt to invade Cuba to overthrow Prime Minister Fidel Castro; 1961 - deprivation of power of Kong Le in Laos;
1963 - military coup against Ngo Dinh Diem in South Vietnam;
1963 - military coup against President Juan Bosch in the Dominican Republic;
1964 - military coup against President João Goulart in Brazil;
1964 - putsch against President Victor Paz Estenssoro in Bolivia;
1965 - putsch against President Ahmed Sukarno in Indonesia;
1966 - putsch against President Juan Bosch in the Dominican Republic;
1967 - military coup against Georgios Papandreou in Greece;
1973 - military coup against President Salvador Allende in Chile;
1975 - coup against President Juan Velasco Alvarado in Peru;
1981 - assassination of President Roldos Aguilera in Ecuador;
1981 - the assassination of the ruler Omar Torrijos in Panama;
1983 - US invasion of Grenada following the assassination of Prime Minister Maurice Bishop;
1989 - US intervention in Panama and the removal of the ruler Manuel Noriega;
1981–1990 - US intervention in the Contra war with the Sandinistas in Nicaragua;
1991 - military coup against President Jean-Bertrand Aristide in Haiti;
1991 - US-led military intervention against President Saddam Hussein in Iraq;
1999 - War in Kosovo - NATO military operation under US high command;
2001 - US-led military intervention in Afghanistan against the Taliban;
2002 - failed coup attempt against Venezuelan State President Hugo Chavez;
2003 - Rose Revolution and overthrow of President Eduard Shevardnadze in Georgia;
2003 - the Iraqi war, which in 2006 led to the execution of State President Saddam Hussein;
2005 - Tulip Revolution and overthrow of President Askar Akayev in Kyrgyzstan;
2011 - US-led military intervention against Libya and the assassination of State President Muammar Gaddafi;
since 2011, the war in Syria and the failed attempt to overthrow President Bashar al-Assad;
2014 State coup in Ukraine against President Viktor Yanukovych /
Exactly the same patterns can be observed in the current crises between the United States and Venezuela, North Korea, Cuba and Iran. This is because these governments do not provide international corporations with access to their countries' resources. The central banks of North Korea, Cuba and Iran are also not under the control of the Rothschilds. Therefore, these conflicts - just like the US conflicts with Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya, whose banks were independent before the US intervention - are unlikely to calm down until the existing governments are overthrown and replaced by puppet governments.
Based on these relationships, it can be assumed that many future conflicts, government overthrows, and every economic or financial crisis will bear the imprint of the international financial elite. They act like a criminal syndicate that has no conscience or morality, and which plunges entire nations into destruction for the sake of power and money. It's time to put an end to these criminal machinations and bring the guilty puppeteers to justice.
In the appendix, we suggest looking at the testimony and assessment of the former agent of the American foreign intelligence NSA John Perkins: “There are two ways to conquer and enslave the country. The first is with the sword. The second is through debt. (John Adams, 1735 - 1826). John Perkins: (Former Chief Economist Chas. T. Maine Incorporated, author of Confessions of an Economic Killer). We - the economic killers - were responsible for creating the first truly global empire. And we worked in different ways. But perhaps the most common way to take over a country that has resources like oil is to mediate a large loan from the World Bank or one of its subsidiaries to that country. But, in fact, the country does not receive money. On the contrary,money is received by our companies in this country for the construction of infrastructure projects.
Power plants, industrial zones, ports are what benefit the few wealthy people in this country. In addition to our business. In fact, most people do not benefit from these services. However, the debts remain on these people, throughout the country. This is such a big debt that they are unable to pay it off. This is part of the plan - they cannot repay the debt. And so we economic killers return to them at the appropriate time and say: “You owe us a lot of money, you cannot pay off your debts, so sell your oil very cheaply to our oil companies”, “Let us build military bases in your country ", Or:" Support our military somewhere in the world, for example, in Iraq with your troops ", or:" Vote for us in the next elections to the UN "…. This is to privatize their energy companies,as well as their water systems and VM systems, and sell them to American companies or other multinational corporations.
This is all spinning out of control, and this is so typical of the IMF and the World Bank. They put countries in debt, and these debts are so high that countries cannot repay them. And then countries are offered to refinance these debts and pay additional interest. They demand "Quid pro quo", that is, "quid pro quo", this is the so-called conditionality or "effective management" - which, in fact, means that they have to sell their resources, many social services, utilities, and sometimes and school systems, including the penitentiary system, the insurance system - and, of course, all this is sold to foreign corporations. Here, the attack is manifested more powerful in two, three, four and no matter how many times!
Iran 1953. The precedent for an economic killer began in the early 1950s. When the prime minister Mossadegh was elected in Iran on a democratic basis. He is a bulwark of democracy in the Middle East and around the world. Time magazine named him "Person of the Year". But one thing he set in motion was the idea that foreign oil companies should pay the Iranian people much more money for the oil they export from Iran, and the Iranian people should benefit from oil. Strange politics. Of course we didn't like it. But we were afraid to do what we usually do: send an army to the country. Instead, we sent one CIA agent. Kermit Roosevelt is a relative of Teddy Roosevelt. Kermit came in with a couple of million dollars and had exceptional success in a very short time. He succeeded in overthrowing Mossadegh and attracting the Shah in his place. A person who was positive about oil. And it was very effective. After returning to the US and Washington, people appreciated the deal, saying "Great, it was pretty simple and cheap." Thus, a completely new path was laid: the manipulation of countries, the creation of an empire. The only problem with Roosevelt was that he was a certified CIA agent. If caught, it would have rather serious consequences. At this point, a decision was made very quickly to use private consultants. To send money to the World Bank or the IMF or one of these agencies - send people like me who work for private companies. So that there are no consequences for the government if we are caught.who was positive about the oil issue. And it was very effective. After returning to the US and Washington, people appreciated the deal, saying "Great, it was pretty simple and cheap." Thus, a completely new path was laid: the manipulation of countries, the creation of an empire. The only problem with Roosevelt was that he was a certified CIA agent. If caught, it would have rather serious consequences. At this point, a decision was made very quickly to use private consultants. To send money to the World Bank or the IMF or one of these agencies - send people like me who work for private companies. So that there are no consequences for the government if we are caught.who was positive about the oil issue. And it was very effective. After returning to the US and Washington, people appreciated the deal, saying "Great, it was pretty simple and cheap." Thus, a completely new path was laid: the manipulation of countries, the creation of an empire. The only problem with Roosevelt was that he was a certified CIA agent. If caught, it would have rather serious consequences. At this point, a decision was made very quickly to use private consultants. To send money to the World Bank or the IMF or one of these agencies - send people like me who work for private companies. So that there are no consequences for the government if we are caught.saying "Super, it was pretty simple and cheap." Thus, a completely new path was laid: the manipulation of countries, the creation of an empire. The only problem with Roosevelt was that he was a certified CIA agent. If caught, it would have rather serious consequences. At this point, a decision was made very quickly to use private consultants. To send money to the World Bank or the IMF or one of these agencies - send people like me who work for private companies. So that there are no consequences for the government if we are caught.saying "Super, it was pretty simple and cheap." Thus, a completely new path was laid: the manipulation of countries, the creation of an empire. The only problem with Roosevelt was that he was a certified CIA agent. If caught, it would have rather serious consequences. At this point, a decision was made very quickly to use private consultants. To send money to the World Bank or the IMF or one of these agencies - send people like me who work for private companies. So that there are no consequences for the government if we are caught.then this would have rather serious consequences. At this point, a decision was made very quickly to use private consultants. To send money to the World Bank or the IMF or one of these agencies - send people like me who work for private companies. So that there are no consequences for the government if we are caught.then this would have rather serious consequences. At this point, a decision was made very quickly to use private consultants. To send money to the World Bank or the IMF or one of these agencies - send people like me who work for private companies. So that there are no consequences for the government if we are caught.
Guatemala, 1954. When Arbenz became president of Guatemala, the United Fruit Company and large international companies dominated the country. His campaign promise was to return the country to the people. And when Arbenz came to power, he put into action the mechanisms that were supposed to lead to the fulfillment of this promise - to return the right to land to citizens. United Fruit didn't like this. So they hired an advertising agency and launched a huge campaign in the United States to convince the US population, the American press, the US Congress that Arbenz is a Soviet puppet, and if we let him stay in power, the Soviets will have one foot at the doors of the Western world.
At that time, everyone had a great fear of the Red Communist Terror. Then, to shorten the story a little, the CIA and military operations to destroy Arbenz came out of this PR campaign. And in fact, we did it. We sent planes, soldiers and terrorists there. We hooked up everything to destroy it. And we destroyed it. As soon as he was removed from office, the new man who came to power after him again transferred practically everything to international companies, including the United Fruit Company.
Ecuador, 1981. Ecuador has been ruled by dictators for many years, and often very brutal, but maintaining friendship with the United States. Then it was decided to hold real democratic elections.
Jaime Roldos ran for president and said his main goal as president is to ensure that Ecuador's resources are used to help the people. And he won by an overwhelming majority - with more votes than anyone ever elected in Ecuador. He began to introduce guidelines according to which oil revenues were channeled to help people. Okay, but we didn't like it in the USA. I was sent there, as one of many economic killers, to change Roldos, bribe and convince him: “Jaime, everything is clear, you know what to do. You can become rich, you and your family, if you are with us … However, if you continue the policy that you promised, you will disappear …"
He didn't want to hear anything. He was killed. After the plane crashed, the entire area was cordoned off. The only people allowed to be there were people from the nearby US military base and some of the Ecuadorian military. When the investigation began, two key witnesses died in car accidents before they could testify. Many very strange things happened in connection with the murder of Jaime Roldos. I, like most other people deeply involved in this matter, had absolutely no doubt that it was a matter of murder.
And, of course, in my position as an Economic Hit Man, I always knew that something would happen to Jaime. It would be either a coup or a murder, I was not sure - in any case, he would be eliminated. It was impossible to bribe him. He didn't give in to the pressure the way we wanted it.
Panama, 1981. Omar Torrijos, President of Panama, was, as you know, one of my favorite politicians. I really liked him. He was very charismatic. He really wanted to help the country. And when I tried to bribe him or give a bribe, he said: “Listen, Juanito, I don't need money. What I really need is fair treatment for my country. I want the United States to pay the debt it owes my people for all the destruction that has happened here. I need to be in a position where I can help other Latin American countries gain independence and free themselves from this terrible influence from the north. You gutted us too much. I want to return the Panama Canal to the Panamanians. This is what I want. So leave me alone. You know that, so don't try to bribe me. " It was 1981, Jaime Roldos was killed in May,and Omar understood that perfectly. Torrijos told his family: "Perhaps I will be next, it is understandable, because I did what I came for."
I was negotiating a channel again. The channel will now be ours, and we just negotiated a deal with Jimmy Carter. In June of that year, just a few months later, Torrijos was also killed in a plane crash that was no doubt orchestrated by CIA-sponsored mercenaries. There are many indications that one of Torrijos's bodyguards, at the last moment, as he entered the plane, handed him a tape recorder, a small tape recorder containing explosives. I find it interesting that this system continued to operate in much the same way - over the years, except that the "economic hitman" got better and better. We then focused on dealing with what happened recently in Venezuela. In 1998, Hugo Chávez became president-elect - after a series of highly corrupt presidents who basically destroyed the country's economy. And Chavez was elected at this time. Chavez opposed the United States. He did this by demanding that Venezuelan oil be used in the interests of the Venezuelan people. Well, yeah, we didn't like that in the United States. So there was a coup d'état in 2002, which in my opinion - and in the opinion of many others - was undoubtedly carried out with the involvement of the CIA.
The manner in which this coup d'état was fueled reflected well what Kermit Roosevelt did in Iran. He paid people to take to the streets, brawl, protest, said that Chavez was unpopular. But if you attract several thousand people for this, then television can give the impression that the whole country is on the streets, and action begins to spread. Except in the case of Chavez: he was smart enough, and people stood behind him so confidently that they overcame it all. It was a tremendous moment in Latin American history.
IRAQ 2003 Iraq is indeed a great example of how the whole system works. We, the economic killers, are the first line of defense. We go inside, we try to bribe the government and force them to take these huge loans, which we then use as a means of coercion, in order to control them in principle. If we fail, as I did in Panama with Omar Torrijos and Ecuador with Jaime Roldos, people who refuse to take bribes, then our second line of defense is to send assassins. And then the murderers overthrow the government or kill. Then a new government comes to this place. They obey because the next president knows what will happen if he doesn't. In the case of Iraq, these two measures were unsuccessful. Economic assassins have not been able to penetrate Saddam Hussein. We tried our best to get him to accept an agreement that was very similar to the one accepted by the Saudi dynasty in Saudi Arabia. But he didn’t agree. And then the killers came to kill him.
They failed, he had very good security. After all, he once worked for the CIA himself. Hired to assassinate a former Iraqi president, he failed. But he knew the system. So in 1991, we sent an army and destroyed the Iraqi army. At that moment, we assumed that Saddam Hussein would come to his senses. Of course, we could have killed him at that moment, but we didn't want that. He was one of those "strong people" we like. He controlled his citizens. We thought he could control the Kurds, keep the Iranians within his borders, and keep producing oil for us. And if we destroy his army, he will change his mind.
So, the "economic killers" returned again in the nineties, but to no avail. If they were successful, he would still be in office. We would sell him all the bombers he wanted. Anything he wants. But they were unsuccessful. The terrorists again failed to remove him. So we sent in the military again, and this time we did the job ourselves and took him out. And at the same time, we entered into several very, very lucrative construction contracts to rebuild the country that we practically destroyed. Which is pretty good when you own very large construction companies. So, in Iraq, all three steps are indicative.
The "economic killers" failed there, and neither did the terrorists. And, as a last resort, troops were sent. And so we created a real empire, but we did it very, very secretly. It's a secret. All the empires of the past were created with the help of the army and everyone knew that they were creating it. The British knew they were creating it. French, Germans, Romans, Greeks. And they were proud of it. They always had excuses. Such as the spread of civilization, the spread of any religion, something like that. But they knew who did it. We are not. Most people in the United States have no idea how we benefit from the benefits of a secret empire that there is more slavery in the world today than ever before. Then the question arises: well, if this is an empire, then who is the emperor? Obviously, our presidents of the United States are not emperors. The emperor is the one who has not been elected, is not limited in time and practically does not report to anyone. Thus, our presidents cannot be included in this category. But we have something that I consider to be the equivalent of an emperor. And this is what I call corporatocracy (merger of companies and politics), as it were, dominance of corporations. The corporatocrats are the group of people who run our largest companies. And they really behave like the rulers of this empire. They control our media. Either directly, by owning them, or through advertising. They control most of our politicians as they finance their election campaigns. Either through concerns or private donations that come from concerns. They are not elected. They do not have a limited tenure. They should not be accountable to anyone. As for the top of the corporatocrats themselves, it is impossible to say with certainty whether a person works for a private company or for the government, because this is constantly changing.
For example, someone is currently the president of a large construction company such as Halliburton. The next moment he is the Vice President of the United States. Or the president of the oil industry. And this is true, it doesn't matter whether Democrats are in office or Republicans. Everywhere there is a constant alternation, as if walking through a revolving door. And in a sense, our government is invisible most of the time. And these strategies are implemented by our companies at one level or another. Government strategies are practically driven by concerns. They are presented to the government and then become government laws. This is a very close relationship. This is not a conspiracy theory or anything like that. These people don't need to get together and plan what they want to do. They all work on almost general terms, such asthat they should maximize their profits. And this is regardless of the social and environmental costs.
From the Kla-TV program
