Any census of history by the winner begins with the destruction of the history of the conquered people. As long as the loser has something to fight for, there is something to restore, as long as they remember their ancestors - this people will resist, you will not expect loyalty from them.
Remember, at least World War II, 75 years have passed, and the contemptuous "fascist", the proud "my grandfathers fought" still become a weighty argument in the dispute over the ownership of territories, they are still forced to honor the memory of ancestors and take care of the heritage they defended. Erase memory, destroy monuments and a person will cease to resist, he will become a slave that flows with the flow, he has nothing to defend, nothing to be proud of, he considers himself a hostage of circumstances. The main goal of crowd controllers is to make slaves feel like they are part of a "great" cause and not be distracted by what is really going on behind them. Not familiar with such distractions? Inflating shock content about another star who made a row, discussing a ridiculous law on collecting deadwood, while they are adopting a pension reform, driving the elderly into poverty. The purpose of all this is one: the slave should be busy, but should not interfere and ask questions. For example, why does registration at the place of residence still exist, or where does the money go from the sale of national wealth in the form of oil and gas, who built this fort and who destroyed it?
These are not drawings in the fields left by green men, this is what remains of a huge fort, which was dug to the ground. A literal visualization of the phrase: "Don't leave a stone unturned, and raze it with damp earth"? Where do you think this is filmed? In Spain, Germany, France, Italy? Their forts, the twins of this have been preserved in the best possible way, and the photo above was taken … in the Omsk region!
From the ground, you will not see anything except ditches and pits, all the stones, all the internal filling (and the fort is the same stone, and metal, and personal belongings of people, and accommodation for the night, and supplies) - everything was taken out under a clean one.
Can you imagine what it means to take apart a building, a castle brick by brick? What kind of ambitious goal should justify such time and human costs?
Promotional video:
Now to the most important thing - the goal. “Theirs” would have taken out building materials in case of extreme need, but so that there are no traces left in the place where people live, so that any references in the documents were destroyed? Who was defeated in that war? Who defended themselves inside this Siberian fortress? We do not know this yet. Perhaps they called themselves Russians, perhaps Tartars (we google maps for Tartaria or Grande Tartaria requests), historians of forbidden archeology call them pre-Russian.
If the pre-Russians lost and allowed their heritage to be destroyed, then the winners took their place. Omsk, Russia, Russians. They won and destroyed everything that allowed the pre-Russians to know about their recent past. If in Europe there are forts to this day, and their existence in Russia is now recognized by images from space and from aerial maps, and even then not all, then what is the conclusion? The conquerors came from where the forts stand intact. If you decide that our scientists know nothing about them, then you are deeply mistaken. Go back to the beginning of the article, to the first photo. It is clearly written "-" Protected by law. "they are still at the helm and continue to mock the vanquished.
If you think that the Pokrovskaya Fortress is the only one, then we are starting an exciting journey through the selection of "Star Forts". There are literally thousands, if not tens of thousands of such forts in Russia, and all of them, ALL !!! - razed to the ground.
If at that time the invaders knew that they would invent a way to photograph a huge area from the air and examine every meter, then these forts would be covered with sand. People walk along ditches and pits and do not even know what views are opening from a bird's eye view.
Apart from Russia, such forts are located in Ukraine, but the greatest density of discovered fortresses is in a very limited space in the Omsk and Tyumen regions. What does history tell us about the development of Siberia?
Do you know why historical references about such a structure of forts attribute them to the 18th century of construction, and not an earlier one? Because these arrows, beams on the edges of the fort began to be erected only with the widespread use of artillery. A cannonball or a projectile “loves” a perpendicular surface, and from an inclined one it ricochets in the direction it likes.
Incredible clearing efforts, vast distances. Why were we only told about the Siberian savages? The tolerant word “mastered” is often replaced by the more precise word “conquered”.
The intervention of the 18th century was only a continuation of the seizure of lands by Comrade Yermak.
The most interesting thing is that all the forts and fortresses, all the castles were built according to individual projects, taking into account the peculiarities of the area. And our forts are just twins. Straight "Khrushchev". Logically, we draw a conclusion about standardization - a single project, at the time of their construction it was almost a fantasy.
There cannot be a single standard in a country that has not achieved industrialization. And there is no need now to hint at the capital, where is Moscow and where these wilds are on the maps. For such a development, production put on stream and a unified personnel training system are needed. United!
Another interesting fact is the number of forts. It is one thing to fold a tower in a single copy and another to train highly qualified workers, engineers and designers on site. And the finances and resources for the construction? Stones were not collected from vegetable gardens. Does this fit into the story of the scattered principalities on the territory of medieval Russia?
Such structures require a high-quality ubiquitous system capable of training and organizing human and material resources. And it was built not for peasants, but for trained soldiers. It fits well into our history textbooks, where they write about the endless deserted spaces inhabited by savages who worship wooden idols to the sound of a shaman tambourine.
The conquest of Siberia lasted more than one century. In the series of national wars, there are such events as "peasant uprisings and riots" by Stepan Razin and Emelyan Pugachev.
There is an assumption that Peter, who settled in St. Petersburg, was at the forefront of the treacherous war between the Russians and the pre-Russians, who are not even known what they called themselves. Hardly Tartars. Tartary this country was called in Europe, as we call Japan - Nihhon, Nippon.
Probably the only fort left to us from that people is the famous Peter and Paul Fortress.
They did not destroy it. It is much easier to attribute the credit for the construction to yourself. But the invaders simply could not explain how all this was built. They did not know anything about such high technologies, so the French in the nineteenth century wrote fairy tales with pictures about the construction of St. Petersburg. Anyone interested can look for temporary discrepancies about the construction of the Alexander Column. (There are quite a few funny inconsistencies in the history of Peter - either the "eyewitnesses" lie with a mistake in years, then one says that they raised, and the second that they carried …)
Pay attention to the density of the construction of such forts on the Irtysh alone.
Was wild and undeveloped Siberia good?
Can you believe this is to build small-town tribes led by shamans? Modern resources are able to rebuild this only with the help of guest workers, I do not ask where on such a scale they will mine / buy / deliver stone and for how much they are able to build.
We examined Siberia, get acquainted with the Great Wall of the Trans-Volga.
She, too, would have been happy to fall asleep and razed to the ground if they had assumed about devices capable of shooting from the air. Scientists say that it was built to repel the attacks of Asian nomads on Muscovy. Only the protrusions of the towers look in the opposite direction - to the west. Those. the defenders of the wall defended themselves against invasion from the west. Do you know the length of these fortifications? It is clear that it will not be possible to establish for sure now, but if you measure by one of the remaining sections, it will turn out that the fortifications were from Astrakhan to Perm.
What is left of this wall is now an average of five meters high and SEVENTY wide! These are unrealistic numbers and this is only what has come down to our days. If you add here 30 percent from above, then the Egyptian pyramids simply fade in terms of the amount of work performed. You feel like a dwarf in comparison with your ancestors. Did they do it all without building mechanization? It's scary to imagine, but you can't argue against facts. We can see it, we can walk and this is what is left of our ancestors, in our country where we live. Why are historians silent about this, where is the information on buildings in textbooks? Well, yes, according to the textbooks there was an ice age, and at that time Western civilization flourished … It turns out that the Western "enlightened" civilization by deception,betrayals and using information attacks was able to defeat the civilization in the east, many times higher than its level of development. Then I had to invent her story.