No, I understand everything, man is a small creature. If you look from space, and in general, entomological. But is it really impossible to compensate for the small growth with the breadth of consciousness and try to consider the whole picture as a whole, without getting hung up on a tiny fragment where someone laid three huge bricks?
Why is everyone buried in this ̶S̶o̶n̶y̶ ̶T̶r̶i̶n̶i̶t̶r̶o̶n̶ Trilithon, when right there, in Baalbek, a whole landscape of historical strata opens up, several thousand years long, with such turns that three, albeit giant stones, become small grains of sand?
So, let's cure strabismus, take our eyes off our nose and plunge into the world of previous civilizations. Step by step, holding the jaw.
For a start, a little local reconnaissance. Baalbek is located in the Middle East in a valley between mountain ranges in Lebanon. Let's pretend that we do not notice the Arab terrorists running back and forth and continue our inspection.
Before us is a plateau on which we see the ruins of Roman temples in honor of Jupiter, Venus and Bacchus. Teetotalers and Alcoholics Anonymous see the latter as a temple of Mercury. Low-drinking scientists have not yet decided.
Three stones around which all alternative activists are running are in the western wall of the Temple of Jupiter. The approximate dimensions of each are 21.3 - length, 4 - width, 4, 8 - height. If all researchers are in relative consensus with the size, then the weight of the stones is already beginning to vary depending on individual preferences. Standard scientists estimate it as 800 tons, non-standard from 1 thousand and above, depending on the power of the creatures to whom they attributed their manufacture.
Promotional video:
The composition of the stones does not cause heated disputes in any of the communities - it is limestone. Firstly, because you can chop off a piece and chemically prove that this is not an alien meteorite, and secondly, there is a limestone quarry a kilometer away with an abandoned workpiece of the same size and shape. He, like Trilithon, has a name. Even a few. I chose the "Stone of the Pregnant Woman", you can also choose to your liking.
In addition to the weight and size, many are surprised by the accuracy with which the stones are fitted to each other. Let's not remember Freud in vain, but as in the case of the blocks of the Pyramids, for some reason everyone wants to insert something between the stones. In Giza, these were blades; in Baalbek, they operate with needles. In both cases, no one was able to stuff anything there. I am beginning to worry about the sex life of the researchers and the size of their working apparatus.
Another mystery is the location of the giant blocks in the wall. If they were at the very bottom, then it would be possible to build a theory of a "retaining wall" that protects the entire complex from sliding, earthquakes and other soil erosion. The ambush is that they stand in the middle of the masonry, on smaller and, accordingly, light blocks. On the sides and on top, they are also supported by God knows what. Somewhere Roman cobblestones, somewhere Arabian "Ishak" construction equipment "from what horrible, what was left of those who knew how to build."
The vile Romans really did not leave any documentation about him. And as you know, what is not printed in the newspaper, that cannot be, even if it is before your eyes. As I understand it, historians are waiting for a crazy Jewish bomb that could accidentally fall on the complex during preventive strikes against Hazbollah. There was still hope for Ishil, but there were already few of them, thanks to the Russian troops, and historians had not yet transferred the full payment for Palmyra.
Nevertheless, there are still some versions, but everyone interferes with them, including the local residents, who, as luck would have it, remember all their legends and claim that the Romans, in general, have nothing to do with it. They say that Baalbek was built before the Great Flood by Adam's son Cain. Yes, thus a fratricide. Cain began to build the city, because God sent him to the settlements of Eden. I hope everyone understands why? However, during the flood, the water turned everything into ruins, which, having dried their clothes after the water disappeared, were restored by the "race of giants" under the command of Nimrod, King of Sinar from the book of Genesis.
This spoils the whole picture for scientists and leaves us at a loss. Who built it? And when?
One could discard the legends of local storytellers, but they have an interesting catch that adds a couple of percent to their weight. No one comes up with a legend according to which your hometown was built by one of the most vile characters in the Bible, and besides, it was exiled from Eden. In normal people, the founders are always white and fluffy, often with wings and a halo. And here it is!
Scientists claim that Baalbek emerged as a convenient trading port, that in principle, there may be rivers there. Excavations of the courtyard of the Temple of Jupiter have shown the presence of a mound that dates back to 2900-2300 BC. This shook the claims that the Romans built. Then they found hundreds of tombs in the rocks, which, as it turned out, belonged to the Phoenicians.
The Phoenicians are one of the Achilles' heels of all historical science. They preceded the ancient Greek civilization, invented everything, perhaps, from different ships to the alphabet, built cities and ports on the coasts, but historians mention so little about them that sometimes it seems that they are doing it on purpose.
The ancient Jews and their vengeful god Yahweh were especially disliked by the Phoenicians. In the Bible, he promised his followers all the Phoenician lands, all Phoenician women and all Phoenician men. “They will be in your service, forever and ever, from head to toe, from small to large” - this is from there. Those Phoenicians who decided to resist were supposed to be burned, cut and exterminated in every possible way. Read the Old Testament - purely a meat grinder, more abruptly than any horror films.
Even Christ, in later times, incorrectly called the Phoenician woman with a sick child - dogs, when they asked him for treatment. True, then he came to his senses (how could Christianity be spread to other nations with such an approach?), Condescended and cured. And, yes, in the Bibles the Phoenicians appear as the Canaanites.
In the Bible, in general, almost all non-Jewish peoples are called Canaanites - the descendants of Ham through his son Hanan, so that one can safely identify them with the "goyim".
Science today is also dulling about the Phoenicians. Scientists' minds scattered in different directions and cannot understand whether it was one people or a mixture of different, but friendly ones. How the Phoenician cities were governed and where there is central subordination is still a big question.
Some consider them the first world trade (economic) empire.
And, yes, our name sounds ridiculous and gives off dates. In Latin transcription, everything is somewhat more majestic than Phoenic without one letter Phoenix. Both bird and people come from the same root name for the color - purple. For color blind people, purple is a mixture of purple and red.
The main god worshiped by the Phoenicians was Baal (in Slavic transcription), he is also Baal (in non-Slavic), hence Baalbek, because Bek is just a city. He was revered as the god of sunlight, the creator of the world and the universe. You have correctly understood the analogy - in the Jewish faith he was transformed into the devil, he is Lucifer, who brings light.
March 14, 2018 4.5 thousand views 1.8 thousand reads 25 minutes 4.5K views. Unique visitors to the page. 1.8 thousand reads, 41%. Users who have read to the end. 25 minutes Average time to read a publication. What's wrong with the megalith from Baalbek? No, I understand everything, man - the creature is small. If you look from space, and in general, entomological. But is it really impossible to compensate for the small growth with the breadth of consciousness and try to consider the whole picture as a whole, without getting hung up on a tiny fragment where someone laid three huge bricks? Why is everyone buried in this ̶S̶o̶n̶y̶ ̶T̶r̶i̶n̶i̶t̶r̶o̶n̶ Trilithon, when right there, in Baalbek, a whole landscape of historical strata opens up, stretching for several thousand years, with such turns that three, albeit giant stones, become small grains of sand? So,let's cure strabismus, take our eyes off our nose and plunge into the world of previous civilizations. Step by step, holding the jaw. For a start, a little local reconnaissance. Baalbek is located in the Middle East in a valley between mountain ranges in Lebanon. Let's pretend that we do not notice the Arab terrorists running back and forth and continue our inspection. Before us is a plateau on which we see the ruins of Roman temples in honor of Jupiter, Venus and Bacchus. Teetotalers and Alcoholics Anonymous see the latter as a temple of Mercury. Low-drinking scientists have not yet decided. Three stones around which all alternative activists are running are in the western wall of the Temple of Jupiter. The approximate dimensions of each are 21.3 - length, 4 - width, 4, 8 - height. If all researchers are in relative consensus on size,then the weight of the stones is already starting to vary depending on individual preferences. Standard scientists estimate it as 800 tons, non-standard from 1 thousand and above, depending on the power of the creatures to whom they attributed their manufacture. The composition of the stones does not cause heated debate in any of the communities - it's limestone. Firstly, because you can chop off a piece and chemically prove that this is not an alien meteorite, and secondly, there is a limestone quarry a kilometer away with an abandoned workpiece of the same size and shape. He, like Trilithon, has a name. Even a few. I chose the "Stone of the Pregnant Woman", you can also choose to your liking. In addition to the weight and size, many are surprised by the accuracy with which the stones are fitted to each other. We will not remember Freud in vain, but as in the case of the Pyramid blocks, for some reason everyone wantsinsert something between the stones. In Giza, these were blades; in Baalbek, they operate with needles. In both cases, no one was able to stuff anything there. I am beginning to worry about the sex life of the researchers and the size of their working apparatus. Another mystery is the location of the giant blocks in the wall. If they were at the very bottom, then it would be possible to build a theory of a "retaining wall" that protects the entire complex from sliding, earthquakes and other soil erosion. The ambush is that they stand in the middle of the masonry, on smaller and, accordingly, light blocks. On the sides and on top, they are also supported by God knows what. Somewhere Roman cobblestones, somewhere Arabian "Ishak" construction equipment "from what horrible, what was left of those who knew how to build." It seems that when the Romans were building their temples,and at the cost of incredible efforts of thousands of slaves, they laid their huge "small" bricks suddenly giants came running, drove the midgets away and laughing loudly, under a glass they hewed out another at the Trilithon quarry. They put it on an unfinished wall. They were also going to throw a fourth stone, but then a window in the heavenly dome opened and my mother strictly ordered the children to go to dinner. Thus, "The Pregnant Woman" is lying around, unfinished in her career, and "Triliton" did not become "Chetyreliton". After standing for a while in silence in amazement, the Roman architect ordered the slaves not to stare at the sky with their mittens open, but to continue working as if nothing had happened. At the state acceptance, the cunning contractor tricked on the sketch of the project with an eraser and to the question of a higher authority - "What is this asymmetrical garbage in your wall?"ran up with corrected drawings signed by Caesar. The officials decided that the head on the shoulders was more expensive than common sense and did not insist on alteration. At the grand opening, just in case, they took Caesar everywhere except the western side, and all documents, including drawings, were burned in the Library of Alexandria, having previously sent those involved in the project to the unknown, then still, lands of South America, so that they, for an hour, would not let slip about this incomprehensible insert. Finding themselves in the middle of an empty continent, an architect, a contractor and a thousand slaves, for some time were in despondency, bored without Roman society and women. When the call of nature intensified so much that the former leaders of the construction site, sighing and mentally overshadowing themselves with crosses, as if asking for forgiveness, began to look closely at the young slaves, a flock of great apes accidentally ran by. The pretty young men from among the slaves breathed a sigh of relief, and the issue was resolved without sexual violence. The mass pecking of the cutest anthropoid (this is important!) Primates was the beginning of the civilization of the Inca and Maya. Having in their genome the DNA of the architect of the temple of Jupiter, they subsequently learned by an effort of will to summon the very giants who laid Trilithon. Thus, the megalithic structures of South America arose, including the pyramids and Machu Picchu. The ending, unfortunately, was predictable - the giants began to tire of the exorbitant exertion and whimper. Hearing that in the sandbox, someone offends her children, a giantess mother came down from the sky and trampled all the Incas and Mayans to hell, grabbed the offspring in her arms and took them home. That evening, she found the nearest repair office in the telephone directory, and the next day, parent-controlled double-glazed windows were installed on the window. The issue with new megaliths on Earth was closed. This version of events in one fell swoop explains how the American Indians built their structures, how their civilization arose and how died, and also why the Romans did not have any mention of the construction of Baalbek temples. Perhaps, of course, everything was not so, but these three stones actually enter scientists into such a stupor that they prefer not to notice them, like, by the way, the entire Baalbek complex. The vile Romans really did not leave any documentation about him. And as you know, what is not printed in the newspaper, that cannot be, even if it is before your eyes. I understand historians are waiting for a crazy Jewish bombwhich can accidentally fall on the complex during preventive strikes against Hezbollah. There was still hope for Ishil, but there were already few of them, thanks to the Russian troops, and historians had not yet transferred the full payment for Palmyra. Nevertheless, there are still some versions, but everyone is hindering them, including the local residents, who, as luck would have it, remember all their legends and claim that the Romans, in general, have nothing to do with it. They say that Baalbek was built before the Great Flood by Adam's son Cain. Yes, thus a fratricide. Cain began to build the city, because God sent him to the settlements of Eden. I hope everyone understands why? However, during the flood, the water turned everything into ruins, which, having dried their clothes after the disappearance of the water, was restored by the "race of giants" under the command of Nimrod, King of Sinar from the book of Genesis. This spoils the whole picture for scientists and leaves us at a loss. Who built it? And when? One could discard the legends of local storytellers, but they have an interesting catch that adds a couple of percent to their weight. No one comes up with a legend according to which your hometown was built by one of the most vile characters in the Bible, and besides, it was exiled from Eden. In normal people, the founders are always white and fluffy, often with wings and a halo. And here it is! Scientists claim that Baalbek emerged as a convenient trading port, that in principle, there may be rivers there. Excavations of the courtyard of the Temple of Jupiter have shown the presence of a mound that dates back to 2900-2300 BC. This shook the claims that the Romans built. Then they found hundreds of tombs in the rocks, which, as it turned out, belonged to the Phoenicians. Phoenicians -it is one of the Achilles' heels of all historical science. They preceded the ancient Greek civilization, invented everything, perhaps, from different ships to the alphabet, built cities and ports on the coasts, but historians mention so little about them that sometimes it seems that they do it on purpose. The ancient Jews and their vengeful god Yahweh were especially disliked by the Phoenicians. In the Bible, he promised his followers all the Phoenician lands, all Phoenician women and all Phoenician men. "They will be in your service, forever and ever, from head to toe, from young to old" - it's from there. Those Phoenicians who decided to resist were supposed to be burned, cut and exterminated in every possible way. Read the Old Testament - purely meat grinder, more abruptly than any horror films. Even Christ, in later times,not politically correct named a Phoenician woman with a sick child - dogs when they asked him for treatment. True, then he came to his senses (how could Christianity be spread to other nations with such an approach?), Condescended and cured. And, yes, in the Bibles the Phoenicians appear as the Canaanites. In the Bible, in general, almost all non-Jewish peoples are called Canaanites - the descendants of Ham through his son Hanan, so that one can safely identify them with the "goyim". Science today is also dulling about the Phoenicians. Scientists' minds scattered in different directions and cannot understand whether it was one people or a mixture of different, but friendly ones. How the Phoenician cities were governed and where there is central subordination is still a big question. Some consider them the first world trade (economic) empire. And, yes, our name sounds ridiculous and gives off dates. In Latin transcription, everything is somewhat more majestic than Phoenic without one letter Phoenix. Both the bird and the people come from the same root name for the color - purple. For color blind people - magenta is a mixture of purple and red. The main god worshiped by the Phoenicians was Baal (in Slavic transcription), he is Baal (in non-Slavic), hence Baalbek, because Beck - it's just a city. He was revered as the god of sunlight, the creator of the world and the universe. You understood correctly the analogy - in the Jewish faith he was transformed into the devil, he is also Lucifer, who brings light. It was not possible to erase the memory for good. But he blackened it notably (enlarge the picture, otherwise Zen cut it off arbitrarily, scoundrel). It was not possible to erase the memory for good. But he blackened it notably (enlarge the picture, otherwise Zen cut it off arbitrarily, scoundrel). It was not possible to erase the memory for good. But he blackened it notably.
It is also believed that the Phoenician faith later formed the basis of the Greek, and then the Roman. Then, in general, they did not take a steam bath and simply renamed the pantheon. Good advice when you see a grandfather with a beard on the throne before saying, “Oh! Jupiter is sitting , come closer and read the tablet, maybe it's Zeus!
In the Bible, Baalbek is mentioned as Valaaf (Balaat in the Latin Bible) and is described as a fortified fort of the Jewish king Solomon, despite the fact that Baalbek is generally considered the birthplace of Walla, who is almost the devil. If you now have a feeling of disharmony of mind, confusion of mind and you want to follow Professor Preobrazhensky from “Heart of a Dog” to ask: “Who stood on whom? Take the trouble to express your thoughts more clearly!”, Then I will redirect you to historians. Nothing bothers them here.
And I have not yet touched on the Hittites and Egyptians, who are still grazing nearby, but will soon appear, because in principle the Hittites are, perhaps, the Phoenicians and they had a common kingdom with the Egyptian Pharaohs.
Or maybe there was a war between them, which served as the demise, first the Hittites, and then the Egyptians, but became the basis for the Phoenician development until Alexander the Great came and established his own order. Whether there is life on Mars, whether there is life on Mars, science is unknown. Science is not yet in the know. (copyright)
Meanwhile, Baalbek, in the region of minus 300-plus years, also received the name Heliopolis from the Egyptian king Ptolemy, who at first was a satrap (ruler, governor), and after the death of Alexander the Great and king. He left the throne to his heir, Ptolemy. Why scatter names? Ptolemy Ptolemeich - sounds proudly! At the same time, he looked like a Greek, and his statues can be found in Athens and Olympia.
If you do not get confused in the Ptolemies and begin to distinguish the Greeks from the Romans and other kings of Egypt, then this once again proves that Baal-Baaal-Lucifer (possibly) carried light to people and was worshiped like the sun, because Helios is a solar deity in Greek mythology.
At the same time, he is at the same time the son of the titan Hyperion (in general, not a god!), The all-knowing god-soothsayer Phoebos, Hephaestus and … Zeus himself! Quite a lot of his avatars! Just in case, I will note that that was also the name of the boy drowned in Eridan.
(Historians, isn't it funny for you yourself?)
Soon the Greeks and Egyptians ended and the Romans began, who decided to build a temple to Jupiter in Baalbek, which is absolutely definitely not a "boy drowned in Eridan", but the rebirth of the Greek Zeus.
Roman construction began during the reign of Emperor Augustus at the end of the first century BC. It is known that they used as the foundation and starting point of construction, the podium and walls of the previous temple-city-pyramid - whatever. Here historical science crumples again and for some reason says that it was an open-air temple that was built by the Seleucids 100-150 years before. All the Helios disappeared somewhere.
Plus, the Romans forgot how to properly build their temples. In Baalbek, they made an unforgivable mistake with the location of the facade, courtyards and porticoes. Even worse, there is, in general, a problem with their presence, despite the foundation built under them.
Scientists say that this is nonsense just trying out new trends in architecture. Apparently, right in the middle of the construction, they spat on the blanks of the courtyard and ran to build a podium on the west side of the Temple of Jupiter.
Trilithon is located in this cyclopean structure, unnecessary according to Roman architectural canons. Moreover, the rest of the stones under and around it, although they seem small in comparison, but weigh 450 tons and have never been used on Roman construction sites before. Worse, they didn't finish building it here either - the wall with Trilithon is unfinished. Considering that the abandoned "Pregnant Woman" is lying nearby, then what kind of throwing of the architect is in the process of making the complex?
Maybe it's time to let the alternative historians out of their cage and let them tell about the aliens who long ago built a level platform for future Roman temples in Baalbek? It would be interesting to listen to. But it's too early.
Under the platform, almost directly under Trilithon, there is an unnecessary blank for the column of the future complex. So, it was thrown out before everyone was leveled and the stones were placed. According to archaeological rules, everything below is older. The column is Roman, Trilithon is on top, which means that it is not older either. We do not open cells with alternatives yet.
Scientists are struggling to pull the owl onto the globe, and explain why huge stones were needed here, not seen before or after. At least the Romans.
Friedrich Raguette, in his work, invented the Phoenician tradition of three layers of stone. Here's nothing more, nothing less, only 3 or go out go build pigsties. The podium is 12 meters high, which is why I had to call the Cyclops.
Some kind of nonsense! Not only have the Phoenicians been dragged in again, although we have been busy with the Romans for a long time, we also accuse them of tyranny! Why did they need exactly 3 layers?
-Well, first of all, it's beautiful! - the scientist answers.
I am not kidding. He justifies this by the interest in appearance. They sailed.
He also adds that these stones were supposed to symbolize the greatness of the Romans, but people forgot about this and began to attribute it to some gods, Cains, Baalams. Do you understand now where the legs grow from alternative theories of history? With such explanations from specialists, any alternative nonsense looks no worse!
Well, okay, let's say the Romans got numb in one eye and considered the alien interspersed as a new squeak of fashion. How did they knock him out and then bring him in and put him to bed? Scientists believe that, in general, I had problems. They chopped off a piece in the rock with metal pickaxes, then hewed it out, polished it and drove it away. However, they clarify, there was another car. Without her in any way, she left four-meter cylindrical marks on the blocks. Historians have lost the scheme of the miracle machine. Or they didn't.
Scientists want to deliver huge blocks to their destination using round wooden blanks. They saw such in Egypt and Mesopotamia. To this, the Romans themselves shout to them directly from the minus of the first century: “Hey! Is there anyone at home? The Egyptians had a plain, but we have gorges and mountains here. Ride the blanks yourself."
One French scientist (historians did not retain his name, finishing off a half-dead body with the labors of Herodotus, while they carried it to the fire in the outskirts of Giza to burn, along with the newly bought joint, the next edition of the new book by Nosovsky and Fomenko), also did not believe and calculated that for such a weight, the blank method will require 40K people at a time, and there is simply nowhere to place them.
Nevertheless, scientists insist. It's all about the rollers! For reliability, they appeal to Mother Earth, they say that earlier in Baalbek there was a different relief and the quarry was higher than the plateau. So, they put the stone on the rollers and rolled it!
The funny thing is that they nod in the direction of St. Petersburg and Thunder - the Pedestal of the Bronze Horseman - a Stone that weighs 10 times more and dragged it 10 times further.
I will not touch the thunder stone yet, but I will remember the quarry for the Alexandrian pillar. Well, you will also look at the next ubiquitous rectangular holes, without which not a single stone wider than brick can do. They even jumped into the album to Montferrand.
Personally, I do not mind, it fits well into the chronology of modern history, which assumes the mental retardation of humanity, which has forgotten itself for a thousand years, and then, by magic, turned on technical and scientific evolution, slipping a couple of hundred years in the Renaissance.
It's funny that this is happening almost simultaneously with the introduction of "loan interest" and the banking system named after the Rothschild family.
About 2K years, the worship of Jewish gods, I'd rather keep silent, although Chrtistos never tired of repeating that he came exclusively to the sons of Israel. Why did three-quarters of the world suddenly decide that he was visiting them too? Oh yes! Comrade Savel (the future Apostle Paul) at night in a cave dreamed that now the teaching of Jesus, for everyone, it would be necessary to go and preach. Oh well!
Unfortunately, the answer to the question "how" in relation to Trilithon does not answer the question "why?" Neither architectural nor structurally hefty stones are needed there. Even if technologically such a trick could be carried out, with wooden rollers or papyrus rollers, it does not matter, without explaining the reasons for the installation of an insert discordant with the ensemble, all this theory is not higher than the levels of stupidity, the theory about aliens from the other anti-scientific side.
Then the question arises of placing blocks at a height of 7.5 meters. They need to be lifted, laid down and leveled. And then, what do I see? As one of the options, German scientists propose the method of Domenico Fontana, the picture with which I posted in the article about the Alexandrian Column, purely for fun, because it looked almost one to one like Montferrand's drawings.
March 14, 2018 4.5 thousand views 1.8 thousand reads 25 minutes 4.5K views. Unique visitors to the page. 1.8 thousand reads, 41%. Users who have read to the end. 25 minutes Average time to read a publication. What's wrong with the megalith from Baalbek? No, I understand everything, man - the creature is small. If you look from space, and in general, entomological. But is it really impossible to compensate for the small growth with the breadth of consciousness and try to consider the whole picture as a whole, without getting hung up on a tiny fragment where someone laid three huge bricks? Why is everyone buried in this ̶S̶o̶n̶y̶ ̶T̶r̶i̶n̶i̶t̶r̶o̶n̶ Trilithon, when right there, in Baalbek, a whole landscape of historical strata opens up, stretching for several thousand years, with such turns that three, albeit giant stones, become small grains of sand? So,let's cure strabismus, take our eyes off our nose and plunge into the world of previous civilizations. Step by step, holding the jaw. For a start, a little local reconnaissance. Baalbek is located in the Middle East in a valley between mountain ranges in Lebanon. Let's pretend that we do not notice the Arab terrorists running back and forth and continue our inspection. Before us is a plateau on which we see the ruins of Roman temples in honor of Jupiter, Venus and Bacchus. Teetotalers and Alcoholics Anonymous see the latter as a temple of Mercury. Low-drinking scientists have not yet decided. Three stones around which all alternative activists are running are in the western wall of the Temple of Jupiter. The approximate dimensions of each are 21.3 - length, 4 - width, 4, 8 - height. If all researchers are in relative consensus on size,then the weight of the stones is already starting to vary depending on individual preferences. Standard scientists estimate it as 800 tons, non-standard from 1 thousand and above, depending on the power of the creatures to whom they attributed their manufacture. The composition of the stones does not cause heated debate in any of the communities - it's limestone. Firstly, because you can chop off a piece and chemically prove that this is not an alien meteorite, and secondly, there is a limestone quarry a kilometer away with an abandoned workpiece of the same size and shape. He, like Trilithon, has a name. Even a few. I chose the "Stone of the Pregnant Woman", you can also choose to your liking. In addition to the weight and size, many are surprised by the accuracy with which the stones are fitted to each other. We will not remember Freud in vain, but as in the case of the Pyramid blocks, for some reason everyone wantsinsert something between the stones. In Giza, these were blades; in Baalbek, they operate with needles. In both cases, no one was able to stuff anything there. I am beginning to worry about the sex life of the researchers and the size of their working apparatus. Another mystery is the location of the giant blocks in the wall. If they were at the very bottom, then it would be possible to build a theory of a "retaining wall" that protects the entire complex from sliding, earthquakes and other soil erosion. The ambush is that they stand in the middle of the masonry, on smaller and, accordingly, light blocks. On the sides and on top, they are also supported by God knows what. Somewhere Roman cobblestones, somewhere Arabian "Ishak" construction equipment "from what horrible, what was left of those who knew how to build." It seems that when the Romans were building their temples,and at the cost of incredible efforts of thousands of slaves, they laid their huge "small" bricks suddenly giants came running, drove the midgets away and laughing loudly, under a glass they hewed out another at the Trilithon quarry. They put it on an unfinished wall. They were also going to throw a fourth stone, but then a window in the heavenly dome opened and my mother strictly ordered the children to go to dinner. Thus, "The Pregnant Woman" is lying around, unfinished in her career, and "Triliton" did not become "Chetyreliton". After standing for a while in silence in amazement, the Roman architect ordered the slaves not to stare at the sky with their mittens open, but to continue working as if nothing had happened. At the state acceptance, the cunning contractor tricked on the sketch of the project with an eraser and to the question of a higher authority - "What is this asymmetrical garbage in your wall?"ran up with corrected drawings signed by Caesar. The officials decided that the head on the shoulders was more expensive than common sense and did not insist on alteration. At the grand opening, just in case, they took Caesar everywhere except the western side, and all documents, including drawings, were burned in the Library of Alexandria, having previously sent those involved in the project to the unknown, then still, lands of South America, so that they, for an hour, would not let slip about this incomprehensible insert. Finding themselves in the middle of an empty continent, an architect, a contractor and a thousand slaves, for some time were in despondency, bored without Roman society and women. When the call of nature intensified so much that the former leaders of the construction site, sighing and mentally overshadowing themselves with crosses, as if asking for forgiveness, began to look closely at the young slaves, a flock of great apes accidentally ran by. The pretty young men from among the slaves breathed a sigh of relief, and the issue was resolved without sexual violence. The mass pecking of the cutest anthropoid (this is important!) Primates was the beginning of the civilization of the Inca and Maya. Having in their genome the DNA of the architect of the temple of Jupiter, they subsequently learned by an effort of will to summon the very giants who laid Trilithon. Thus, the megalithic structures of South America arose, including the pyramids and Machu Picchu. The ending, unfortunately, was predictable - the giants began to tire of the exorbitant exertion and whimper. Hearing that in the sandbox, someone offends her children, a giantess mother came down from the sky and trampled all the Incas and Mayans to hell, grabbed the offspring in her arms and took them home. That evening, she found the nearest repair office in the telephone directory, and the next day, parent-controlled double-glazed windows were installed on the window. The issue with new megaliths on Earth was closed. This version of events in one fell swoop explains how the American Indians built their structures, how their civilization arose and how died, and also why the Romans did not have any mention of the construction of Baalbek temples. Perhaps, of course, everything was not so, but these three stones actually enter scientists into such a stupor that they prefer not to notice them, like, by the way, the entire Baalbek complex. The vile Romans really did not leave any documentation about him. And as you know, what is not printed in the newspaper, that cannot be, even if it is before your eyes. I understand historians are waiting for a crazy Jewish bombwhich can accidentally fall on the complex during preventive strikes against Hezbollah. There was still hope for Ishil, but there were already few of them, thanks to the Russian troops, and historians had not yet transferred the full payment for Palmyra. Nevertheless, there are still some versions, but everyone is hindering them, including the local residents, who, as luck would have it, remember all their legends and claim that the Romans, in general, have nothing to do with it. They say that Baalbek was built before the Great Flood by Adam's son Cain. Yes, thus a fratricide. Cain began to build the city, because God sent him to the settlements of Eden. I hope everyone understands why? However, during the flood, the water turned everything into ruins, which, having dried their clothes after the disappearance of the water, was restored by the "race of giants" under the command of Nimrod, King of Sinar from the book of Genesis. This spoils the whole picture for scientists and leaves us at a loss. Who built it? And when? One could discard the legends of local storytellers, but they have an interesting catch that adds a couple of percent to their weight. No one comes up with a legend according to which your hometown was built by one of the most vile characters in the Bible, and besides, it was exiled from Eden. In normal people, the founders are always white and fluffy, often with wings and a halo. And here it is! Scientists claim that Baalbek emerged as a convenient trading port, that in principle, there may be rivers there. Excavations of the courtyard of the Temple of Jupiter have shown the presence of a mound that dates back to 2900-2300 BC. This shook the claims that the Romans built. Then they found hundreds of tombs in the rocks, which, as it turned out, belonged to the Phoenicians. Phoenicians -it is one of the Achilles' heels of all historical science. They preceded the ancient Greek civilization, invented everything, perhaps, from different ships to the alphabet, built cities and ports on the coasts, but historians mention so little about them that sometimes it seems that they do it on purpose. The ancient Jews and their vengeful god Yahweh were especially disliked by the Phoenicians. In the Bible, he promised his followers all the Phoenician lands, all Phoenician women and all Phoenician men. "They will be in your service, forever and ever, from head to toe, from young to old" - it's from there. Those Phoenicians who decided to resist were supposed to be burned, cut and exterminated in every possible way. Read the Old Testament - purely meat grinder, more abruptly than any horror films. Even Christ, in later times,not politically correct named a Phoenician woman with a sick child - dogs when they asked him for treatment. True, then he came to his senses (how could Christianity be spread to other nations with such an approach?), Condescended and cured. And, yes, in the Bibles the Phoenicians appear as the Canaanites. In the Bible, in general, almost all non-Jewish peoples are called Canaanites - the descendants of Ham through his son Hanan, so that one can safely identify them with the "goyim". Science today is also dulling about the Phoenicians. Scientists' minds scattered in different directions and cannot understand whether it was one people or a mixture of different, but friendly ones. How the Phoenician cities were governed and where there is central subordination is still a big question. Some consider them the first world trade (economic) empire. And, yes, our name sounds ridiculous and gives off dates. In Latin transcription, everything is somewhat more majestic than Phoenic without one letter Phoenix. Both the bird and the people come from the same root name for the color - purple. For color blind people - magenta is a mixture of purple and red. The main god worshiped by the Phoenicians was Baal (in Slavic transcription), he is Baal (in non-Slavic), hence Baalbek, because Beck - it's just a city. He was revered as the god of sunlight, the creator of the world and the universe. You understood correctly the analogy - in the Jewish faith he was transformed into the devil, he is also Lucifer, who brings light. It was not possible to erase the memory for good. But he blackened it notably (enlarge the picture, otherwise Zen cut it off arbitrarily, scoundrel). It was not possible to erase the memory for good. But he blackened it notably (enlarge the picture, otherwise Zen cut it off arbitrarily, scoundrel). It was not possible to erase the memory for good. But he blackened it notably (enlarge the picture, otherwise Zen cut it off arbitrarily, scoundrel). It is also believed that the Phoenician faith later formed the basis of the Greek, and then the Roman. Then, in general, they did not take a steam bath and simply renamed the pantheon. Good advice when you see a grandfather with a beard on the throne before saying, “Oh! Jupiter is sitting ", come closer and read the tablet, maybe it's Zeus! In the Bible, Baalbek is mentioned as Valaaf (Balaat in the Latin Bible) and is described as a fortified fort of the Jewish king Solomon, despite the fact that Baalbek is generally considered the birthplace of Walla, who is almost the devil. If you now have a feeling of disharmony of the mind, confusion of the mind and you wanted to follow Professor Preobrazhensky from "Heart of a Dog" to ask:“Who stood on whom? Take the trouble to express your thoughts more clearly!”, Then I will redirect you to historians. Nothing bothers them here. And this I have not yet touched on the Hittites and Egyptians, who are still grazing nearby, but will soon appear, because, in principle, the Hittites - - this, perhaps, is the Phoenicians and they had a common kingdom with the Egyptian Pharaohs. Or maybe there was a war between them, which served as the death, first the Hittites, and then the Egyptians, but became the basis for the Phoenician development until Alexander the Great came and established his own order. Whether there is life on Mars, whether there is life on Mars, science is unknown. Science is not yet in the know. (copyright) In the meantime, Baalbek, in the region of minus 300 years, received the name Heliopolis from the Egyptian king Ptolemy, who at first was a satrap (ruler, governor),and after the death of Alexander the Great and the king. Left the throne to his heir - Ptolemy. Why scatter names? Ptolemy Ptolemeich - sounds proud! At the same time, he looked like a Greek, and his statues can be found in Athens and Olympia. If you do not get confused in the Ptolemies and begin to distinguish the Greeks from the Romans and other kings of Egypt, then this once again proves that Baal-Baaal-Lucifer (possibly) carried light to people and was worshiped like the sun, because Helios - it is a solar deity in Greek mythology. At the same time, he is simultaneously the son of the titan Hyperion (in general, not a god!), The all-knowing god-soothsayer Phoebos, Hephaestus and … Zeus himself! Quite a lot of his avatars! Just in case, I will note that that was also the name of the boy drowned in Eridan. (Historians, isn't it funny to you yourself?) Soon the Greeks and Egyptians ended and the Romans began,who decided to build a temple of Jupiter in Baalbek, which is absolutely definitely not a "boy drowned in Eridan", but a reincarnation of the Greek Zeus. Roman construction began during the reign of Emperor Augustus at the end of the first century BC. It is known that they used as the foundation and starting point of construction, the podium and walls of the previous temple-city-pyramid - whatever. There, historical science crumples again and for some reason says that it was an open-air temple, which was built by the Seleucids 100-150 years before. All the Helios disappeared somewhere. Plus, the Romans forgot how to properly build their temples. In Baalbek, they made an unforgivable mistake with the location of the facade, courtyards and porticoes. Even worse, there is, in general, a problem with their presence, despite the foundation built under them. Scientists saythat this is nonsense just trying out new trends in architecture. Apparently, right in the middle of the construction, they spat on the blanks of the courtyard and ran to build a podium on the west side of the Temple of Jupiter. Trilithon is located in this cyclopean structure, unnecessary according to Roman architectural canons. Moreover, the rest of the stones under and around it, although they seem small in comparison, but weigh 450 tons and have never been used on Roman construction sites before. Worse, they didn’t complete it here either - the wall with Trilithon is unfinished. Considering that the abandoned "Pregnant Woman" is lying nearby, then what kind of throwing of the architect is in the process of making the complex? Maybe it's time to let the alternative historians out of their cage and let them tell about the aliens that were built long ago in Baalbek,a flat area for future temples of the Romans? It would be interesting to listen to. But it's too early. Under the platform, almost directly under Trilithon, there is an unnecessary blank for the column of the future complex. So, it was thrown out before everyone was leveled and the stones were placed. According to archaeological rules, everything below is older. The column is Roman, Trilithon is on top, which means that it is not older either. We do not open cells with alternatives yet. Scientists are struggling to pull the owl onto the globe, and explain why huge stones were needed here, not seen before or after. At least the Romans. Friedrich Raguette, in his work, invented the Phoenician tradition of three layers of stone. Here's nothing more, nothing less, only 3 or go out go build pigsties. The podium is 12 meters high, which is why I had to call the Cyclops. Some kind of nonsense! Not only have the Phoenicians been dragged in again,although we have been busy with the Romans for a long time, we also accuse them of tyranny! Why did they need exactly 3 layers? -Well, first of all, it's beautiful! - the scientist answers. I am not kidding. He justifies this by the interest in appearance. They sailed. He also adds that these stones were supposed to symbolize the greatness of the Romans, but people forgot about this and began to ascribe to some gods, Cains, Baalams. Do you understand now where the legs grow from alternative theories of history? With such explanations from specialists, any alternative nonsense looks no worse! Well, okay, let's say the Romans got numb in one eye and considered the alien interspersed as a new squeak of fashion. How did they knock him out, and then brought him in and put him to bed? Scientists believe that, in general, they were carrying problems. They chopped off a piece in the rock with metal pickaxes, then hewed it out, polished it and drove it away. However, they clarify, there was another car. Without her in any way, she left four-meter cylindrical marks on the blocks. Historians have lost the scheme of the miracle machine. Or they didn't. Scientists want to deliver huge blocks to their destination using round wooden blanks. They saw such in Egypt and Mesopotamia. To this, the Romans themselves shout to them directly from the minus of the first century: “Ay! Is there anyone at home? The Egyptians had a plain, but we have gorges and mountains here. Ride the blanks yourself. " One French scientist (historians did not retain his name, finishing off a half-dead body with the labors of Herodotus, while they carried it to the fire in the outskirts of Giza to burn, along with the newly bought joint, the next edition of the new book by Nosovsky and Fomenko), also did not believe and calculated that for such a weight, the blank method will require 40K people at a time, and there is simply nowhere to place them. Nevertheless, scientists insist. It's all about the rollers!For reliability, they appeal to Mother Earth, they say that earlier in Baalbek there was a different relief and the quarry was higher than the plateau. So, they put the stone on the rollers and rolled it! The funny thing is that they nod in the direction of St. Petersburg and Thunder - The Bronze Horseman's pedestal is a Stone that weighs 10 times more and was dragged 10 times further. I will not touch the thunder stone yet, but I will remember the quarry for the Alexandrian pillar. Well, you will also look at the next ubiquitous rectangular holes, without which not a single stone wider than brick can do. They even jumped into the album to Montferrand Thunder stone I will not touch yet, but I remember the quarry for the Pillar of Alexandria. Well, you will also look at the next ubiquitous rectangular holes, without which not a single stone wider than brick can do. Even the Thunder stone jumped into the album to Montferrand, I will not touch it yet, but I remember the quarry for the Alexandrian pillar. Well, you will also look at the next ubiquitous rectangular holes, without which not a single stone wider than brick can do. They even jumped into the album to Montferrand. Personally, I do not mind, it fits into the chronology of modern history, which presupposes the mental retardation of humanity, which has forgotten itself for a thousand years, and then, by magic, turned on technical and scientific evolution, slipping a couple of hundred years in the era Renaissance. It's funny that this is happening almost simultaneously with the introduction of "loan interest" and the banking system named after the Rothschild family. About 2K years, the worship of Jewish gods, I'd rather keep silent, although Chrtistos never tired of repeating that he came exclusively to the sons of Israel. Why did three-quarters of the world suddenly decide that he was visiting them too? Oh yes! Comrade Savel (the future Apostle Paul) at night in a cave dreamed that now the teaching of Jesus, for everyone, it would be necessary to go and preach. Oh well! Just in case! There is no anti-Semitism here, just Jesus, how to put it mildly, did not invite anyone to follow him except the “ Children of Israel. ” I think he was a little surprised when crowds of complete strangers began to knock on heaven! Unfortunately, the answer to the question "how" in relation to Trilithon does not answer the question "why?" Neither architectural nor structurally hefty stones are needed there. Even if technologically such a trick could be carried out, with wooden rollers or papyrus, it does not matter, without explaining the reasons for the installation of an insert discordant with the ensemble, all this theory is not higher than levels of stupidity,theories about aliens from the other anti-scientific side. Then the question arises of placing blocks at a height of 7.5 meters. They need to be lifted, laid down and leveled. And then, what do I see? As one of the options, German scientists propose the method of Domenico Fontana, the picture with which I posted in the article about the Alexandrian Column, purely for fun, because it looked almost one to one like Montferrand's drawings. It looks like everything in the official history is fractal! from events to pictures. It looks like everything in the official history is fractal! from events to pictures. It looks like everything in the official history is fractal! from events to pictures. German scientists proposed the method of Domenico Fontana, the picture with which I posted in a note about the Alexandrian Column, purely for fun, because it looked almost one to one like Montferrand's drawings. It looks like everything in the official history is fractal! from events to pictures. It looks like everything in the official history is fractal! from events to pictures. It looks like everything in the official history is fractal! from events to pictures. German scientists proposed the method of Domenico Fontana, the picture with which I posted in a note about the Alexandrian Column, purely for fun, because it looked almost one to one like Montferrand's drawings. It looks like everything in the official history is fractal! from events to pictures. It looks like everything in the official history is fractal! from events to pictures. It looks like everything in the official history is fractal! from events to pictures.
Do you know where Fontana set his (Egyptian) phallic symbol? Opposite the Basilica of St. Peter in Rome. Do you know how to spell it in English?
St Peter's Basilika))) True, the first part gives St. Peters'burg?
The train of thought of Western historians is interesting, they offer the Romans the Fontana method, which raised the Egyptian obelisk of 327 tons, although in terms of meaning, they had to draw analogies with the St. Petersburg pillar - its weight is almost identical to the weight of Baalbek's stones, 700 against 800. As we know, according to the official version, humanity is not very intelligent, therefore, in the 19th century, methods available not only to the Romans, but, it seems, to advanced monkeys, were used to lift the columns. If, of course, you give them the ropes necessary for this. Nevertheless, I have not found any analogies with the column on Palace Square. Possibly bad looking.
But I found several historians who categorically stated that the stones cannot be lifted in this way, even by drilling holes in them, which, moreover, are not in them. Instead, they offered an option with a change in the relief, where after roller skating described above, the stone blocks themselves jumped into the right places in the masonry. Fuck it, with jumping stones and reliefs changing to please historians! What about the column now? After all, it turns out that the way to install it is impossible !!!
It only instills that every historian makes all his statements that contradict each other, opponents, unfortunate alternatives, common sense, and sometimes physics, in a mentoring tone that does not tolerate objections. As if he saw it himself. And, perhaps, he built it himself.
A striking example, here were the "debunkers" of alternative fantasies, scientific knights from the site https://antropogenez.ru/. In their article about Baalbek, from the part where they claim that they know how stones crawled, rolled and jumped on the wall, they link to the site https://www.skepticink.com/, which, in turn, links to the blog Michael Heiser - a specialist in the Bible (what? And why not the Koran?), Who finally told everyone how the Trilithon was staged.
To begin with, this expert is an interested person, he needs a nosebleed that only the Romans and no one are in Baalbek, never before, otherwise he has all of Jerusalem and the ten kingdoms of Solomon will begin to crawl, roll and jump along with Trilithron on the historical scale. But even this is not the main thing. As a basis, as evidence of his innocence, he, and along with him the previous skeptics-exposers, take the work of the Frenchman Jean-Pierre Adam as much as 1977!
Moreover, neither our anthropogenesis, nor an imported skeptic, the Frenchman's work has not been read. In their links to materials, after the articles, there is no address of the work itself, only the title. That is, they did not recheck each other. All along the chain believed the bibliophile! Or a bibliographer?
In this example, the main problem of historical science is clearly visible, because of which it is not quite a science. This is a branched pyramidal structure, at the base of which there is no factual material, but only fabrications based on sources recognized as credible. There are not even clear criteria and signs of who is trusted and who is not. Much on the level - do you respect me? Nobody approaches the originals of documents, does not examine anything, even if this original is just a click away. What for? After all, he trusts the source !!!
All this leads to inertia, insensitivity, and in most cases to outright tyranny and forgery, because everyone is interested in maintaining the "status quo" of the official party line. They will stretch any deadliest owl onto the largest globe, perhaps even the globe of Ukraine, so that not a single brick will crack and pull the rest with it.
As for the work of the Frenchman, then all the guesses, assumptions and statements about the megaliths of Baalbek, which I met from different authors, are all taken from there. And the parallel with the Thunder stone and with the installation of the Egyptian obelisk and all the pictures of possible ways to move the stones, everything is taken from there. And it looks like if I read it to the end, I will find a couple of other solutions that I have not noticed there yet.
And now I have a question, why does the work of '77 start to be mentioned only in 2012? And everywhere at once, all and in parts?
Bible lover Dr. Heizer, who built his evidence on its basis, a little more than completely, says that until that time it was available only to a narrow circle of specialists, and in 2012 it was posted for free access.
What nonsense? What narrow circle? Did they whisper it to each other and shoot back from the rest of those who wanted it? And most importantly, if everything was proven in 1977, why are there still discussions on this topic in the scientific world?
Do you know why? Because, unlike the snobs from anthropogenesis and the interested Heizer, the Frenchman does not claim that it was so, but simply lists the options for the movement of megaliths that were technologically available for Roman times, which had already been tested somewhere.
This, of course, is a kindergarten, especially the central one, about the delivery of blocks from the quarry. At the same time, I will not say that this method will not work. Once the gun fires and the porridge is cooked from the ax. Look, even with Musk, something flew from a run, but I will never believe that adults experienced architects, mostly military, will take up a contract where you answer with your head with such a ghostly chance of success and the amplitude of the assumption, the level of meeting a dinosaur in It seems that historians believe that all of antiquity was built by aliens, since they keep builders and designers of buildings that have stood for many hundreds of years, for funny fools with unhealthy enthusiasm. The faith of historians in the limitless possibilities of levers and capstans especially delivers. If something does not fit,you just need to add levers and take stronger capstans, and then even a child from Myazin will launch the Mask into space with NASA money.
It is the use of mechanisms elsewhere that allows the Frenchman to draw an analogy. He does not have his own technical or documentary Roman base. Moreover, most parallels are drawn from much later times and always with non-analogous conditions. If interested, read it.
A propos du trilithon de Baalbek. Le transport et la mise en oeuvre des mégalithes.
As Nero Wolfe liked to ask some of his interlocutors in the books of Rex Stout, do you know what a hypothetical question is? I hope so, especially since I don't have a question, I just want to make a hypothetical assumption.
Suppose the Romans could grind, polish, move, even play football, with these stones, in any way convenient for them. Will then there remain arguments in favor of the version that it was not they who put them in the base of the Temple of Jupiter?
It turns out that even with this assumption, the picture does not change. Let's list the reasons why Trilithon has nothing to do with the Romans.
- If you take a closer look at the western wall, you can see that these huge blocks are alien to the general concept, like a birthmark on the nose. Maybe someone likes it - there are a lot of deviations in the world, but the artistic taste offends all-round.
- On Trilithon's blocks, erosion is much more visible than on other stones and temple remains. This means that he was exposed to wind and sand much longer while standing outside. The destruction on its surfaces is comparable to the state of stones in the walls of Mycenaean Greece and other megalithic complexes around the northern coast of the Mediterranean Sea. There, scientists do not fool themselves and our heads with all sorts of rollers, but normally in a working order estimate the age of stones in 3K-6K BC.
-
Many classical temple complexes of those places and at about the same time were built on the foundations left over from previous civilizations. Here, civilization should not be understood as a technogenic man of the future, hung with devices. It simply means another people who lived in these places earlier.
As an example, you can take the Acropolis in Athens, the stone walls of Delphi, Tirines, and so on.
- The Phoenicians mentioned earlier were seen in love with large sizes. There are drawings (in fact, almost the only one) in which the walls of the Phoenician period are composed of massive cyclopean blocks - 30-40 tons. Such stones for children are warm-up stones. But nonetheless!
- Especially for the site - scientists expose that anthropogenesis - in order to resist soil erosion and keep the soil from subsiding, large blocks should be at the bottom of the structure, and not rest on smaller ones. Resilience is getting worse, you know? Take the cubes from the nearest child - practice.
In my opinion, this is a decent list of doubts in order to lag behind the Romans and not torment them with guesses about why they suddenly decided to chop off in Baalbek such a number with stones, although never before and never greater in its history, megalithism of the brain and its architectural appendage did not suffer.
And if the Romans, freely breathing deeply, laid megaliths alien to them on the ground and started building ordinary antiquity - their direct business, then the question immediately hangs on us: who then is the author? The weight of this question is not less than the sum of kilograms of all Baalbek Trilithons. Dug, buried, abandoned and even mythical.
Really, having fought off, from careless historians, we returned to the ridiculous point of the search for high-tech aliens? Shame is not enough.
Now I use a forbidden trick and, using the experience of soap television operas, I will say that the continuation is in the next episode. I already suspect that not everyone made it to this page with us alive. Many have already died of old age while reading.
Nevertheless, I am not ready to talk as much about the origin of Trilithon. Possible origin.
Well, my home Annunaki is already whining forlornly looking at an empty dinner bowl. Yes, I keep him in a black body and do not allow the use of cutlery.