The 45th President of the United States may debunk the official versions of the landing on the moon and the 9/11 attacks.
Popular among the people "conspiracy theories" - those notorious alternative versions of well-known events, which are indecent even to mention in the society of the political establishment - today can be confirmed at the highest level. In any case, two of them are the most scandalous and discussed. It turns out that one of the supporters of an alternative (or maybe just a more realistic) view of history is none other than the 45th President of the United States, Donald Trump.
Back in 2001, Trump questioned the official White House version of the September 11 tragedy and publicly announced that the twin towers had been blown up from the inside. The American media at the time actively recruited Trump as the chief expert on the construction of skyscrapers in New York. Engineers from the company of the future president then came to unambiguous conclusions - a Boeing seized by terrorists, even filled with explosives, in a collision with the World Trade Center building could not have led to its collapse, which the head of the White House without a second thought and said in an interview with local journalists … Trump's main hypothesis was based on exactly the same, on which the "conspiracy theory", woven around that tragedy, has been built for fifteen years - the twin towers were mined and blown up from the inside.
In his presidency, Trump, however, did not return to discussing the 9/11 attacks, and it is still difficult to say whether his opinion on this matter has changed over the years or not. However, the members of his team are not at all afraid to express their own versions of well-known events that are undesirable to the American establishment, even after settling in the White House.
So, Trump's advisor on science and acting professor at Yale University David Gelernter recently encroached on one of the main "braces" of American history - the Apollo mission. The scientist directly stated that the astronauts never landed on the moon, and the official version on this score is "the biggest fraud in the history of mankind." Let me remind you that these are the words of the official adviser to the President of the United States on science.
This is the current leader of the United States. And he scored a team to match himself - he will get to the bottom of the truth, even to the detriment of national interests. However, what interests can we talk about if they suddenly turn out to be built on outright lies? Indeed, in this case, it is not known what will be better for the Americans themselves - to continue to live, believing in their fairy tales, or, finally, to publicly tear off the pink glasses of their own exclusiveness from their faces.
One way or another, in the light of such statements, it becomes obvious why the entire American establishment broke loose in its persecution of Trump and did everything to keep him out of the White House, and now is trying with all its might to erase him from there. In fact, in this light it becomes clear why Trump did become president.
The fact is that any superpower (as well as any concept with the prefix "over") implies the presence of something majestic and impressive so that it would be absolutely inaccessible to everyone else (deprived of the prefix "over"). And at least formally elevated you above ordinary mortals who managed to be born in ordinary countries - "powers" without any prefixes.
Promotional video:
In the Soviet Union, this role was played by ideology - an idea digested by our craftsmen from an amorphous state into dozens of volumes of scientific literature. Belief in a "bright future", freedom, equality and brotherhood. Actually, this was a kind of Faith, copying in its mechanics the religious practice on which the Russian state has relied for over a millennium. In the 80-90s. XX century, with accompanying economic and political problems, this belief was undermined and the Soviet Union collapsed.
The United States, however, built its superpower on completely opposite principles of public consciousness. There belief in "tomorrow" was initially replaced by belief in "successful today" and, as a result, resulted in a cult of consumption and entertainment. However, the desire to "take everything from life" is not a distinctive feature of Americans. Historically, this was also the fault of, for example, the French, by the way, long before the formation of the United States. Anyway, jeans, Coca-Cola and casinos somehow do not draw on the distinctive features of a superpower or some kind of supermen. Except for super-idiots. Everyone can consume. You don't even have to be human for that.
And, probably then, in order to more successfully resist the hostile, ambitious and incredibly powerful ideology of communism at the time, the American rulers decided to take a desperate step - a bluff. And to create the appearance of victory over the Soviet Union in its own field - in the matter of scientific and technological progress in general and in space exploration in particular. After all, it is on this, as you know, that Moscow fully relied, demonstrating to the whole world that it is investing enormous forces in the future of all mankind.
And one fine day, the Americans, who for a long time lagged behind the USSR in the space race, suddenly declare their landing on the moon, demonstrating technical and ideological superiority over their rival and creating the appearance that their socio-political system is more progressive and more effective. Along the way, another "brace" is being created in the historical calendar for local patriots, who can only give them reasons for pride and faith in their own exclusivity.
But if this was the case, then Washington's adventure, it must be admitted, was a success. After all, until now, no one, except for the supporters of those notorious "conspiracy theories", has asked the question - why for almost half a century no one has repeated the "feat" of American astronauts, the last time committed, according to the official version, in 1972? Nobody, including the Soviet Union, which became a pioneer in outer space and possessed advanced technologies in the field of flights outside the Earth? Including the United States itself, which to this day sends about $ 19.5 billion "into space" annually - the official budget of NASA? This story is not the same as the one that was successfully carried out in our country with the promise to build communism?.. Who knows.
As for the September 11 attacks, the motive is simpler and clearer, having only a mediocre relationship to ideology. Ever since the Vietnam War, dissatisfaction with the Pentagon's military adventures abroad has grown in American society, and the people have become increasingly skeptical about the implementation of the policy of "controlled chaos" necessary for the United States to remain a superpower. The youth in every possible way avoided serving in the army, instead uniting in various pacifist movements and subcultures, like the same hippies. Such tendencies seriously hindered the Washington "hawks of war".
And, probably, then they decided to turn from "aggressors" into a victim, who, of course, was forced to defend themselves. As we know from history, this is the best way to start a war. One way or another, September 11 was used as an effective weapon of domestic politics, designed to "shut up" all pacifists and opponents of US military companies. Like the moon landing, it did a good job in Washington's interests at the time.
But you can't build an empire on lies alone. People feel deceit even when they cannot prove it. Like Soviet citizens, who felt at one time that they would not see any communism and supported Gorbachev and Yeltsin, the Americans realized that they were being cheated. And they voted for Trump. Just to spite those who have fooled them for the past half century. How Russians once voted for a chronic alcoholic in spite of the communists.
And now there is a man in the White House who, in an instant, with one word, can debunk all the deception that has been painstakingly woven in Washington's government offices for nearly fifty years - a sixth of the entire history of the United States. And with this word, in the very second, he can kill everything that makes his country a superpower. Kill her entire ideology and the very idea of superiority over other states at the root.
Will he do it openly or will he throw hints like that? Will he sacrifice the ambitions of his fatherland for the sake of truth? And what will he stake on in the end - on a superpower built by deception or a wise and reasonable people who know the truth? Time will tell.
Ivan Chimbulatov
