Many of the mountains of the Urals have been called "stones" since ancient times. And surprisingly, the name is purely Russian, and this alone speaks volumes. Once upon a time in Russia, the Ural Mountains themselves were also called "Stone". When was this name changed to the present - Ural? The Russian writer, traveler, researcher of the secrets of past civilizations A. Kadykchansky believes that the change of these names took place after the defeat of the remnants of Tartaria by the troops of foreign mercenaries called up by the Romanovs to keep the illegally seized Moscow throne.
These events in official history are now known as "the uprising of Yemelyan Pugachev." And it was after him that the city of Yaik became Ural, and the Yaik river was renamed Ural. Apparently by the name of the river, the history falsifiers renamed the entire mountain system to "Ural". Nevertheless, behind the individual mountains of this system, the name "stones" is still preserved. Moreover, some of these mountains once housed the remains of the structures of a megalithic civilization. In my post titled “How megaliths turn into“outliers”over time,” I showed how the megaliths of Mount Kochkanar, one of the highest mountains of the Urals, looked like 150-170 years ago. And the difference between the engraving of the 1840s and their present appearance due to the destructive action of natural elements and time is very significant. That is why now the remains of these megalithic structures bear little resemblance to an artificial structure.
But it turned out that these were far from the only Ural megaliths. Another ancient megalithic complex was once located on a mountain called Konzhakovsky stone. Until now, these ancient structures, although severely damaged by erosion, are quite impressive in their appearance. Of course, scientists have convinced us that this is supposedly a "natural natural formation", but in reality it is not. Why am I so sure? Yes, because I came across an amazing description of these places, given in the encyclopedic publication "Picturesque Russia - Our Fatherland in its land, historical, tribal, economic and everyday meaning" volume 8, published in 1901 based on the materials of expeditions of Russian scientists and travelers to the Urals in the middle and second half of the 19th century.
And here's what you can read about the description of these places:
First, of course, it is interesting why this Russian-language encyclopedic publication uses the English system of measures for the height of mountains. But on the other hand, the description of the megalithic complex clearly indicates that it received strong destruction as a result of either a natural disaster or destructive weapons. By the way, there are interesting remains of these stone structures on the Serebryansky stone mentioned in the text.
And if we compare the engravings of the 19th century depicting the megaliths of Mount Kochkanar with their current photographs, we can roughly imagine how the megalithic complex of the Konzhakovsky stone actually looked like 150 years ago, if travelers saw in it a clear resemblance to "bastions", "Gates" and "a wall cut with embrasures." Of course, we do not see any of this now. But this is precisely what is indirect proof that we are talking about an ancient artificial structure that did not spare time, and not about “natural natural formation, as all those who are interested in hiding our true history are trying to convince us.
Of course, this is only a hypothesis, not a proven fact. Indeed, for its accurate confirmation or refutation, an expedition to these places and a thorough study of these stone structures are needed. But after all, such Russian researchers as A. Kadykchansky and G. Tymnetagin discovered clear signs of the artificial origin of the Kolyma megaliths. And thanks to the interesting film by A. Kadykchanskiy "The elder brother of Machu Picchu", we can see these signs with our own eyes, not relying blindly on the unfounded statements of hired chatterboxes of the parasitic system that this is supposedly a "natural natural formation".
Well, the already well-known megalithic complex in Gornaya Shoria, explored by the expeditions of G. Sidorov and other independent researchers, in general causes the extreme displeasure of the Vatican, which stands behind the total project of falsifying history. Rather, he is displeased with the information about this complex, which is freely available. And this is no coincidence. After all, such discoveries tell us that similar megalithic complexes were located on many other mountain peaks. And, apparently, that is why they partially survived the previous catastrophes, which supposedly occurred in the late 17th and mid-19th centuries, and did not turn out to be buried by a thick layer of sedimentary rocks, as happened with most of the cities of Tartary in Siberia.
That is why these cities are still inaccessible for research, and Siberia looks like an allegedly “non-historical” and initially “wild and sparsely populated” territory. And precisely for this reason, a more thorough study of the remains of ancient megalithic complexes located on the tops of the mountains is necessary, where, I am sure, many interesting discoveries await researchers. And to make these discoveries it is not at all necessary to rush headlong into the far corners of the planet. where famous tourist centers are located with recreated by archaeologists a remake of ancient megalithic complexes. After all, there should be a lot of such complexes on the territory of our country. And many of them are marked with the characteristic name “devil's settlement”, which already indirectly indicates their artificial origin.
michael101063 ©