- Part 1 - Part 2 - Part 3 -
FILLED RUSSIA
As for clay, it is generally a mystery - why not black soil? Where does clay come from? And this is not an empty question. After all, if in Africa and North America we see other “natural processes” (somewhere part of the continent was covered with sand, somewhere with gypsum, somewhere the surface skin was cut off), but Europe and we were covered with a “cultural layer” how uncultured, which is even difficult to predict, since geologists were not given permission to dig deeper than a certain layer and excavate exclusively wooden fences, and if an excavator accidentally uncovers brickwork, then you have to immediately bury it, or the asphalt will fall through - the authorities are activated faster than it is in their direct responsibilities, find funding both for fences and for closing the gap and for the media to sound "official excuses."It would be better if we would be more active in ensuring a decent old age for our pensioners!
But we already have such examples:
And there are many of them:
This is Vienna:
Promotional video:
When you see buried buildings on the floor, you already have to throw a lot aside. But we see so many floors:
And how can you not remember the go-ahead “Don't tell my slippers! Buildings that are more than a hundred years old are almost all sinking. " This comment was left under a building of only two floors. Indeed, there are people today who believe that buildings along the entire street are capable of evenly sinking underground. Moreover, the buildings, which are different in size - one floor, two, three, four, and all exactly gave a drawdown. There is also a wooden building, as they say - also a drawdown. I grew up in a young city under construction, there are 9, 10-storey and also 16-storey. So, not a single building in a third of a century has gone even a millimeter underground, but we are told about a building with a couple of floors that they can sink. Examples with "dugouts" are also interesting, since I analyzed them at one time - there is no foundation, but there is no drawdown either.
But that's not the point. Just bring this debriefing to the question - what do surveyors do? How do they measure out what they measure out, where to put the building, and where not? They get in touch with the top management, and those on old maps that were in this place before, check whether to put the building or not? Or simply - they arrived, scanned them with radars - what if the building would fall into an underground city and there, by chance, people would see a block seven meters high and fifteen meters wide? After all, what are they telling us that they taste the clay and determine by the color which clay is greater than the clay of all the clays? In addition, on the buildings of the young city, I have never seen geologists and archaeologists - it’s not interesting to see them there. The excavation site is apparently dictated from above, but what does not fit into generally accepted views,we all know a bunch of examples from the time of Stalin - to bury, pour concrete, as you need to fulfill the plan! This is the difference, why commercial thinking was imposed on the modern generation, and not practical - so that the capitalism machine would work without failure.
In addition, let's drive another nail into the lid of the coffin with the lisp of false science - how many so-called quarries have our generation developed? We have inherited almost 99 percent of the "quarries" from the past! But nevertheless, the TV tells us how we are developing, how minerals are looking for the most slack offices that have no legal right to speak as they are.
I'll drive another carnation into this lid … where did the black earth come from? Let's take a little closer look at the first excerpt we come across from official sources:
How long have soils appeared on Earth? More than 500 million years, if you count with "distant ancestors". Well, how old are today's soils? From 0 to 5 - 7 million years. The soils we encounter today had predecessors. And you can get to know them. True, you will have to go far - to Antarctica, to the Atacama and Sahara deserts, and also to climb high in the mountains. What kind of soil will we find there? The surfaces of crushed stone or fine earth are covered with films with a thickness of I - 3 mm, in which organic substances formed as a result of the activity of microorganisms accumulate. About 400 million years ago, peat bog soils joined these primitive film soils, and about 300 million years ago, soils appeared with leaching and erosion horizons, with carbonate new formations, i.e., soils similar to modern ones. Soils such as chernozems,which were formed due to the powerful root system of herbaceous plants, appeared only 40 million years ago. And the youngest types of soils are tundra soils (1.5 - 2 million years).
We were taught something approximate from childhood, they say, a meteorite with organic bacteria fell from space millions of years ago, they began to rot and as a result of millions of years and some kind of processes we have a surface layer. In childhood, we do not have questions about how you can believe this and on what basis these sayings are generally held. When I was a child, my brain did not fit that the adult World could lie so much when I was drummed so many times "well, we are for the truth, we only need to tell the truth." But as soon as he grew up, he immediately realized how naive he was - the words "we are for the truth" were invented by adult speculators for adult speculators! Do supermarkets sell food? No, a substitute for it. Is toothpaste good for your teeth? No, this is harmful chemistry and spoils teeth! When you buy medicines at the pharmacy. Are you sure you are buying them,and not chalk instead of aspirin? Why do they irradiate us with X-ray and ultrasound radiation in hospitals, so that bones become fragile, people are frail? Why is the toxic so-called European-style renovation being introduced, which takes the whole immune system to hell? Isn’t the police militia pretending that they are against crime, and they themselves, like a rekkit, only look like an elderly saleswoman to rip off money or to chicken out from someone at the station? And these idiots who imagine themselves as border guards, why are they standing in some kind of field, dividing the Russian-speaking population with explanations like “this is an intergalactic border and on two sides are different types of aliens”, didn’t lie? They themselves understand that they are standing there because of lies, but they portray such atrophied, as if they were turned into vegetables in a mental hospital by experiments! What is this border in general, rulers, the importance of paying taxes,to fight each other and from where does it come to us, if not from school, where we were programmed for today's reality, to be accomplices of lies? Why did they come up with different countries and patriotism in order to break into pieces the love for the entire planet and give birth to hatred for it? Adult World, You have played too much, lead a meaningless life and leave nothing healthy behind you.
The same is the case with the official explanations of the "history" of chernozem.
But we can see from the above examples how the buildings were under the ground, and the black soil on the surface and almost with a bayonet. Another small detail - in Europe, in many places, there is almost no black soil, so it is brought there from "Russia" and "Ukraine". And we were told about million years of decay! They did not tell us the truth about clay, not about black soil. And this attempt to present us with a worldview turned upside down completely excludes a natural disaster, the ice age of glaciers that passed like a jeep across all continents, as well as the flood - well, there is no point in turning the information World around like that if the disaster were natural! The cold came not because of the glaciers, but because of the atomic winter, as the so-called flood could well fit in with this judgment. By the way, you will laugh, but the “ice age” was invented by the Bolshevik movement,which was directly related to England. Don't believe me? Here is a link to Wikipedia and read a little biography of the author of this hypothesis:
You will also find there such an interesting thing that the Bolshevik movement was not only in the Empire of Russia invented by them, this movement was present in all the invented countries of Europe, when planetary Russia was torn to pieces, and people were forced to degrade and emit that they believed in an invented history and reality of different, fictional at that time, countries. As they said in those days, "even the walls have ears." (geographyofrussia.com/skolko-let-pochvam)
SHABROVSKAYA PYRAMID
Space-scale technologies are also indicated by the structure, which today they are trying to cover with a “career” screen. For example, the so-called "Shabrovsky talc quarry" or "Old lens" attracts very much attention. If you go deeply into the search for quarries or not, you will not find a single proof, mined something there or made secret excavations. For several years I have not found a single proof, only literature based on the official version. And only one article with a different point of view. And here we will read it:
Recently, I learned about the existence of a very beautiful abandoned talc quarry (mine) very close to Yekaterinburg (near the village of Shabrovsky), which has not been developed since 1974. This place has long been a pilgrimage for Yekaterinburg vacationers - and this is no wonder. Not only is the quarry beautiful and impressive enough (its dimensions are 100 meters deep, the maximum width is 250, the length is 400 meters), but it is also very unusual. Almost all who have visited it note its resemblance to the pyramids.
For comparison, look at the photo of the pyramid in Teotihuacan (Mexico).
And after visiting the mine, I also began to be tormented by vague doubts: is this really a man-made quarry? Probably, these photos will raise a similar question for you.
What is the biggest misfortune of our people? “They believe everything they are told. There is probably no other place in the world with such a number of “trust” fraudsters. And I'm not only talking about those who hang us noodles from the TV. They are all around. They send SMS to everyone in a row about the allegedly blocked card, call their parents (“your son had an accident..”), spud pensioners, selling them penny medicines for their entire pension, pump out vacuum cleaners to insane aunts for crazy money …
So with this object (like a mine), things can be in a similar way. We could have been banal. Imagine the following picture: after the revolution, workers mining talc near this "quarry" discover a strange lake (most likely this object was flooded at that time, since water is constantly flowing into it). We pumped out water on you too! Pyramid wall! Then, of course, no one in the Urals had heard of the pyramids in Mexico, and no one had seen the Egyptian pyramids either. At this point, it is understandable that the NKVD-Schniks came running, all those involved in the discovery were declared Japanese spies to the wall, and the object was simply called “mine”. It was impossible to excite the Soviet people with stories about aliens, the planet Nibiru and other absurdities prohibited in this area. Narodishko should not have been distracted from the construction of "socialism" in a single country. Of course, they dragged all kinds of equipment into this supposedly "mine" to divert their eyes, broke another quarry nearby for cover (below in the photo), and began to slowly study this object, and pump out water.
While they were studying, the USSR was gone. The archives of scientists disappeared in the bowels of the KGB. And the "mine" is still worth it. The current NKVD is no longer up to the mine - maybe they allocate a little money, but what will the population think about such a miracle they don’t care … sorry - all the same.
And what should a person who is not used to taking everything for granted, having seen this career with his own eyes, think? He may have questions like this.
First, why is water being systematically pumped out of it if the quarry was abandoned already in 1974? After all, all this needs money - why should the talc plant spend it on a completely unnecessary matter? Usually quarries are quietly abandoned and artificial reservoirs appear on their basis. In addition, the plant itself is clearly not fattening - all the buildings are old, life seems to be glowing inside, but barely. And what immediately catches the eye - more than 20 years after the collapse of the USSR, an old sign with the word "USSR" still hangs at the entrance to the plant.
There is no money to change the signboard, but there is no money to pump water from the quarry!
Secondly, talc is usually used in powder form, but talcum bricks were sometimes made too. Let's say that the Russian engineer A. Stolyarov really came up with such a machine to immediately rivet bricks from the rock (this is the official version of the mine development). But why was this technology used only in Shabrovsky? I looked at the photos of two other talc quarries in Russia and did not find anything similar to these technologies.
Where are similar careers, even remotely similar to Shabrovsky? I haven't found them on the web.
Thirdly, where has it been seen that Russians work so beautifully? In the quarry, they created such steps, as if not the rock was mined, but the house was being built. More precisely - a pyramid. Moreover - the Mexican …
Fourth, if you read a very detailed article about how workers sawed these stones using special machines A. Stolyarov (link to the article), then you should be alerted by one detail - the photographs that allegedly illustrate the process of cutting the stone are not photographs, but in general it is not clear what. They do not prove anything, but on the contrary, they sow doubts in fertile soil.
You, of course, can simply say that everything I have listed is bullshit. Strong argument. That is to say - a blow directly to the forehead.
To this I can answer the following. In almost all regions of the world where people live, strange structures or objects are found that are clearly built by some kind of civilization, the level of development of which was clearly higher than that of local residents who lived there several thousand years ago (at the time when these objects were supposedly created). Traces of this advanced civilization have been found on almost all continents, except Australia and Antarctica: the Sphinx on the Giza plateau and a granite temple near it, the Great Pyramid and its neighbors, the Khafre and Menkaure pyramids, the Red and Broken Pyramids south of Giza, and even further south - the Osirion temple in Abydos (this is all modern Egypt), the pyramids of the "Sun" and "Moon" in Teotihuacan (Mexico), some foundations or parts of later structures (the temple in Baalbek (Lebanon), the "temple mountain" in Jerusalem,the ancient port in Lixus (Morocco), the cities of Machu Picchu, Cuzco and Tiahuanacu in South America).
More primitive, but also not corresponding to the capabilities of the people of the "Stone Age" structures such as dolmens and some temples were found in different parts of the world, but most of them in Europe (about 30 temples in Malta, a temple on the islet of Gavrini off the coast of France, buildings in modern Spain, Portugal, Wales, Ireland, Scotland). In addition to these structures, in some areas of Spain, Malta and northern Africa in Libya, numerous traces were found on the stones, which resemble the ruts from some kind of transport. As if some carriages in the "Stone Age" drove over the stones and left traces. And drawings on stones, which clearly depict some people who look like astronauts or airplane pilots, are found even in the deserts of Australia.
An interesting situation is developing. These representatives of some unknown to us civilization (possibly alien) flew and left traces of their activities anywhere, but not here. Why is this so? Indeed, until 1960, when the Soviet air defense accidentally shot down Powers' American reconnaissance aircraft near Yekaterinburg, it was possible to fly completely freely over the Urals and Russia. What kind of discrimination?
In fact, they probably flew, landed and built something here. But whatever they do here, all this will be ignored by the natives. Local residents, on the one hand, believe anything, and on the other, do not believe their own eyes. With so many mysterious objects all over the world, our homegrown skeptics immediately start laughing when they hear about similar objects in Russia (in particular, in our Urals). A structure resembling a pyramid near the Shabrovsky village … - Ha-ha-ha! - This cannot be, because we were told that this is a mine! Yes, if we, in the Urals, found a pyramid, we would have been told about it at school or on TV …
Exactly, what our people were not told about at school or on TV does not exist at all. How easy it is to rule these "highly intelligent" people with the help of television! Drive him any snowstorm, hang everything on his ears - any expired noodles will do. They will devour everything and not choke!
But what is it that is located near the village of Shabrovsky? I think that an expedition should be urgently equipped for this object for a thorough study. If someone gives me a couple of tens of millions of rubles, then I am ready to personally head it … Although this is probably devilishly dangerous …
PS: really dangerous. I almost stepped on a viper there!
***
That is why this is not a quarry, but a high-tech facility. Firstly, do you see slopes in it for KamAZ trucks and other vehicles, which usually happens in quarries? They are nowhere to be found. Of all the leaked evidence of the presence of mining, not a single photograph, not a single video, although photographing and filming took place both under the so-called "Union" and under the so-called "Empire of Russia". All that was slipped to us was supposedly lousy pictures from the newspapers, which, upon closer examination, show that these are just drawings. All the equipment at the bottom indicates only that it was not she who made this structure - this technique does not have such technical characteristics. On closer inspection, we see solid bricks, and where there is destruction, soil is visible, and extensive vegetation indicates that an alloy of solid talc, or, to use the words of science,the place of birth is not there - it is just bricks made of solid material. The platform is also all laid out, as if made of tiles, and as level as a table, which again indicates that the equipment thrown there is present to divert the eyes. And finally, when they tell you that such a quarry was developed in the Empire of Russia, they forgot to mention that talc is one of the most refractory materials - just imagine what an overdeveloped furnace should have been in the days of the “tsars”.this is one of the most refractory materials - so imagine what an over-developed furnace should have been in the days of the "kings".this is one of the most refractory materials - so imagine what an over-developed furnace should have been in the days of the "kings".
I assume that this is precisely a super-technological building. Why it was built - the key, probably, is in the very name "old lens". This is what legends are being snatched from, from which this name came “one scientist dropped the song and started digging in the ground, looking for the dropped lens, and eventually dug what was dug. And after these fantastic "legends" from the official science, we are still made visionaries. In fact, there really was a huge lens on this object, giving heat, for which the talc itself was needed.
Here you are - there is no career here. All that happened was excavation, like most other cases.
Bullets of Snowfall