In 1996, the book "Crucified Russia" by the famous Russian artist, academician of painting I. Glazunov was published. It has an interesting section devoted to little-known pages of Slavic archeology. The main conclusion of I. S. Glazunov can be briefly formulated as follows: in Slavic archeology, a lot is hidden from the wide - and even scientific - community. Moreover, apparently, he is hiding on purpose. In the light of our research, it is clear why this happens. Archeology very often conflicts with the Scaligerian history. This is especially evident in cases where the archaeological finds are Slavic. Therefore, it is Slavic archeology and the conclusions inevitably following from it that, in a certain sense, are a forbidden topic in history. And for many years.
Promotional video:
Large bronze statue of the Et-Russian Chimera. A huge grinning dog with a tail in the form of a stinging snake prepared to throw. Chimera d'Arezzo. Florence, Archaeological Museum
I. S. Glazunov draws attention to the almost forgotten works of the famous Russian scientist of the 19th century, the founder of Tomsk University, Vasily Markovich Florinsky. I. Glazunov writes: “Vasily Florinsky (1834-1899) lived for 65 years. Graduated from the St. Petersburg Medical and Surgical Academy. The brilliant abilities of the graduate were noticed, and after a few years he was awarded the title of professor. But it was not his medical knowledge and abilities that this man paved the way to immortality. Archeology became his destiny and all-consuming passion. More precisely, comparative archeology.
The outstanding scientist was looking for - and found - the answer to the burning question: to what peoples and what race do THOUSANDS OF ANCIENT KURGANS belong to, scattered across the expanses of Siberia? Florinsky's answer was clear and unambiguous: the most ancient population of Siberia belonged to the Aryan race, or rather to the tribes that later became known to history under the name of the Slavs. Vasily Markovich carried out a gigantic work, comparing the archaeological finds of the TROY excavated by Schliemann, the ADRIATIC VENETS (it is well known that the Veneti are Slavs, which both our and Western historians cannot deny), as well as the VENETOV PIBALTIC with the finds in the NORTHERN IUZHURUSKH IUSHURUSKH. The similarity of the found - household items, ornaments, dishes from the Venetian - more precisely, Slavic - lands with the SIBERIAN burial mounds was so striking that there was no doubt."
So, it turns out that Asia Minor and a significant part of Western Europe were inhabited in the past by the same Slavic peoples as Russia and Siberia. And it's clear why. All these are traces of the Great Slavic conquest of Eurasia, which, as we have shown in our works on chronology, took place in the XIV century. And today it is presented by historians as a "Mongol" conquest of the alleged XIII century AD. e.
Let us make a remark along the way about the excavations of Troy mentioned by Glazunov. One should not think that G. Schliemann really excavated the real ancient Troy. As shown in our book "Forgotten Jerusalem", "antique" Troy is one of the names of the ancient Tsar-Grad on the Bosphorus, about 30 km away. from the current city of Istanbul. Today it is the abandoned fortress of Eros on the Asian coast of the Bosphorus, near its outlet to the Black Sea. Very close to Eros is the "Mount of Isus" - Beykos, on which the symbolic "tomb of St. Isus-Yusha" is located. According to our reconstruction, this is Golgotha. See our books Empire and Forgotten Jerusalem.
The ancient settlement "Troy", excavated by G. Schliemann, in our opinion, has nothing to do with the real chronicle Troy. This is just one of the "antique" settlements of the XIV-XV centuries in Asia Minor. After the great Slavic conquest of the world of the XIV century, it was naturally inhabited by the Slavs.
I. Glazunov: "Florinsky writes that the Adriatic or Italic Slavs - Veneti, who were part of the union of Trojan tribes, having left Troy, founded … Venice, as well as Patava (from the Slavic word pta - bird, now Paduyu)."
About Venice. It is known that the city of Venice, located partly directly on the sea, stands on ancient wooden stilts driven into the seabed. These piles are already several hundred years old. An interesting question arises: what wood are they made of? According to some reports, this is Siberian larch. The wood of which has unique properties: it does not rot in water. But if Venice really stands on stilts from Siberian larch, then another, even more interesting question arises. Siberian larch, as you know, grows only in Siberia. How could the inhabitants of Italian Venice have learned about the properties of this tree? And if such a large amount of Siberian larch was delivered from Siberia to Venice, it means that fairly close trade relations were established between Siberia and Venice. But in the Scaligerian chronology, the ancient connections between Venice and Russian Siberia look ridiculous. However, in the light of our reconstruction, they are completely natural.
I. Glazunov writes further: “I remember how in Germany … where I worked on the embodiment of the stage images of Prince Igor and The Queen of Spades, I was irresistibly attracted to the famous island of Rügen, where the glorious Arkona was located - an ancient religious center, if you want, the Mecca of our ancestors - the Baltic Slavs. Soviet history textbooks, as well as our scientists themselves, obviously having their own reasons, seemed to have forgotten about the thousand-year existence of our ancestors on the shores of the Baltic.
Let's add the following. Today it becomes clear why historians and archaeologists really do not like to talk about the former presence of the Slavs in Western Europe, Asia Minor, Africa, etc. Although historians have convinced everyone that the Slavic presence in Europe was, they say, “a very, very long time”, But, apparently, some of them still understand that such an aging of Slavic finds in Western Europe is actually ARTIFICIAL. And that, in reality, many of these finds are OBVIOUS MEDIEVAL. Therefore, archaeologists try to touch the "sore spot" as little as possible.
I. Glazunov: “Being on the island of Rügen and learning about the archaeological excavations, I hastened to get acquainted with young archaeologists, students of the University of Berlin … One of them … shook his head sadly, and said:“What a pity you were late!..”
Why am I late? I asked in surprise. The young man told me that a few days ago they dug up a SLAVIC WOODEN BOAT of the 9th CENTURY (dating from the 9th century, of course, the Scaligerian - Auth.) AND FOR NONNESS YESTERDAY they again covered it with EARTH. "How? … Why did you do this?" The young archaeologist answered evasively: "Who needs it?" - “How to whom? - I could not recover from amazement - well, they would have sent to Moscow! " Looking at me with the gray eyes of a Viking, the German youth looked away: "Moscow is not interested in this." "Well, of course, have mercy on us, we have a famous historian and archaeologist academician Rybakov." The Viking frowned his tanned forehead: “We know the name of Genosse Rybakov from our leader, the world-renowned scientist Genosse German. Our business is to dig, and to report the results of finds to the professor. " Deeply agitated, I asked my new acquaintance,what are the most interesting finds were discovered by the German expedition. The descendant of the Teutons shrugged his shoulders and uttered an irritated phrase that engraved in my memory for the rest of my life: "HERE IS EVERYTHING TO THE MAGMA SLAVIC!" In Germany, the remains of the original Slavic population, the Lusatian Serbs, are still preserved. “The Luzhitsky language (Serbolic language) is one of the West Slavic languages. Distributed among the Lusatian Serbs (Lusatians) in the Dresden and Cottbus districts of the GDR (Luzhitsa). Number of speakers approx. 100 thousand people. " The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Brockhaus and Efron says: “Luzhitsky or Serbs (otherwise Sorbs, Vendians) Lusatians represent the pitiful remnants of the once strong and vast tribe of Polabian Serbs, whose language was spread before the Oder … this tribe partly died out, partly it was completely Germanized. A few representatives of this tribe survived in the villages and villages of Luzia, preserving in a rather pitiful form their language and consciousness of Slavic origin … It is almost impossible to determine the exact number of Luzic people … because many of them find it more profitable … to impersonate Germans … According to … recent data (written at the beginning of the 20th century - Auth.) There are 96,000 people in the mountainous Lusatians (52,000 in Saxony and 44,000 in Prussia), and the Dolny people - up to 40,000”[988: 00], article“Luzhichans”.) there are 96,000 mountain residents (52,000 in Saxony and 44,000 in Prussia), and up to 40,000 of the Dolny people”[988: 00], article“Luzhichans”.) there are 96,000 mountain residents (52,000 in Saxony and 44,000 in Prussia), and there are up to 40,000 of the Dolny people”[988: 00], article“Luzhichans”.
Then I. Glazunov tells about his conversation in Berlin with the deputy professor Hermann. He told Glazunov the following: “I can tell you one thing, that we have a huge warehouse in the GDR filled with SLAVIC ARCHEOLOGY and ANCIENT BOOKS WRITTEN IN OLD SLAVIANS. After the end of the war, we brought a lot to this storage facility, AND NOBODY HAS BEEN DROUGHT IN IT TO THIS TIME."
To the question of I. S. Glazunov, if there are Slavic books written on wooden tablets, the answer was: "Maybe there is … BUT NONE OF YOUR SOVIET OR OUR SCIENTISTS DID NOT SHOW AN INTEREST TO THIS." I wonder what happened to this "Slavic archaeological warehouse" in recent years? Didn't it burn out "by pure chance"?
As we have already said, Slavic archaeological finds in Germany, apparently, are difficult to attribute to the deepest antiquity, since the remnants of the Slavic population live in Germany BEFORE. IS Glazunov quotes the words addressed to him by "the writer and publicist Dmitry Anatolyevich Zhukov, known for his interest in Russian and Old Slavic culture." "And you have not visited … the representatives of the last Slavic tribe of the Sorbs?.. All that remains of the Slavs in Germany is a small tribe of Sorbs, in the GDR, however, no one offends them."
And one more remark. Some scientists are trying to comprehend the wide distribution throughout Eurasia of similar Slavic archaeological finds. They are trying to find in the Scaligerian chronology a place where all this huge Slavic archaeological material could be sent. But since the entire Middle Ages in the Scaligerian version is already "occupied" by other peoples, one has to go far into the past and come up with theories about some mysterious "ancient Proto-Slavs". In our opinion, all such finds are not related to the distant Proto-Slavs (who, of course, once lived, but about whom we know nothing today), but to the medieval Russian conquerors of Europe and Asia. It was they who conquered Eurasia and North Africa in the XIV century, and America in the XV century. See our book "Biblical Russia".
3.4.6. A look at Russian history in the light of a new understanding of the history of the Et-Rusks | Slavic conquest of the world | 1. The Slavic presence in Europe can be traced back to the 18th century
From the book: Slavic Conquest of the World. Authors: Fomenko Anatoly, Nosovsky Gleb