It seems like the same shoes, but what different fates (copyright film The Dog of the Baskervilles dir. Maslennikov)
How much has been written about the construction of St. Petersburg. This, in my opinion, is one of the weakest points of the official history and has not fallen down until now, only for one reason - most people do not care deeply what was there 300 years ago. Long-term forecasting is not available to them, and the question of the emergence of St. Petersburg will not affect today's earnings.
This, by the way, is a very effective way of managing humanity. It is necessary to create conditions when people are in constant time trouble and stress regarding their lives. You have to work all the time and your head should only think about solving today's problems. There is no time to study global issues of science, history, its purpose and further development. Perhaps that is why they are struggling with unemployment and raising the retirement age. A free, unoccupied brain is a source of eternal problems.
Very few people in the world have the financial ability to look around, to study what happened before and into what future the current chosen road leads. At the same time, half of them directly belong to the guiding circle, and the other has found a way to comfortably exist in the current paradigm, and even having seen the light, are not inclined to take active actions - it will be more expensive for themselves, and the benefits are not obvious.
Promotional video:
High-speed construction can be declared the delivery of millions of peasants to the locality (from Mars?), And the inconsistency of the building plan with the trends of that time, the brilliant progressiveness of Peter. In order not to go too far into the past, you can throw a couple of cards where the Swedes allegedly already have a city there. Like you climb further, we will also draw the capital for them there. The Swedes are dancing with joy. Russian alternative specialists gave up in fright.
In order to have a more complete understanding of what is happening, you cannot rest your nose at one point and study only it, global processes are global for that, in order to occur around the entire globe and be indistinguishable when you are a nationalist rested against your native birch. Even as huge as Russia.
Therefore, let's look in the direction of America, sometimes something happened there, and not all things are logically explainable either.
For example, not everything is clear with Washington, which is the local capital.
The government used to sit in Philadelphia at the Independance Hall.
Not a palace, but not a communal apartment either, of course.
The main shrine of America (well, maybe one of the main ones), the Bell of Independence, still hangs there.
Not so hot in size, but not like a cow.
An interesting detail - freedom in the United States cracked at about the same time that Montferrand dropped the king in our country.
You can understand Montferrand, it's not for you to hold the Alexander Column for a day in your hands in the water. The bell is really heavy. But in reality it is not known where the tsar's piece broke off, whether in his crooked paws, or a hundred years before that, during an A (surprise !!!!) fire. And how the Americans managed to damage theirs, still no one knows. They tried to know how to fix it. It still has a bunch of marks from drills and staples.
By the way, read, at least in Wikipedia, how the Tsar Bell was cast. This is a circus with skipping horses on a dog. And it would be fine, only they did not know how and when a famous piece broke off, but it says in black and white that after the low tide in 1736, they kept him buried in the ground, as they considered it too heavy. And only in 1836, having dropped it five times, Montferrand raised him in his arms. But only from the pit. Higher and he could not.
In the chemical composition, in addition to the actual bronze, another 0.036% gold and 0.26% silver were revealed. these are 72 and 525 kilograms, respectively. And this is in addition to the bronze itself (copper, tin, sulfur) for 202,000 kg.
On our throne, what were the idiots sitting on? What a fool at first orders a bell that cannot be raised, and then also keeps it for a hundred years in a pit to raise it, but not a story on the bell tower, but put it next to it ???
I would also understand if the customer overestimated his strength. He ordered a drink, they poured it for him, he pulled himself up, realized that he would not raise it, apologized to the people and ordered, if such was the case, to use bronze on the case. Previously, of course, trying to pick out precious metals from there. But so that? Moreover, it is not clear where to split?
Well, this is not some kind of distinctive feature of us and the Americans, the bells of many fell and cracked. It was necessary, just to read the instructions more carefully, since the weapons of the ancestors remained on hand.
Mahaparinirvana (India).
Well, some parallels, just in case, if anyone, at all, does not know.
Vajra, crown, bell, dome with vajra on top. Which of all this worked, and which was already being manufactured as a cargo cult - I have no idea.
Vivos voco. Mortuos plango. Fulgura frango ("I call for the living. I mourn the dead. I tame the lightning"), was written on all European bells. Instead of poetic taming of the lightning, put the Lightning Control and Zeus will appear on the horizon again. Or Jupiter. I do not remember such a character either in the Gospel or in the Old Testament.
In short, the leaders of the United States were sitting in Philadelphia at the Congress Hall, knocking on their Liberty Bell and blowing on. But then in 1783, the soldiers who were revolutionary helping to fight off the British Empire and their tax authorities, suddenly realized that they were underpaid for the war.
400 of them decided that if the government was well shaken, then coins could fall from them, which would also be enough for the delay interest. They gathered around the Independence Hall and demanded payment. In history, this will later be called the Pennsylvania Rebellion, and the arrangement of those demanding money - a siege.
Congress rushed to the Pennsylvania authorities, namely to John Dickinson, calling for help - "Help, they are robbing!" He looked out the window, looked at the disgruntled people gathered around the Congress building and replied: “There are only four hundred of them! You can handle it yourself! " And he went to dinner.
At first, the deputies thought to pay out of fear, but then the toad took them in their hands, strangled them, and the congressmen, ashamed of their first cold-hearted impulse, proudly hid in the toilets, having previously launched a carrier pigeon towards George Washington. He was somewhere wandering with an army nearby.
In general, in the end, the active army came running, probably just in case, took the money in advance and dispersed the disaffected. The congressmen were finally able to get out of hiding, but the sediment, as they say, remained. They decided that it was impossible to tolerate a situation where great men in the legislature could be locked up for four days by a gang of creditors.
As a result, the authorities issued a bunch of self-defense laws and began to choose a place to build a new capital, since Pennsylvania practically put them out by locking them in toilets. Moreover, they no longer wanted to huddle in someone else's jurisdiction, but demanded the allocation of land to the ownership of the government, otherwise you never know what Dickinson will come up with next time.
Pennsylvania then, by the way, changed its mind. At her own expense, she began to build new buildings for the President and a large palace for the Congress, but the deputies turned out to be vindictive and moved out of the inhospitable apartment.
For a time, government agencies were homeless, but in 1790, someone managed to persuade the state of Maryland to tear off a piece from itself in favor of the whole country.
Then President Washington appeared on the horizon again, looked at the map, praised everyone for their excellent choice and said:
- Here on the right is a pretty town. I was passing there once. Let him also be included in the new government district. And the fact that we, like hicks, will sit on a small heel. Neither drive fishing nor ride a horse.
The congressmen had to persuade the state of Virginia to voluntarily and forcibly allocate for common purposes a piece of their land, on which the city of Alexandria stood.
The fact that not only Alexandria stood on this land, but also the property of George Washington, namely several houses and plantations, they say, became clear a little later. Apparently, when the clause was added that on this part where Washington grazes sheep, it is forbidden to build government buildings.
This is a word about the holy city on the hill. The icon of all democratic gonfalons.
As a result, they fought for the territory for another three years, then a special commission of three people, including astronomer Benjamin Banneker, surveyed the territory and drew maps of the area.
Chief Astronomer, Cartographer, etc. USA suddenly turned black, which is a little strange.
In 1793, all questions with the territory were finally settled. The Negro marked the area and everything was ready to call the planners.
But it turned out that Washington, which is not yet a city, but the President already in 1791 ordered a plan from Pierre Charles Lantfant, which he drew without any problems, indicating all future buildings with coordinates, exact lines of the river, the Atlantic coast, hills and lowlands. In order not to get up twice, he at the same time dug future channels on the map.
That is, while a black man with his comrades marks out territories, makes his way through forests and slopes in order to enable builders to understand how best to use the territory bitten off from Maryland and Virginia, some Frenchman has already drawn everything.
Moreover, while measurements have been going on for 3 years, Washington, which has replaced three architects and acquired several new plans. From the first French, however, they differed so miserably that for example I did not notice them. And the Frenchman, by the way, was fired and he died, as befits all such stories, in poverty, leaving behind a pair of glasses and a snuff box.
About the same outlandish story about an empty place where a city was immediately drawn, took place in St. Petersburg. Moreover, we also had a fired Frenchman who drew the first map of the future city and who was fired.
President Washington was a simple man and on the plan of 1792 you can already see that the future city also decided to become Washington. Unlike Peter the Great, there was no suitable angel to throw a name on him.
And no matter what, no one had any doubts that with the origin of Washington (which is a city), something unclean, they put MDCCXC on the maps instead of 1790, and the hill and the House of Soviets on it were named Capitol, in honor of the highest Roman hill. Ancient Roman.
Well, in the end, it is worth noting that the plans of Peter and Washington are quite similar, both in the overall impression and in the presence of all sorts of lines, compasses bars and other behind-the-scenes tips from the Anunnaki.
Next time, let's see who they could have taken away, the city built by the congressmen offended by Pennsylvania. Or do you agree that the Frenchman did not paint from nature?
