I think everyone knows that there are pyramids in Egypt, a little less people know about the existence of pyramids in Mesoamerica, and the smallest part of the world's population knows about the existence of pyramids all over the world. But in Russia? What if the very first civilization appeared in the north of Russia, and then the fashion for pyramids went further? Let's figure it out.
Look at this beauty. "Experts" in the comments will begin to talk about the natural origin of this pyramid, but the trouble is, it turns out that this structure is officially recognized as man-made. Moreover, its age is estimated at 9000 years !!!
What conclusion can we draw? This pyramid is older than the Egyptian ones, but what kind of civilization built it? Nobody knows. There is, of course, a version that the ancient civilization on the territory of the Kola Peninsula existed 40,000 years ago, but so far it is impossible to prove this.
Here is another creation of the "Arctic" civilization. If we consider that this structure may also be about 9000 years old, then it is still well preserved. Of course, no one knows the builders of these pyramids and for some reason foreign archaeologists are not going to visit our pyramids, but why? It's very simple. Nobody benefits from admitting that civilization could come from the northern regions. After all, everyone knows about Egypt, Greece, the Mayan civilization, and Russia is superfluous here. But for now, let's move on.
This drawing cannot be ignored. It clearly depicts a person. The Sami believe that Kuiva is depicted on the rock. Kuiva is a legendary giant of Sami mythology, who was aggressively disposed towards people and killed them, and the Sami gods struck him with lightning.
Promotional video:
Official science believes that the drawing appeared due to cracks and an abundance of moss in them, but the drawing has been known for more than a hundred years and has not changed in any way. Therefore, I do not agree with official science.
I think many people have a question - where does the figure of 40,000 years come from? Pay attention to the photo:
Traces of stone processing are clearly visible. These numbers are not accidental. Several expeditions were sent to the Kola Peninsula. In 1922, the expedition of A. Barchenko discovered traces of the "Arctic" civilization, but the NKVD tried to bury them, destroying all the participants of the expedition.
In 1997 V. Demin also led an expedition to these areas. He was able to prove the existence of an ancient city, but his find is not amenable to publicity. Because a plausible refutation of these discoveries is not yet ready.
It is impossible to deny - these megaliths are man-made. I believe that civilization died in some kind of global catastrophe. It is to these blocks that scientists assign an age of 40,000 years.
And now the next "natural" education. The remains are not just trails, but a road that is lined with concrete slabs. There are traces of high technology, careful stone processing, but how in ancient times it was possible to achieve the construction of such blocks?
I believe that people lived on this territory in ancient times, and they were distinguished by their intelligence, imagination and had rather high technologies of stone processing. It is possible that it was from these lands that the first civilization went to the south, spreading the culture further to the whole world. Perhaps this is the ruins of the once great Hyperborea, which was repeatedly mentioned by ancient historians.