Probably not everyone is able to believe that there was once a temple of antique construction in Yegoryevsk near Moscow? But, nevertheless, a lot speaks in favor of just this. So, a few months ago, I drew attention to the fact that the historical part of Yegoryevsk, just like the historical part of St. Petersburg, Peterhof, Kronstadt and some other ancient cities in Russia, is oriented towards the old antediluvian pole. And this suggests that, at least, the historical part of Yegoryevsk was built on the foundations of ancient buildings destroyed by the cataclysm. In addition, the ground floors of these newly rebuilt houses are covered with soil and silt after the disaster of the mid-19th century.
This was confirmed by my virtual research of photographs and the official history of the construction of the two main currently operating churches of the city - the Old Believer Church of St. George the Victorious and the central Orthodox church of the city - the Alexander Nevsky Cathedral. I have already talked about this in detail earlier in my posts and videos. But, surprisingly, there was another temple in this city, much more ancient, beautiful and majestic. and it was built according to ancient technologies from standard white sawn stone. It is no coincidence that it is still called "white stone".
Its official history of construction says that this temple was allegedly founded in 1826 by High Priest Filaret when he passed through Yegoryevsk to crown Emperor Nicholas I in Moscow. At the same time, the link in Wikipedia leads us to Filaret (Drozdov), who was Metropolitan Kolomenskoye and who really lived in the first half of the 19th century and really participated in this coronation. But, surprisingly, on such a significant day for Yegoryevsk, not a single thin artist or even a draftsman was found to capture this fact on canvas in the form of at least a simple drawing. But this is far from the only oddity in this story. For 9 years of the official construction of the cathedral, there is also not a single drawing or engraving that would confirm that it was built at this very time.
So, Metropolitan Filaret really participated in the rite of the wedding to the kingdom of Emperor Nicholas I, and this event took place on August 26, 1826. By the way, it was on the same day that he received the title of Metropolitan. True, in the article devoted to him in Wikipedia, for some reason, the fact of laying the white-stone Assumption Cathedral in Yegoryevsk is not mentioned at all, but the Kremlin's Assumption Cathedral is often mentioned. where the wedding to the kingdom of Emperor Nicholas I took place. There is also a list of monasteries and sketes built with the blessing of Metropolitan Filaret. It is difficult to say whether this Filaret is the very "high priest" who laid the first stone on the construction of this temple or not. But more on that later.
And we will continue to study the official history of the construction of this amazing antique building, which has survived only in photographs and reproductions of the second half of the 19th - early 20th centuries. Approved. that the Assumption Cathedral, which was also called the "White Cathedral", was designed by the architect OI Bove in the Empire style and was built in 1830-1839 at the expense of Yegoryevsk merchants. At the same time, the cathedral impressed with its size and consistency of style. And this cathedral accommodated 5 thousand people, while the population of the entire city was 3 thousand people.
Indeed, the first question that arises at the same time: why was it necessary in such a small town in the Moscow province as Yegoryevsk was then, to build a cathedral with a capacity that was almost twice the number of its inhabitants? The second question that arises in this case is the very Empire style. in which this cathedral was executed. Is it that Yegoryevsk merchants had nowhere to put their money to in order to build a temple in their city, comparable in size and architecture to those in Moscow? After all, the services of the same O. I. Bove also cost a lot, if according to his own project and at the same time, almost all the buildings of an antique type in Moscow were built, as well as several other churches in the Moscow province.
Promotional video:
For example, it was according to his project, according to the official version of history, that such famous Moscow buildings as the Bolshoi Theater, Manezh, Triumphal Gates, as well as many churches in Moscow and the Moscow region were built. In general, if you see a building in an antique style in Moscow, or a church in Moscow and the Moscow region, which in their appearance more resembles an antique than an Orthodox church, then you can be sure. that it was built according to the design of the ubiquitous architect OI Bove.
Only the construction of the Krivyakino estate in Voskresensk could not be attributed to him. Firstly, the official construction date does not coincide with his years of life. and secondly. apparently the size was not impressed. After all, OI Bove loved to build on a grand scale: once he made Yegoryevsk residents happy with a handsome cathedral, worthy of a capital city, into which two people of such a city as Yegoryevsk could be gathered. Well, the indefatigable energy of this OI Bove can simply be envied. So, for example, only in 1830-1839, when under his leadership this antique-looking temple in Yegoryevsk was being built, he also supervised the construction in Moscow of the Triumphal Gates, the Gradskaya Hospital, the Church of the Great Ascension at the Nikitsky Gates, the Church of the Life-Giving Trinity in the Danilov Monastery, Trinity Cathedral in Klin,and also supervised the reconstruction of the Church of All Who Sorrow in Moscow and the Church of the Intercession of the Most Holy Theotokos in Krasnoe Selo.
Can you imagine that? And this despite the fact that all these buildings are made not according to standard, but according to individual projects of this architect, and after all, all this needs to be kept in your head and not to confuse the drawings, constantly moving from one construction site to another, and even in the distant first half XIX century, when there was still no developed railway network in our country. For example, traffic on the Voskresensk-Yegoryevsk railway opened only in November 1870. Well, it became possible to get from Moscow to Voskresensk by train only 8 years earlier. But those who wrote the official history of the construction of all these structures are absolutely not embarrassed by anything.
But let's return to the ancient Yegoryevsky temple, which, according to Wikipedia, “was a large four-pillar five-domed temple with side porticoes and a multi-tiered bell tower. Side-altars Nikolsky, Georgievsky and Alekseevsky. Its length was 95 arshins, and its width was 42 arshins, the height of the bell tower was 100 arshins. " And although Wikipedia is silent about what material this temple was built from, the very name "White Cathedral" already tells us that it was built of white sawn stone. Why am I focusing so much on this detail, because the white sawn stone of a single standard sample, as independent researchers of the secrets of the past have already found out, is a "visiting card" of the ancient civilization and its high technologies.
By the way, if you take a closer look at some of the surviving photographs of this cathedral, then on those constructions where there is no whitewash, antique white stone masonry is clearly visible. And the design of the arched vaults of the interior also testifies to the fact that it was originally an ancient temple. And only in the middle of the 19th century, with the money of local merchants, they purchased bells and decorated the interior with Christian painting. Here I completely agree with the official version.
There is also indirect evidence in favor of the fact that this temple was an ancient building that survived the catastrophe of the late 17th century, which destroyed the ancient civilization. Of course, apparently, this building required some repairs, and therefore could only adapt it to a Christian church closer to the middle of the 19th century. And this, by the way, logically explains its huge size, absolutely awkward for a small county town of that time. Well, the story with Metropolitan Filaret can also be explained. Why did everyone decide that "Right Reverend Filaret" is precisely Metropolitan Kolomna, who lived at the beginning of the 19th century? It seems to me that the fact of his presence at the coronation of the Russian emperor in the Assumption Cathedral of the Kremlin was used to invent the whole story with his allegedly laying the first stone of this cathedral in 1826.
Imagine, Filaret (Drozdov), instead of rushing to the Dormition Cathedral in Moscow for the coronation of the emperor, he drives into a small district town and lays down a temple there that can accommodate two residents of this city. And this despite the fact that he has not yet become Metropolitan of Kolomna. If only they had come up with a more believable story that he did it on the way back without haste and with the joy of becoming a metropolitan. But did he have the right to lay the first stone of such a huge church before being a metropolitan? That's the question.
Imagine a person who has not yet been appointed minister of construction, on the way to the inauguration ceremony of the president, calmly and without haste calls into some district center to lay the first stone of some grandiose construction and only after that goes to the inauguration, after which he is appointed minister. Isn't it some kind of nonsense turns out. So I can't believe that the future Metropolitan of Kolomna could have done this.
By the way, another Filaret is known in history, who was the Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia, and so the years of his life are 1553-1633. And so he then could participate in the laying of this ancient temple, which was clearly built before the catastrophe of the 1690s, which changed the position of the poles. But whether this was really the case - we do not know. Of course, they may object to me that Yegoryevsk itself was formed as a city only in 1778. But settlements existed here before. And given the careful work of the forgers over the past centuries, one must understand that the true picture of the past is quite distorted. And therefore the assumption about that. that before the catastrophe of the 1690s, which destroyed the ancient civilization, a fairly large ancient settlement could have existed on the site of present-day Yegoryevsk, it has a right to exist. And since there was a settlement, then a temple could have been built, which in those days was a technical, not a religious building. However, about this his appointment - a little later.
Another indirect evidence in favor of the fact that the Assumption Cathedral was originally an ancient temple is its absolutely illogical destruction in 1935 under a clearly far-fetched pretext. So, the official explanation says that the temple obstructed traffic in the city. And this is in 1935? You know, in the previous 10 years I traveled to Yegoryevsk for work at least once a week and I can say that compared to my native Voskresensk, thanks to the layout that has many parallel streets, there are still no traffic jams in Yegoryevsk. And the only place where you can sometimes get stuck for 15-20 minutes is a railway crossing crossing the road to Voskresensk. And they are trying to convince us that this temple was blown up due to the fact that it allegedly interfered with traffic in the 1930s. Was there really more vehicles thenthan now? Apparently they really consider us to be idiots.
By the way, my colleague in the federal fire service and a good friend who, being a resident of Yegoryevsk and drew my attention to this temple and some other interesting historical buildings of this city, believes that they blew it up just to hide the fact of its construction back in ancient times time. But personally, I believe that this is only one of the reasons, and the main reason was somewhat different, although directly related to ancient technologies.
In a photograph taken a moment before the explosion of the cathedral on April 17, 1935 (and this fact, in contrast to its foundation and construction for history, was captured), not only elements of antique white stone masonry are clearly visible. I draw your attention to the strange "obelisk" in the foreground in front of the cathedral on the left. And so strange wires are still visible there, going from the obelisk to some metal structures of the pin type, in the upper part of which there is a certain "ball".
And those who are studying the technologies of the past related to the use of etheric energy and atmospheric electricity have already guessed that we have before us a real power plant, which was used for the needs of this building. Therefore, the ancient temples were just power stations. Most likely, initially, the structures of the colonnades in interaction with the obelisk represented a molecular condenser in ancient times. For those who are interested in how such a construction worked, I refer to Alexander Romanov's video clip “Knowledge of the Ancients”, which I already mentioned in my post “Where did the obelisk at the Kazan gathering in St. Petersburg disappear”, in which he explains all this with the help of technical terms telling how this technology was used to illuminate and heat buildings and even protect them in antiquity.
However, after the catastrophe that destroyed the ancient civilization, many of these structures were damaged, and their simple copying due to the lost nuances of this technology did not allow many of the restored power plants to be restarted. And then, the people of the inter-Flood civilization began to use devices for collecting etheric energy for heating and lighting. These devices, made in the form of strange "vases" or pins with "balls" at the top, can be seen in many engravings and paintings of the 18th century.
And only after the catastrophe of the middle of the 19th century, which covered the first floors of buildings around the world, and a new redistribution of the world by new elites, as well as rewriting history and science at their request, this technology was made "forbidden" By the way, among the photographs of the Assumption Cathedral in Yegoryevsk, there is one that was taken a short time after this disaster. And this can be clearly seen from the condition of the streets adjacent to the temple.
But it seems that during this last catastrophe, this ancient structure was also lucky. The building itself not only did not collapse (here they are - ancient technologies!), But it also seems that the cunning Yegoryevsk priests managed to restore the power plant, which already provides the Orthodox church, if not with heat, then certainly at least with lighting. Well, the fact that this power plant survived until 1935, when the Trotskyist-Zionist gang, which flooded the country with blood, had not yet been defeated and sent to the camps for their crimes, and signed the death warrant both to her and to the cathedral itself, so that they would not embarrass those who have not lost the ability to think for themselves and ask "bad" questions to official historians.
And of course, the "fiery" Trotskyists could not fail to fulfill the order of their masters - the Jewish banking clans - to destroy the "forbidden" technologies and artifacts. That is why it was this temple that was blown up under a far-fetched pretext, without touching the rest of the city's temples, which have survived to our time. All this logically answers the question that many of the residents of Yegoryevsk are now asking, looking at the combined photos of old and modern photographs and wondering: "Who could have got in the way of such a beautiful cathedral?" I answer - to the very forces that falsified history and science, hiding from us the truth about our true past and about the "forbidden" technologies of past civilizations, which would not allow the servants of these forces to constantly increase energy tariffs, receiving super-profits for fuel and energy transnational corporations,tied to traditional energy.
Of course, the version I have presented here is just a hypothesis. not proven truth. But, nevertheless, it logically explains both the strangeness of the official history of the construction of this temple and its barbaric destruction a little less than 100 years ago. Unfortunately, in our time, the servants of the same parasitic satanic forces continue to "clean up" and loot artifacts of the past all over the world and especially actively in the Middle East, where artificially provoked wars are still going on with the use of terrorist rabble financed by the richest banking clans and royal dynasties of the Earth, which became thanks to their black deeds - "black aristocracy." And in the same way, many interesting artifacts of the past have been preserved only in photographs.
michael101063 ©