Recently, more and more often, there have been reports in the press that “a group of scientists has started,” “close,” “black holes,” “electromagnetic fields,” etc. One gets the impression that not today - tomorrow, at least, twenty years later we will get a real opportunity to visit the kingdom of Nebuchadnezzar, talk with Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin, walk around the mythical Atlantis and meet with its last prophet, magician and co-ruler Sorid (Zarid) … But is it really so?
To answer this question, first of all, it is necessary to find out what time is, and, indeed, it can be turned back.
Let's make some clarifications. In many of my further considerations, the concept of "system" will be present. I apologize in advance for the possible change in its generally accepted definition (I, unfortunately, do not remember the exact wording). In this case, it acts as an "ordered set" or "an ordered set of homogeneous and heterogeneous elements." It is this definition that will appear in all my further arguments.
So. At its core, the very concept of time is likely to have a dual basis. First of all, it is real, since it is an integral property that characterizes any existing system. On the other hand, it is subjective, since it manifests itself exclusively as a property and cannot exist separately from any system. The main thing, in this case, is the system. And in relation to it, the properties of time change. So for a system from one individual, time becomes individual and depends on his reaction speed, attitude and other personal qualities. For a separate state or planet, it can be declared or planetary. For the Galaxy - general galactic. Well, for the Big Universe - Absolute. And so in each case. For us, this means one thing: time is secondary. It only reflects the properties of that systemto which it belongs.
This means that speaking about a change in the course of time, in fact, we mean a change in the state of a particular system or a set of any elements. What does it mean to return to the past, say, for a given person? This means that it is necessary for the sum of the vectors of displacement of all elements of his body to set the opposite direction, that is, to act on him. The same applies to any other system, whatever we take.
Moreover, over time (absolute, characterizing the Big Universe), some of the elements of local systems pass into other systems and, simply speaking, become inaccessible. Therefore, it becomes impossible to talk about a complete return of any system to its original state, in relation to a given change, because this would require enormous energies to be applied selectively to each specific element in order to force it to take its original position, not to mention restoration all its other properties.
As for “black holes”, “electromagnetic accelerators” and other similar ways to change time, then in the absolute sense, from the point of view of materialism, they are unfounded. If their goal is to go from the present into the past, then in fact this suggests that an experimenter is making an attempt to go from one system to another. The latter means one thing - this system must exist. That is, in order to move from the present to the past, this past must exist and be as physically real as the present. Otherwise, it must be recreated, which is hardly possible. As for travel to the future, this is completely absurd, because the future is invariant and depends not only on objective reasons, but also on subjective ones, which, in principle, cannot be calculated and predicted one hundred percent. There is only one kind of "travel" - slowing down the local time of an individual. But, first, it is unidirectional - from the past to the future. Secondly, it is irreversible. And thirdly, it is pointless: we do the same thing, only faster and at a shorter distance.
This is, alas, today's reality. So does all time travel come out a myth? In the absolute sense of this word - yes, and there is nothing you can do about it. But in another … In addition to real travel in time, which, of course, is impossible, there is also another way: return of the system to a previously recorded state (rollback point). The latter is quite real. In the presence of the so-called Memory of the Big Universe, of course. But this is a different philosophy and a different worldview, different from all existing ones and resulting from their further development and subsequent logical fusion into something more acceptable and perfect. (Feasible or not - I don't know). But even in this case, if we have the opportunity to visit the future, then only the past, which once already existed, and is unlikely to remain unchanged.
Promotional video:
PS Unfortunately, I have neither the strength nor the opportunity to continue researching this issue. The ideal for which I started all these publications turned out to be an illusion. Some of us were born for love and flight, while others … like me.
It all started with the problems of genetics. I may be mistaken, but it seems that I still managed to get closer to solving the mysteries of DNA, which our Yankee friends publicly declared that it is 90% of evolutionary debris. If this is so, then the basis for further work in the field of Eternal Youth and the extension of life up to at first up to 500, and then up to 1000 years (as in the biblical heroes); as well as complete regeneration of the body and correction of genetic errors, in principle, has already been created!
Further work, unfortunately, requires serious financial investments and economic independence of the authors themselves. Which, unfortunately, in my conditions seems impossible. Nowadays, fanatic enthusiasts like me are called schizos.
Maybe that's the way it is, remember, for example, Goya.
But on the other hand, not a single truly fundamental discovery has been made in science over the past 50 years. Under these conditions, we can hardly count on a smooth transition of the species Homo Sapiens Vulgaris to a new higher level of Homo Sapiens Magius. A civilization that has stopped in its development is doomed to regression and extinction! However, maybe I'm wrong. Who knows.
Lysenkov S. A. (Zared)