This year the events of September 11, 2001 are 15 years old. In the morning, in New York, after strikes of hijacked (according to the official version, of course) passenger planes collapsed the towers of the World Trade Center. According to media reports, in the evening in Washington, another passenger plane crashed into the Pentagon.
It was with this aircraft that the investigation subsequently had the most problems, since its fragments and the remains of passengers were not found, and the hole in the wall was much smaller than the wingspan of this aircraft.
These are far from the only oddities associated with the collapse of the Twin Towers.
The official death toll is 2843 people. There is colossal destruction in New York, but in the midst of this destruction, a completely whole car is found, in which there are untouched and clean Koran and the passports of the hijackers. The phrase of the main character of the film "Beware of the Car" by Detochkin immediately comes to mind: "The beer has just been brought, and the roach has just been caught."
Already on September 11, President Bush announced that this was an act of Arab terrorists. CIA chief George Tenet announced the interception of al-Qaeda communications on 11 September. Suddenly it turned out that everything was intercepted, but nothing was prevented!
The investigation revealed a lot of inconsistencies in the official version. For example, for 40 minutes after the aircraft were hijacked, there was no communication between the Federal Aviation Agency and the North American Aerospace Defense Command. Journalists noted the confusion in the testimony of Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld. The authorities admitted that they had been warned by the special services about an impending terrorist attack, but nothing was done. Also on September 11, ironically, military exercises were held, during which it was planned to simulate the hijacking of aircraft. In the story of Gilbert Chesterton "The Broken Sword" to the question: "Where is an intelligent man hiding a pebble?" - Father Brown replies: "Among the pebbles on the seashore." What better cover than exercise?
Nevertheless, despite all this confusion, the Kin-Zelikov commission came to an absolutely ironclad conclusion - this is a terrorist attack in which Al-Qaeda is to blame. The commission was unable to answer a number of questions. Why did the towers fall flat? Why did the firefighters hear explosions inside the towers?..
Promotional video:
There are also some oddities. For example, the representative of the FEMA organization - the American analogue of our Ministry of Emergency Situations - Tom Kenny in an interview on September 12 said that the rescue team arrived in New York on Monday, September 10, so that on the 11th morning the rescuers could start work immediately. Mayor Giuliani also said that on September 10, rescuers were stationed at the 92nd berth, which after the explosion became the command center of the rescue operation. The question is - is this a thorough preparation for an unexpected terrorist attack ?!
On September 24, 2001, NewsWeek reported that on September 10, a group of Pentagon officers canceled their flights the next morning. And in February 2002, it became known that a group of businessmen, who usually held their meetings in a shopping center in the towers, held them on September 11 at an air force base in Nebraska.
According to the observation of Viktor Fridman, the author of a very interesting study on the terrorist attack, in the first days of September there was a purposeful activity on the stock exchange. In his opinion, some were well aware of future explosions, because the ratio of put options to call options was such that some people made $ 10-15 billion at once. And the owner of the towers, Israel's great friend Larry Silverstein, received $ 5 billion in insurance.
There was evidence even before the attack. One of the startling events happened in June 2001, when ufologist William Cooper, the famous author of the book "The Pale Horse", made a statement that in September, or at the latest in October, serious terrorist attacks would take place in the United States, and blame for them a man named Osama bin Laden. This man possessed unique information, so it is not surprising that at the end of 2001, Cooper was shot and killed by the police, accusing him of first resisting the police and then trying to escape. The police were not informed that Cooper is a disabled veteran of Vietnam, and instead of one of his legs he has a prosthesis - you can't run. To finish the police theme: according to eyewitnesses, after the first tower collapsed, the police were urgently sent to the second, which began to drive people away from the tower ("and the vobla was just caught").
Also, unconditional evidence is the fact that already in July 2001, at the talks with Pakistan, the Americans openly declared that in October they would capture Afghanistan. In September, even before the bombings, Great Britain conducted the most significant naval concentration off the coast of Pakistan in the annual Essential Harvest maneuvers. At the same time, NATO maneuvers in Egypt end with 40,000 soldiers being deployed to Pakistan.
The Americans generally have a wonderful tradition of creating situations similar to September 11 to resolve geopolitical problems. For example, on February 15, 1898, an explosion occurred on the roadstead in Havana on the American battleship Maine. The battleship's crew: 266 people, of which 260 are black and 6 are white officers. There is evidence that when the explosion occurred, there were no white officers on the ship. The Americans blamed the Spaniards for the death of their ship, which was the reason for the American-Spanish war. As a result, Cuba became an American semi-colony.
Sunken cruiser "Main"
The next issue in the program of the American crossbow is the incident with the airliner "Lusitania". Although the Lusitania was sunk on May 7, 1915, and the United States entered World War I on April 2, 1917, it was the sinking of this ship that was the turning point in creating a warlike mood among the Americans. This interesting historical event should be told in more detail. Although the "Lusitania" was a passenger ship, on board of which there were 1,200 people (195 of them - Americans), it transported - in violation of all wartime rules - 6 million ammunition for the Entente countries, paid for by the Morgan house. The Germans, upon learning of this, made an advance payment to fifty American newspapers and asked to publish an ad stating that they would not recommend American citizens to sail on the Lusitania.since the ship carries ammunition and, according to wartime rules, automatically becomes a target. But only one American newspaper in Des Moines, Iowa, published this announcement, 49 other newspapers abstained because the US State Department advised them to wait until the circumstances were clarified. The circumstances, of course, were not clarified, and "Lusitania" set sail. She crossed the Atlantic, since the Germans did not drown her, entered the English Channel and began to wait for the pilot ship Juneau. After a long wait, the captain of the Lusitania unexpectedly received a message that the First Lord of the Admiralty Churchill had sent the pilot ship Juneau very far, and they would have to wait a long time. The Germans observing the steamer understand that it is impossible to wait any longer and the liner needs to be heated, because 6 million ammunition loads is very serious. The order is given to "destroy". The British intercept this order but take absolutely no action. "Lusitania" is safely drowned, which becomes one of Belli's incidents for the United States to enter the war.
Sinking "Lusitania"
It is impossible not to recall the events of December 7, 1941, when 3.5 hundred Japanese aircraft fell on the American base at Pearl Harbor, destroyed 200 aircraft and 4 battleships, including the battleship Arizona, killing more than 2 thousand Americans. As a result, the US had a reason to declare war on Japan. Since then, American researchers have done much to clarify this situation. It is now practically proven that a little over a year before the events at Pearl Harbor, the Americans broke Japanese codes. This suggests that they were well aware of Japan's plans. However, Roosevelt did not lift a finger, because he needed an excuse for America to enter the war.
Speaking about Roosevelt, it would not be superfluous to mention the following: the scheme "Roosevelt's new course solved all the problems of the USA" is just a myth. Yes, he solved some problems, but he also created new problems. These problems were so serious that in the mid-1930s, Roosevelt had a very dangerous rival on the American political scene - Louisiana Governor Hugh Long. It was Hugh Long who became the prototype for the protagonist of Robert Penn Warren's novel "All the King's Men" by Willie Stark. Hugh Long was a left-wing populist who created property redistribution societies across America. By 1935, 8 million people were enrolled in them. In 1935, Hugh Long was killed, as it should be - a loner. This tracing paper is known to us from the history of the murders of the Kennedy brothers, Martin Luther King, Lincoln. By the late 1930s, America faced a choice:either serious social reforms, which, however, can lead to shocks, or a world war (by the way, Roosevelt began to use the term "world war" six months earlier than Hitler).
Undoubtedly, Pearl Harbor solved the problems of declaring war on Japan - after all, Roosevelt went to the polls with a firm promise not to let America be drawn into the war. At the same time, both he and the forces that stood behind him understood perfectly well that in order to become the hegemon of the world capitalist system, America must enter the war, more precisely, force majeure circumstances are needed that will force the United States to start a "retaliatory war." Ironically, one of the last commissions to deal with the Pearl Harbor problem in America ended on September 11, 2001. Experts concluded that the Japanese torpedoes were too outdated and weak to penetrate the Arizona's armor. Something else has happened. Most likely, there was an explosion on the "Arizona" itself. But since the towers exploded on September 11,Pearl Harbor - "the affairs of bygone days" - almost worried no one.
Pearl Harbor after the Japanese air raid
In Belli's list of American incidents, one can also recall the incident in the Gulf of Tonkin in 1964, which became the reason for the United States to enter the Vietnam War. The Americans shouted to the whole world that the North Vietnamese had fired at them in neutral waters. Then it turned out: the sailors of the DRV opened fire on the ship that had invaded the territorial waters of their country, but this was later, when the United States had already used this incident provoked by them to start hostilities.
As we can see, Americans have a very rich history of crossbows. Whoever wants to know the true story will easily find it out. Whoever does not want to, will sincerely believe that al-Qaeda and a man named bin Laden are behind the bombings.
Much has been written about this character, but it is worthwhile to briefly say about him, because this figure clearly shows how explicit and even more secret American politics is structured.
Bin Laden was born in 1957. In December 1979, at the suggestion of his patron, Prince Turki al-Faisal, who had been the head of Saudi Arabia's intelligence services for more than 20 years, bin Laden began managing the financial side of the CIA's secret operations in Afghanistan. He controlled with the help of systematized information, a matrix, which in Arabic is called "Al-Qaeda" (translated as "database"). Subsequently, this was the name of that ghostly organization (many researchers do not believe in its existence), on which the Americans blamed for the explosion of the twin towers.
After the end of the war in Afghanistan, the Islamists split into those who believed that America was the enemy, and those who believed that America should be friends and contact. Bin Laden ended up in the camp of Hasan al-Turabi, the leader of the anti-Americanists. In 1996, Osama declares jihad against the United States and Israel. In 1998, after the terrorist attacks in Dar es Salaam and Nairobi, where almost 300 people were killed and 4,500 were wounded, the United States blames bin Laden for everything and puts him on the wanted list. Then all terrorist attacks, including the events of September 11, begin to hang on him. In 2011, we were informed that Osama was killed in a special operation. According to very authoritative people from the Western intelligence services, bin Laden was not alive after 2007. Speaking about the massacre of 11, I would like to draw attention to the mores of the modern American elite. The media showedlike in the White House at the TV screen to watch the show, how they will kill a person, the top officials of the state gathered. Only "Wow!" were not told, as in the case of Gaddafi, the otherwise identical picture - the joyful contemplation of a bloody murder. By the way, all the American special forces who participated in this operation, after 1.5 or 2 months, completing the task, were ambushed under rather strange circumstances, and almost all were killed. Either they were really removed to hide the ends in the water, or they were simply hidden in this way from possible revenge.5 or 2 months, completing the mission, they were ambushed under rather strange circumstances, and almost everyone was killed. Either they were really removed to hide the ends in the water, or they were simply hidden in this way from possible revenge.5 or 2 months, completing the mission, they were ambushed under rather strange circumstances, and almost everyone was killed. Either they were really removed to hide the ends in the water, or they were simply hidden in this way from possible revenge.
It is also surprising in the story of "terrorist No. 1" that the bin Laden family had a privileged position and long-standing ties with both the Bush family and the Saud family. One example is enough. In 1979, Islamists staged an explosion, seizing a mosque in Mecca. They shot the pilgrims, captured the mosque. The trucks and the plan for the mosque were delivered to the terrorists by one of bin Laden's older brothers. All the participants in this terrorist act were captured and executed. Except for one, the one who provided them with trucks, because he is from the bin Laden family. In fact, the Bushes, Saudis, bin Ladens are one economic unit. It is significant that the finances of bin Laden's group in America were in charge of the CarlyleGroup, which ranked 11th in the American military-industrial complex. The group was created in 1987 and employed such people as former CIA chief Frank Carlucci, former British Prime Minister Major,George W. Bush is the father. Bush Jr. himself has repeatedly crossed paths with representatives of the bin Laden family. In particular, when he made money from illegal economic transactions at HarkenEnergyCorporation, he borrowed a very large amount from one of bin Laden's older brothers and could not give it back. This older brother later died on a plane while flying over US territory. Some journalists believe that this could have been done on the orders of the father of the hapless debtor - then President Bush Sr. Some journalists believe that this could have been done on the orders of the father of the hapless debtor - then President Bush Sr. Some journalists believe that this could have been done on the orders of the father of the hapless debtor - then President Bush Sr.
Osama bin Laden
Let's go back, however, to September 2001. Events immediately after the terrorist attack developed at a frantic pace. Already on September 12, Congress issued Resolution No. 1368 "The US Right to Self-Defense", in fact, the right to aggression is legalized. On September 13, in order to warm up the population, the White House was evacuated - allegedly the danger of explosions remains. September 14, Congress authorizes Bush "to resort to the use of any force against any country, organization or person that prepared, committed, or facilitated the September 11 attacks." On October 7, Bush announces that he has ordered attacks on terrorist and Taliban camps in Afghanistan. This is how the American military operation Enduring Freedom begins.
Interestingly, a note by senior US analyst Wong to the US Army Strategic Research Institute said: “Current public support for the war is comparable in level to that following the attack at Pearl Harbor. The Americans assert today that they believe military action is appropriate, that they are for a long war and that they have the will to endure all the negative consequences of the war."
Earlier on 9/11, Henry Kissinger wrote: “The government must be entrusted with a mission to provide a systematic response that will hopefully lead to the same outcome that followed the attack on us at Pearl Harbor - the destruction of the system responsible for this attack. This system is a network of terrorist organizations that hide in the capitals of certain states."
Which is very significant and symbolic, both Kissinger and Wong remember Pearl Harbor. Kissinger must know that Pearl Harbor is a provocation. He equates Pearl Harbor with 9/11, and thus implicitly blurts out. Isn't it strange that already on September 11, he knows what terrorists did it, and links them with Baghdad and Kabul.
In September 2000, the US government unveiled a blueprint for the New American Century, Rebuilding America's Defense. Among its authors - Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush (brother of Bush Jr.), Donald Rumsfeld. The project says: "The process of transformation (of the world. - AF), even if it brings revolutionary changes, is likely to be long, unless some catastrophic and accelerating event happens, like the new Pearl Harbor" (ed. me. –AF) And again - Pearl Harbor as a model, as an approach. People who know perfectly well what Pearl Harbor was say they need a new Pearl Harbor. In about the same way, at the beginning of the 17th century, Ivan Bolotnikov, already surrounded by the troops of Vasily Shuisky, sends letters around the country with a request to announce some new Dmitry. He knows that Dmitry is a false tsarevich …
In 2003, the US-British aggression against Iraq begins. And if Afghanistan is geopolitics and drugs, then Iraq is geopolitics, oil and a course to reshape the Arab world, to create a patchwork quilt called the "Greater Middle East" in the interests of American TNCs. It must be said that drug trafficking and the interests of drug control clans play a very important role in all changes in the Middle East, from the American aggression against Afghanistan to the so-called "Arab Spring". Before the American invasion, the Taliban reduced their heroin production in Afghanistan, and after the invasion, it rose sharply. The American invasion of Iraq provided the American military establishment with a very substantial source of income. And not only the American, but also the English establishment,since the heroin production zone in Afghanistan, as one of the American generals let slip, is the zone of responsibility of MI6. In general, according to analysts dealing with drug trafficking, 90% of drug trafficking production is controlled by three special services: MI6, the CIA and the Mossad, and 10% is in the hands of various mafia structures. Today, Blair is free to repent and say that the introduction of troops into Iraq was a mistake, but the job was done, and no one answered for it.
In a series of Freudian slips, in September 2002, the Bush administration released a document called the US National Security Strategy. It has just a wonderful phrase: "The events of September 11 opened up gigantic new opportunities for us." An amazing thing: the United States speaks openly about its plans and capabilities, while the world media are silent!
When the Soviet Union shot down a South Korean Boeing that invaded its territory, the world press went crazy. How much in vain did she condemn the Soviet Union. I will not discuss here and now the question of whether the USSR really shot down a passenger Boeing or some other Boeing, and the passenger was planted in Okinawa, taking from the South Koreans a 25-year nondisclosure agreement, which ended in 2008 … Let me remember something else: five years later, in 1988, over the territory of the Persian Gulf (not over the territory of the United States!), An American aircraft carrier shot down an Iranian Boeing. 300 people died. Ronald Reagan said that it was a pity that people were killed, but the captain of the aircraft carrier, although he was mistaken, acted absolutely correctly, as he considered that the plane was a threat. The world media did not criticize either Reagan or the United States - it is understandable: it is one thing when the USSR knocks down something, it is unacceptable;it's another matter when the "democratic and free state of the United States" does the same - this is permissible.
The fact that September 11 allowed the Americans to solve a number of foreign policy problems is one side of the matter, the external one. The inner side is no less important. One cannot but agree with those analyst journalists who believe that the September 11 bombings were the prologue to a change in the US political regime. No, the facade has remained the same, but there have been fundamental changes within the country. The executive branch has created new structures to extend to domestic politics the methods that the CIA and the military used outside the country in the 1990s and earlier. America has become a de facto military empire. This is very well covered in Chalmers Johnson's trilogy Blowback, The sorrows of empire and Nemesis. In a strange way, only the last part of the trilogy was translated into Russian. Chalmers Johnson is a renowned CIA analyst. In the late 1990s, worried about what was happening in the United States, he wrote this trilogy, in which he showed that during the Clinton presidency, very important changes took place in the United States behind the smiling Monikalevin facade. According to Chalmers Johnson, the military has de facto taken control of the United States. And the events of September 11 made it possible to de facto turn it into de jure. How?How?How?
On October 8, 2001, the Office of Homeland security was created in the United States. It was headed by Tim Ridge. This event marked the beginning of a profound reform of the American state apparatus. This Bureau became equivalent to the National Security Council, and, in fact, turned into something similar to the Bureau of Military Mobilization during the Second World War. The Patriotic Act, adopted on October 26, 2001, dramatically expanded the powers of the investigating authorities, increased control over the American population, favoring police brutality. So in the name of terror in the United States they institutionalized and legalized the police state.
In November 2002, under the guise of defending against terrorism, Bush signed into operation the Total Information Awareness program. This program allows the US government, without any restrictions, to collect any information about everyone who interests it, in all the world's databases. Admiral John Poindexter was appointed in charge of this program. In Russian, they say about such people: "There is nowhere to put the stigma." This man was implicated in the Irangate scandal that erupted in 1986-1987 during the Iran-Iraq war in connection with the secret import of weapons into Iran from countries such as Israel and the United States … The investigation lasted a very long time, and only in 1999 he received 18 months prison for the destruction of documents that testified to his guilt.
In addition to this "Total Information Awareness", the Americans launched another information control program - "The Matrix" (what is the name!). Under the guise of collecting anti-terrorism information, this program collects information about all US citizens and their addictions. It is not without reason that many analysts say that if in the 1990s the United States turned from a republic into a military empire, then after the events of September 11, they are rapidly turning into a new Reich, into a fascist state. In their February 2002 article "The Rise of the Fascist American Theocratic State", journalists John Stanton and Wayne Madsen write:, died. And while democracy expired,a fascist and theocratic American state was born."
As the English say: "Every acquisition is loss and every loss is an acquisition" ("Every acquisition is a loss, and every loss is an acquisition"). Russians say differently: "Don't be dashing while it is quiet." American neocons during the Bush presidency awakened forces in the Middle East that they now have no control over. America overextended itself. Americans need to leave the Middle East in their old capacity and come in some other way. During the shift shift, they need controlled chaos, which is what the Islamists are now creating, whom R. Labevière called "the watchdogs of American-style globalization." As is often the case in history, a certain event, solving short-term measures, creates medium-term problems. To solve medium-term problems, medium-term measures are needed, and they give rise to long-term systemic problems,which can no longer be solved without changing the system. Today it is clear: the situation in the Middle East has gotten out of American control, the chaos is becoming uncontrollable and turns against the "chaosogens gentlemen" who stumbled over Syria, more precisely, on the positions of Russia (as well as China, Iran and some other forces). In this situation, a nervous breakdown of the outgoing hegemon cannot be ruled out, especially if a woman becomes president, who in the States is nicknamed "Killary Clinton" (to kill). American journalists count about 400 strange deaths for the Clinton couple. If so, then we have just the second edition of Bonnie and Clyde, but not a movie one. It must be remembered that people who are not inclined to restrain their nervous impulses, be it everyday life or foreign policy, understand the language of power well. Then they keep their promises. Gaddafi believednot having the strength - and paid. Regarding such characters, who are now often called "partners", Shakespeare's Hamlet once said: "… whom I trust as two vipers" ("whom I will trust as I will adders' fanged"). This is how we should believe in the reboot proposals and much more.
… As for the events of September 11, then most likely we will never know the whole truth about them. Yes, in fact, all the detailed truth at the moment is not required. Almost everything was clear from the very beginning - there is a wonderful clarifying question: cui bono? (who benefits?). I think that now that America is in a much worse position than at the end of the twentieth century, we should again wait for a war. The CIA is at the ready. The only thing is that, unlike the Mossad and MI6, they work very roughly, clumsily, with the help of white threads. But that's what their media are for, or rather - SMRAD (Mass Advertising, Agitation and Disinformation), which these white threads paint over with black. US journalists are so successful that even a significant portion of their professors - the country's intellectual elite - believe that bin Laden blew up the towers on September 11. In such cases, I answer them:“And Kennedy was killed by Lee Harvey Oswald. Moreover, he acted, of course, alone - as earlier Booth, who killed Lincoln, and Sirhan Sirhan, who shot Robert Kennedy. The investigation is over - forget it. But we will hardly forget the events of September 11, because it was with this provocation that, it seems, began the last desperate offensive of the most aggressive segment of the Anglo-American elite, seeking to save itself at the cost of most of humanity.seeking to save himself at the cost of most of humanity.seeking to save himself at the cost of most of humanity.