Everyone knows that there was an ice age on Earth! And some people think they are not alone. But in this matter, you need to be extremely careful. The power and vastness of the glaciers, many scientists urge not to exaggerate - to put it mildly.
Here is the opinion of our scientist, Professor Valery Nikitich Demin: “In the scientific, educational and reference literature, an at first glance indisputable opinion prevails: the northern territories of Eurasia were inhabited by man no earlier than the 15th millennium BC, and before that all these lands were completely covered a powerful continental glacier, which, in principle, excluded all life and migration. Essentially, the glacier has fettered history itself!
However, the above absolutized dogma is contradicted primarily by archaeological data. The dating age of the oldest sites within the boundaries of the postulated glacial zone in the North of Eurasia begins at a 200,000-year mark, and then smoothly and consistently passes through all the centuries up to the observable and already reflected times in written records.
For example, the age of the Byzovskaya site on the Pechora is, according to various sources, from 20 to 40 thousand years. In any case, material facts testify: life here flourished just at a time when, according to the "glacial theory", there could be no life. There are hundreds, if not thousands of such sites and other material monuments in the Arctic zone of Russia. a glaring contradiction, but if only one!
The problem can be looked at, so to speak, from the other end. Why does the continental glaciation not repeat itself in the current, no less harsh conditions, say, in Eastern Siberia, at the “cold pole?” These and many other indisputable facts have long ago cast doubt on the scale and consequences of the glacial cataclysm that once befell our planet."
Seven books directed against the glacial dogma that paralyzed science and ironed history cleaner than any glacier were written by Academician Ivan Grigorievich Pidoplichko (1905-1975), who until the end of his life headed the Institute of Zoology of the Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. But try to find these books today. In the Russian State Library, the four-volume (!) Monograph "On the Ice Age" (edition 1946-1956) has been handed over to the archives and is not being issued to readers. There is no free access in other libraries to books that collect and generalize unique geological, climatological, botanical and zoological material that refutes the "glacial theory" in its current dogmatic form.
This tragicomic situation resembles an incident told by the author of the forbidden topic himself. When glacialists, that is, adherents of the "glacial theory", once discovered a second fossil soil in the pits, and according to their instructions there should be only one, the "extra" was simply filled up, and the expedition was declared "supposedly unheard of." In the same way, the non-glacial processes of formation of boulder deposits are hushed up. The origin of the boulders is usually explained by the "ironing" of the ice, although in polar quarries, boulders are found at considerable depths.
Ignored by supporters of absolutized dogmas and the opinion of the founder of paleoclimatology in Russia, Alexander Ivanovich Voeikov (1842-1916). considered the existence of extensive European glaciation unlikely and admitted only a partial one in the north of Eurasia and America.
Promotional video:
As for the central zone of Russia, Voeikov was more than categorical here: in accordance with his calculations, the ice shell at the latitude of Russian chernozems would automatically entail the transformation of the earth's atmosphere over this territory into a solid block of ice. This, of course, did not exist, and therefore there was no picture of glaciation, which is usually drawn on the pages of textbooks. Therefore, it is necessary to be more than careful in comparing the glacial hypothesis with the known historical realities.
Summing up the accumulated facts and summarizing the general state of the problem of the so-called ice ages, I. G. Pidoplichko concluded that THERE ARE NO FACTS - GEOLOGICAL, PALEONTOLOGICAL OR BIOLOGICAL, - CONFIRMING WITH LOGICAL INEVITABILITY ANYWHERE EXISTING ON EARTH IN ANY PERIODEUME
"And there is no reason to predict," the scientist emphasized, "that such facts will ever be discovered."
Ustin Chashchin is even more categorical: "IN THE PRESENT GEOCHRONOLOGY THERE IS A PLACE FOR ONLY ONE ICE PERIOD, THAT DOES NOT CONTRACT WITH THE FACTS."
A. Sklyarov in his article "Does the fate of Phaeton await the Earth?" writes: “The popularity of the theory of plate tectonics and the adherence to it of official scientific circles gave rise at one time to such a well-known myth as the Great Gondwana Glaciation, which allegedly lasted from the Ordovician to the end of the Permian (that is, it lasted about 200 million years!) and captured all of Gondwana continents (Africa, South America, Antarctica and Australia). … It should be noted, however, that a certain cooling, albeit not on such a scale, did take place during this period. " Tell me, my reader, can anything living exist for 200 million years on an ice-covered Earth?
The point of view of the aforementioned scientists seems convincing to me, and I will not talk about the ice age, but about a sharp short-term jump in cooling on Earth. Immediately after the geocosmic cataclysm, a sharp drop in atmospheric temperature is coming. Estimated spacing from -50 ° C to -100 "C. The estimated duration is two years. The nature of the remains of "prehistoric" animals found around the world unambiguously testifies to their almost instantaneous freezing.
About the animals found in Alaska, A. Alford says literally the following: "These animals … died so suddenly that they immediately froze, not having time to decompose - and this is confirmed by the fact that locals often thawed carcasses and ate meat." Here's how, even the meat was preserved? !!! Has it really lain 75 million years and not deteriorated? Or is it better to admit that the disaster was recent?
The disaster ended with the formation of permanent ice at the poles. The permafrost front runs along the northern latitudes, it seems to have fixed the border of the ancient ecumene and the lands formed as a result of the movement of tectonic plates, which indicates that when the disaster ended, the geomagnetic position of our planet was already the same (or approximately the same) as we are see him today. There was, however, a second movement of tectonic plates; although strong enough, it will not have such a destructive character. The conversation about the second progress is still ahead.
One large piece of land, breaking away, stopped at the South Pole. But here's what, dear reader, is curious: there are maps of the XIV-XVI centuries, which depict Antarctica. But it will only be "discovered" in the 19th century!
In 1512, the Turkish admiral Piri Reis published the Bahriye navigation atlas. (This atlas is still kept in the National Museum of Istanbul.) Its maps depict Greenland, North and South America with the Amazon, the Falkland Islands, as well as the Andes Mountains, not known at that time, with amazing accuracy. But Magellan will only go on his first trip around the world in seven years!
Based on ancient sources, Muhiddin Piri Reis's map depicts a large island (which is no longer present) in the Atlantic Ocean east of the South American coast. Is it a coincidence that this supposed island is shown just above the underwater Meridian Mid-Atlantic Ridge, just north of the equator and 700 miles east of the Brazilian coast, where the tiny rocks of Saints Peter and Paul barely peek out of the waves?
But the miracles don't end there. The same map depicts Antarctica, showing that coastlines and topography are represented with a confidence that can only be achieved with aerial photography at high altitude, if not from space. The southernmost continent of the planet on the Reis map is devoid of ice cover! The Reis map shows not only the coastline, but also rivers, mountain ranges and mountain peaks! Tropical animals are depicted: a monkey, a roe deer, a lemur, an animal that looks like a cow. Two large tailless monkeys, standing on their hind legs, hold hands as if they are dancing. Or maybe they are people?
Curiously, the map also shows ships with a perfect sailing system! And we are told that Antarctica was discovered in January 1820 by the Russian expedition of F. F. Bellingshausen - M. P. Lazarev.
Greenland on the Voyage maps also has no ice cover and consists of two islands (a fact recently confirmed by a French expedition)! In short, Greenland is depicted as, according to the official version, it could only be related to the geographical picture of the planet five thousand years ago!
The analysis of the Piri Reis maps by Dr. Afetinan Tarikh Kurumu in The Oldest Map of America (Ankara, 1954) and the examination by the American Institute of Marine Hydrocartography revealed the incredible accuracy of these maps, which depicts even the recently discovered mountain ranges of Antarctica and Greenland by geologists. And among other things, such accuracy, according to experts, can only be obtained using aerial photography.
Piri Reis explains the origin of these cards. They were found on a Spanish navigator who participated in three expeditions of Christopher Columbus, who was captured by a Turkish officer Kemal during a naval battle. Piri Reis points out in his notes that, according to the Spaniard, Columbus sailed to the New World using these maps !!! Piri Reis maps are kept in Istanbul (Constantinople) in the Imperial Library, of which the admiral was an honorary reader. Thus, based on all of the above, we can conclude that not long ago Antarctica and Greenland were ice-free!
In late 1959, at the Library of Congress in Washington, Professor of Keene's College (New Hampshire, USA) Charles H. Hapgood discovered a map drawn by Oronteus Phineus. And on Phineus' map (1531) Antarctica is also shown without its ice shell! The general outline of the continent coincides with what is depicted on modern maps. Almost in place, almost in the center of the continent, lies the South Pole. The mountain ranges that line the shores are reminiscent of the numerous ridges that have been discovered in recent years, enough not to be considered an accidental result of the imagination of the cartographer.
These ridges have been identified, some onshore, some in the distance. Rivers flowed from many of them to the sea, very naturally and convincingly fitting into the folds of the relief. Of course, this assumes that the coast was free of ice when the map was drawn. The central part of the continent on the map is free of rivers and mountains. As shown by seismographic studies in 1958, the relief depicted on the map corresponds to reality.
Question: how could the boundaries of the Antarctic land be depicted, if the glaciation of the continent (again, according to the official chronology) began 25 million years ago?
Confidently treated the cards of Phineus and Gerard Kremer, known to the whole world under the name of Mercator. The result of the study of ancient maps by MIT professor Richard Streichan: their compilation requires knowledge of geometric triangulation methods and an understanding of spherical trigonometry. And apparently, the compilers of the "primary sources" used by Piri Reis and other compilers of ancient maps had similar knowledge.
In particular, Hapgood also found a Chinese map copied in 1137 from an earlier original on a stone pillar. This map contains as accurate longitude data as the rest. It uses the same grid and uses spherical trigonometry.
Modern science knows other "strange" maps, which are united by the presence of unknown geographical objects at the time of their creation and the incredible accuracy of coordinate values. These, in addition to those listed, are Dulcert's portolan (1339), Zeno's map (1380), Yehuda Ben Zara's "Portolano", Haji Ahmet's maps (1559), Mercator's maps (1538), Gutier's maps (1562).), Philippe Bou-ashe (XVIII century).
But the most interesting thing is that I have not seen Australia on any map! And Antarctica has a different shape and is twice as large as modern. The mainland is so large that it rests against South America and almost reaches Africa. And the northeastern borders of Antarctica exactly copy the northern borders of modern Australia.
Well, isn't it suspicious? Finally, we need to muster up the courage and admit that the history of the geography of the Earth and the chronology of events in reality look very different.
Author: Alexander Bogdanov
