We know about the construction of this column, about how it was built from the drawings of Montferrand, but not everyone believes these drawings, namely the supporters of the alternative history, they stopped believing in the officials, because there are many unconnections, incomprehensible things, and the tendency went to distrust the official sources.
Therefore, abstracting from the knowledge presented by historians, representatives of the theory, based on their research, come up with their own versions.
Researchers on this topic do not understand how certain things were done and do not believe in "magic slaves" who can do anything.
For example:
For example, the Alexander Column, it is also known that the second column was buried nearby, it was dug up in the 70s and buried back again, because it is cracked.
But even with today's technologies and already built roads, smooth roads, it is difficult to drag such a weight, but how then did they drag it.
Here is a pedestal of 400 tons being transported:
Promotional video:
The workpiece is cut into the rock by hand, they take hammers and chop off a piece.
But there is not a word about the second column in Montferrand's drawings by which we know how it was made, more precisely there is no image.
And in general, how real are these drawings?
Many who have actually met such things do not believe what the official sources tell us.
A column is a figure of rotation, and without rotating the workpiece around the central axis, it cannot be made, well, nothing! What the hell are chisels and files ?!
And here is the version from the builders: in fact, this is casting, and a freshman can solve such a problem.
