A former criminologist, which means he has certain knowledge, which means that the category of "the researcher who knows everything better than anyone else" is not about him because his profession inspires confidence, that is, you can rely on his opinion, as he believes that the official stories about unfortunate slaves carrying 80 tons, There are 150 tonnes and 500 tonne blocks that move them with the help of rollers, which cannot withstand such a mass and still drag them on ropes more like a fairy tale. According to engineering calculations, it is not technically possible to carry multi-ton blocks in the way that archaeologists operate. Processing such blocks with copper tools is also more likely to be attributed to the category of a fairy tale.
The forensic expert “forgot” the theory for schoolchildren and conducted research on his own, on the spot.
He believes that the blocks were made of plaster, which hardens in half an hour and today is used to fix the arms and legs, and for the form they used the same technology as today - formwork.
That is, all these sketches with pulling blocks are not a reflection of reality, but in fact, the blocks were simply poured into the molds and received what they received, hence the narrow space between the blocks, where the blade cannot be inserted. Nearby there is a village whose name is very telling, called Alabaster (a type of gypsum), and from it, at that time, the products were popular. And gypsum, infused with copper sulfate, becomes 8 times stronger.
The descriptions mention that the pyramids shone white, alabaster fits.
Promotional video:
Now questions and weaknesses
Where did this technology go, why it was lost and there was no development.
The weak point of the theory
Alabaster would not have stood for 4500 thousand years, but the expert believes that not everything goes smoothly with age, the buildings are only 1000 years old.
This is a shell rock - fragments of slabs were found in quarries hundreds of kilometers from the pyramid. Another thing is that this technology could be, but the composition of the solution and the applied binder are not clear, the bricks are more like a rock.
The fact that they were built by the method of formwork casting such an opinion has existed for a long time, any builder will confirm this, and my friend the builder is also the first thing he said when he saw that it was concrete technology. There is also a photo with traces of mats. There is a photo where these blocks are crumbling and there are not small caverns. These are casts with traces of papyrus leaves.
Let's say it's clear with technology, but that's what the solution consisted of. There is a version that this is "Roman concrete": clay and lime.
Nevertheless, none of the versions has been proven, since no one can repeat. And there were attempts, they all failed, even on a micro-scale.