Official nonsense
I wonder why the most violent and irreconcilable disputants are always supporters of the official version of history (read: the version prepared by German historians in the 17th and 18th centuries)? No facts, arguments, arguments, not to mention logical conclusions, are not taken into account. These adherents of the canonical version of history, believe in it just as religious fanatics believe in the tenets of their faith.
However, there are questions that do not have a rational explanation within the framework of the version of world history hammered into our heads. And yet, these questions don't go anywhere - demanding answers. One of them: where in the world are buildings covered with soil from?
Old Omsk. It can be seen that the windows are in the ground, and next to it are simple wooden houses with ordinary windows.
Backfilled floors
That's not news. All over the world there are buildings with first and sometimes second and more floors covered with soil. Moreover, I am sure that you saw such buildings, but did not pay attention - out of habit.
They explain to us that this is a cultural layer like this - grit accumulated over time … that is, the dirt was not removed, and if something was built, it was poured right over the old road, sidewalk, square - filling entire floors of nearby buildings. Doesn't it sound like idiocy?
Promotional video:
Kremlin wall.
During the reconstruction of the Kremlin, the underground part of the Kremlin wall was opened, built of the same brick as the upper part, its outer side is made with a slope (in case of an assault), and the pit, dug 10 meters deep, did not reach its base …
Reconstruction of the Moscow Polytechnic Museum.
The museum building (photo above) was buried in some places for more than 5 meters, while windows and doors were made in the covered part.
An apartment building on Solyanka (Moscow), the labyrinth below it is a plan of underground premises.
In addition, the capital has thousands of kilometers of mysterious dungeons. Nobody knows their exact extent. Today we are told that these are sewers and they were built from the 16th to the beginning of the 20th century, with a depth in some places up to 6-8 meters. Imagine the amount of excavation, brick, and construction. Since the underground part is not so deep, according to the technology, it was first necessary to dig a pit, build this entire block of bricks (on a strong foundation), erect floors, and then bury it back. Remove the remaining soil. Can you imagine the challenge for the 16th century? Such a process is still a grandiose construction project. And even more so at that time. Historians assure us that all this was built by men with shovels, axes and bast shoes, and from the transport there were horses, sledges and carts.
Kazan.
Good. Here is an example of such a construction from the present time: this photo was taken during the construction of a planned underground gallery. It clearly shows that the foundation of the buried building is at a depth of 5 meters from the current level of the road. Windows and doors 3-4 meters underground, of course an original architectural solution. The construction of the gallery (in our time) took a long time, expensive, as a result, the budget was not calculated and everything was abandoned. And this is at a time when there is electricity, machinery, skilled trained workers, transportation. But we are told that in the 16th century semi-literate bast shoes were able to build underground galleries for many kilometers.
There are thousands of buried buildings in Kazan; there are also underground passages. According to legends, they cover the entire city center.
Omsk.
In 2016, in Omsk, the Ministry of Culture carried out the reconstruction of the gallery along the museum. Vrubel, and this is what opened up to our eyes - a full-fledged floor, which for some reason was filled up. A layer of clay is visible at a fairly large depth of about two meters. How and when could he appear? Official historians say that the building has an underground floor according to the project. Historians do not bother to explain why this underground floor has windows and a main entrance.
Egypt and the strange selectivity of desert sand.
It turns out Egypt is also filled up. Now it has been dug up, but this is how it looked in the 19th century. Skeptics will of course say these are dust storms. But on the maps of the 17th century on the site of the present deserts, there are many cities (Map of ancient Egypt.):
Now a few cities are located only along the banks of a few rivers. But then something happened, deserts appeared and everything fell asleep.
In Odessa, we also see a familiar picture with buildings buried to several meters throughout the city. But in this city, among other things, there are underground catacombs with a length of 2500 km. The famous Parisians are only 500 km away, and the Roman ones are 300 km away. The guides say that in these catacombs a stone was mined, from which the city was subsequently built, but looking at the narrow passages of the catacombs and the current technology of mining this stone, doubts creep in the truth of their statements.
The well-known Colosseum was also half buried - did you know about that?
In this photo, you see the excavations of Rome in the early 20th century. Apparently, they finally got around to cleaning up the cultural layer that was boring to everyone. Workers cheerfully throw soil into dump trucks and take it out. It can be seen how the famous Colosseum stands half-buried.
And this is Paris.
Here is a photograph (above), dated 1973, during the construction of Les Halles in Paris. On it you can see the underground structures, going down some five stories. The cultural layer, apparently, has simply not been removed for a long time … The structure, wrapped in yellow material, above the metal scaffolding on the right, is the fountain of the Innocents!
The monastery in Mozhaisk immediately after the removal of the soil - the soil boundary is visible on the building in the form of a dark strip about 2 meters high.
View after reconstruction.
The "cultural layer" even covered tombstones! And what, even the relatives did not look for the missing graves of their ancestors?
St. Petersburg, built according to the official version on a swamp (!), Stands apart in this row. Everywhere in it, filled up first and even second floors, deep basements. The question is: why build basements in the swamps? Isn't it easier to build upwards than to suffer with waterproofing, drainage and eternal flooding?
Hermitage, in the center superimposed a piece of Photoshop.
People walk around the palace square and do not see that the main museum of the country has at least one more floor underground. Pay attention - the first floor is much lower than the second and looks mundane. And the windows, the very windows that should have been above the ground, are immersed in it almost completely. In the center - a reconstruction in Photoshop, now you can imagine how the palace should look like. Quite another matter! And it was not dug up from the "cultural layer" even for the sake of harmony and beauty of the solution conceived by the architect?
Another common explanation is building subsidence. But it happens only for the first 3-5 years, then everything stabilizes. In addition, it is not possible to sag evenly, especially given the absence (at that time) of reinforcement. The building will crack and may collapse, but this is not observed.
Don't you think they don't tell us something about our common history? What are they hiding from us? There is no logical explanation for these facts, but there are more and more similar materials, and thanks to the Internet, it is becoming more and more difficult to hide all this.
Those interested can easily find a huge number of videos and articles on this topic on the Internet. And in the next article, I will introduce you to another question that puts the adherents of a distorted history in a stable stupor.