The Right To Choose. An Alternative Point Of View - Alternative View

The Right To Choose. An Alternative Point Of View - Alternative View
The Right To Choose. An Alternative Point Of View - Alternative View

Video: The Right To Choose. An Alternative Point Of View - Alternative View

Video: The Right To Choose. An Alternative Point Of View - Alternative View
Video: The TRUE story of the 3 little pigs by A.Wolf as told to Jon Scieszka. Grandma Annii's Story Time 2024, May
Anonim

I can be safely called a fatalist man. I am inclined to believe that we do not have the right to choose, but live according to a strictly written script and only in very rare, exceptional cases, the "Author (God)" himself changes the plot, the event.

But, for me, a smart person is a person who at least sometimes questions everything. Since only in search can a person come to the correct knowledge, to the truth. To look at all things from different angles, disassembling and analyzing variants of our knowledge.

And here's what thought came to me about the Right of Choice by Man. More and less educated people have heard of Schrödinger's cat. What's the point? For starters, this is a thought experiment. The bottom line is to demonstrate the effect of an observer, before we measured one of the states, the cat and the whole box were in an undefined state for us. Quantum mechanics answers the question of how many of these states and what their probabilities are, that is, in how many independent experiments out of a hundred it turns out that the cat is alive.

Shroedinger `s cat
Shroedinger `s cat

Shroedinger `s cat.

Such a problem exists in quantum physics, where atoms passed through two slits behave like particles or waves depending on the observer. In the same way, with a cat, whether he is alive or dead depends solely on the opinion of the observer or the one who thinks about the cat.

And if you look at our "Right of Choice" from the point of view of quantum physics, it turns out that our future is not predetermined. It exclusively depends on the observer, that is, on you and me. And this pleases me to some extent. But, not long, why?

Because Schrödinger's cat is alive or dead only in our thoughts. And we will know this only after we open the box. In reality, only the "Scriptwriter" knows whether he is dead or alive. And he really is in one of these states. And I think that the state of the cat is already predetermined by the "Author".

But the experiment with atoms is more complicated. Everything really depends on the observer.

Promotional video:

Image
Image

So maybe everything in our life depends on us, on the observers of our life?

But this whole pleasant theory collapses after when I look at my own experiments with the future. And I see evidence that I myself personally MAKE DECISIONS that will lead me to those actions or consequences that I saw in advance in my dreams. And it turns out that my thoughts are a script!

In my case, I don't see quantum physics working in action. And that's why. Suppose you saw clearly in a dream that you would commit a crime, murder of a good person. And you are sure that this dream is the future. And in order to prevent it and change the course of events, you decide to kill yourself. That's so radical, leave no chance for a bad future where you are the culprit of the murder.

But the problem will always be that your dream does not guarantee that you have seen one hundred percent of your future. There is no stamp in the dream, CHECKED, THE DREAM IS CLARIFY. This means that you cannot be one hundred percent sure what the future will be like. Everything is like with Schrödinger's cat.

That is why I see no evidence that everything depends on us, on the observer.