Snowmen are periodically found in temperate regions around the globe. There are tens of thousands of photographs and videos in which they are depicted. Footprints and clumps of fur of these cryptids have been recorded by numerous researchers. However, mainstream science refuses to acknowledge the existence of the yeti.
In particular, because scientists allegedly do not have a Bigfoot skeleton. Hence a logical question arises: why has no one still obtained the bone material of the Bigfoot?
Yeti remains - a needle in a haystack
Let's start with a scientific hypothesis. As you know, paleontologists, archaeologists and evolutionists create the images of bygone biospheres, relying on the remains of extinct animals. The totality of such material finds represents the so-called paleontological chronicle, reflecting with a high percentage of reliability what was on Earth before. Despite this, the fossil record is never complete, since the remains of many real-life animals are simply not found by scientists.
The skeleton, contrary to popular belief, is not eternal and tends to decompose. The more time separates us from the death of a creature, the less likely it is to find its bones. Say, finding the remains of a marsupial wolf is easier than the remains of a mammoth. A mammoth is lighter than a dinosaur. Decomposition of bones is a physicochemical process. It is believed that the former owner of the bone, which has lain in the natural environment for more than 60 thousand years, will no longer be identifiable.
In addition, the number of fossil animals that paleontologists can find is directly proportional to the population of these animals. In other words, the remains of the once numerous creatures are easier to unearth than rare ones. Who said that Bigfoot used to be a large percentage of all creatures living on Earth? If there were very few of them, then the remains of at least one representative of this species may be so rare that they will never be found.
Promotional video:
By the way, the discovery of the entire skeleton of a relict hominid is something from the realm of fantasy. As a rule, researchers find only fragments of skeletons, and the smaller such a fragment, the more difficult it is to determine the type of animal. Paleontologists are used to pride in their ability to reconstruct fossil skeletons from individual bones, but the possibilities for such reconstructions are far from limitless. If you can still say something about the entire skeleton from the lower jaw or upper vertebra, then, for example, a separate rib is literally useless for scientists.
The scarcity of the fossil record is noticeable even to the eye. If you look at the world map of paleontological finds, it becomes clear that only some modest areas of our planet have been well studied in this regard. For example, the East African valley of Olduvai or the Kostenkovsky district in the Voronezh region of Russia. And even there, only a few hundred square meters of land were explored as thoroughly as possible, and this is less than one billionth of the area of the entire planet. Now imagine how many places that paleontologists may never reach at all.
The skepticism of the people of science makes everything worse
Bigfoot should be, like you and me, a hominid - a representative of the family of the most intelligent and progressive primates. This means that the Sasquatch must have the same build type as the Homo Sapiens. Therefore, individual bones of the Yeti may well be mistaken by scientists for fragments of a human skeleton. It should not be forgotten, however, that most paleontologists refuse to believe in Bigfoot.
This means that if they actually get their hands on Bigfoot bones, experts can easily attribute them to the remains of our Neanderthal ancestor. Thus, a kind of vicious circle turns out. There is no one hundred percent proof of the yeti's existence yet, so people of science do not believe in it. And if such evidence suddenly appears among specialists, then scientists will try to fit them into the generally accepted scientific model. That is, experts, knowingly or not, will try to come up with any explanation for such evidence, except the true ones.
Imagine that a huge flying saucer hovers over the Kremlin for several days, and then rushes off into space. Thousands of ordinary people and reporters will be able to film it. Let's think about it: how many people end up admitting the existence of aliens? What will the scientists talk about? Surely many of them will say that it was a hologram, some kind of experimental aircraft of the American military, or even a mass hallucination. Even having on their hands indisputable evidence of the existence of something like this, eminent professors will try to rationalize what happened in their own way. What can we say about some kind of vertebrae and ribs of Bigfoot …
Rare footage
In addition, there is an opinion among conspiracy theorists that scientists still find the remains of the snowmen, but they hide this information from the public. This is done because researchers have long denied the existence of sasquatch, and such findings will certainly make scientists look stupid. Therefore, it is easier to destroy evidence and continue to maintain your lucrative authority. No wonder they say that science is the same mafia. Try to prove to the world the existence of snow people, aliens or ancient giants. If your evidence suddenly turns out to be too believable, you may simply be "removed". There is a carriage and a small cart for such examples.
Snowmen also bury their dead
If in the forest today you can stumble upon the remains of Homo Sapiens, then, probably, in such cases we are talking about various tragedies. For example, about a predator attack, murder or accident. In all other cases, we bury or cremate the dead. However, why do we think that snowmen just fall to the ground and die? Are they really that undeveloped? Many far more stupid animals prefer to leave before death in special places and give up the spirit, hiding there. And elephants, for example, generally bury their dead relatives - just like people …
American Yeti researcher Benjamin Chamberlin is convinced that Bigfoot people also prefer to die in comfort, while the relatives of the deceased sasquatch take care of his body. According to Chamberlin, some snowmen bury their dead in the earth in very remote places. Other tribes, according to the researcher, take the bodies to caves and leave them there. Due to the cold, the remains are kept in good condition. If scientists ever discover such an amazing cave full of dead yeti, an unprecedented sensation will occur. If people of science, of course, do not want to hide this fact.
Bigfoots don't leave their remains in our reality
Finally, there is a theory according to which the sasquochies do not come from this world at all, but from a parallel one. Snowmen, they say, periodically find themselves here, leave their traces, sometimes fall into the lenses of cameras and video cameras, but they never die in our reality. Experts who adhere to this hypothesis believe that Bigfoots are incredibly smart, have hypnosis, telepathy, and they are subject to free movement between worlds. Try to catch this …