There are two main hypotheses in the world regarding the origin of man. According to one of them, man originated from God, in other words, was created in his image and likeness. According to the other, man is a descendant of a monkey …
The first hypothesis, of course, flatters Homo sapiens. Still would! Man is the crown of nature, created in the image and likeness of God himself. It sounds proud! Basically, the adherents of this hypothesis are religious people. And there are more than two billion of them on planet Earth now. While boasting of their divine kinship, they somehow forget the story that man has long departed from God and, like the prodigal son, wanders around the restless, “eating pig slop” (Bibl.). Another obvious fact that is overlooked is that God is neither man nor woman. He is sexless by his divine nature, moreover, he is triune.
But if we consider that the physical appearance of a person is the image and likeness of God, it should be recognized that the great apes are made according to the same “blueprints”. After all, great apes are really very similar to humans. Especially on some …
Observations and conclusions
There is no doubt that monkeys and humans are quite similar in appearance. Charles Robert Darwin drew far-reaching conclusions from this observation. On April 5, 1859, he sent the first three chapters of his manuscript, The Origin of Species by Natural Selection, or Conservation of Favored Breeds in the Struggle for Life, to the publisher. After the publication of his work, an unprecedented commotion arose in society, resulting in a real scandal. And disputes about Darwin's correctness do not subside to this day.
It must be said that Darwin did not immediately come to the conclusions that so amazed his contemporaries. But finally, he was convinced that he was right by the existence of "hairy people." This was exactly what Julia Pastrana was, advertised by the owners of the circuses as a female gorilla. Charles Darwin considered these people to be the missing link in evolution between ape and man. He even described Julia in his work, because, thanks to the fact of her existence, he was finally convinced of the origin of Homo sapiens from a monkey.
From Charles Darwin's description, it follows that Julia had a luxurious beard, long hair covering the entire body, and two rows of teeth in each jaw. Her face, especially in profile, looked like a monkey's.
Who looks like whom?
Many modern scientists still adhere to Darwin's theory and are looking for evidence in its favor. After all, great apes are very similar to people not only in their appearance or some habits, but also genetically. But scientists still cannot decide from which monkeys man originated. From a chimpanzee, orangutan or gorilla?
DNA studies have shown that about 95% of human genes are similar to those of chimpanzees. On the other hand, humans have as many as 28 physical attributes similar to the orangutan (seven with a gorilla and only two with a chimpanzee).
Humans and orangutans, for example, have the same tooth structure and arrangement. And the results of experiments in the last third of the 20th century prove the ability of great apes and some other higher vertebrates to master the simplest analogs of human speech, that is, to learn and use “intermediary languages” for communication.
Could it be that our ancestors are monkeys …
Such a belief, of course, does not flatter a reasonable person, but it creates the illusion that he has strongly evolved in his development. At the same time, the idea of the divine origin of man with his subsequent departure from God to the present state testifies to the significant degradation of homo sapiens since those ancient times …
Perhaps Darwin and his followers made correct observations, but erroneous conclusions? After all, this happens quite often.
It is believed that great apes really are an intermediate link between humans and animals and were once human beings. But it so happened that they trampled on their human nature, neglected the bestowed possibilities of existence in the image of a man, and departed even further from God. As a result, their development went on a downward spiral, involution. That is, monkeys are an example of how low a person can fall. Longing for human life
If you look more closely at the habits of different breeds of monkeys, their appearance, then the hypothesis proposed above will not seem too implausible. There are packs with a rigid hierarchy of power, almost like in modern gangster organizations. There are very aggressive monkeys, prone to violent fights for any reason, but there are also quite lazy ones. There are predators and one hundred percent vegetarians. There are monkeys in whose herds all members constantly and randomly copulate with each other, just like some people, devoid of moral guidelines and the concept of love.
There are monkey communities where the strongest males fiercely fight for the place of the leader of the herd. And for the place of the favorite of the leader, the dominant female, there is an equally fierce competition among the ladies. When looking at male baboons with their brightly painted muzzles and bare heels, certain associations involuntarily arise with men of non-traditional sexual orientation or transvestites. The behavior of many chimpanzees is suggestive of an incorrigible exhibitionist or nudist. The craving of some monkeys for drawing and a penchant for primitive labor leads to the idea that these creatures yearn for human life.
Filtering knowledge and alternative opinions.
“The age of Homo sapiens is not 50-100 thousand years, as some scientists believe, but many times more,” said the famous American archaeologist, anthropologist and specialist in the field of archaeological anomalies, Dr. Michael Cremo. - This is evidenced by numerous archaeological finds, and in various parts of our planet. The oldest finds from Shegayanda date back at least 125,000 years. And this is far from the limit!
By the way, archaeologist John Sanford, who made this discovery, was fired from public service by the efforts of his furious opponents, and tons of collected finds were buried in the storerooms of the Canadian National Museum. Powerful power structures were used to take possession of at least a few artifacts. And this is just one example of the so-called knowledge filtering. This situation arises because, recognizing the facts of such a solid age of a person, science will face a difficult task.
After all, then we will need to change our view of the origin of humanity! Therefore, the facts are hushed up. Despite the fact that in different parts of the world - England, Central Asia, China, South and North America - archaeological finds have been found that do not fit into Darwin's theory. They testify to the existence of Homo sapiens at least 50 million years ago. According to Darwin and his followers, even the most distant human ancestors did not exist at that time.
There was no evolution?
But if Darwin was wrong, then it means that man did not appear as a result of evolution. But as? The mystery of the origin of Homo sapiens still exists.
“Man is a creation of God,” says Michael Cremo. - There was simply no evolution. For humans, evolution is a return to the original. But not to monkeys, but to God, who is love. Man has lost love, that's why he fell. Actually, only the ability to love and create distinguishes humans from animals, but many people still neglect these opportunities, cultivating in their lives what monkeys have.
Lana BREEZE
Secrets of the twentieth century