Read the first part at this link.
Having established ourselves in the opinion that the origins of the ancient Egyptian religion, culture and civilization as a whole originate in ancient contact with a higher mind, I would like to confirm this theory with as many facts as possible that testify in favor of this assumption.
Considering that almost all theories regarding many things concerning ancient Egypt are based only on the conclusions of their authors, I will try to provide my assumptions as abundantly as possible with indirect and direct evidence and facts not yet presented in the first part of the work.
One of the most grateful directions for this is everything related to the pyramids. Immediately I will make a reservation that as a model and example, I consider only the pyramids built from the third to fifth dynasties, since I consider them to be the carriers of reference information on this issue. Everything built later is of an exclusively parodic nature and does not contain the desired knowledge.
But before we delve into the study of everything related to the pyramids, let us once again recall the ancient Egyptian language and writing. This is necessary precisely because at the present stage of the development of Egyptology, everyone is accustomed to the fact that this language and writing have been completely deciphered, and Egyptologists freely translate and understand absolutely everything that is written in this language. But in fact, this is absolutely not the case.
Starting from the time of the first translations, and they can be dated to 1822, it was then that Jean-François Champollion for the first time made a report to the French Academy about his decoding of the ancient Egyptian letter, everything that is written in this language cannot be translated unambiguously. Any text can be rethought, and the most important thing is to put different meanings into the same words. In a way, it is a unique language that has never been fully understood. This is partly because no one is able to correctly explain all the richness of concepts that the Egyptians put into the same word combinations. To better understand this, armed with an ancient Egyptian list of hieroglyphs and words consisting of them, try to translate at least one inscription from any text. You will immediately notice that although the signs are the same, but what is written,has nothing to do with the examples in the dictionary. Another reason for this is the poverty of symbols, and, as you know, the fewer signs in writing, the more combinations of the same words that have different meanings. Elementary examples of any two modern languages, one complex with a lot of words, the other simpler, will convince any skeptic of this.
Therefore, starting a review of this topic, it is necessary to clearly realize that any text on the basis of which someone considers something already proven is controversial inside and out.
A special example of such controversy is the name of the pyramids, given to them by the ancients in epochs that are thousands of years away from us.
Promotional video:
I do not pretend to absolutely correct interpretation of my concepts of these texts, but, being guided by the scientific principle of evidence, I will try to give the greatest number of arguments, which will automatically make the assumption more provable than others. Such an introduction is all the more necessary because it is with the pyramids that most of the indisputable facts are connected, both of what is already considered to be correct, and of what simply no one notices. The main tenet of archeology and history is that a source of information, a monument or something, is an inexhaustible carrier of knowledge. The essence of this formula is that each student finds something new, invisible to others, and therefore the final conclusion is constantly changing or supplemented.
The pyramids most fully demonstrate the correctness of this dictum. More or less reliably known about thirty-one pyramids of Egypt, W. Budge mentions seventy-one, although he includes here the remains of structures similar to pyramids. They were built, the ones that have been best preserved, from the third to the sixth and slightly in the twelfth dynasty. The most grandiose and largest in all respects are considered and are in fact the pyramids of the third and fourth dynasties, it is on their example that most of the evidence will be given, but the most informative are the pyramids of the fifth dynasty, since the so-called texts of the pyramids laid down on the walls of their interior the basis of the book of the dead and many other cult texts.
There are many inconsistencies in the existing chronology of the creation of the pyramids. It can be said directly and honestly that Egyptologists simply forcefully reduce many facts in accordance with their assumptions, and ignore the contradictions, returning to them only when something happens, for example, they find something that destroys the old theory to the ground. It will be a little inappropriate, but necessary, to note also that in the late nineteenth - early twentieth centuries of our era, very many Egyptologists, believing that they knew exactly the meaning of the hieroglyphs, did not accept the deciphering of the same Champollion. In this regard, the same texts have been translated in different ways. For example, W. Budge in his book "The Mummy" takes on faith the comments of the ancient Greek authors associating hieroglyphs with the visual arts (this is actually the case). But at the same time he agrees with their conclusions about the semantic meaning of the given hieroglyphs.
Personally, with all due respect to the humanitarian knowledge of ancient Greece and Rome, I will not undertake to believe in the correctness of their conclusions, because if some priests from Egypt taught these learned men their literacy, then it would make sense, but only for based on their personal conclusions, it is unlikely that anything is true. First of all, because these researchers lived in the era of the early formation of civilization and did not have at hand technical analogues and scientific theories that would answer many inexplicable descriptions and phenomena of ancient Egyptian history. But the most important thing is that all scientists who have been deciphering hieroglyphs for two hundred years do not agree with the conclusions of their colleagues. This clearly demonstrates the controversy of any conclusions on this topic.
So, the first pyramid in our short review will be the famous pyramid of Djoser or Mount Nethirehet, the third dynasty. The time of construction, according to various sources, from 4700 BC, the old version, up to 2700. BC, the modern version, by the way, is completely illogical, although it is based on newer research. The ancient name of this pyramid is unknown, in addition, in the book on which I rely when writing this work, there are many inconsistencies that have arisen either through the fault of the compiler or through the fault of the author. So Djoser is listed as the first pharaoh of the third dynasty and right there in the table of dynasties he is the second after Sanakhte in the list of the third dynasty. At the same time, nothing about Sanakhta is explained, although it is clear that he is a pharaoh. The name Djoser began to apply to this pharaoh from the time of the Ramses, a new kingdom, since this name is more ancient,than many "Greek" names of the pharaohs, until a certain moment it was in circulation as the main one. In fact, the true name of Horus is Netheirehed.
The Pyramid of Djoser is considered the first large pyramid, the original height is 60 meters, and although it is built of bricks, and not of giant blocks, its size and preservation inspire respect for the architect and builders. Moreover, these bricks can be called so only conditionally. Their size is up to several meters and the masonry is made without a binder solution (as in the pyramids of Sneferu, Khufu, Khefren, Menkaur). The fact of inclined masonry deserves special attention. All "bricks" are slightly inclined towards the inner part of the pyramid, which gives the building stability. It should be noted that such a technique is based on knowledge of physics and architectural experience, the accumulation of which requires practice and, consequently, the remains of other buildings on this basis, which does not exist. Therefore, absolutely nothing prevents us from supposingthat such a construction technique was "gifted" to the Egyptians, how much was "gifted" about which they themselves openly wrote everywhere. In any case, there are many more logically provable examples in favor of such an assumption than against it. In general, it would be most correct to arrange the pyramids according to the chronology available now, so as not to confuse the time of construction and the reign of their creators. Following this motto, we will initially arrange the pyramids in order of priority. Djoser - 1 pyramid; Huni - 1 pyramid, and that is not completed; Sneferu - 2 pyramids and one completed behind Huni; Khufu - 1, but what a !; Khefren - 1, almost the same as Khufu's; Menkaur-1, a breakdown is already felt. Masonry with a slope inward was also used later, and much later and after the construction of the large pyramids of the fourth dynasty and even after the pyramids of the fifth. The twelfth dynasty. The pyramid of Sesostris at Fayum has a very curious masonry with a central line across the entire structure and an inward slope on both sides. True, the bricks are smaller there, but the technique is the same, which speaks of the vitality of knowledge somewhere in the depths of the priestly-building caste. The underground layout of the first considered pyramid of Djoser is quite complex and is not described in detail anywhere. The given figures and diagrams in the available editions are contradictory and without explanations, for example, I am very interested why one of the cameras is called “stellar”, but this is nowhere explained. As in the pyramids of the fourth dynasty, there are no inscriptions or drawings in the Djoser pyramid, all this is in the adjacent pyramid complex. More precisely, there was. In the literature I looked through and in the photographs, I did not find not a single example relating to the time of Djoser, moreover, there was not even a mention of it. Meanwhile, in Pierre Monte's book "Egypt of the Rameses" is quoted a priest of the Rameses period, who visited the complex of Djoser and spoke enthusiastically about the beauty of his texts, he was also outraged by the blasphemous, in his opinion, inscriptions applied to the walls by his contemporaries, who not only stupid, but also mediocre in terms of art. But an example of these inscriptions is given, and there are even many photographs. The content is something like this. "Here Khadnakhte, the treasure scribe, made a pleasant journey west of Memphis." Almost "Vasya was here" - it is not surprising that an educated person was outraged. Write something like this now on the wall of the temple and you will immediately know what they think of you.who visited the Djoser's complex and enthusiastically spoke about the beauty of his texts, he was also outraged by the blasphemous, in his opinion, inscriptions applied on the walls by his contemporaries, who are not only stupid, but also mediocre in terms of art. But an example of these inscriptions is given, and there are even many photographs. The content is something like this. "Here Khadnakhte, the treasure scribe, made a pleasant journey west of Memphis." Almost "Vasya was here" - it is not surprising that an educated person was outraged. Write something like this now on the wall of the temple and you will immediately know what they think of you.who visited the Djoser's complex and enthusiastically spoke about the beauty of his texts, he was also outraged by the blasphemous, in his opinion, inscriptions applied on the walls by his contemporaries, who are not only stupid, but also mediocre in terms of art. But an example of these inscriptions is given, and there are even many photographs. The content is something like this. "Here Khadnakhte, the treasure scribe, made a pleasant journey west of Memphis." Almost "Vasya was here" - it is not surprising that an educated person was outraged. Write something like this now on the wall of the temple and you will immediately find out what they think of you. The content is something like this. "Here Khadnakhte, the treasure scribe, made a pleasant journey west of Memphis." Almost "Vasya was here" - it is not surprising that an educated person was outraged. Write something like this now on the wall of the temple and you will immediately find out what they think of you. The content is something like this. "Here Khadnakhte, the treasure scribe, made a pleasant journey west of Memphis." Almost "Vasya was here" - it is not surprising that an educated person was outraged. Write something like this now on the wall of the temple and you will immediately find out what they think of you.
But let's leave the texts, the layout itself, the dimensions and execution of the pyramid and the entire complex, although they are amazing, do not amaze with their inexplicability. More precisely, when considering everything related to the Djoser complex, there are no unanswered questions. The technology for creating the pyramid is clear and does not contain contradictions. It can simply be stated that at this site the ancient builders and architects demonstrated the maturity of their knowledge and skills. Moreover, the pyramid was built in several stages and, most likely, did not have the appearance after the death of Djoser. The many chambers of the wives and sons of the pharaoh inside the pyramid are proof of this, because they all died at different times, later than Djoser. Another curious detail. Almost nowhere, in the available literature, is it described whose mummies were found and where. But from indirect sources it can be judged that there are many mummies and they often belong to very noble people. For example, in the complex near the pyramid of Khufu, the mummy of the granddaughter of this pharaoh was found; there is a mention of this in the book "Egypt of the Pyramid" by Albert Siliotti and Zaha Hawass. In the already mentioned book by W. Budge "The Mummy" there is a mention, albeit without references, that all the mummies of ancient dynasties were found in a non-mummified state, skeletal. In other words, these are not mummies, but just remains. If we immediately remember that the sarcophagi of the same first dynasties were not decorated with inscriptions and drawings, then we will get another confirmation of my theory that the ancients copied cameras, waiting for a result for a long sleep, and that is why they did not need decoration. And only after, making sure that there was no result, they began to do something themselves,so that the body does not deteriorate, and the inscriptions and drawings compensate for what did not happen. The same W. Budge has a description. With reference to a certain Abd-al-Lafit that he had a conversation with a "trustworthy person" and he told him that once, when he and his comrades "walked" around the ancient cemetery near the pyramid of Khufu in search of treasures, he found a larger vessel, in which there was honey. He and his comrades began to eat this honey and one of them saw hair on a finger. Pulling on the hair, the companion of the narrator pulled out from the vessel the body of a small child, which was wearing many expensive ornaments. This story is simply unique. Firstly, it testifies to the fact of conservation in honey, and, as you know, this method was not very widespread, while the body was practically not touched, because in the environment of honey, everything filled with it did not deteriorate. Secondly,only a select few could afford such a method of conservation because of its high cost, and, therefore, the found child was clearly of a noble family, which is confirmed by the presence of expensive jewelry. And thirdly, on this occasion, we can unmistakably judge what was happening throughout almost the entire AD in the territories of the necropolises of ancient Egypt. Imagine a night, a moonlit cemetery near the Giza pyramids, three or four "trustworthy people" climbing into the tomb, eating ancient honey from a vessel with their hands and immediately pulling out the child's body. What happened then is quite understandable - I think these "worthy" people tore off all the jewelry from the body with the same hands, threw the corpse on the ground, calmly finished the honey and went to divide the spoils.which is confirmed by the presence of expensive jewelry. And thirdly, on this occasion, we can unmistakably judge what was happening throughout almost the entire AD in the territories of the necropolises of ancient Egypt. Imagine a night, a moonlit cemetery near the Giza pyramids, three or four "trustworthy people" climbing into the tomb, eating ancient honey from a vessel with their hands and immediately pulling out the child's body. What happened then is quite understandable - I think these "worthy" people tore off all the jewelry from the body with the same hands, threw the corpse on the ground, calmly finished the honey and went to divide the spoils.which is confirmed by the presence of expensive jewelry. And thirdly, on this occasion, we can unmistakably judge what was happening throughout almost the entire AD in the territories of the necropolises of ancient Egypt. Imagine a night, a moonlit cemetery near the Giza pyramids, three or four "trustworthy people" getting into the tomb, eating ancient honey from a vessel with their hands and immediately pulling out the child's body. What happened then is quite understandable - I think these "worthy" people tore off all the jewelry from the body with the same hands, threw the corpse on the ground, calmly finished the honey and went to divide the spoils.a moonlit cemetery near the pyramids of Giza, three or four "trustworthy people" having climbed into the tomb, eat ancient honey from a vessel with their hands and immediately pull out the child's body. What happened then is quite understandable - I think these "worthy" people tore off all the jewelry from their bodies with the same hands, threw the corpse on the ground, calmly finished their honey and went to divide the spoils.a moonlit cemetery near the pyramids of Giza, three or four "trustworthy people", having climbed into the tomb, eat ancient honey from a vessel with their hands and immediately pull out the child's body. What happened then is quite understandable - I think these "worthy" people tore off all the jewelry from their bodies with the same hands, threw the corpse on the ground, calmly finished their honey and went to divide the spoils.
The next, according to the present chronology, the pyramid is attributed to Huni, the last pharaoh of the third dynasty. Nowhere in and around the pyramid is the name of this pharaoh, but in the adjacent temples there is the name of his son Sneferu. Based on this, it is generally accepted that Huni did not have time to build the pyramid, but his son Sneferu, the first pharaoh of the fourth dynasty, completed it for him. It can be assumed that Sneferu built three pyramids, and his dad did not build a single one; exactly as many examples speak in favor of this version as in favor of the now accepted version, and the difference in the development of some plots may indicate something else.
One way or another, but the pyramid in Meidum is unlike any other. It is made in the form of several high levels and rather resembles a larger house, the original height is 93.5 meters! The ancient name "Stable Pyramid" most likely indicates that its shape has never been similar to the subsequent pyramids of the correct shape. The mountain of crumbled stones around it may not be its cladding, as many believe, but be the remains of the upper floors. Inside, this pyramid is very comparable to the two pyramids of Sneferu, "red" and "irregular". This similarity is mainly in the stepped ceiling of the interior, which is found in this pyramid for the first time and then continues in the two pyramids of Sneferu in Dakhshur and in Giza in the pyramid of Khufu. One thing is clear, all these four pyramids have some kind of connection, kinship. Either they were built by one pharaoh, or one architect. It is also believed that Sneferu, completing his father's pyramid, began to change its shape to the correct one and subsequently the layers that filled the voids slipped off. This hypothesis can be indirectly strengthened by the fact that the "wrong" pyramid in Dakhshur is a kind of unsuccessful search for the correct shape, which began in the completion of the Huni pyramid. And only in the “red” pyramid did the builders finally manage to embody the perfectly correct shape.
The height of the "red" pyramid is 104 meters, almost the same 104 for the "wrong" predecessor against the planned 128, if the angle of the sides had not been changed. The ancient names are "Shining Sneferu" and "Shining in the south Sneferu". It is very strange that practically nothing is known about such great pyramids. Nobody writes anything about them, they mention them in passing, nothing is said about their location. Tourist routes run far to the side. When talking about the pyramids, they always mean those that are in Giza, but
the complex in Dakhshur is no less significant, and no worse preserved. By the way, if it is considered that the facing of the Giza pyramids was taken away for the construction of Cairo, then where was the facing of the pyramids in Dakhshur taken? And who? There is practically no mention of what and in what quantities was found in these pyramids, there is absolutely no data on the mathematical ratio of their proportions, which is usually applied to Khufu's pyramid. The wall of silence and the parsimony of mentions, in my opinion, is not accidental. The fact is that, like the entire history of ancient Egypt, the history of these pyramids clearly demonstrates the fragility of existing theories, and sometimes their obvious far-fetchedness. I can demonstrate this especially clearly on the example of the already well-established legend of the pyramid of Khufu.
This pyramid is the only one about which there is a lot of information, on the basis of which one can draw at least some conclusions. Analyzing this information, let us dwell in detail on some of the most interesting points.
First. Never and nowhere have I seen all the photos of the interior of the Dakhshur and Giza pyramids. Only now and even then very bad copies of photographs of the premises of the pyramid of Khufu and a few others began to appear. Such stinginess can be attributed to the field of copyright and the laws associated with it, and the reluctance of professionals to bring up topics for discussion of the profane that only a few specialists know about. However, this is not the only point. As soon as high-quality images appeared, I could easily see what no one said, not a word about over many years of research! Why?! It seems that people prefer not to notice this, because no one knows the answer to the questions that arise.
On the walls of the "greater gallery" in the pyramid of Khufu, traces of machine-conveyor processing of the stone surface are clearly visible, page 50 of the atlas "Pyramids, Egypt" and page 58 of the atlas "Egypt. Art and history. " From the series "5000 Years of Civilization" by Bonechi Publishing House, bought in Egypt and, most likely, printed for tourists, although there is probably somewhere else on sale. No Egyptologist, three times famous, will convince me that symmetrical rows of furrows on the set of blocks that make up the walls are something else. In order to understand this, it is enough to look at any stone slab that has come off the working table of a modern stone-processing machine. Both here and there will be, though different in pattern, but similar traces of incisors in the form of symmetrical stripes.
By the way, excursions to the pyramid and its larger gallery stopped long ago, why? Maybe the tourists were shooting the walls too much ?! Or asked unnecessary questions ?! In any case, I do not believe that the microclimate of the pyramid would suffer greatly from a well-regulated visit.
A fact of this kind is like a bomb under the foundation of a cozy house of prevailing stereotypes and no one wants to destroy it. The public is being offered a cliché, and experts are quietly studying possible versions of what happened. But, for example, as a lone researcher, I am not at all satisfied with the fact of hiding information. First of all, because I cannot afford, having gone to Egypt, to obtain all the permissions of local bureaucrats for at least inspecting these monuments. I completely and completely depend on the disseminated information and even these grains are sometimes enough for me to draw conclusions that are beyond doubt. You can imagine what they are actually hiding from you and me, if a couple of photos and they turn everything upside down.
Absolutely all Egyptologists seem to agree that blocks weighing up to one hundred tons and with an ideally correct geometric shape were carved and processed using bronze tools, soft, by the way, so much that it is impossible to actually process such blocks to such a state as they have. In this case, why hasn't it occurred to anyone to investigate the surface of these blocks for the presence of traces of bronze of which a great many should remain on them. For research, you can take samples from the surface of the stones in the "ventilation shafts", since they are the most intact during all this time. In the end, for the sake of such a case, you can penetrate the internal blocks, with modern technology it is not difficult.
But no one did it, more precisely, I am more than sure that I did, but did not say about the results. And the thing is that if there are traces of metal, which were used to work the stones, then no matter how bronze, judging again by the furrows on the walls of the gallery. Schemes of lifting mechanisms, with the help of which blocks with the smallest weight of 2.5 tons were lifted to a height of 147 meters! Like the whole theory, this has long been associated with no one except children. And the fact that the pyramid was built for thirty years, and Khufu ruled for twenty-three years, although all this is very relative, no one at all pays attention. But this is not the most interesting thing. The most interesting thing is on the plates that make up the ceilings of the unloading chambers above the "Pharaoh's chamber".
It was there that the archaeologists Wiese and Perring in 1837 discovered some inscriptions that are still classified as records indicating that this pyramid belongs to Khuf and how much was spent on the needs of workers during the construction, for example, garlic, etc. Despite the fact that a good one hundred and sixty-five years have passed since then, no one has published these inscriptions anywhere, which is very strange. If this is covered somewhere, then, for sure, these are rarities of the nineteenth century. Many scholars believed that these writings did not belong to the time of Khufu, and something else, but never any evidence other than random phrases and mentions. In the atlas "Egypt of the Pyramids" published in 2001 with a circulation of 5000 copies, edited by A. Siliotti and Z. Hawass, these inscriptions were recklessly printed to translate,having a couple of editions of the dictionary at hand is not a big deal for someone who wants it. But before continuing, I would like to make a small digression.
On page 4 of this edition it is written. "All rights reserved. Full or partial use or reproduction of text and illustrations in any format without written permission of the owner is prohibited."
I didn’t look for this owner, because I don’t intend to quote the text of this publication, which is very stingy both in informational and artistic sense, which cannot be said about photographs. And to refer to publications, thank God, no one has come up with a ban. However, in this regard, I will not be able to show these photos with hieroglyphs, especially since the compilers made sure that even if their rights were violated, the photos would turn out to be of poor quality. They are given very small, and when scanning or reprinting, you simply will not make out anything on the print.
I hope that the content of the text, as well as its meaning, equally with the entire heritage of the ancient Egyptian civilization, will not be interpreted as a violation of someone's copyright. Moreover, for sure not a single pharaoh authorized the modern inhabitants of these territories or anyone else to the right to inherit anything.
So, we smoothly approached the consideration of the most grandiose pyramid of all time, the pyramid of Khufu, Cheops. Recently, many attempts have been made, it should be noted that they were completely fruitless, to read some information encoded in the proportions and ratios of the lengths and sizes of this structure. It is surprising that none of the authors tried to do this using the example of other great pyramids, and there are at least three more. However, the paucity of information about them could well contribute to the unwillingness to do this, as I already wrote, these pyramids are practically not mentioned, not that they are written in detail. The very idea of such an attempt is interesting, because a conversation with a different mind, most likely, will not take place in some language or with the help of gestures. If this is different from us in everything and, it seems, only according to the principle of rationality, then the only language,in which you can communicate is the language of mathematics, the same for the entire universe. The physics of a phenomenon can be different, chemistry is fundamentally opposite, etc., but mathematical relations and rules are the same always and everywhere. Looking from this point of view at the pyramids of ancient Egypt, one cannot but agree that something is sure to be hidden in such perfect forms. Another thing is how people are trying to read or decipher this information. All publications of the late twentieth century - early twenty-first on this topic are ridiculous in their attempts. Having started the book with attempts to multiply and divide something by something and then explain, they continue to try to find some dates in history in these numbers and end with completely mystical conclusions and occult assumptions. It is quite possible that some dates are laid in the proportions of Khufu's pyramid,but for sure these are not the dates of world wars, etc. And even more so, there is still no person capable of translating and explaining this clearly and scientifically.
However, we digress a little from the inscriptions on the ceiling slabs in Khufu's cell. To begin with, I want to note that a lot of confusion arises when trying to understand whether there were rules governing how to write, from left to right, top to bottom or bottom to top? Analyzing the texts, I came to the unequivocal conclusion that there were no such rules. Everything depended on the surface on which they wrote, if the place was narrow and long, then they wrote either from right to left or from left to right. If the place was stretched out in the same way, but from top to bottom, then they wrote from top to bottom or bottom to top. And if the place was like on the edge of the slabs in Khufu's chamber, then they wrote at random, similar methods are found now. People who know grammar, albeit not perfect, will still read it correctly, simply shuffling the meanings or letters in the inscription and choosing the only correct option.
The person who wrote these signs was in a hurry. Considering that no information was intentionally left on the pyramids of these dynasties, an attempt by some builder to write something on stone for history could and certainly often ended fatally. This is supported by the fact that the handwriting is clearly hasty and careless. It is because of this that many hieroglyphs are identified by mistake and, as a result, can be translated incorrectly. However, the signs are enough to try to read them correctly using elementary methods of graphological analysis. So, let's begin. It is written in a scatter and should be read from left to right in a column from top to bottom.
1. Located on the right in the lower corner of page 50 of the aforementioned atlas "Egypt, pyramids" by A. Siliotti. Read from left to right from top to bottom.
Transfer. The first part is "33 men from August to October." The second part is "66 men per year (during the season)."
Numbers and months when translated do not cause the slightest doubt in the interpretation, and the designation of men, the hieroglyph of the testicles, is much more consistent with its appearance than the concept of a person in general. Most likely, we are talking either about losses or about the number of participants in something. Judging by the clear correspondence of 33-66, most likely it means construction crews performing some kind of work.
2. Located just above the first label. Read from top to bottom.
Transfer. “From September to January, 100,000 men harvested wood (wood) (grab, beat, hit, chop).
To the left, something is depicted that does not lend itself to text translation, but undoubtedly refers to the same inscription. I am sure and believe that this is the emblem of a detachment of builders (as you know, in ancient Egypt, artisans and builders were united into brigades, detachments, and it is quite reasonable that each such association could have its own distinctive sign and number, which is also in the inscription) … The emblem includes a hieroglyph for hitting, chopping, striking and weaving other signs of animated content with the number 21 to the right of the emblem. That is, it is written who did what and when, clearly and unambiguously.
3. Shown very small, but discernible, one of the inscriptions is shown in the upper left corner in a larger scale and implies a cartouche of Pharaoh Khufu.
In fact, all three inscriptions are nothing more than the classic cartouches of three different kings with a listing, under them and next to them, of acts most likely associated with the construction of the pyramid. In addition, it is clear that Khufu is not in this list at all, since the signs of the birds in his cartouche do not correspond to the signs of the birds in the cartouche attributed to him. In the cartouches belonging to another pharaoh, there is a sign drawn like the signs in Khufu's cartouches, and they are drawn distinctly differently from the signs on the cartouches of the alleged Khufu, with a round head, while in the false Khufu cartouches the birds' heads are flattened. Considering that all this was drawn by one person, and this can be seen from the handwriting, there are no Khufu cartouches among the inscriptions at all. It is interesting, based on what concept, this pharaoh was ranked among the owners of the pyramid,the existing inscriptions with his name make it possible to reveal such a discrepancy for a long time. Maybe it's just someone convenient or necessary?
Transfer. Cartridge with inscription No. 1. Small, bottom.
Cartouche - the name "Man (man) bringing weapon (force)" or "Man armed beast" The freedom of translation is quite applicable and depends on what the people who gave this name had in mind, and we will never know.
Transfer. Inscription under the cartouche. “Many dozen (or 33) immortals (eternally young) were added, 81 (of them) attacked (arrived, appeared) on the recorded (marked) two holidays (weekends), the earth (them) was replenished.
Considering that the Egyptians did not have punctuation marks, all this should be considered as several sentences related to the cartouche of Pharaoh drawn next to it. In this case, we are not dealing with the deeds of this pharaoh, but with events belonging to his time, possibly reign. However, one cannot exclude the possibility of this pharaoh's involvement in the events described. In addition, everything described undoubtedly has something to do with the pyramid itself. Considering that in the translation of the figure 81 I am almost sure, the first part should more likely be translated as "many tens", and the figure usually meaning 33 in this case carries the value of several tens, without indicating a clear number.
4. Shown at the bottom left is large enough and discernible.
Transfer. Cartouche name. "Swift, bringing (the beast) the sun such divinity a hundredfold."
The text is nearby. "Established and discovered immortality (eternal youth) (for) 80, 82, on the recorded (established) 2 holidays (weekends), embalmed, (preserved, sealed)".
It was the hieroglyph, meaning eternal youth, immortality that was most likely interpreted as garlic, herbs, which is generally true, but not in this context, and even less so in such a combination of signs. But it is difficult to imagine what prompted and whom to rank the description of the provisions in such a text. The name of this pharaoh, already the second! It is quite consistent with the meaning of the text nearby. Both there and in the cartouches there is a semantic similarity and, in addition, the hieroglyph of a certain beast, which can be translated and how - bringing.
The meaning of what has been described is also combined as a continuation with the previous inscription about the arrival of someone in the amount of 81. And it is on this basis that one can probably assume that instead of 82 one should read 80 in inscription No. 4. At the same time, one of them disappears somewhere, but this is more logical than the fact that he appears from somewhere.
5. Inscription and cartouche, shown in small and enlarged cartouche at the top center and in the upper left corner.
Transfer. Cartouche name. "(To something) similar thrice, in wisdom (embraced) divine by mother, wise."
The text is nearby. “He who eats a hundredfold, wood (wood) (got) 80 (something).
It is this name that is considered the name of Khufu, but it is this name that does not belong to him. Firstly, because the hieroglyphs of birds do not look like a chicken, namely two chickens are part of the name Khufu, but they look like ibises. And secondly, the hieroglyph of the sun, belonging to Khufu, is also missing. Instead, a circle is depicted and the number 3 in it, which is not at all the concept of the sun, but rather means something to which everything else is numbered three times. If we try to identify to whom the ibis belongs as part of the name, then, most likely, as a symbol of the god Thoth and wisdom, the ibis acquires a completely different meaning, and perhaps this is how the divine Thoth himself was called, if we assume that he reigned as a pharaoh … Remembering the legend of how Khufu was looking for drawings of the "secret chambers of Thoth" and, assuming that over time those who wrote this legend misinterpreted the meaning,it can be agreed that these are the very chambers from the "architect of the universe", who can be called Thoth rather than Hemeun, who is credited with the pyramid of Khufu and the title.
So, we have simply amazing texts, which have been known for about two hundred years and about which not a single researcher of ancient Egypt said or wrote anything intelligible. (In theory, there should be a description of these inscriptions, but editions most likely date back to the nineteenth century and are very rare). Why?! Wasn't anyone able to translate it, or, having translated it, didn't understand anything at all? I think that's not the point. The fact is that these texts destroy the entire accepted chronology and history of this ancient civilization. From them, the following conclusions can be made for sure.
The pyramid contains three names of completely unknown rulers who reigned, most likely in the era of the first dynasties, and even in the pre-dynastic period. And if we take into account the list of their acts related to the pyramid, then it turns out that it was built much earlier than the correct date accepted now, and not at all in thirty years, but at least during the reign of three pharaohs, which theoretically can be equal to one hundred years. The absence of a cartouche with Khufu's name also speaks in favor of this. Moreover, it turns out that Khufu did not have a pyramid at all. If we remember that the ancient Egyptian writing developed, or rather, degraded from complex to simple, then the assumption that the structure of the pyramid went from great to small is quite viable. And then it becomes clear why all the other pyramids are no longer like this one,but only similar and less remarkable in everything. The entire chronology of construction is being logically transformed, and we see how they try to copy the twin from the great masterpiece, but it is either smaller, or of a different shape, or simply of the wrong proportions. I turned over quite a lot of literature containing complete lists of pharaohs known to this day and their names, including the throne and others. These names are not on the lists, they are completely unknown rulers of an unknown era, in which the level of knowledge and linguistic development of society, perhaps, even surpassed ours. It is also necessary to take into account that the semantic meanings of some signs in that era could have a different meaning from that which they acquired later, during the period of the ancient kingdom, or at the end of this kingdom. This is supported by the fact that translate these names and give meaning to the inscriptions,using the accepted vocabulary system is extremely difficult. I used U. Budge's dictionary and in addition, a huge number of images in which these signs carried a semantic load in conjunction with the entire drawing. And I tried, guided by a logical explanation, to isolate then this part of the drawing as a separate hieroglyph with its most common meaning.
Most likely, all the pyramids except the “great” one, now called the Khufu pyramid, were built later, including the Djoser pyramid. And they are simple copying from the original. Additional proof is that none of them have such ideal proportions and ratios of lengths and sizes. The legend of the pharaoh Khufu and the sage Jedi is harmoniously understood and the contradictions disappear. Dzhedi did not give Khufu the blueprints, confusing his head with various tricks and pseudo predictions. The Jedi was over a hundred years old, and it is reasonable to assume that even at the time of his birth, the construction of the Great Pyramid may have already been completed, and Khufu was looking for the remaining drawings. But, after carefully rereading the legend, I am nevertheless closer to the idea that the drawings lay, if they lay there at all, in the temple for much longer, because they are already for Jedi,who was then a child managed to become a legend and a shrine.
Having rethought in the process of writing everything that I wanted to say earlier, I decided not to consider in more detail the pyramids that were left without attention in this work, because I clearly understood that all of them, without exception, except the Great One, do not have the interest that I expected from them earlier … Therefore, the main conclusion of the work can be considered the translation of the inscriptions in the "king's chamber" of the Great Pyramid, or rather the inscriptions on the ceiling slabs of the discharge chambers. I can say with full responsibility that I have translated them accurately and efficiently. Using dictionaries and images known to this day, dating back to the era of Ancient Egypt. When translating, I did not make unnecessary assumptions and conjectures. I am ready to defend the thoroughness of the translation in front of any scientific community and the lack of scientific degrees in this matter will not hinder me in any way. Besides,I do not prohibit the use of my translation by absolutely anyone, nowhere and never, the only condition for its use is the recognition for me of the primacy of this very translation and the absence of obvious plagiarism. Truth should not be licensed and distributed for money, it is not the right to publish music discs and films and not a work of dubious content.
Without a doubt, the largest and oldest of the pyramids, Djoser, Khafren, Sneferu, Unas and others, are invaluable to science and more than worthy of study. But due to the lack of information and the conclusion already made, they lose personally for me the interest that was at the beginning. In their forms and interiors, the spirit and style of the great standard is necessarily present, and it is quite possible to find in them something valuable both in informational and historical sense. However, I will leave this to those legions of those suffering for knowledge who will come after me and those who seek at the same time with me.
ENDING
Having completed the previous work, I could not shake off the thought that I hadn’t said something. After going through everything I was talking about, I came to the conclusion that I had done too little for those who will read it all to have a clear and clear idea of what it is about. Speaking, for example, about the great pyramid and bearing in mind that it was a type for everyone else, I think it is simply necessary to support this statement with evidence.
If we follow the assumption that the creators of the pyramid speak to us in the language of mathematics, then it is indisputable that in understanding this language the key point is logic. Let us arm ourselves with it and try to see what has already been lying on the surface for quite a long time, and we, looking at this, do not understand anything at all, although it is easy to understand.
Let's start with a quick introduction to the history of the Great Pyramid. Herodotus wrote: "It is marked on the pyramid in Egyptian letter, how much money was spent on onions, garlic and radish" ?!
It is another matter that the real text does not speak about what Herodotus is talking about, but it is clear that this is the text that is meant, since Herodotus refers to it, talking about 100,000 workers employed in construction and
it is this number that is indicated in the inscriptions on the plates. Of course, there may have been other inscriptions during the time of Herodotus, but judging by his narration, he did not read them, but retells what he was told.
Let us recall that the entrance to the pyramid was "unsealed" publicly, so to speak, and many centuries later than the times of Herodotus, which proves the fact that the narrator passed on to Herodotus the legend (which existed for several thousand years, and did not go to the pyramid to read these inscriptions), albeit modified, but still a carrying piece of accurate information. Similar to excerpts from ritual texts, cited by me in the first part of the work. Also, Herodotus was told the approximate cost of food for the builders. This amount, most likely adapted by Herodotus himself to his own "talent", was 41920 kg of silver in units of weight !!! That is 1600 "talents", 26.2 kg each "talent".
But all these are most likely approximate figures and not subject to perfect clarification due to the impossibility of reliably establishing their correctness. But the Great Pyramid itself in this respect is more than a blessed example.
Many authors claim that she says, well, as they say, he who has ears, let him hear, and he who has eyes, let him see. But the language of conversation, as already noted, is mathematical quantities, the translator is logic.
So let's get started.
If you average the total weight of the total number of blocks a little, then the smallest will be 2000 kg, and the largest will be 40,000 kg.
The total number of blocks is approximately 2.300.000.
The total cubic capacity is 2.600.000 cubic meters or any launch pad with any rocket available in the world is placed in the pyramid.
In order to trim (with modern precision and quality, and that is how it was done) these blocks, it is necessary to process 13.500.000 sides of these blocks. The quality of the processing is so great that, for example, it is impossible to put even a piece of paper between the granite slabs of the Tsar's chamber, and their surfaces are polished to a mirror shine !!! With all the desire, small incisors, especially copper or bronze, cannot be done.
But this is only the processing time of the material !!! The construction itself can be expressed in equally impressive numbers.
If you try to fit the time for which the great pyramid was built in 20 years, then the average will turn out that every two minutes they put on a block, this is averaged. I will only note that these data are taken from published literature and seem to be reliable. Since it is absolutely impossible to assume such a thing (unless the pyramid was folded like in a computer program by unknown force fields), we take one step towards more realistic terms. We multiply everything tenfold.
So now it turns out that if one block was put into the pyramid every 20 minutes, then it took 200 years to build !!! But even 20 minutes is not enough, even taking into account modern technology, the most realistic (this is with ideally organized work) is 2 hours for each block. Again, with modern technology and a grandiose scale of construction and without the same days off and night breaks, which is unlikely. But then it turns out that the pyramid was built for 1200 years !!!!!!!!!!
And remember that we did not take into account the time for transportation and the time for preparing the construction site and roads, as well as the time for the extraction of stone from the quarry and processing.
From all of the above, absolutely accurately and indisputably, it follows that the great pyramid could not be built not only in a period of 20-30 years, which for some reason is considered real by modern Egyptologists, but also for longer periods equal to 50-70 years. After all, these 1200 years, approximately calculated by me, can be accepted only on the condition that the ancient Egyptian builders possessed construction equipment at least equal to modern, and then in an industrialized country. And if you believe the same majority of Egyptologists and take into account that the stones were processed manually with copper tools, and the blocks were raised to a height of more than 100 meters with the help of some kind of rope mechanisms and embankments, then the period of 1200 years can be safely multiplied tenfold.
But the fact of the matter is that then this does not agree with other indisputable facts, namely, with the radiocarbon analysis of objects found in the vicinity of the pyramid and with generally known knowledge about the climate of that era, the traces of which the pyramid must bear if it was built long before 3000g … BC. These footprints are found on a sphinx, supposedly built before the great pyramid. However, these traces could have been on the facing removed in the Middle Ages for the construction of buildings in Cairo.
So what do all these numbers tell us? In the language of mathematics, they tell us that this structure was erected with the help of a force incomparably more powerful than the present strength of human technology. But let's not be so naive, because with all these calculations, it is simply necessary to take into account the simultaneous execution of many operations. For example, I roughly calculated that if 25,000 people worked simultaneously on the processing of blocks and 10 people processed one block at once, then they could hew all 2,300,000 blocks in 5 months !!! Well, of course, this was not actually the case, but the numbers show that nothing is impossible here. I wonder if the calculation with 2 minutes and one block takes into account the possibility of stacking several blocks at the same time? If not, then the pyramid could well have been built in less than 20 years, in theory. The participation of the Egyptians in the construction can be considered proven on the basis of the inscriptions on the plates of the unloading chambers, their role and functions in this very construction are undeniable.
One should not lose sight of the fact that, following the logic, not a single community, even more developed than our present one, is capable of carrying out such construction for, for example, two hundred years according to a single plan and continuously. First of all, because the architect and engineers, and even more so the builders, will die, and the favorable economic situation will not last so long. From this logical conclusion, it follows that the Great Pyramid was built without interruption and in a maximum of 50-100 years, although the theoretical logic is less accurate and comprehensive than mathematics in pure numbers. This can be confirmed by the presence of three names of kings in the inscription, the total reign of which may be approximately equal to 100-150 years. Let me remind you that the historically recorded maximum time of the reign of one pharaoh in the entire known history of ancient Egypt,90 years old. Of course, all three could not live, let alone rule for so long, but in total and theoretically 100-150 years are possible. Let me remind you right away that in this case it turns out that the pyramid was built at a speed of one block every 20 minutes or faster! It turns out to be a logical nonsense, on the one hand, mathematical calculations and the quality of work execution speak of terms in centuries, and on the other hand, the logic and experience of the history of construction about terms that could not exceed 100-150 years.the logic and experience of the history of construction about the timing that could not exceed 100-150 years.the logic and experience of the history of construction about the timing that could not exceed 100-150 years.
If we calculate according to the same principle the Khafre pyramid and both large Snefer pyramids, I think we will be no less surprised, but I did not find sources that have data for such calculations, so I mention these pyramids without any data. I would only dare to assume that if there are similar inconsistencies in them (and, for example, both pyramids of Sneferu are much further from the Nile than the Gizian ones, and it takes longer to carry the stone there), then this means only one thing. The instant demise of all modern Egyptology as an established science and a global revision of the reasons for the progressive development of the entire civilization. And all the big pyramids can be quite calmly pushed back on the time scale of years 300-500 back and admitted that they were built in the era of proto-Egyptian civilization unknown to modern Egyptology,if you will, in the era called by the Egyptians themselves "the era of the gods."
There is, however, one more explanation, all this was built by the "architect of the universe", in our Lord God, and then all these numbers are understood simply and clearly, whether he will not be able to fit into such a mathematical framework, and not this if he wants …
However, the mind suggests some analogy. Everyone knows and no longer argues that the universe is infinite, but how is that ?! There's no end at all! Emptiness without edge and limit! The impossible is possible! You feel something similar, pondering the magnitude and dimensions of the great pyramid, comparing all the data and realizing that this is not possible, but it is and has stood before the eyes of a childishly amazed humanity for a good 5000 years only in its memory. And how much it was before, only the creator knows, the creator of the pyramids, whoever he was. If we follow the logic of numbers, then taking into account all the large pyramids in order to bring everything into reasonable agreement with mathematical calculation, their construction should be attributed to no closer than 4000 BC and add the subsequent rapid regression of society. And how fast can he be,well-known and well-known history testifies. For example, from the 19th to the 21st century AD, civilization has changed so much and stepped forward that the total progress of all the previous millennia has been surpassed in 200 years !!! The regression is likely more swift and merciless.
Author: DMITRY NECHAY