Another mysterious fire, about which little is known. In the vastness of the Internet, the event is described very briefly, and the plot of the development of a fire looks like a competent story. The official version claims that the city of Seattle in 1889 was completely wooden, they say, the material is cheap. Therefore, when glue caught fire in one of the woodworking workshops, it was the beginning of the largest fire! Well, considering that the city was "completely wooden", naturally, it burned out to the very foundation!
If the city was completely wooden, then whose brick structures are they?
Plywood walls and "wooden" bricks ?! And then what? …
Probably a cardboard?
Just look at these huge destroyed buildings. But the official version claims: the city was completely wooden, even the pipes through which the water flowed were made of wood! But in the photographs, we clearly see the once beautiful structures, the height of which was about 30 meters or more. To believe that such severe destruction was caused by a fire is simply unthinkable!
Promotional video:
An even more serious argument for the theory that fires were not involved, are prompted by numerous events associated with similar urban destruction within the same year. For example, the Chicago fire of 1871 has similar devastation. And another important fact: wooden pillars and some trees did not burn down, but brick buildings collapsed like houses of cards! In an article on the Chicago fire in 1871, I briefly described a possible version of the fires that occurred. I recommend reading it!
Author: ARTEM YANOVICH