Chapter 1. Old maps of St. Petersburg
Chapter 2. Ancient tale in the north of Europe
Chapter 3. Unity and monotony of monumental structures scattered around the world
Chapter 4. Capitol without a column … well, no way, why?
Chapter 5. One project, one architect or cargo cult?
Chapter 6. Bronze Horseman, who are you really?
Chapter 7. Thunder stone or submarine in the steppes of Ukraine?
Chapter 8. Falsification of most of the monuments of St. Petersburg
Promotional video:
Fiction of the author. The story of the Great City - the glory of the ancient era (beginning)
Somewhere in the Danish kingdom, the end of the 17th century, the Holstein-Sondenburg castle.
I, Friedrich Ludwig, Duke of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Beck, consider the conquest of such a huge state inappropriate. Other, more promising solutions are needed. Russia is great not only in territory, it is strong in spirit and faith, Ivan the Terrible proved this to us, it will not work to come to an agreement with them. A coup and a change of power in our favor is more beneficial, but so far unlikely. None of the Russian tsars will agree to this, their faith is too strong, and Orthodox Russia is formidable.
- Bribery?
- The treasures of Russian territories and their lands are endless, it is easier for them to surprise Europe than to interest them in Europe.
- Substitution of the sovereign?
- But this is worth thinking about. Who rules over there now after Alexei Mikhailovich, who left 14 heirs, Sophia? Peter?
- Find and deliver portraits of Pyotr Alekseevich at any price, in the absence of such, send the artist to Russia. Prepare a person similar to Peter (choose from our family, immediately recall the nephew from the Portuguese campaign).
To teach the language, Russian literacy, court etiquette. To inform the people who are loyal to us at the Russian court, do not skimp on bribery, the price of the plan is much higher. In any way, to interest the young sovereign in European wonders and sciences, to lure him on a trip and take him to Europe.
- I order! Immediately equip the Dutch merchants, merchant ships, and go to Arkhangelsk with gifts no later than next month. Deliver gold and stones to Russia by land, contact Menshikov. Observe maximum secrecy when executing orders. For violation of the above plans, or for their disclosure, punish with death, regardless of ranks and privileges.
To be continued…
To complete the picture, it is worth reading the study by Alexander Sharymov "Prehistory of St. Petersburg. 1703".
Portraits of Peter I
A more detailed examination of the portraits of the sovereign also prompts different thoughts.
Consider the portraits of the young king.
Peter the Great was born on May 30 (June 9) 1672 in Moscow in the family of the Russian Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich. Peter was the youngest son of Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich. Tsar Alexei was married twice: the first time to Marya Ilyinichna Miloslavskaya (1648-1669), the second - to Natalya Kirillovna Naryshkina (from 1671). From his first marriage, he had 13 children. Many of them died while their father was still alive, and of the sons, only Fedor and Ivan survived him, although they were both seriously ill. Perhaps the thought of being left without heirs prompted Tsar Alexei to rush to a second marriage. The king was very happy with the birth of his son. The tsarevich was baptized only on June 29 in the Chudov Monastery, and Tsarevich Fyodor Alekseevich was the godfather. According to the ancient custom, a measurement was taken from the newborn and the icon of the Apostle Peter was painted in its size. Peter I Alekseevich. Alexey Mikhailovich, Russian tsar, father of Peter. Natalya Kirillovna Naryshkina, mother of Peter. Fyodor Alekseevich, Peter's elder brother.
CHARLES BOUTE. Portrait of Tsar Peter I. Around 1698 Gold, enamel.
Portrait of a young Peter by the artist Kneller, 1698, the king is 26 years old.
The portraits of young Peter are very similar to each other. Look closely, on the nose on the right side of us, he has a mole. The artist drew from nature, and there was no point in drawing something from himself.
Now let us consider the later portraits of the sovereign from life, made by the "Personal Affairs Master", the favorite artist of Peter I, Nikitin Ivan Nikitich.
Nikitin Ivan Nikitich. Portrait of Peter I. 1717
Ivan Nikitich Nikitin - Portrait of Peter I, State Russian Museum, First half of the 1720s.
I. N. Nikitin, Peter I on his deathbed, 1725
During his lifetime, Peter I poses from the other side, moles cannot be seen, and only in the last portrait of the emperor we see that it is not.
Confused and other portraits, where he does not look like himself.
JOHANN KOPETZKI. Peter the Great.
Now let's try to recreate the forgotten history.
From Russia, where drunkenness and smoking are considered a sin and subject to punishment, leaving his beloved wife (Queen Evdokia, but correspondence with her), remaining in excellent relations with mentor Gordon and friend Lefort (with their submission, Peter goes "incognito"), Peter the Great leaves under the name Mikhailov. Young (26 years old), healthy, with a mole on his cheek, very educated knows mathematics, astronomy, military engineering, amazes interlocutors with his knowledge …
In the embassy team, consisting of Russians.
After 2 years (in 1698) he returns - taller, at least 10 years older, without a mole, with chronic tropical fever, speaks terribly bad Russian (writes in Latin), amazes with its ignorance and ignorance …
In the embassy team, consisting of only foreigners (except Menshikov).
And at this time in the Bastille (in 1698) appears "Iron Mask", under the name of Marchiel.
After returning home, Peter never wore royal clothes and a crown, because the left Peter was shorter and denser. Upon arrival, Peter did not allow his wife, who bore him 3 sons (the third - Paul?), And all the household members who knew him well before leaving. He immediately sent his wife to the monastery.
What begins after the return of Peter the Great?
Wife to the monastery (died).
Friend and mentor die; Ivan V - died suddenly at the age of 29; children Alexander, (Natalia and Lavrenty - conflicting information) - killed; Alexey - later sentenced to death.
Riot of the archers (the king is not real), Tsarina Sophia was placed in custody in the Novodevichy Convent, where she died.
Calendar, ABC, January 1, 1700
Blitzkrieg and genocide of Siberia and the Far East (Loss of up to 4 million people).
Serfdom, vodka and tobacco, debauchery.
All written documents and books were collected on pain of execution - no one else saw them.
The "stone" 3D map of the World of the past civilization has disappeared.
All (almost) Spiritual Places of Western Siberia have been destroyed.
Lost China, along with the walls, and partly Turkestan: "Great Wall, whose are you?"
The Great Silk Roads stopped working.
Greedy, selfish foreigners have flooded the Russian land.
An abundance of Masonic lodges (and the Jesuit Order, right there).
And Menshikov becomes the Prince of the Russian and Roman Empires.
If someone considers Peter I the founder and forefather of the Russian fleet, perhaps this article will change his point of view: "Long before Peter I, Russia had its own powerful fleet."
Here is a more detailed list of the reforms of the newly-minted emperor, which lie on the very surface:
- smashed the Russian self-government - "zemstvo" and replaced it with a bureaucratic apparatus of foreigners who brought theft, debauchery and drunkenness to Russia and intensively enforced it here;
- transferred the peasants into the ownership of the nobles, which turned them into slaves (to whiten the image of the impostor, this "event" falls on Ivan IV);
- smashed the merchants and began to plant industrialists, instead of believing in God, instilled faith in money;
- defeated the clergy - the carriers of Russian culture and destroyed Orthodoxy, bringing it closer to Catholicism, which inevitably gave rise to atheism;
- introduced smoking, drinking alcohol and coffee;
- destroyed the Old Russian calendar, rejuvenating our civilization by 5503 years;
- ordered all Russian chronicles to be brought to St. Petersburg, and then ordered to burn them. Summoned the German "professors"; write a completely different Russian history;
- canceled the natural measures: fathom, finger, elbow, vershok, which were present in clothing, utensils and architecture, making them fixed in the Western manner. This led to the destruction of ancient Russian architecture and art;
- replaced the Russian title system with the European one, which turned the peasants into an estate. Although "peasant" is a title, as there is more than one evidence;
- destroyed the Russian writing, which consisted of 151 characters, and introduced 43 characters of the writing of Cyril and Methodius;
- disarmed the Russian army, exterminating the archers, as a caste with their wonderful abilities, and formidable weapons (a ban on wearing leather and chain mail that protects against bullets and bayonets), and, in the European manner, introduced primitive firearms and stabbing weapons, first dressing the army in French, and then into a German uniform, although the Russian military uniform was itself a weapon. The people called the new shelves "amusing".
- a duty on wearing a beard was introduced in 1698 by Peter I.
By the decree of January 10, 1705, four categories of duty were established:
- from courtiers, city nobles, officials for 600 rubles a year
- from guests of the 1st article - 100 rubles per year
- from merchants of medium and small articles, as well as from townspeople for 60 rubles per year
- from servants, coachmen and cabbies, from church clerks and all ranks of Moscow residents - 30 rubles annually.
Everyone who paid the fee received a beard badge (see image).
The peasants were not taxed, but each time they entered the city they were charged 1 kopeck "from the beard."
Since 1715, there was a single duty - 50 rubles per person per year. The duty was canceled in 1772. (more details here).
- the flag of the Russian state under Peter I also underwent changes, this is how it was under Ivan the Terrible.
Considering that Ruriks were descended from the Roman emperor Octavian Augustus, the similarity of the coats of arms of both states is natural.
The Roman coat of arms, the symbol of Jupiter - the eagle - was made the coat of arms of the emperors.
In the XIV century, it became two-headed.
This is how the flag became under the father of Peter I, Alexei Mikhailovich,
but for some reason he did not suit Peter I, he was drawing a new flag.
For comparison, the flag of the state of Oldenburg (Duke of Munster-bishopric
German Hochstift Münster). The yellow stripe (sun, gold, power) indicates independence and the absence of colonial pressure.
Here is another interesting flag (Petrovskoe innovation)
Pay attention to the colors of the stripes.
White is the color of surrender, truce.
For those who believe that the white flag as a symbol of surrender appeared not so long ago, I will immediately give a historical background.
The ancient Roman historian Cornelius Tacitus mentioned the white flag during the surrender in AD 109. Up to this point, the Roman armies have surrendered, raising their shields over their heads. After that, the white flag began to be used all over the world.
And here's the English Flag:
The red-white-blue color was privatized by the British Empire back in 1606, and the Netherlands adopted the colors of the British Empire on its flag only in 1630. Emerging from the yoke of Spain in 1581, Holland fell into the British Empire 50 years later, which is written on its flag.
Holland flag:
Iceland flag:
The location of the stripes different from the flag of Great Britain shows the difference of its mission. The flag of the Netherlands itself is rightly considered the flag of Euro (Judeo) -Masonry (not to be confused with Freemasonry), to which Holland serves as a patrimonial nest, and all countries over which the Freemasons established the crypto-protectorate of Great Britain received a red-white-blue flag on the flag, implementing the colonial principle: just look at the flags.
France:
USA:
Russia:
Colonial flags:
With difficulty I found this book:
It was under the white-blue-red flags that Peter I placed his fleet (engraving of a contemporary).
The book where the information was taken from.
They also worked on the life expectancy of the Russian people, and clearly worked with a twinkle, read the inscription at the bottom of the photo.
These are the people who still adhered to the old foundations and traditions, lived according to the laws passed on to them by their fathers, grandfathers, and great-grandfathers.
Not everything is clear with Peter's victories either
Prutsk Peace Treaty of 1711 between Russia and Turkey, signed on July 12 (23) near the river. Prut near the town of Yassy. After completing the Prut campaign in 1711, Russia pledged to give Azov to Turkey, to tear down the newly built fortresses of Taganrog, Kamenny Zaton and Bogoroditsk, not to interfere in Polish affairs, and not to have an ambassador in Constantinople. Turkey was supposed to expel the Swede. King Charles XII, do not interfere with the withdrawal of Rus. troops to Russia. Due to violations on both sides of the terms of the agreement, its implementation was delayed for 2 years. In 1713 Turkey started the war again. In 1713, the treaty of 1711 was replaced by the Treaty of Adrianople.
Lit.: Treaties of Russia with the East. Political. and trade, comp. T. Yuzefovich, St. Petersburg, 1869.
But historians, despite the complete loss and territorial losses, call it a major diplomatic victory for Russia.
The Battle of Poltava in 1709 also raises many questions. Its presentation is more reminiscent of an artistic fantasy, so nothing is supported, and the real documents are under seven locks. In the film below, a short review of the historian about the Battle of Poltava (watch from the 47th minute).
Pictures of the Battle of Poltava:
Louis Caravacc (1684-1754) - 1718. "Peter I in the Battle of Poltava."
I did not find a single banner with the Russian coat of arms on these canvases, and under Peter I the coat of arms of the Russian state looked like this.
It is so much like the coat of arms of one of the most powerful royal dynasties in Europe during the Middle Ages and modern times that you can play "find the ten differences." The wreath that hangs around the eagle's neck is present on both coats of arms, clearly hinting at centuries-old regalia and unlimited power. Representatives of the dynasty are known as the rulers of Austria (from 1282), which later transformed into the multinational Austro-Hungarian Empire (until 1918), which was one of the leading European powers, as well as the emperors of the Holy Roman Empire, whose throne the Habsburgs occupied from 1438 to 1806 (with a short break in 1742-1745).
And in the 15th and 16th centuries, the coat of arms of the Russian state looked like this
Seal of Ivan III, 1497.
Seal of Ivan IV, 1539.
In the painting by an unknown artist "The Apotheosis of Peter I" the tsar - the commander is depicted on a horse, whose hooves trample the defeated lion - the symbol of Sweden.
Some artists tried so hard to exalt the victory of Peter I at Poltava that they painted it from the words of not even eyewitnesses, but something, somewhere they heard, and the story of a “great” victory was born.
Another interesting fact: Peter I did not become crowned emperor, considering that this was no longer necessary, since he had unlimited power in his hands, which no one doubted. But he solemnly crowned his wife as an empress, and put the crown on her himself. By this, Peter wanted to raise the status of both his wife and the daughters she had born before marriage, through whom he really wanted to intermarry with the European monarchs. All the legitimate children of Peter I (born before 1698), as well as his relatives, at that time were either openly executed or secretly killed.
Two medals were also stamped in honor of the Nystadt Peace, one with the Latin text, the other with the Russian. Peter I was already titled emperor on them. Here is the inscription that was embossed on one side of the medal with the Russian text: “V. I. B. Sch. To Tsar Peter I, in the name and deeds of great deeds, to the Great Russian Emperor and Father, who had pacified the North after twenty years of triumphs, this medal from home is most zealously brought. Although this war cost the country enormous losses, according to various estimates of historians, in Russia, during this time, from a quarter to a third of the population disappeared. Not only through military losses. After all, Peter I pursued a very cruel policy. There was mobilization, there were uprisings in its rear, they were struck with fire and sword. Peter I modernized Russia in his own way, and did it with the most barbaric methods.
For the sake of justice, it is necessary to clarify that not all the slabs of the "Stone" 3D World Map disappeared under Peter. About 200 more plates existed until the end of the 18th century and disappeared under the subsequent Romanovs.
Under Peter, the fastest missing one and a half hundred plates showing the North and South Plus. And on the basis of their images, expeditions began to be organized to search for lands in the North and South.
More detailed information about maps here.
In order to rewrite history for yourself, you first need to destroy all sources and records of previous history (under Peter, almost all church chronicles were forcibly seized, with the aim of copying and replicating them, which have never appeared anywhere else). And the most important thing: to confuse the chronology. What was successfully produced with him. Peter ordered instead of January 1, 7208, "from the creation of the world" to consider January 1, 1700 "from the birth of the Lord God and our salvation, Jesus Christ." The civil new year was also moved to January 1. The year 1699 was the shortest for Russia: from September to December, that is, 4 months. However, not wishing to conflict with the adherents of antiquity and the church, the tsar made a reservation in the decree: "And if anyone wants to write both those years, from the creation of the world and from the birth of Christ, I will be free in a row",which led to even more confusion with dates. Since Peter 1, the history of the Russian state has been occupied by all and sundry, except for the Russians themselves. It was written by Germans and French, Turks and Poles, Swedes and Dutch. Real events were erased from it and beautiful pictures of the ignorance of the Russian people were pasted in. Reverence for Europe was inculcated artificially and forcibly, trampling on and nullifying all the traditional folk values.
So who are you really Peter Alekseevich Romanov
There are many blank spots and ridiculous inconsistencies in history. But the phenomenon of Peter I stands alone here. The first 28 years of his life are especially dimly lit. Even the very origin of Peter I is not as obvious as it seems at first glance. The obvious anti-Russian emphasis of his policy, rejection of Orthodox traditions and the destruction of the centuries-old structure of Russian society have no unambiguous explanation. After all, that's what he and the tsar, to defend the ancient Russian values. That is why he and the Sovereign Father, to protect his people. That is why he is the anointed of God to defend Orthodoxy. And Peter hated not only Russia, not only his subjects, but also his own crowned predecessors. There were persistent rumors among the people about the non-Russian origin of Peter. They called him the Antichrist, the German foundling. The difference between Tsar Alexei and his son was striking,that many historians had suspicions of the non-Russian origin of Peter. Moreover, the official version of Peter's origin was too unconvincing. She left and leaves more questions than answers. Many researchers have tried to lift the curtain of the strange lack of understanding about the Peter the Great phenomenon. However, all these attempts instantly fell under the strictest taboo of the ruling house of the Romanovs. The Peter phenomenon remained unsolved. Continuation in the book by Alexander Kas "The collapse of the empire of the Russian tsars". However, all these attempts instantly fell under the strictest taboo of the ruling house of the Romanovs. The Peter phenomenon remained unsolved. Continuation in the book by Alexander Kas "The collapse of the empire of the Russian tsars". However, all these attempts instantly fell under the strictest taboo of the ruling house of the Romanovs. The Peter phenomenon remained unsolved. Continuation in the book by Alexander Kas "The collapse of the empire of the Russian tsars".
I am rereading the book by Alexander Kas about the early deeds of Peter the Great.
I was interested in two cities of Oranienbaum - one in the area of Peter's maneuvers on the Gulf of Finland, the second - a settlement invented by historians on the edge of the Voronezh region. Allegedly, in the second "Oranienburg" (historians write) there were events related to Menshikov and Peter in 1702, since they could not pass in the first Oranienbaum - the territory was hostile at that time. The idea that Peter the First is the enemy is seditious, heretical and treacherous, is impermissible for orthodox historians.
Reading the book, I got (as illiterate people usually write) - and so - While reading the book, I got additional considerations and observations (findings, with your permission). I will present them here.
On the satellite map of Ranenburg (Chaplygin) I did not see any traces of the fortress. Maybe he looked bad? The locals comment on what is passed off as the remains of a fortress wall as follows: “It’s not the remains of a fortress wall. It's just a piece of wall from an old electrical garage. The bank crumbled down, the garage collapsed, but this piece remained (meaning the bank of a narrow river).
But the main thing is that there is no lake! And on Peter's plan it is clearly written: "lake".
But in Oranienbaum there is a pond with a fortress: "on the other side of the Lower pond in the Friedental valley (German: the valley of peace), the fortress of St. Peter appeared." The fortress, as in the drawing of Peter, had 5 bastions and, like everything that was Peter's, was later called "amusing". True, its construction is attributed to the 1756th year. And what to do?.. “It is possible that the author of the drawing was also Peter” (they mean the grandson of Peter the Great). According to traditional chronology, almost immediately the fortress was completely rebuilt (strange, of course) and again "there is no reliable information about the author of the fortress project." And ends in the water.
The fortress has not survived. It is logical - they were removed from the territory of the estate as unnecessary. But who would need to tear down the fortress in the outback between Ryazan and Voronezh is not clear.
What is passed off as Menshikov's house in the Voronezh Region does not in any way correspond to the scale of his personality. To give a whole fortress in addition to this shed is a disproportionate absurdity.
The Menshikov House is a confirmation of the real capabilities of the builders of the 18th century.
The French traveler Marquis Astolphe de Custine, who visited Oranienbaum (Lomonosov) in 1839, wrote: “Leaving the palace, I asked to show me the ruins of a small fortress, from which Peter III was taken to Ropsha, where he was killed. I was taken to some small village on the outskirts; I saw dry ditches, traces of fortifications and piles of stones - modern ruins, created more by politics than time. " Obviously, no attempt was made to preserve the memory of the fortress. Traditional historians will say: because they did not honor the memory of Peter III. But another version is also equivalent: they did not want to remind of the deeds of Peter I in these places. And that is not all. During the Great Patriotic War, it became clear that Oraninbaum is an excellent place not for "amusing", but for real fortresses. The Oranienbaum bridgehead is located here - an area on the southern coast of the Gulf of Finland,which was cut off from the main Soviet forces during the Great Patriotic War and played a significant role in the defense of Leningrad. Thanks to the feat of the bridgehead defenders, all the buildings of Oranienbaum have retained their authenticity (Wiki). So Peter and Menshikov built fortresses here not for "fun", but for a serious military operation. The funny thing is, it becomes clear where the Voronezh River came from in the imaginations of historians (Lesnoy Voronezh flows near the town of Chaplygin): "The western point of the Oranienbaum bridgehead - on the Voronka River - was the westernmost point of the USSR, not occupied by the Wehrmacht troops." After the confluence of Lesnoy and Polny Voronezh, the Voronezh river flows for about 60 km to the northwest, then about 5 km below the confluence of the Stanovaya Ryasa river (source: Chaplyginsky district of Lipetsk region),bends sharply from north to south with a slight deviation to the southwest. So they moved (on paper) the scene of action from the Voronezh River to the Voronezh River - sewn-covered, according to the documents, everything will come together.
Fiction of the author. The story of the Great City - the glory of the ancient era (continued)
Residence of Friedrich Ludwig, Duke of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Beck, Holland. - Our relative became at the helm of one of the greatest empires. But Russia is strong and unpredictable, managing it at such a distance promises many problems. I think the only correct decision is the option of moving the capital of the Russian state closer to the northern sea routes. - But how to make the Russian court leave Moscow? - I have an idea in this regard, to raise the old maps of the trade route across the Neva. - You mean the ruins of the city at the mouth of the river? There is also not far from Kotlin Island, with ancient forts and a fortress. - Yes. - So the place there is unprofitable, swamps, off-road, in winter the bay freezes over, ship wood rots in fresh water. Even the Swedes refused it, considering it inexpedient to restore the city, which is constantly sinking under water. Merchants passing by consider him cursed. They do not want to go ashore, fearing to disturb the ashes of the builders of these ancient temples.
This is the place that is optimal for the new Russian capital. We have preserved maps and plans, there is a lot of building material there, and it won't take much time for restoration work.
- Maybe you shouldn't give control over the fortresses of Kotlin and the northern trade route into the hands of the Russians? I suggest giving away Riga.
- And let the Russians into the Gulf of Riga, thereby giving them access to all the major trading cities of Europe, the opportunity to fortify at sea, concentrating the entire combat fleet there, and bring up ground forces? Not! Chancellor, you idiot !!!
- If we soberly assess our current state, we must agree that Europe has exhausted its ship timber reserves, Russian hemp and saltpeter have risen in price five times, overland routes have become dangerous, they cost us too much. Capturing the mouth of the Neva is the primary task. This is an exit to Ladoga, through it to Onega, access to Karelian timber. This is control over the north of Russia! Timber transportation is the main task, the waterways should be operational immediately. The place I have chosen is so remote and inaccessible that at any moment we can capture it from the sea, blocking the entire Russian courtyard, preventing them from escaping. Not a single army will be able to get there by land, let alone resist an attack from the sea. The game is worth the candle, and the forts of Kotlin will eventually play the role of a traffic jam that will block the Russians' access to the Baltic,not such a big loss. But we will gain direct access to the forest and furs, bypassing the key-city of Smolensk, leaving Muscovy aside.
- Equip a messenger with an order to his nephew, and send the order to Menshikov.
To be continued…
Confirmation link: "Petersburg is irreplaceable."
About falsifications"… Ivan IV (the Terrible) for the first time in 1547 was married in a church with the title of the Moscow Tsar, as an" imitator "of the Greek and Roman emperors. Of the 37 signatures that sealed the letter sent from Constantinople to Moscow, 35 turned out to be fake. So Ivan the Terrible became “The heir to the Byzantine emperors.” So the lie was legalized. Peter I continued the massive state falsification of the history of his people. For the first time in 1701 he issued a decree on the withdrawal from the conquered peoples of all written national monuments: chronicles, chronographs, chronicles, ancient historical records, church documents, archives, etc … This was especially true of Kievan Rus. In 1716, Peter I "removes a copy" of the so-called Konigsberg Chronicle,where the "unification" of the ancient chronicles of the Kiev and Moscow principalities was shown and the unity of the Slavic and Finnish lands was substantiated. However, access to the fake “copy”, as well as to the original itself, was denied. This Petrova falsification became the basis for further falsifications - the writing of the so-called. "All-Russian chronicles", which substantiated the right of Muscovy to the inheritance of Kievan Rus. On the basis of these falsifications on October 22, 1721. Muscovy declared itself the Russian Empire, and the Muscovites - Russians. This is how the historical name Rus was stolen from the legitimate heirs of Kievan Rus - Ukrainians. Peter brought a large number of specialists from Europe, including professional historians, who were attracted to writing and falsifying the history of the Russian state. For this, every foreigner who entered the civil service,swore an oath not to disclose state secrets and pledged never to leave the Moscow state. The question arises, what state secrets can there be in the "processing of Russian history" of ancient times? In any civilized European country, after 30-50 years, all archives are declassified. The Russian Empire is very afraid of the truth about its past. Deathly afraid! After Peter I, who turned Muscovy into the Russian state, the Muscovy elite began to think about the need to create an integral history of their own state. Empress Catherine II (1762-1796) carefully took up this matter, who did not allow the thought that in the royal family she could be among the ordinary Tatar-Mongol nobility. Catherine II, a European educated person, having familiarized herself with the archival primary sources, drew attentionthat the entire history of the state rests on a verbal epic mythology and has no evidence base. Therefore, Catherine II, by her decree of December 4, 1783, creates a "Commission for the preparation of notes on the ancient history of predominantly Russia" under the leadership and supervision of Count AP Shuvalov, consisting of 10 outstanding historians. The main task that was set before the commission was to substantiate the “legitimacy” of Muscovy's appropriation of the historical heritage of Kievan Rus and the creation of a historical mythology of the Russian state through revisions of the chronicles, writing new annalistic collections and other falsifications. The commission worked for 10 years. In 1792 "Catherine's History" was published. The work of the commission was carried out in the following directions: - Collection of all written documents (chronicles, archives, etc.). This work was already partially done by Peter I. The collection of materials was carried out not only from his own country, but also from other countries - Poland, Turkey, etc.; - Study, falsification, rewriting and destruction of historical materials. This is how the chronicles were rewritten: "The Lay of Igor's Campaign", "The Tale of Bygone Years", "Laurentian Chronicle" and many others. Some chronicles were rewritten several times, and the originals were destroyed or classified. So, were classified "Scythian history" A. I. Lyzlov, published in 1776 and 1787.., "History of Russia from ancient times" by V. N. Tatishchev, published in 1747. AI Lyzlov's "Scythian history" indicates that the inhabitants of Muscovy are a separate, isolated, distinctive people, having nothing in common with Russia (Moscow time), Lithuania, Poles, etc.; - Writing new "all-Russian vaults", which were written in the XVIII century.,and were served so that they are XI, XIII, XIV centuries. All these vaults preached the "common Russian idea". This was at a time when Slavic tribes lived on the Kiev land (glade, Drevlyans, northerners, etc.), who were already Christians, Finnish tribes (Muroma, Merya, Vse, Moksha, etc.) lived in the "Zalishchanskie" lands., which were in a semi-wild state, and these tribes had nothing in common in history until the 16th century; - To substantiate the unity of Kievan Rus and the Finnish tribes, thousands of different codes were written. All these vaults and chronicles, as indicated in the research novel by V. Belinsky, are only rewritten, and not a single original. NO ONE!!!Who were already Christians, Finnish tribes (Muroma, Merya, Vse, Moksha, etc.) lived in the "Zalishchanskie" lands. They were in a semi-wild state, and these tribes had nothing in common in history until the 16th century; - Thousands of different codes were written to substantiate the unity of Kievan Rus and the Finnish tribes. All these vaults and chronicles, as indicated in the research novel by V. Belinsky, are only rewritten, and not a single original. NO ONE!!!Who were already Christians, Finnish tribes (Muroma, Merya, Vse, Moksha, etc.) lived in the "Zalishchanskie" lands. They were in a semi-wild state, and these tribes had nothing in common in history until the 16th century; - Thousands of different codes were written to substantiate the unity of Kievan Rus and the Finnish tribes. All these vaults and chronicles, as indicated in the research novel by V. Belinsky, are only rewritten, and not a single original. NO ONE!!!there is only a rewritten form, and not a single original. NO ONE!!!there is only a rewritten form, and not a single original. NO ONE!!!
It's hard to pass by
Frederick I, Elector of Brandenburg, King of Prussia.
Elector of Brandenburg, wife of Frederick I.
Peter the Great
And here is grandfather, father
and son.
Hence the love of Peter the Great, who returned from Europe, to the non-Russian girl Martha. Information about the youth of Catherine I is contained mainly in historical anecdotes and is not sufficiently reliable. Her place of birth and nationality have not yet been precisely determined.
Marta Samuilovna Skavronskaya (Kruse), Ekaterina Alekseevna Mikhailova.
Catherine conferred the title of count on Karl and Friedrich in January 1727, without calling them her brothers. In the will of Catherine I, the Skavronskys are vaguely named "close relatives of her own surname." Under Elizaveta Petrovna, daughter of Catherine, immediately after her accession to the throne in 1741, the children of Christina (Gendrikov) and the children of Anna (Efimovsky) were also elevated to the rank of count.
For comparison, Alexei Mikhailovich Romanov and his wife Natalya Kirillovna Naryshkina, father and mother of Peter the Great:
Portrait of Peter I before the Great Embassy. Jan GOLE FITGORN.
The dynastic line of the Germans is strong, I bring to your attention a few more portraits.
Peter the Great
Friedrich II, or Frederick the Great, also known by the nickname Old Fritz (German Friedrich II., Friedrich der Große, Alter Fritz; January 24, 1712, Berlin - August 17, 1786, Sanssouci, Potsdam) - King of Prussia since 1740. A bright representative of enlightened absolutism and one of the founders of the Prussian-German statehood.
Duke of Swabia since 1147, German king since 1152, Emperor of the “Holy Roman Empire” since 1155. Now take a closer look at the portrait below, please take a closer look.
The official portrait of Peter the Great, printed on banknotes by order of Nicholas II, and distributed throughout Russia. (If the similarity is not fictitious, oh, how strong are some of the royal dynasties of Europe).
Here are some more brothers forever:
Emperor Peter III and King Frederick II of Prussia.
In order to soberly assess the influence of Europe on Romanov Russia, just look at the photo of the last Romanov, Nicholas II
… and compare it to the photograph of George V, King of Great Britain.
Conclusions to make you …
The deeper the roots, the more difficult it is to dig them out. The female line is fine too.
Sisters Princess Dagmar and Alexandra, future Queen of England.
Continued: Chapter 10. For what to say thank you, Tsar Peter?
Author: ZigZag
