Read the first part here.
The greatest secret of the Great Pyramid Khufu, aka Cheops, is in front of the eyes of everyone who looks at it, but people do not want to see it. Give them ancient Egypt with pharaohs or Anunakhs …
Whole sections, stripes and belts of the outer layer of blocks fall inward. Anyone can see it up close, but with side light it can be seen from afar. It is explained by the fact that under the layer of cast-blocks there are no millions of blocks weighing millions of tons, but there is ordinary, naturally sagging sand. Which cancels all the calculations of the official and alternative sciences about the time, opportunities, labor costs of the pyramid builders. Put it in a rainy area, it would not have stood for half a century, it would have formed in an ugly way, in the same 19th century, and in Egypt - nothing, even keeps its shape, though only from afar.
The outer layer of all three Great Pyramids - Khufu (Cheops), Khafra (Khafren) and Menka-ur (Mikerin) - collapses. But before we talk about the structure of the pyramids, let's take a look at the external casting. Well, or on hewn, molded, geopolymer blocks, embedded with mantras, UFOs, an Egyptian draft crowd with an Egyptian mother along an embankment, as official and alternative scientists of historical sciences teach.
The Pyramid of Cheops. These dents cannot be erosion, they are too different from all types of erosion on all blocks. There are dozens of them.
It looks like a ladder for carrying the solution has been imprinted.
Promotional video:
The extraneous thing is forgotten.
Still dropped out rubble against the background of the edge from the formwork sheet. Typical sinus - any concrete worker will tell. Visors, drips of solution hang everywhere. For wind erosion, the solution turned out to be stronger than "brick".
This is the dropped quarry and the edges left by the formwork. An unfinished solution, debris - everything went into casting.
Part of the buta has fallen out, part is still sticking out, but it will definitely fall out, especially from the windward side of the Great Pyramid of Khufu, where the erosion of lime-sand casting is faster.
Often, scrap was used this way. Why not?
The blocks are full of traces of primitive grout like these stripe patterns, followed by stamping over the damp ones, like in the quarry near the Khafre pyramid. Alternatives have traces of mysterious instruments.
Only without stamping.
An ordinary grater with an extremely garbage solution leaves just such. Where there are no quality requirements, and you only need to close the masonry, Tajiks do not measure, but the mileage of such a finish is faster than the speed of the Nile. On pyramid molding, this is complementary. It is necessary to close the butt, or the snot hangs big - the ancient Egyptian went through with a grater of the golden section, seams, seams, ready, then went to build an ancient Egyptian masterpiece!.. It's a second thing - such wiping.
The quality of the lime-sand mortar, as you have noticed, is shameful, and the work is the same as in the casting of the pyramids, or in the plaster of the supposedly solid rock of the quarry near Khafre (and in all of "ancient Egypt"). Tajiks would not be paid for that.
Small things, which have crawled out, are stuffed into the pyramids, but this little thing, forgotten by the ancient Egyptians in casting, is outstanding.
The profile is steel, not iron; iron is a very corrosive metal, in its pure state it is never used anywhere. An iron profile in the open air, even Egyptian, will turn into dust not in 4.5 thousand years, but in one and a half hundred that have passed since the middle of the 19th century.
Historians Martin made a furnace for melting steel in 1864, and experiments were done 10 years earlier. But no! It was not Martin who received steel rolling, but the ancient Egyptians, the Anunakh technologies and the secret knowledge of the Atlantean priests!))
These slots cannot be obtained by any fitting of blocks, even in theory. The edges of the blocks perfectly repeat each other with curved lines. They can only be obtained by sequential filling of a row. This particular one was poured from right to left.
The formwork was put in place. Thin elastic sheets of metal - iron is fine. The block is poured, the sheets are hastily put, the next one is poured. The sheets are removed. One block pushed through the sheet more, the other less, the third squeezed out the formwork sheet and the stack at all … Spit, they docked to the small block and poured the big one - there is not a single block at all repeated, all are different. Incredible rush and race.
The top row is especially revealing. This is an impossible masonry. Sequential casting only.
From here you can see the above deck canopies on the blocks. They were knocked down, cut off, still damp. But not everywhere.
Two remarkably broken-off blocks show the inner layered structure of the casting.
The fill went from right to left. The solution was introduced in portions (otherwise it would break any formwork, the flooding of these and any megaliths is possible only in layers). The first portion was slapped to the bottom, to the right wall of the casting mold, which is the face of the previous cube. The second, third … - in inclined layers. On the day when these cubes were poured, it was especially hot, each layer had time to dry out, forming a crust.
This layering says that the work was manual. A small labor army - soldiers, local slaves, a prisoner … - may well make a pyramid in a few years.
French scientists discovered ancient Egypt. Apparently, this was Napoleon's Egyptian campaign. The narrow-gauge railway, inevitable in the construction of pyramids, we have already seen in the photo of the 19th century in Luxor and Giza (in general, the narrow-gauge railway has existed, it is believed, since the 16th century). This technical minimum, plus several years of the regime's status of the territory, is all that is needed to fill in place 1 percent of the extravagant quantities of blocks from the works of scientists, which we see and beyond which we will not see (unless the pyramid begins to completely fall through, crumble, for example, from the abnormal rainy season).
Scientists - the guardians of history, of course, cannot assume such things, neither official nor alternative. Fomenko and Nosovsky have brilliant criticism, but a useless reconstruction (otherwise no one would have ever known about them). Together with Davidenko and others, they actually legalized the pyramids in tandem with the officials, counted in tons, cubes and labor costs 99 percent of the Great Pyramid, which are not blocks.
For some reason, no one is surprised that the Chinese have poured more than a thousand pyramids, including those larger than Cheops, and at the same time not a single Chinese has said anything about this to any world media.
The Great Wall of China, when the rain washed it away, was empty.
Fufel, like everything Chinese, is two bricks thick, with sand.
The megaliths of Cuzco, unable to bear the rain, collapsed, inside the same emptiness, the soil with which the natural hill was filled up and planned, nothing more.
The ruins of Sacsayhuaman, the temple complex of the great Inca civilization in Cuzco (Peru), were allegedly built in the 15th century. From chunks of hewn, fitted with the help of mantras and Anunakh technologies to micron precision. Since 1983 on the UNESCO World Heritage List. Only recently the ruins, made by primitive casting in fabric formwork, have collapsed a little. Just like the Chinese Wall after heavy rains. A century has not passed.
There was not a single thing under the ruins. They were made immediately like ruins.
I had to save a great civilization for UNESCI and humanity.
But the world historical community, official and alternative, is not supposed to know about this.
And than the pyramid of Cheops, of the estimated number of blocks of which people see less than 1 percent, is worse?
An embankment, a couple of chambers, passages, mines were made inside, maybe a couple more hid, scientists for the upcoming discoveries, that's all. More than 99 percent of the volume of the Great Pyramid has never been seen or will be seen, unless it rains in Egypt.
Most of all the pilgrims of Egypt and the pyramids are confused by the incredible curvature of the rows in height. Smooth from a distance, and the closer, the more curves - shrinkage goes inside the edges. If you are doing a great miracle of the world for centuries, then either level the rock foundation, or bring the foundation even. And what about Cheops? They say about this: the bull nassed. Let's trace one row.
Whichever way you look from the foot of the Great Pyramids, and Red at the same time - it will be so.
With lateral illumination, the dips of the edges are visible from a distance. The edges are not just crooked, but walk like Danube waves, the drops reach several meters!
Why? Because there is sand under the casting, there are no 2.3 million blocks weighing 5.75 million tons. We led several rows. They covered the hill. The sand was settling, this is inevitable. The edges were leveled with the same sand and corrective casting - this is possible. But vertical waves cannot be aligned back and forth. Moreover, the waves started from the lowest tiers, and of such magnitude, which cannot be explained by the different sizes of the blocks.
This is the great mystery of the Great Pyramid.
Scientists and the public do not even know the minuscule that is known about Khufu about the inside of Khafre.
Pyramids of Khufu, Khafren and Mikerin.
On the eve of the Big Questions, scientists backed up a little, took away from the invisible 99% of the volume of the Cheops pyramid another 23%, in the wrikipedia, the head-source of the Egyptian sofa, they wrote that, according to the latest data, 23% of the pyramid's volume is a rocky base in its center. But even three-quarters of the remaining volumes of blocks, to hew and drag from somewhere is an unbearable task for human and anunach cultures.
Nobody is surprised that in El Tahin the ancient Mexicans type in the 2nd century AD. most of the pyramids are underfunded. Why are we slowing down in Egypt? Igipitsky Morok?
The stump is clear, it is impossible to venerate this Egyptian disgrace, which is also falling through, as science believes, looking at the cap of the Khafre pyramid. The rest, they say, has not survived through the centuries, the sultans took to palaces, imams to mosques. Nonsense. The hat was immediately built like this.
Having reached the beginning of the cap in the project, the builders changed the step casting of blocks to vertical, and led vertical walls with a height of five to seven rows, alternating the casting of horizontal blocks with casting of vertical ones, and from the border of the cap to the top they began to pour the product under the outer formwork.
Knowing the real quality of the pyramid casting, we reinforced the vertical wall under the head with additional pillars. This is one of them, which could not appear in any way with the previous step casting.
These supports cannot be put up during the restoration work, without removing the usual blocks and thus without bringing down the casting on bad heads, they were put up during the construction.
The support fits into a square bore in the upper molding. This means, first they poured it, and the upper casting of the so-called cladding - onto it. Other horizontal blocks spilled out - the imprint of one of them remained on the adjacent casting. Not surprising given the quality of the basic block casting. When pouring a step, the crumbling blocks remain in place, with a vertical one, they crumble.
And this is the facing of Sneferu in Dahshur. No tiles, ordinary blocks with an outer edge under the formwork. All. Somewhere else, the decor stuck into the half-frozen block has been preserved. Without a doubt, lightweight, ductile, oxidized metal into the trash. Dural is quite suitable in terms of properties and color. And it hangs so that not a single pilgrim can reach it.
Between the castings, wood was pushed, metal in the formwork only from the outside. Wretchedness - I myself am surprised, and sheer exclusive.
Preparing to erect a twice heavier layer with "facing" so that the latter would not collapse into the settled sand of the central part of the pyramid, the last one and a half to two dozen rows to it were led not by the standard filling of blocks, but every other time - by full-fledged brick pedestals, camouflaged with plaster. That is why the "facing" is intact, and the base under it is stronger and looks different.
This masonry of the Great Pyramid of Khafre is a jamb like a stone with a concrete rod from the construction of Stonehenge after the collapse of the plaster, which got into all the old photos and engravings, which were made for half a century after construction without counting
Now let's take a closer look at the mysterious cuts with a mysterious tool in supposedly granite monoliths, supposedly hewn by the ancient Egyptians, adored by the alternative public and scientists. What is it, who did it, and why?
Scientists of the official sciences are allowed to speak only about the bronze chisel saws of the ancient Egyptians. Because they have not melted iron in the official history, something stronger - even more so.
Scientists of alternative sciences are allowed to say that it was cut by the Anunakhs, with lasers from the Whiteman, and the great civilization of the Atlanto-Aryans, by mantras that make plasticine from granite. It is permissible for conspiracy to talk about a fake with a modern diamond-coated saw and cutting discs for metal with victorious solders …
At the same time, filming of cuts and cuts in all scholarly sites is given only at an angle so that the cuts are like cuts. Let's see a normal shooting - and everything will become clear.
At the base of the Great Pyramid there are several blocks of cut / sawn granite type.
But if we look closely, we will see jumpers among such an alleged cut.
More jumpers in the type of cuts.
Considering that the length between the crosspieces is the same, we will see simple traces of simple dies of the same type, which were stuck into the unconsolidated mass of the future granite block, hewn by the ancient Egyptians in order to divide it in half and get the corrugated surface of the halves. Just simply.
At Giza, the pyramidal temples, obelisks and artifacts are full of grooved and perfectly flat granite. It was necessary to have many slabs of the same type with the same type of relief. Made. The marriage was abandoned on the spot. Only.
Divided by the raw half, it gives an exhaustive idea of what kind of cuts it is (and since it fell apart incorrectly, it is also too fragile - marriage and violation of the ancient Egyptian GOSTs of the composition of the granite mixture by the builders of the pyramids).
Another divided one. There is no smell of whiteman lasers here, these are just boards that were shoved into the casting.
By the way, they began to trim the base of the Great Pyramid with such, but they quickly abandoned it. The deadlines were pressing, the workers fled, the foremen decided: this will do … God knows.
Scrapping up close. Whoever wants to see lasers from the whiteman, let him see the lasers from the whiteman by faith, but in the physical world there were formwork plates. More than an obvious breakdown of the jumper between them.
Another type of marriage - a crookedly dividing formwork was pushed in. Not suitable for virtuoso ancient Egyptian masters.
What the hell are these scientists inventing …
Another warehouse of granite products, abandoned due to the fact that the marriage, which can neither be used nor continued the wall, was called by the scientists the Funeral Temple of Mikerin.
Among scientists, the ancient Egyptians hewed this granite or the great civilizations of the Anunakhs softened them with mantras thousands of years ago. Casting in formwork one and a half to two centuries ago was an absolutely forbidden topic for alternative workers.
There were definitely no ideas to hew with a wave - all the hewn waves are crooked, and all are different. It's just an unfinished hallway. They started pouring, but abandoned.
Here we will finally see the famous megalithic nipples.
They are obtained when stones are placed in a fabric mold so that it holds its shape, like a spacer and a fixing object, so that it does not warp when pouring. For limestone "stones" a limestone load was pushed, for granite naturally granite … Limestone-sand stones, like the Southern one, can be poured without matter (limestone cement is the oldest material used to this day, lime is found everywhere; although the antiques poured in the 18-20th centuries), but for finely dispersed components going to granite, mineral dust, a dense fabric is needed, otherwise the smallest component will flow out, there will be disgrace, not casting.
A very good picture of such a nipple was taken by Sklyarov or someone from the LAI forum (as soon as they touched on the topic of formwork, the discussion of the pictures was interrupted harshly and instantly).
It can be seen that water oozed from this nipple through the fabric and washed out the fine dust from the lower block a little until it was completely dry. The result is a track. If you find pictures of antiquities with these nipples in good resolution, you will see such traces on other UNESCO and human monuments.
Specifically, these hewn lumps were cast in formwork frames with a fabric base, the edges were additionally pressed over the fabric with boards. And behind the formwork, the stump is clear, no one was watching (I think this was impossible with the volumes that were at Giza), it broke and broke, the top board kicked out, and the wood was with it. And they poured more solution than they should have. Conveyor process costs.
It was cast, of course, here, and in this position. Traces on the lower block from the water flowing from the upper teat are evidence of this.
From the second nipple of the upper block on the lower block the same trace.
The entire batch of granite blocks was rejected. The lower row came out completely nothing, although with influxes through the formwork, the upper one went out of order.
There are three blocks, the fourth was thrown off. On the middle top, they tried to fix the defect - they cut off the influxes, moreover, manually, without machines, this can be seen from the unevenness (this is where the "ancient Egyptian stonemasons-masters" really had a hard time, this is generally an ass - to hammer granite!)
But they gave up this occupation - for posterity it will do.
The other two "floated" over the top, because of the unusable formwork, especially the near one. The “floated” part of the block was also cut off (horror how much manual work, not otherwise, the ancient Egyptian foreman was terribly angry with the bunglers and forced them to hammer their works, like slaves from historical Egypt !!)
The fourth block was thrown off. It was also used to cut off the upper inflow and the "floating" part from the side of the rear edge of the formwork.
Moreover, they managed to split. It is not easy with high-quality granite, and here the squad was violated.
So it remained casting to wallow in the sands of time and in the darkness of centuries. Not a wall, not a corridor, or a warehouse. An ordinary marriage, which cannot be continued in any way, and it is impossible to drag away and adapt somewhere.
In general, the ancient Egyptians poured granite often, a lot and with pleasure - in St. Petersburg, in Europe, in Asia and of course in ancient Egypt. The artel is one, the technologies are the same, but for descendants, scientists and ignoramuses, let historians distribute them to eras.
Here is the wonderful Khafre Granite Temple in the Giza Valley. Science took him back to the 26-23 century BC.
Officially built of limestone slabs, faced with granite slabs.
However, with a good shot, it is clearly visible that the walls were not tiled, but were cast with artificial granite.
Compare the last photo with the cracks in the cast granite of St. Petersburg Isaac, Kazan and the Roman Pantheon. One office made history at approximately one real, but different historical time, naturally, that both technologies and materials were used the same.
Another material of ancient Egyptian maters used in Giza is basalt.
Allegedly hewn and delivered from the devil-those from where the blocks, which lined the floor near the Great Pyramid.
Let's pay attention to the base for pouring these slabs - we will meet it more than once in the prepared, but not embodied, Great Ancient Egyptian Pyramids; and on the full correspondence of the lower edges of the basalt plates to the relief they filled.
No need to say anything at all. A simple sane look and normal photos will tell you everything.
If this is not formwork and pouring, then what? Ancient Egyptian bronze saw-chisels ??
The thickness of the formwork was as follows.
Sheet metal, of course.
When the sheets were taken out, micro-scratches remained.
The not quite dry surface immediately cracked along the cut of the formwork.
Rush. As with Cheops.
Another basalt floor.
There are only two of them in the area of the discovery of ancient Egypt at the beginning of the 19th century - it was not good with coal or with basalt raw materials.
General form.
Traces of smooth formwork are everywhere here.
Smooth edge from the formwork close up.
The shitty quality of the new-molded block. Crumbles, barely had time to pour.
Granite is a non-thermal casting, it is easier with it. The creators of ancient Egypt had big problems with thermal.
A question to any concrete worker: did the slaves poured the slabs with the sinuses? Or were the Anunakhs cut out with lasers?
Anunakh (laser) sinus near. The importance of this photo is different: at the bottom, the blocks repeat the relief of the ground or what was poured onto the ground.
This means that no one brought "basalt slabs" from anywhere, poured here. A mobile smelting furnace, on the principle of the one that pours tar on the roof of a Khrushchev, was placed right at the location of the artifact, the block merged onto the ground. They did it right away like the remains of a basalt floor, random blocks.
Immediately to the trolls: the sintering temperature of basalt fibers is +1000, simple brown coal in a home heating system gives a temperature of about 1900 degrees, coal is 2100. anthracite is 2250. The pyramid of Userkaf was discovered by Italian archaeologists in 1831. Such and such coal-fired stoves are the great builders of Rome, etc. They knew how to do in the 19th century.
Another trail of formwork on two blocks. Even the characteristic formwork blotches are visible.
The characteristic formwork ridge, giving out casting immediately and undeniably, was chipped.
The shuttering sheet led. The hot mass pushed him down and almost flowed.
It seems that here, at the pyramid of Userkaf, a copper or bronze sheet was used. Iron doesn't behave like that. Copper does not melt at 1000 degrees (it has a melting point of 1083 degrees), bronze also (1140 degrees), it only softens, like the formwork on this casting.
Brakodels yyikhipitsky!
It sucks with the thermal casting, what really …
Obviously trying to portray something more complicated than a slab for the floor. Two forms were inserted into the liquid mass. I didn't like it or it didn't work out. The formwork ridges were split off and then the rest of the floor was poured.
And now let's turn from the floor to the object itself, for the sake of which the floor was piled up. A pitiful incomprehensible ugliness that scientists have named the Userkaf pyramid in Sakkara.
You will not believe it, but in science this pharaoh, the founder of the V dynasty, immortalized his name with this great structure, replacing the direct predecessors of Djedefr, Mikerin, Sneferu (builder of the 5 pyramids), Chefren and Cheops.
Here is this mess.
No aesthetic claims.
Or at least for decency.
What is important to see in order to understand the real purpose of this misunderstanding?
Attention - to the most powerful casting, emerging from under the sand all over the site near the under-pyramid, slabs without any claims at all, not for display, purely functional …
… and on the layering and considerable depth of their occurrence.
For whom and what is such power? Withstand the crowds of Pharaoh worshipers?
Let's take a look at the completely garbage casting, not for the public, stuffed up stuff sticking out of the sidewall.
On wire reinforcement, tied or broken off from the same rubbish casting, as you can see, on the eve of the presentation of the non-pyramid to the public.
On the layout of the site with an under-pyramid with an obvious shift of sand away from it.
Still removed and shifted soil.
A chamber made of cast granite slabs recognizable from all the top pyramids. The first pair turned out, the second burst, and on that they gave up the work. Scientists write: the robbers took away everything they could from the Userkaf complex, even in antiquity. What have they taken away? Granite-concrete fools weighing a ton that are missing here? They were not here. Inscribed they surrendered to the robbers … They are absent, because on the second pair of this vault the item burst, because more than a lot of garbage. The picture shows it.
Around the non-pyramid not to say that they are high, but simply started several indistinct buildings, reinforced with monumental casting.
From whom did they make such power, but with a passage protected just as monumental?
From meteor showers? Atomic war? Dinosaur herds? Crowds of asuras, batyrs and Atlanteans?
Scientists have found out and drew a reconstruction on which these pillboxes are the welcoming and funeral temples, tombs, the pyramid-companion of the Pharaoh's wife …
But the pyramid of Userkaf itself is no longer to get into. It was described and painted by scientists, after which in 1991 the passage was hopelessly blocked by an earthquake. Only the outer entrance remained. So there you go!
For those who have not yet understood. All the confusion is explained by the construction site of the foundation of one of the following Great Pyramids. Unfulfilled object. The interior of the pyramid was placed without any beauty. Powerfully protected chambers and passages, hidden in the thickness of the pyramid for centuries. Sand should be poured onto the site from above, several layers of casting should be carried out along the perimeter of the sand … Everything is like in the two and a half Great Pyramids of Giza.
One of the ugliest structures of the pyramid of Amenemkhet III in Dashur (allegedly the 19th century BC) is ugliness, only if it is considered conceived and finished. In the country of great temples, sciences, golden sections and pyramids, drawn by historians, to build such a heap of crap (and what else does it look like in shape?), Spending his life and the ancient Egyptians on it, would be ashamed of a real pharaoh. It's not a shame only invented.
The builders of this failed pyramid have advanced a little further than the artel of the Userkaf pyramid.
We made the filling, the core of the future pyramid, and began to fill it up.
It was buried with sand and slag, and not excavated by the researchers of ancient Egypt, the discoverers of the pyramids - the sand did not even cram into the grooves and cracks.
As in Userkaf and, no doubt, in all Cheops and Khefrens, a platform of incredible, super-excessive thickness was laid here, protected in the most powerful way from the megaton load of the planned pyramid "inner chambers" with passages to them.
Tons of mortar and defective casting are commonplace, all this goes under the sand, not for beauty.
Entrance - according to a single ancient Egyptian guest, common to all places, pharaohs and times.
This is how the same Cheops looked before falling asleep and starting to cast blocks along the perimeter of the hill, you can be sure. This is not the ugliness of a fictional pharaoh. Just unfinished. The whole and the mystery of the mysterious black pyramid of Anemenkhet.
Here is the remarkable Dark Under-Pyramid of Senusret II at El Lahoun, 19th century BC.
From adobe, adobe bricks, i.e. soaking clay with straw. Which for 4 thousand years has not soaked.
Everything is in place.
Platform, platform, standard entrance, stupid casting, declared by scientists as a "pyramidal complex with the Senusret Labyrinth", etc.
A funny exhibit depicting a shard of a temple or something like that - a lump on which the pharaoh is imprinted on the wet, moreover, the embossing has gone to the other side. From which it is clear that the form for prints in the ancient Egyptians is flexible, rubber seems to be.
Reminiscent of the form with the inscriptions of the Atlantean-Druido-Aryans at Stonehenge. Why not? If one office does it, then why would it change its methods?
This two-core wire in a brick may seem like a joke of restorers …
… if not for the same inside the bricks and in the depths of the masonry. Not otherwise, Senusert II electrified the pyramid. Fresh papyri to read from boredom.
Another blank pyramid in Medum, 100 km from Giza, represents a whole class of buildings that scientists hesitated to call pyramids, but coined the term mastaba. Pharaoh was not invented for her, therefore it is listed in Egyptology simply under the number - Mastaba №17.
The site, prepared and slightly cleared for visits, gives an idea of the size of the pyramid in the project.
Without much care for posterity, the same powerful slab base was cast, which, after the change of the project, was abandoned to cast, at least on that patch that is open from under the sand for visits.
On the base - a usual internal pyramid bunker in case of an atomic war, designed for megaton pressure.
The casting was abandoned, the formwork was hastily assembled, there was a mess everywhere. The work is now in the status of restoration is being done now. By the time the tseu came to fold the pyramid and start pouring the mastaba, the builders had no time to top up or finish what they wanted.
And then a slab over one of the aisles burst, threatening to collapse and block it. And one of the burial chambers will remain unopened by scientists - why is this necessary?
This is how this "ancient Egypt" did. Give people a story. More marriage and incomplete construction than finished buildings. But nothing, scientists will finish drawing. We've been doing it so far.
I almost forgot about the mysterious square holes, these, in the Aksumite, Baalbek, Palmyrian, Hellenic, Aswan, Roman, Machupik and other ancient casting, no matter how much there is, you can see the grooves from the formwork fasteners, which in two places they forgot to free from the timber. In the pyramid of Sneferu (Dakhshur, type 26 century BC), with the rest of the woods, and in the tunnel under the Wailing Wall, it is the wall of the complex of the Temple of Solomon (Jerusalem, type 19 BC).
And finally, for the mood, a few famous and not very antique sculptures from the angles from which it is not very customary to shoot, since traces of the reinforcement are visible.
The illustrious Venus de Milo from the Louvre.
By the way, the second hand of Venus is strangely smeared. Although under the putty one can guess a sealed oval hole.
Ancient Greek disco throwers of the Vienna and Roman museums. The dog knows whether to cover up these traces of fittings or not. It is not aesthetically pleasing either way.
Belvedere torso. Vatican.
Statues of the ancient Greek city of Ephesus (Selcuk, Turkey).
Pergamon Altar. Berlin Museum.
Portrait of Tutankhamun, I hope everyone found out))
Continuation: "Egyptologists on the protection of ancient Egyptian relics. Aswan Obelisk. Part 3".